WELL-OILED PROTEST MACHINE AIMS TO KILL CONTRA AID

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000100510003-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2010
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 8, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000100510003-1.pdf90.89 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/24: CIA-RDP90-00806R000100510003-1 By John Holmes and Bill Outlaw Intelligence experts call it "The Network" - a massive but almost' invisible spiderweb of hundreds of left-wing groups and organizations, linked together by sinewy threads of personnel, ideology and politics, and seeking dramatic changes in the social, economic and political poli- cies of the United States govern- ment. And- now, The Network has focused its attention and resources on its latest target: President Rea- gan's Latin American policy. Last Thursday night, shortly after President Reagan announced his plans for bringing a halt to conflict in Nicaragua, a coalition of pacifist church groups began to prepare for a program of "nationally coordi- nated legal vigils and phone-ins" of protest. Dennis Marker, spokesman for that coalition, which is called Pledge of Resistance, was quoted over the weekend as saying that an "active alert" went out over its 55,000- person telephone network. Mem- bers of this network were told to call their congressmen the day after Mr. Reagan makes a future television speech on Nicaragua and urge them to vote against his policies. This apparently well-oiled protest machine is just a small part of what is called "The Network:" Over the years, those who organize, operate and manipulate this web have thrown their efforts behind many causes opposed to policies of the administration. The Network consists of literally hundreds of groups on the left side of the religious and political spec- trum. Many are shoebox and tele- phone booth outfits - small groups of cause-oriented people working in cramped spaces for little or no money. Some, however, are large, well-funded and highly organized. Most of these organizations claim to be non-partisan and independent, interested in such noble causes as "human rights" and "social justice:' Tb a degree, that's true; and many individuals who participate in these activities are motivated out of a genuine sense of righteousness and altrusim. But in many cases, that's not the whole truth. WASHINGTON TIMES 8 April 1985 Well-oiled protest. machine aims to Contra ai Wall Street Journal columns Suzanne Garment pointed out tha "there is by now - on the America I left - a whole cottage industr using the language of human right and social justice to delegitimize i the United States' efforts to nurnm democratic, anti-communis regimes in Latin America. "While these organizations por tray themselves as `objective observers of Latin America, thi often is not the case:' said Joaj Fraley, an analyst writing in th Heritage Foundation's "Polic3 Review" "Analysis of Latin America issues is offered mainly by organza lions whose fundamental ideologica. perspective is sharply suspicious of if not openly hostile to, U.S. policy this region:" Of course, legitimate differences of opinion and debate are essential to the democratic process. But experts who have observed The Net- work over many years point out that some of the groups employ question- able tactics, including the planting of disinformation and outright deception - a tactic known as "active measures:' "Anything that advances their cause is, in their eyes, the truth. Any- thing that retards it becomes an untruth;" wrote Auguste Lecoeur, a former high-ranking : Communist Party official in France, who was drummed out for protesting the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. Adds one analyst: "Ever since the creation of the World Peace Council by the Soviet Union in 1949, Moscow has manipulated the slogan 'peace' as a weapon of 'war.' " And some groups in The Network. actively cooperate with organiza- tions established by the Kremlin for just these "active measures;" pro- claiming allegiance nevertheless to the lofty goal of "world peace" of groups, this handful stands out as the largest, best organized and sin- gularly most effective. In an arena littered with amateurs, these are the professionals. While their names may sound vague and non-partisan, and they may have differing fields of prime i interest, many groups in The Net- work are linked in one way or another to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which has been described as a radical "think tank" with headquarters near Dupont Cir- 1 cle. "IPS has one line [on Central America]: It wants the United States to be disinvolved;' says Sam Dickens, director of Interamerican Affairs for the conservative American Secu- rity Council. "The single objective is to curtail Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/24: CIA-RDP90-00806R000100510003-1