ANTITERRORIST POLICY A CASUALTY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010057-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 20, 2012
Sequence Number: 
57
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 24, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010057-9.pdf90.3 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010057-9 `v7ASHINGTO^1 POST ARTICLE iF"P1.ARED 24 June 1985 ON PAGE_ LOU CANNON f__ Antiterrorist Policy a Casualty W hile President Reagan struggled successfully last week to maintain U.S. unity and his prestige in the face of the Mideast airplane hijacking, his administration's widely heralded antiterrorist policy became a casualty of the hostage crisis. The big loser was Secretary of State George P. Shultz, who for the past eight months has been telling any audience willing to listen that the United States "must be willing to use military force" to combat terrorism. On Oct. 25, 1984, Shultz kicked off the antiterrorism campaign in a speech at Park Avenue Synagogue in Manhattan in which he said, "The public must understand before the fact that there is potential for loss of life of some of our fighting men and the loss of life of some innocent people." A few weeks later, Reagan reportedly approved a covert operation directing the Central Intelligence Agency to tram counterterrons units for strikes a ainst sus ected Mideast terrorists, a o is avore u tz and -national secunt r affairs adviser Robert c Farlane. This policy blew up March 8 along with a car bomb in a Beirut suburb that killed 80 persons and wound 200. The bomb was directed at Mohammed Hussein Fadlalah, leader of the tt~ e Hezbollah (Party of God), a militant Shiite movement that at this writing has William Caseey. director of central custody of five or six of the passengers inte genre. a Y has is taken off Trans or Airlines t shortcomings, but it is probably a 847. romantic view to eve that the CIA is Fadlalah survived the explosion 50 likel to have muc success in yards from his home, although several penetrating militant to groups in of his bodyguards reportedly died in the w is a recruit may ordered to carry t assassination to prove is an blast. Fadlalah has been tied by U.S. intelligence to several attars at n. inc u g e facilities in the Mideast, Oct. 23 1983, suicide bomb attack on the Marine coin in irut that killed 241 U.S. servicemen. The attack on Fadlalah was directed by a runaway group of Lebanese and others. Although the bombin was not authorized by the CIA, the implications of the incident were so rmin for U.S. policy that Reagan dig n the covert support operation. Nonetheless, McFarlane continued to insist in subsequent speeches that the United States has the will and the ability to act against terrorist groups. Shultz and McFarlane are firm allies on this issue, as on many others. Both were architects of the ill-fated U.S. policy in Lebanon, and both insist on the need for antiterrorist operations, in part because of the reluctance of Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger to use conventional military force against terrorist groups. It is one of the internal ironies of the Reagan administration that the "conservative" Weinberger has been most realistic on the limitations of combating terrorism while "moderates" Shultz and McFarlane have been most insistent on pushing a policy of retaliation that in emotional appeal makes up for what it lacks in probability of success. One of McFarlane's persistent advocacies is that the administration needs improved intellience in the st an implied rebuke to Middl ou fidelit . More realisticallsome national security, o icials sa that the United States lost muc o its inte ence ca it wit the srae invasion of Lebanon on June 1982, and tile subse uent ex ulsion om t e country of the Palestinian ration prgtion. The PLO, for all its terrorism, was far more susceptible to U.S. penetration than the militant Shiite factions now trying to fill the Lebanese vacuum. So far, the real moderate in the administration has proven to be the president, who somewhat plaintively expressed his frustration at the news conference Tuesday when he said he had "pounded a few walls" and added: " .. You have to be able to pinpoint the enemy. You can't just start shooting without having someone in your gunsight." The question now is how long Reagan can sustain this statesmanlike approach in the face of demands from prominent advisers to "do something" terrorism. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/20: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010057-9