EXPERTS SAY U.S. AND ISRAEL HAVE A HISTORY OF COOPERATION ON INTELLIGENCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000604960005-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2013
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 28, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000604960005-5.pdf110.79 KB
Body: 
et Declassified ar-d-AT.._,2-kved For Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP90-00965R000604960005-5 NEW YORK TIMES 28 November 1985 Experts Say U.S. and Israel Have a History of Cooperation on Intelligence "y=ROBIERT-PEAR "Special-to-Tbe-New York Times WASHINGTON, Nov. 27 ? Relations be- tween intelligence agencies of the United States and Israel are normally marked by the closest cooperation, but over the years there have been occasional reports that Israelis spied on Americans or engaged in clandes- tine operations in this country. The relationship has come in for special scrutiny since Jonathan Jay Pollard, a civil- ian counterintelligence analyst for the Navy, was arrested last week and accused of selling classified code information to the Israeli Government. 'Pretty Clear Understanding' If Mr. Pollard did whit he is accused of doing, it would, by most accounts, be a devia- tion from the norm for relations between the two countries. William B. Quandt, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who served on the staff of the National Security Council in the Nixon and Carter Administra- tions, said today, "We did not run agents in Israel, and we had a pretty clear understand- ing that they did not run agents here." Wolf Blitzer, Washington correspondent of The Jerusalem Post, said in a new book, "De- spite infractions on both sides, U.S. and Is- raeli intelligence organizations have main- tained a discreet arrangement since the 1950's, banning covert operations against each other." In the book, "Between Washington and Jerusalem: A Reporter's Notebook," Mr. Blitzer said that cooperation between the Central Intelligence Agency and Israel's for- eign intelligence service, the Mossad, was "so close that the two organizations do not really have to spy on each other." American intelligence officials and former officials who were interviewed generally con- firmed that assessment. If anything, they said, the working relationship has grown closer in the last few years, with the United States giving Israel access to more recon- naissance satellite data. In the Eisenhower Administration, Mr. Blitzer said, the United States and Israel reached an understanding to end covert operations against each other. A classified study prepared by the C.I.A. in 1979 said two of the principal goals of Israeli intelligence were the "collection of informa- tion on secret U.S. policy or decisions" con- cerning Israel and the "collection of scien- tific intelligence in the United States and other developed countries." To obtain scientific and technical intelli- gence, it said Israeli agents had made "at- tempts to penetrate certain classified de- fense projects in the United States and other Western nations." The report did not give ex- amples. Agents Under Cover In addition, the study said that Israeli agents sometimes "operate at the United Na- tions under diplomatic and journalistic cover." A major purpose of such operations, it said, is to collect information on Arab coun- tries. Cooperation between intelligence officials in the United States and Israel has been close at least since the 1950's. According to some accounts, Israeli agents obtained and pro- vided to the C.I.A. a copy of the speech in which Nikita S. Khrushchev, then the Soviet leader, denounced Stalin before the 20th Con- gress of the Soviet Communist Party in 1956. In the 1960's and early 1970's, James J. An- gleton, who was chief of counterintelligence operations for the C.I.A., supervised an ex- tensive exchange of information with Israel. He declined today to discuss the exchange. Although the two countries still share large amounts of information, especially about ter- rorism, American officials said the Israelis had been frustrated by the United States' re- fusal to provide certain information on troop deployments by pro-American Arab coun- tries, including Jordan and Egypt. Some Israelis have said the United States did not turn over all the intelligence informa- tion that would be helpful in protecting Is- rael. In other cases, they said, the informa- tion was not provided as promptly as they.be- lieved necessary, so Israelis undertook addi-. tional aerial reconnaissance missions over Arab countries. The Israelis have proposed direct transmission of pictures from Amer- ican reconnaissance satellites to ground sta- tions in Israel, but the United States has not agreed to such an arrangement. In his memoirs, Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's national security adviser, said that he had urged Mr. Carter to "bug" the cottages of Israeli and Egyptian officials at the summit meeting at Camp David, Md., in 1978. Mr. Brzezinski reported that Mr. Carter, "in what I felt was an excess of chivalry, flatly forbade that." As a result, he said, "we did not have adequate intelligence on what transpired in the Egyptian Or Israeli delega- tions ? though all of them took the precau- tion of conducting their own business on the porches of their cabins, and not inside." In advance of the meeting, Mr. Brzezinski said, only a handful of American officials were informed of plans to convene the ses- sion. Explaining the desire for secrecy before the Camp David session, Mr. Brzezinski wrote in his journal, "The Administration is permeated with those who are only too eager to share information with the Israelis." He did not name the people he had in mind. In another incident, critics of Israel have asserted that Israeli intelligence may have been connected to the mysterious disappear- ance of weapons-grade uranium from a plant run by a private company in Apollo, Pa., in the 1960's. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and other Federal agencies have exhaustively ex- amined such allegations, but have not found evidence to prove the charges or to show what did happen to the uranium. Executives of the company that ran the plant have denied diverting uranium to Israel. Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000604960005-5