WHITE HOUSE SAYS C.I.A. HAD A ROLE IN IRAN OPERATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830022-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 28, 2012
Sequence Number: 
22
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 15, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830022-7.pdf96.9 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/29: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830022-7 '\RTiCLE APPEA ,,'J PAGE WHITE HOUSE SAYS C.I.A. HAD A ROLE IN IRAN OPERATION By STEPHEN ENGELBERG Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 - The Ad- ministration acknowledged today for the first time that the Central Intelli- gence Agency had been directly in- volved in the secret arms shipments to Iran. The White House spokesman, Larry Speakes, said at a briefing that the Na- tional Security Council staff ran the operation "in conjunction with the C.I.A." and that an agency operative attended each meeting with the Ira- nians. In Teheran, the Iranian President denied today that his Government had held talks with the United States at a diplomatic level, and he dismissed President Reagan's report Thursday of negotiations as "mere lies." Continued Criticism In Washington, Mr. Reagan's de- fense of the White House's secret policy of conducting talks and sending military equipment to Iran continued to draw criticism today from both Re- publicans and Democrats. Congressional officials said they would demand an explanation for why they were not briefed until 11 months after President Reagan incorporated the new policy in secret financing. Although Congressional officials said they were not briefed, the Administra- tion is required to inform Congress of any significant expected C.I.A. intelli- gence activities. The requirement is contained in laws enacted in the 1970's after Congressional investigations of C.I.A. abuses. A Possible Loophole But President Reagan said in his speech Thursday night that under the! 1947 National Security Act, he had the right to delay briefing Congress until the operation was over. That law was cited in the President's classified exec- utive order last January, which put the plan in place, according to a source who has seen the document. Congressional officials said, how- ever, that they have begun extensive research into the laws regarding con- gressional oversight. Senator Patrick r Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, said he was particularly concerned by the 11- month delay in briefing Congress. He said the provision of the act cited by the President appeared to him to apply to NEW YORK TIMES 15 November 1986 extraordinary circumstances of a brief duration. Congressional aides and members of Congress said they also want a detailed accounting of the amount and value of weapons shipped to Iran by the United States or by third parties at American instigation. The information would be crucial in assessing the Adminstration's conten- tion that the deliveries did not violate American law and could not have af- fected the progress of the Iran-Iraq war. Mr. Reagan's classified executive or- der formally approving the Iran opera- tion said Congress would not be told of the operation because of the "extreme sensitivity" and because of the "se- curity risks" involved, according to a source who has seen it. Administration officials have said that only "defensive" weapons, such as spare parts for anti-aircraft batteries, were shipped to Iran. But some mili- tary experts said that even small im- provements in the Iranians' anti-air- craft capabilities could be critical in blunting the main Iraqi strategic ad- vantage, which is in mounting air at- tacks against key economic targets. "The Iraqi Air Force is not famous for its bravery," said Thomas McNaugher of the Brookings Institu- tion. "All you have to do to throw off their aim is upset them a little at the margins." An Iraqi source said, "What has been shipped would have to be crucial to the Iranians, or they wouldn't have struck a deal. They .never accept less than they need in such things." This source said the Iraqi military has in recent months detected improvements in the capabilities of Iranian antiaircraft gunners defending the Kharg Island oil installation. Various Channels Reported According to accounts from Israeli and American officials, the shipments to Iran moved through several chan- nels, some supervised by the United States, others by the Israelis, who say they in turn received replacements from American stocks. President Reagan, in his speech, dis- puted various reports of United States- sponsored shipments to Iran, but said nothing about reports of a series of shipments by Israel. In a televised interview today, White House Chief of Staff Donald T. Regan said: "We have never authorized, never allowed, never condoned large shipments by anyone, by Far Eastern- ers, Mideasterners, Europeans, Israe- lis or anyone. We do not want large amounts of arms being shipped to ei- ther Iran or Iraq." Mr. Regan did not define what he meant by "large" amounts of weapons. In a briefing Thursday, a senior Ad- ministration official characterized the shipments as "minuscule," saying they could be fit onto a C-5 cargo plane, which can carry more than 100 tons. Additionally, a high-level Israeli offi- cial disclosed that Israel had been ship- ping arms to Iran with American knowledge since 1982. This official said the American Ambassador to Israel was routinely notified of the nature of each shipment. This suggests that the United States was tacitly approving violations of its arms embargo on ship- ments to Iran well before mid-1985, when the first secret contacts with Iran were made by presidential advisers. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/29: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830022-7