HAIG SAYS U.S. SEEKS CONSENSUS STRATEGY IN MIDEAST REGION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 20, 2012
Sequence Number: 
91
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 20, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0.pdf183.03 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0 Arrrax AnyARED ON PAGE A HAIG SAYS 11.5. SEEKS CONSENSUS STRATEGY IN MIDEAST REGION , ? By BERNARD GWERTZMAN _ Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, March 19 ? Secretary of State Alexander M. Haig Jr. said today that the Reagan Administration would try to develop a strategic "consensus", to counter the Soviet Union in an area 'stretching from Pakistan to Egypt and in- cluding such disparate nations as Tur- key, Israel and Saudi Arabia. Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Haig also held out the possibility of improved relations with Iraq, one of the most anti-Israel na- tions in the region, and one that has been closely identified with the Soviet Union in the past. He said Washington had noted "some shift" in Iraqi policy, caused, in part, be said, by "a greater sense of con- cern about the behavior of Soviet imperi- alism in the Middle Eastern area." Mr. Haig's stress on a "strategic con- sensus" in the region is Consistent with the efforts made by the Carter Adminis- tration after the Soviet intervention in Af- ghanistan in December 1979. But Mr. Haig's remarks seemed to suggest a greater stress on persuading the Arabs and Israel, as well as Pakistan and Tur- key, to join in some kind of unofficial and nonspecific ?'arrangement to counter Soviet influence in the region. In his re- marks, he did not seem to be suggesting the establishment of7'any kind of struc- tured alliance ? he described the ar-, rangernent as a .?consensus of strategic concerns" ? but implied a hciPe that key nations in the region would recognize that the Soviet Union represented a .serious threat to their interests and would there- fore see the need to .cooperate with the United States....' ' Fears of a Conflict With Cuba Besides the'Middle East; the questions posed to Mr. Haig by the committee dealt mostly with the senators.' concerns over' the possibility, ithat the United' States 'might become involved in a conflict with Cuba over future Cuban arms deliveries to leftists in El Salvador. ,- ? ? Their apprehension, particularly , among the committee's Democrats, was prompted by testimony yesterday from I Walter J. Stoessel Jr.,;-the Under Secre- NEW YORK TIMES 20 MARCH 1981 tary of State for Political Affairs, who"' said he would not rule out the possibility of military action if Cuba attempted to , step up delivery of arms. Mr. Stoessel added that the flow of weapons had stowed in recent weeks. Today Mr. Haig tried to maintain the Administration's deliberate- ambiguity on the question. Mthtary Force Not Excluded To keep the Cubans off guard, he said, it would be wrong to exclude the Use of military actions at some future time. "I think the American people antici- pate that this Administration is going to deal with this longstanding question with clarity of thought, with firmness in pur- pose," he said of the problem of coping with subversive activities by Cuba in other countries. "That would of necesafty include consideration of a whole range of American assets." On the other hand, he stressed that "no decisions have been made; the President has not arrived at any policy; none has been specifically recommended to him." To ease Senate concerns he said that while military force could not be exclud- ed, he did not want anyone to believe that "worst-case scenarios are being nurtured by some special groups within the Admin- istration." , Yesterday, in testifying before the I House Foreign Affairs Committee, Mr. Haig touched on his plan to bring about a sense of common purpose in the Middle East. "We feel it is fundamentally impor- tant," he said, "to begin to develop a con- sensus of strategic concerns throughout the region among Arab and Jew and to be sure that the overriding danger of Soviet inroads into this area are not over- looked." In recent weeks Mr. Haig has indicated privately and publicly that he wants to give priority to security questions in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf re- gions, even while not rejecting the idea of reviving peace talks. He plans to visit Egypt, Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia early next month and is expected to de- velop these themes at greater length then. ? - t Pakistan of Particular Concern Today he indicated that he wanted to bring Pakistan and Turkey into his strategic "consensus." In response to a question he said it was in the American interest to establish "a consensus, in the strategic regional sense, among. the states of the area, stretching from Paki- stan to the east, to Egypt to the West, in- cluding Turkey, Israel and the other threatened states." Pakistan, bordering on Afghanistan, where some thought by Washington to pose a threat to the Persian Gulf region, is of particular concern -to the Reagan Administration, Mr. Haig said. Pakistan receives no American aid, even thought it is ostensi- bly an American ally. Pakistan's clan- destine nuclear weapons program pikes It ineligible for assistance under current American law. Mr. Haig told Senator Alan Cranston, Democrat of California, who is deeply concerned about stopping the nuclear programs iraPalcistan and Iraq, that "it is my belief that you get more by removing the insecurities that foster the nuclear thirst" among countries like Pakistan. He said ' hd hoped Congress would modify the law so that Washington can "re-establish a dialogue of trust and con- fidence" with Pakistan. The Carter Ad- ministration had planned to seek changes in the law but dropped the idea when Pakistan's leader rejected a the offer of a two-year MOO million aid package as "peanuts." Signs of a Shift in Iraq As to Iraq, which has no formal diplo- matic ties with the United States because of Washington's support for Israel, M. Haig said, "We see some shift in the Iraqi attitude ? a greater concern on the parr of the Iraqi leadership, perhaps as a re- sult of the conflict with Iran, or changes that have occurred in Iraq, or perhaps as the result of recent events in Afghani- stan, a greater sense of concern about the behavior of Soviet imperialism in the Middle Eastern area." - "I think we're going to have to assess very carefully in the period ahead and not find ourselves in an irreversible set of relationships," he said. He said Iraq might want to pursue a more moderate course in nuclear policy and toward the West. This has been the general view of many Western experts for more than a year, but so far Iraq has rejected otters of im- proved ties to Washington even though its relations with Moscow are strained. It was learned that the State Depart- ment is considering sending a' special envoy next month to Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to report on Mr. Haig's Middle Eastern trip. Another envoy will be sent to the Persian Gulf states. , ? Equivocal on El Salvador .. r - On El Salvador, Mr. Hp ig was equivo- cal about the overall prospects. Although there has been a slowdown in the arms flow through Nicaragua to El, .ird Salvador, e - , there were also con- 'thrum intelligence reports" that Nicara- gua was alternative mutes into El Salvador. "So it's essentially a mixed situation which is more positive than negative but which still requires the most careful and continuing assessment and scrutiny," he said. ? . ? " Senator Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island, the ranking Democrat on the committee, pressed Mr. Haig to explain his remarks yesterday that there was a theory that four American churchmen murdered in El Salvador in December had tried to rwt through .4 roadblock or were per-. COM= Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0 ceived as having done so. He said that in testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Commitee he had given "the most prominent theory" on what happened. He said that an autopsy of one of the victims showed that pieces of the windshield had been "propelled into her body by the bullet." Times of Turmoil "Someone constructed the theory," he said, "that either they were perceived or had been actually running the road- block." ...4?,? t_ "Now in times of turmoil, and diffiCul- ty, and crisis, and warfare, and young people are given arms, they could have misread the mere traveling of that party down that road as an effort to run a road- block and could have fired into the vehi- de, killed one or more of the passengers . and panicked, killed the rest and tried to dispose of them," he said. "I laid that out as one of the prominent theories of what might have happened. ?I hope it doesn't get distorted or perverted emotionally_ and incorrectly." He denied that he meant to imply, he be- lieved the women had tried to violate Sal- vadoran laws. He also said he had not. meant to suggest that there was a possi- bility they had fired back at the killers. In Ossining, N.Y., Sister Martha Bourne of the Maryknoll Sisters said the: community had not heard anything from- its own sources in El Salvador that would. indicate the nuns were running a road- block. "I can't imagine anybody in their' right mind would have tried to do that,7. she said. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000302640091-0