LEFT HAND, RIGHT HAND

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700052-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 28, 2010
Sequence Number: 
52
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 16, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700052-5.pdf97.68 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/28: CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700052-5 AR7ICLE APPEARED NEW YORK TIMES 0 , PAGE - 16 December 1983 PARIS, Dec. 15 - For years now, U.S. foreign policy in Central Amer- ica has been undermined by private or semi-private U.S. groups encour- aging the extreme right to disregard official Washington warnings. A senior State Department official said not long ago that it must be dreadfully confusing for the local politicians. They are told publicly that the U.S. supports democracy and reforms, and opposes death squads and wanton murder of peasants. But then they hear whispers from Americans who seem influential that all this talk is for public consumption, and that the U.S. backs anyone who fights Communists. The contradiction is widely known in Washington. The private activities probably vio- late the Logan Act, passed in 1799 and still on the books. It forbids unauthor- ized -U.S. citizens to deal with foreign governments in an attempt to influence foreign policy, which well-placed peo- ple were already trying to do in the earliest days of the Republic. Aaron Burr was an example. The act is con. sidered virtually unenforceable now. But there are disturbing signs that private involvement in covert actions has substantially expanded well be- yond political and economic meas- ures, exemplified by the I.. T. in Chile before the Pinochet c6Up, to paramilitary activities. Whether or not this subverts U.S. policy depends on what the policy really is. in any case, such involve- ment -shields participants from the legal,-oversight mandated for spe- cially, cleared Congressional commit- tees. According to Adm. Stansfield Turner, former C.I.A. Director, It also, probably blocks C.I.A.. control once operations are launched, risking runaway disasters. There is an argument in Washing- ton about whether the Administration is deliberately disguising an attempt to overthrow the Sandinista Govern. mentrin Nicaragua and help the far FOREIGN AFFAI RS mend) Left Hand, Right Hand By Flora Lewis right elsewhere, or whether it is lax in reining in its own supporters. John Carbaugh, the busy former aide to Senator Jesse Helms, said flatly that the C.I.A. was totally in charge, sometimes through private contracts or by accepting "contributions." These seem to include planes and possibly U.S. mercenaries sent to perform saber tage. Mr. Carbaugh has intimate knowledge of devious moves in Central America, but he doesn't hide his con- tempt for what the C.I.A. is doing. Philip .Taubman off Gerth of The New York Times recently tracked several privately owned American planes i vo)ved'in secret operations, but they haven't been able to pinpoint the source of the orders or the money. Argentine soldiers helped train "con- tras" in Honduras and plan attacks in Nicaragua before the Falkland war, but they are no longer available, Con- gressional sources say. The U.S. military and paramilitary network is now expanding through the region.' The Administration says it endorses the efforts of the Latin Contadora group to demilitarize Cen- tral America and promote negotiated settlements. But U.S. actions cast doubt on the declarations, even as Henry Kissinger and his commission tour the area preparing to recom- evolve moderate regimes interested in negotiating. It is easier to see the political un- derpinning for the conflicting drive to the right. There are conservative "think tanks" in the Washington area that make a point of having good rela- tions with such ultras as Salvador's Roberto D'Aubuisson and Guatema- la's Mario Sandoval Alarcon, who are officially shunned by the U.S. because of their murderous reputations. Among them are the Council on Inter-American Security, the Ameri- can Security Council, and the Na- tional Strategic Information Center, the last organized in the 1960's by Wil. liam Casey, now C.I.A. Director. Re- tired U.S. military officers and for- mer C.I.A. officials are among their active members. They travel to Central America, and arrange high-level meetings for their friends when they come to Washington. These sessions are then used by the Latins to spread word that they have confirmed secret U.S. Government backing, despite public denunciations. U.S. ambassadors have confided that they are powerless to reverse the impact. If the policy is what the Adminis- tration announces, to promote moder- ate, democratic regimes capable of social and economic development that will head off Communist ad. vance, then it is being flouted by its servants and friends. If that is only lip service, it is not only deceiving the country and wasting a lot of money, it is compounding the danger. The jungle of intrigue, undercover attacks and provocation has helped make Central America the mess it is. There have been no successes. More militarization, in collusion with cor- porations, covert or open with U.S. troops, diminishes the prospects of both security and freedom. Mr. Kis- singer should take the hidden side into account in his report. - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/28: CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700052-5