PUBLIC TV'S C.I.A. SHOW

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200970014-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 19, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200970014-8.pdf130.11 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200970014-8 ARTICLE APPEAR .D /ON PAGE--- y r r - .>ne of-this'season.'s. most popular: public television: r NATION 19-26 .JULY 1980 .I~ fcc ~~' , w+ti ti7 v a ? v i l crucial sum) for Free: to Choose as well as for forum for controversial programs. But did it? If a program on the energy crisis were funded by the Mobil Oil Corporation or the Ekxon Corporation, the conflict of interest would be. obvious,, but the ethical problems raised by foundation sponsorship of public televi-, sion are less clear-cut. The general public regards founda- tions, for the most part, as charitable-organizations func tioning on behalf of some ill-defined public- interest, and the. foundation world has worked hard to foster. this image. ; .; But it is precisely this benign public view of foundations: that has made them increasingly attractive- "neutral" spon sons for controversial public television shows.. Corp orations and institutions whose images are tarnished now seek such- "neutral"."- intermediaries to convey : their views. is The Smith Richardson Foundation of Greensboro, North Carolina, is one such ideological. middleman.. This non profit foundation, which provided seed money (a, small but.. seemed public television had - provided an independent by foundations rather than corporations; once again, it supported it Choose,;wntten by and programs was. Free: to given about noncommer Choose (the $105,000 fo amined topic policy; $50,C ing station, American fc Gift, a series because KEI funds. In ner most difficu for preprodt 1 man, -among whose previous activities was advis In additio tngthe=Pinochet Government m Chile The show examines of .$47,500 almost everyfacet of the . free enterprise system except the public static source ofthe_fundinQ_for.lVlihon:Friedman'sseries debut on grew out of; public TV:'As far as the average viewer of Free to Choose of the Real. could.tell from the credits, the money was provided mainly .,The new r being prepa brochure tions ought- letter reveals volved in all ter to look ahead "and examine what role the C.I.A. might: play. when confronted with a crisis in the future." : _. Drafts of the story and teleplays are being reviewed by; "consultants," according to the promotion brochure, who include- William Colby,. former director of the C.I.A.;; Samuel Halpern,. former C.I.A.; executive assistant to the! deputy director for plans; John Maury, former C.I.A.chief: of Soviet operations, legislative counsel for Cong~ressionaI;STAT 'relations ` and Assistant. Secretary. of- Defense, and Cord' Meyer, former chief of the C.I.A- covert action staff, chief of. the London station and assistant to the deputy director.' .Despite the fact that Smith-.Richards 6nFoundation` money and other grants have not been enough to produce' the program as yet,. the initial biases of the project and of a key . underwriter indicate some of the problems raised .by Smith Richardson as a donor of such money for public TV programs. The more one knows about the foundation the more disturbing these problems become. .In 1935,.the Smith Richardson'Foundation was incor porated in North Carolina under the name of the Richard son Foundation. ' It was established by' the late H. Smith Richardson, The son of the founder of.the Vick,Chemical Company. The company's name was changed to Richard-: son-Merrell Inc.. in 1960 and the -foundation, which is in- COATINIT D Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200970014-8 -'?Central.- Intelligence Agency and the.Defense Department for many-years.- Its funding'of programs*- dealing with for-. eignpolicyG or. domestic--spending:: raises. serious ques tions about what- should. constitute a conflict of interest Of equal importance' is ":'the viewers'-.right -to know. the ideological, leanings of the underwriters of such programs;] so that rney-caa wetter assess their objectivity; =j Raising money for public programs is as uncertain as pan - runs for gold- Advertising isn't permitted on the system, which is partially funded by the Government. Producers of controversial programs have* a particularly difficult task .because underwriters are reluctant to support them..' One reliable andlucrative?source of funds, however, has. been the Smith Richardson Foundation. With assets of ap 'proximately-$60 `million,'. the: foundation has, since 1975,4 ;grams. of similar conservative hue,. has had close ties' to the.