COLLEGE RESEARCH RESTUDIED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 2, 2011
Sequence Number: 
32
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 6, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2.pdf178.21 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2 DETROIT NEWS (MI) 6 February 1986 College research Despite the guidelines and an ex- 0 tensive review process involving stu- dents, faculty and staff, the universi- ty, s decisions on some Projects have regularly drawn fire from student t `Star Wars' work draws increasing fire from some By Tim Collis News Special Writer Opportunities for professors to perform secret, defense-related research on campus is increasing as a result of the government's interest in the Strategic Defense Initiative and similar programs. Opposition to such research is increasing, too. Analysis As a result of the opposition, and be- cause rules banning "A UNIVERSITY is supposed to be a place that values the free exchange of ideas and the Central Intelligence Agency is one of these agencies in the U.S_ government- that is the least associated with those values," Masterson said. "To the university, the grant represents money and no univer- sity is going to turn down money." His statement goes to the root of the argument and is based on the traditional view of the university as a place where information is disseminated openly for peaceful purposes. While not necessarily Protesters and the researchers them- selves. I THE APPOINTMENT of the' review committee was prompted in Part by last summer's rejection of a Proposal by Raymond Tanter, a U-M political science professor. A former Reagan administration arms control official, Tanter wanted to look at ways of reaching arms control agree- ments through means other than for- mal treaties. However, the research would have involved using classified documents that may have prevented the re lt su s, contradicting that notion, others stress from being published within a year. that universities' do not exist in vacuums Thus university rules prohibited it. and should reflect the needs of the federal "I think it's the height of irony government, which supplies much of their when a project to study ways in which funding. They argue that much defense-re- arms control might be possible cannot lated research is basic and has applications be carried out because of an outdated that transcend their use for weaponry. Policy to prevent faculty members Jerry Roschwap, an official with the from making weapons for the Viet- National Association of State Universities nam War," Tanter said. and Land Grant Colleges, said many uni- Tanter favors keeping the present versities are concerned with the issue but guidelines, but with the qualification classified studies may prevent needed "peaceful" research, the University of Michigan and other schools are re-evaluat- ing rules governing faculty participation in such projects. University of Michigan President Har- old T. Shapiro named a 12-member, facul- ty-student panel to examine U-M research guidelines after the school was forced to reject government-backed studies into ways of encouraging arms' control limitations. THE PANEL'S findings ate due next month. Some panel members already have suggested there will be "a little loosening" of restrictions, but no major changes. "All of us realize this is one of the most sensitive issues the universities face," said Dr. James V. Neel, a panel member and a professor emeritus of human genetics. "Classified research is an issue all over the country. Universities are examining this issue under a lot of stress and strain." At Harvard University, Nadav Safran, the head of the university's Center for Middle Eastern Studies, came under fire for failing to reveal $152,000 of Central Intelli- gence Agency (CIA) funds he received for an academic coonce and research on his latest book. Because of the outcry from his colleagues, Safran will resign this summer as head of the center, although he will remain a tenured professor. At Michigan State University, John Masterson, a mathematics professor, tried unsuccessfully to prevent the awarding of a $740,000 CIA research grant to a colleague. The university trustees rejected his plea and accepted the contract for Professor Shui Nee Chow, who will conduct unclassi- fied research in a highly theoretical field of mathematics. are bending the rules or making them and defense-related research. "I find that it's a mixed bag situa- tion," Roschwap said. "Some schools that will not undertake any classified research on campus handle classified information and do research off cam- pus." AN EXAMPLE Roschwap gave was the Lawrence Livermore Nation- al Laboratory, where the primary research for the Reagan administra- tion's "Star Wars" anti-missile shield, is being conducted. Roschwap said researchers flow back and forth be- tween the laboratory and the Univer- sity of California at Berkley, which has guidelines similar to those at U-M. "It's a peculiar kind of thing (classified research), but universities are peculiar kinds of places. No one really knows how to handle it." A.. At the University of Michigan classified and defense-related re- search has been generating controver- sy since the Vietnam War era. The U-M rules, adopted in 1972, ban research projects that could lead to killing or maiming human beings, and of classified research that cannot be published within a year of comple- tion. that they be nonbinding and left up to the interpretation of the researchers. "Have faith in the faculty," he said. THE NUMBER of classified contracts at U-M has declined in the past decade from 12 to two. The two projects were valued at $368,000 in the 1984-85 academic year, compared to a total research budget of $153 million for the same year. In addition, U-M researchers are now involved in five "Star Wars" research contracts totaling $643,696. Five more proposals totaling $4,711,614 are being considered. Over the next five years an esti- mated $600 million will be given to universities by the federal govern- ment for "Star Wars" research. Last September, the U-M regents passed a.resolution supporting "Star Wars" research on campus. Students and faculty members protesting such research have been circulating peti- tions since October, but the regents have given no indication they will vote to reverse their resolution. MUCH OF the increase in de- fense-related and classified research is being prompted by the Reagan administration's "Star Wars" missile defense plan. Just as significant is the growth of contracts between academ- ics and the CIA or private corpora- tions. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2 In an interview published by The New York Times, Robert Gates, the Deputy Director of Intelligence, re- portedly confirmed that the CIA was making a broad effort to establish ties with academics. He said about one- fourth of the agency's intelligence estimates now are reviewed by profes- sors or other outside experts. Private companies are also fund- ing their share of classified research at universities. For example, the In- tern atio al R usiness Machines .nr- poration (IBM) is spending approxi- ma1eTy $IS million at Brown University and $20 million at Carne- gie-Mellon University in secret proj- ects involving the use of microcompu- ter networks. PROFESSORS ALSO can bend the rules themselves while remaining tied to a university that has classified research guidelines. At most universi- ties, professors are allowed several days a month to do outside consulting that is not governed by university research restrictions. They also can bake leaves of absence to work with the government or a private corpora- tion on research that might not be permitted by their university. University administrators say that safeguards are built into the system to prevent abuses of research privileges. Garrett Heberlein, vice-president of research and dean of the graduate school at Wayne State University, said. .If a researcher is doing defense work that could be used for killing, then we're eventually going to find out by the nature of the articles he publishes. And if he doesn't publish, he's not going to get merit money for his research or promotion or tenure." Some top-notch research schools have no qualms about supporting classified research related to national defense. At Pennsylvania State Qni- versity, each professor decides wheth- er he wants to do classified research. "WE THINK it's a very healthy attitude," said David R. Schuckers, a Washington lobbyist for Penn State, where much U.S. naval research is conducted. Such an attitude would be consid- ered very strange by many at the University of Michigan. Most offi- cials close to the debate there do not feel there will be a radical revision of the present guidelines. "I suspect we will probably recom- mend some loosening here and some tightening there," said Committee Chairman Philip Converse. Professor Neel said that the integ- rity of the researchers, not guidelines, is what will ultimately preserve the humanistic traditions of universities. "In a series of steps almost any- thing involving basic research can go in the direction of killing and maim- ing," Neel said. "If you don't believe that, look 8t Einstein. All he did was come up with a formula that said that nuclear power was-possible. In the end it all comes down to the integrity of the. people." - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000100030032-2