HAWKING DEMOCRACY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700030-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 21, 2010
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 5, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700030-9.pdf109.09 KB
Body: 
STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/21 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700030-9 ARTICLE APPEARED ON PAGE C_-, / ?1 WASHINGTON POST August 1984 Hawking Democracy:; Y OU WONDER WHY we have a = deficit? Greedy welfare moth- ers? Shiftless seniors? Not entirely. - . Let me explain -i and I'm .not_, even going to mention the Pentagon,_ which once again this week demon- strated why it will never give up the:: trophy for shameless profligacy.'( ur bold warriors paid $2,043 for a "common hexagon-sided threaded nut," which is available at Heching- ; er's Home Improvement -store for 13 cents. No, I speak of a much more mod-. est assault on our common sense and our pocket books, the National En- dowment for Democracy, which last year got an appropriation of. "only".., $3lmillion. And what is NED? One of its ene- mies, Sen. Warren Rudman (R-N.H.) calls it "a slush fund for political hacks who like to travel to warm cli- mates in cold weather." And why, when we are $200 bil- lion in the. red, do we have a taxpay-. er-supported Club Med? Who's to blame? It turns out that it is just every- body'who counts in Washington: the president, the Congress, the Demo- cratic Party, the Republican Party, the Chamber of Commerce and the labor unions. ' The range of its sponsorship is,.of course, the explanation for its-sur- vival. Reagan loyalists, to begin with, wish to nurture NED because it was his idea - floated in a Lon- don speech two years ago as an ef- fort "to foster the infrastructure of democracy" in other countries.'. ' ' This simply reflects a deeply held conservative conviction that the su- perior merit of de mocracy is a truth hidden from the rest of the world' Never mind the track record; which so copiously attests to the contrary - has anyone seen a German storming the Berlin Wall from the western side? LS UND But just as the right is convinced that the Soviet Union is leagues ahead in armaments, it is sure that the Russians have the drop on us in the field of "winning hearts and minds." Those not 'anxious ' to support the president have to fend off other sup- plicants in behalf of NED: the chair- men of both parties, lobbyists for the 'Chamber and the AFL-CIO, and i such influential board members as Dante Fascell of Florida, Chairman, of the House Foreign-Affairs Com- mittee, from whom every colleague is bound to seek a favor sooner or later. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a lead- ing right light, is chairman of NED's board. He says that "if the NED never gets off the ground, the big- gest round of applause will come from the Kremlin.". One House member Dan Mica (D-Fla.) in artless and chilling fash- ion, presented NED as a peaceful substitute to the M,_ythose_current_ wof "fostering the infrastructure of democracy" is on view-in-Nicara- ------ ---- pa. where U.S. surrogates_ and mercenaries are shooting peasants and-b urmng_thejLhQuses_down in a ?`.coyertwar." Granted that it's better. to .send clipboards instead of guns,'. don't we have agencies like the State Depart- ment and the USIA to spread the word about our excellent way of life? NED reflects the attitude held by many in both parties that the U.S. has a God-given right to interfere in the internal affairs of other',coun tries. And, to the mortification of NED's friends, it turned out that that was just what NED was doing. It is not easy to find out about its activities NED is exempt from the Free- dom of Information Act, and, despite a recently proclaimed policy of "openness," closes its meetings to the public.' But, thanks to a leaked cablegram . from our ambassador to-Panama , Everett Briggs, we learn that the labor institute of the AFL-CIO, using $20,000 from its NED kitty, intervened in the recent, close elec- tion in Panama. The military-sup- ported candidate, with U.S. labor sponsorship, won by 1,700 votes. Ambassador Briggs, who doubt- less spends much of his time assur- ing the Panamanians that the United States would never meddle in its electoral process, cabled an urgent appeal to Washington to suspend such operations "before the U.S. government is further compromised in Panama." The House was sufficiently stirred to vote to kill NED on May 31.'. But it was revived by the Senate, which was sufficiently embarrassed to authorize the _cut of $10 million granted to the Republican and Democratic parties, but not enough to put the Endowment out of its mis- erable mischief. Sen. Paul Laxalt (R-Nev.), . who doesn't think NED has the right to exist, nonetheless voted to save it, because of "the president's commit- ment." Rep. Hank Brown (R-Colo.), who with Rep. Richard Ottinger (D-N.Y.) led the succcessful House fight, wants to turn all its money over to Fulbright scholarships. "People around the world don't need to be sold on the virtues of our democracy," he says. "They can't wait to find out how you do it." But NED proves that once you have funded a foolish notion And, given enough gravy to enough peo-' pie, it will live forever, and hang the -deficit. Mary McGrory is a columnist for The Post. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/21 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200700030-9