SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000201020001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 23, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 2, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000201020001-5.pdf95.17 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/23: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201020001-5 P-1 4^14.'.`. ON PASV.,L, on the left First Amendment-suit GUARDIAN (US) 2 March 1983 Socialist Workers Party: Court hearings showed that the WL was funding Gelfand's case. All of this might just be a footnote in the A case with potentially far-reaching impli-. groups were it not for the extremely grave cations for First Amendment rights is about consequences that are raised-not only for to go to trial. the SWP, but for all political groups. -. The Socialist_Woritets- Party (SWP), the In an emergency petition filed Jan._.15. largest Trotskyist-party in the U.S., is being - SWP lawyers argued: "If this -cam is, al- sued by. a foener member in a case that lowed to continue and some to trial, the raises the question .of, whetter a political court will pass judgment--on whether thee. p y-or any vu lrmtai. ?e o :.. plaintiff [Gelfand) or the SWP defendants establish its own standards for who can be a -am, in plaintiff's words, the-'true believers''': - member, who canbe% elected to leadership in the-principles that the SWP stands for. In and what the group's ideology. should be.- -... ? making its decision the court will be required:' In 1979 Mau. Gelfand, the plaintiff- iv tbt:.- ... to detye into the-doctrines of theSWP, "vary- case, was expelled,from the SWP:Gelfantt ing interpretations of Marxism, differing government aaenciies. sad is now awaiting . ing.and disruption. That case revealed years .of political groups dwE81 QA: and other: /= be restored, his expulsion be-ruled a breach- of contract in violation. of. the- SWP's rules and that the members of the SWP responsi- bier for his expulsions: including several lead- ing figures of the group, be removed from. their leadership positions. The case is scheduled to open in U.S. District Court.in Los Angeles on March 1. . Gelfand's bizarre charge is that the SWP? leadership is controlled by U.S. government agents who engineered his expulsion, thus violating his First Amendment right to be a member of the political party of his choice. The case originated four years ago during a lawwit by the SWP against government spy- is seeking a court orderthat his membership - . -, views on the-proper organizational principles Grier a sir I~ew York.oh whelhtrahrgovern also of the rights of all Americans; nxrnt has to pay damages foe" their harassment. JOHN TRINKL In .1978 druring the code of ,that case,; Oflfand, who was a member of theSWP.in. Los Angeles, argued that ,i2ue tenders rip of `. the SWP couldn't be trusted and that he should be given; the filet documenting gov- ernment harassment He filed: his own. brief, without the knowledge of the SWP, -. noting he was trying to investigate'"die-al- leged FBI relationships of certain prominent SWP members." Upon learning of the con- tents of this brief, the SWP expelled Ge:fand in 1979. Since Gelfand's expulsion, it has been re- vealed that -he had been collaborating with the Workers League ' (WL), a . small Trotskyist sect hostile to the SWP. while he was still a SWP member and that he had con- ferred with the WL about filing his lawsuit against the SWP shortly after his expulsion. The WL has for several years mounted a campaign against the SWP charging the party was controlled by government agents. , for a Marxist party and other subjects which the First Amendment puts beyond the juris- "Such inquiry into the doctrine. admini- stration and internal functioning of a political party is forbidden by the First Amendment." In a statement protesting the trial of the SWP. Rev. Fred Taylor of the Southern Christian . Leadership . Conference noted. "The trial- itself is a violation of the most fundamental rights of the American people: the right of the people to band together in voluntary -organizations like labor unions and civil rights organizations and to set their own policies, elect their own leaders and de-. termine their own membership. -The intervention of. the U.S. District Courtinto this area of 4emocratic'rights is an infrineemeint of the First Amendment clouts . STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/23: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201020001-5