AGENT'S PURPORTED SPY CONFESSION TO F.B.I. HELD ADMISSIBLE IN COURT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201350040-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 19, 2012
Sequence Number: 
40
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 23, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201350040-0.pdf100.62 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/19: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201350040-0 THE NEW YORK TIMES ''?~`~ 5-------- 23 January, 1985 Agent's Purported Spy Confession ToFB.I. Held Admissible in Court By JUDITH CUMMINGS sew to The New rock Times LOS ANGELES, Jan..22-A Federal The Ogorodnikovs were arrested last Mr. Miller's lawyers, Joel Levine district judge today rejected a motion Oct. 2, along with Mr. Miller, and were and Stanley I. Greenberg, disputed the to exclude a purported confession and also charged with espionage conspir. Government's contention that the inci- other damaging statements from the acy. The Government maintained that dent Mr. Minor described constituted a forthcoming trial of Richard W. Miller, Mr. Miller was to receive $65,000 in confession. Mr. Levine asserted that the first agent of the Federal Bureau of cash and gold for providing classified the bureau investigative notes showed investigation to be charged with eau of documents that could detailed picture that Mr. Miller had offered "to s' of this country's intelligence activities. , nage. 1 a maior setback for Mr. Mill er, Conviction could bring a life prison sen- ov over yrhing'with. rlust. to get Minor the denied inte this. tence. a ed . Judge David V. Kenyon ruled that Mr. Mr. Miller's lawyers According to court documents filed Government "bad faithi "a and th the Miller's statements to F.B.I. question- by the Government el apated nd the the ers were "purely voluntary." , Mr. Miller has resu A major were "part of Mr. Millers said he became romantically involved personnel who pabe ci e " in the u- with Mrs. Ogorodnikov whilassociat- tion.,tigation of deliberate rest ep? meat an the request focused e his argu- tsarina that he was coerced into a con- ing with her in his counterintelligence fession by religious pressure to "re- work. The bead of the Los E,ngeles of- of- hce of the bureau, the Ogorodn said pent from the special agent in charge last October that thMr. Bretzing, e of the bureau's Los Angeles office, were ov Richard T. Bretzing. were suspected as "covert agents" of But Judge Kenyon told a courtroom the K.G.B., the Soviet intelligence of spectators, who included Mr. Mill- service. Mr. Miller was dismissed er's wife, that he believed "that re- from the agency shortly before his ar. gardless of what Mr. Bretzing said, the rest' Mr Miller, who is 48 and a 20-year defendant would have made the exact same statements and acted the exact veteran of the bureau, has asserted same way that he did," and that the that he maintained his relationship statements did not have any effect on infiltrate with the Soviet woman in attempt e- an to M.-. Miller's conduct. a unit of the K.G.B., some- Judge Kenyon also rejected an ergo. thing that he said had never before ment by Mr. Miller that bureau agents, been achieved by the F.B.I. and that who Mr. Miller maintained viewed him would bring honor on the agency. as "a parasite" for his purported be- Judge y on the m Kenyon e mbegan Jan. 9. testa- trayal, had acted deceptively and in The many matter on Jan. e bad faith while investigating him. The question by isr. before the judge said that there was nothing court key rt was a motion by Mr. Miller to ex- wrong with the investigators not telling chide from his trial incriminating statements he made a suspect everything they knew about bureau investigators in over a interviews fi veda-day his actions. bureau invy The judge also ordered that Mr. period preceding his arrest.Mrs. Ogo- Miller be tried separately from his co- f0ov defendants, Svetlana and Nikolay Ogo. A. the incriminating statements odnikov. But Judge Kenyon turned was Mr. Mr. Miller's purported confession. down a Government request that Mr. The bureau's chief polygraph, or lie-de- Miller's trial proceed first, saying that fie d f ed at the hehe hears Paul K Minor, testa. the only probable reason for such are- on Oct. last week that Mr. quest was the Government's hope to ~~ 1, identified thp specific glean information that would later be classified ed material he turned over to damaging against the Ogorodnikovs. [Mrs. Ogorodnikov. The trial of the three is scheduled to The bureau has said it was a 25-page begin Feb. 12, but Judge Kenyon said classified document titled "Reporting he expected to rule Thursday on a re- Guidance: Foreign Intelligence Infor- quest by Mrs. Ogorodnikov's lawyers mation," which the bureau said could for a two-month delay. yield to Soviet intelligence "a detailed Mr. Miller, a former agent in the picture of F.B.I. and U.S. intelligence counterintelligence section of the bw reau's Los activities, techniques and requite- Angeles office, is charged meats." . with conspiring to pass classified na- Robert C. Bonner, the United States tional security information to the 34- i Attorney for the Central District in year-old Soviet woman, Mrs. Ogorodni- , California, said the bureau had video. kov. and her husband, Nikolay, 51. The taped Mr. Miller in the act of giving couple's surname is pronounced Oh-go- Mrs 0 orodnikov the document in her RAWD-nee-kov, according to the two ! car on Sept. 12. Mr. Miller has said the Russian-language interpreters who ac. envelope seen on the videotape con- company them to court every day to tamed nothing but bank documents. translate the proceedings. I Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/19: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201350040-0