ISRAELI SPY UNITS GET UNWANTED PUBLICITY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 20, 2012
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 9, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6.pdf167.55 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6 APPEA1 WASHINGTON POST 9 June 1986 Israeli Spy Units Get Unwanted Psiblicit`- Cabinet Denies Sug estions That Pollard (peration 11ils It icier Than . h I nnu?/cvlticecl By William Claiborne Washington Pont Foreign Service JERUSALEM, June 8-Israel today strongly denied as "unfounded" suggestions by U.S. offi- cials that the Israeli-run Jonathan Jay Pollard espionage operation was much more extensive than Washington has been told by Israel. The sharply worded Cabinet statement came after a turbulent two weeks of disclosures and allegations that have brought an unwanted glare of publicity to Israel's intelligence organizations, long-respected by many as among the world's most efficient, and acute embarrassment to the fractious "national unity" coalition government. Today's statement was the strongest the gov- ernment has issued since Pollard pleaded guilty last week. At that time, the names of alleged Israeli coconspirators were disclosed, along with details that suggested an Israeli espionage op- eration in the United States far more extensive than the unauthorized "renegade" operation that Israel said had operated without the knowledge of officials at the political level here. The Cabinet of Prime Minister Shimon Peres said in a statement released after its regular weekly meeting today that the Israeli govern- ment had "provided full cooperation regarding the Pollard case and remains in close contact with Washington in order to clarify the issues which were raised lately." The statement pledged "a continuation of the cooperation" but added that Israel "is concerned" about allegations by some U.S. officials "and hopes they will not continue." The Cabinet was referring to suggestions by some U.S. Justice Department officials that Is- rael withheld information from a State Depart- ment and Justice Department team that came here last year to interview Israeli officials about the case against Pollard, a former U.S. Navy ci- vilian intelligence analyst who last week pleaded guilty in a U.S. District Court to conspiring to pass U.S. military secrets to Israel. "The relations between the United States and Israel are very close, and it is inconceivable that attempts to disrupt these relations will succeed," the Cabinet said, repeating its assertion that the spy unit that handled Pollard "exceeded its au- thority" and had been dismantled and that no espionage activities are now being conducted against the United States. Since late last month, Israel's domestic and for- eign intelligence wings have both been shaken by unaccustomed controversy. Abroad it was fresh disclosures about the extent of the spy network for which Pollard worked; at home it was allega- tions that Israel's highest-ranking domestic intel- ligence official participated in the fatal beating of two handcuffed Arab prisoners captured after a 1984 bus hijacking and then covered up the inci- dent. The principal Israeli figures involved in the two cases-Rafael (Rafi) Eitan, former chief of operations of the external intelligence service, the Mossad, and Avraham Shalom, chief of the domestic intelligence service, the Shin Bet- were both members of a team that in 1960 snatched Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann off a street in Buenos Aires and brought him secretly to Israel, where he was tried and hanged. But in terms of the government's and society's reactions to the two current scandals, the sim- ilarity ends there. In the case of Shalom, the nation is still en- gaged in a wrenching, introspective national de- bate about the conflict between the fundamental principle of the rule of law and what Israel. sees as its unique security problems. In the case of Eitan, who headed the Washing- ton spy ring that recruited Pollard, the reaction here has been a curious mixture of muted am- bivalence and stiff-necked defensiveness. While Shalom has been condemned by some politicians and the press for his alleged cover-up- and ordered by Israel's attorney general to endure a humiliating police investigation-Eitan has been handed a comfortable new posting as chairman of a huge state-owned chemical conglomerate. His principal "handler" of Pollard, according to the U.S. indictment, then-Lt. Col. Aviam Sella, who ostensibly was doing graduate studies at New York University, was promoted to brigadier general in the Air Force upon his hurried return to Israel and given command of the country's biggest air base. Informed Israeli sources said that the other unindicted coconspirators in the Pollard case- Science Attache Yosef Yagur and embassy sec- retary Irit Erb-have been given attractive new assignments in the Foreign Service. Even though the Peres government continues to insist that Eitan was running a renegade spy operation unknown to his superiors in Jerusalem, the former Mossad agent has not been con- demned publicly by the government or parlia- ment-or much of the public-for establishing a spy network that stole top secret military doc- uments from a close ally and patron nation. The fact that Eitan has not been publicly chas- tised but rather has been rewarded with a pres- tigious executive position prompted the military affairs commentator for Haaretz newspaper, Zeev Schiff, to ask in a commentary published today whether the Pollard ring actually was "renegade." One senior Israeli official said privately, "The only crime Eitan committed was getting caught." Some Israeli officials, speaking on the condi- tion that they not be identified, have bitterly con- demned the U.S. Justice Department for what they term an anti-Israeli campaign of leaks of Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6 k" Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6 embarrassing details of Eitan's espionage net- work. These complaints have generally been coupled with charges that the American press has been "blowing out of proportion" a case that these officials view as essentially closed. One senior official, pressed on the question of whether the $300,000 Pollard allegedly was promised over a 10-year period by his Israeli control agents did not suggest something wider than a small "renegade" spying operation, ap- peared annoyed when he retorted: "Thirty thou- sand a year is peanuts." Acceptance of Eitan's espionage ring as al- most inconsequential-except for the embar- rassment it caused-is not confined to govern- ment. Israel's normally free-wheeling press, includ- ing opposition papers that rarely fail to turn a scandal into a political cause, have limited their coverage of the new Pollard disclosures mostly to playbacks of what the American press has un- covered about the extent of the Eitan spy ring. With one or two exceptions, none of the usu- ally strident Hebrew newspapers has carried a locally written story that attempted to answer such questions as how extensive Israel's espio- nage activity in Washington was, or whether Peres and his Cabinet knew about it, or who was the unnamed Israeli diplomat in whose suburban Maryland house Pollard held clandestine meet- ings, or whether Sella's military superiors knew about his role in the spying operation. When questioned about this unusual absence of aggressive reporting, several Israeli journal- ists at first cited censorship. Israeli military cen- sorship requires that all locally written stories dealing even peripherally with national security matters be submitted for review by the censors, who routinely excise sensitive material. But when reminded about the traditional cen- sorship dodge of leaking restricted material to foreign journalists, waiting for its publication abroad and then reprinting it here on the basis that it has already been made public, the Israeli journalists conceded that the government's blackout on any substantive disclosures on the Eitan espionage ring has had an inhibiting effect on their treatment of the story. Mirroring the government's ambivalence on the seriousness of the case, the journalists also characterized the new Pollard disclosures as ad "internal affair" between the U.S. Justice and State departments. There is also a widely held belief here that Pollard was mostly supplying Israel with docu- ments concerning the activities of its Arab en- emies. 'We were getting information about our enemies that the Americans should have been giving to us anyway. Is that the same as stealing state secrets that could harm the United States' security?" one Israeli official asked. a. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201130002-6