MEMO FOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE FROM JOHN S. WARNER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00610R000200080024-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 27, 2006
Sequence Number: 
24
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 25, 1963
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00610R000200080024-2.pdf93.03 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/07/27: CIA-RDP90-0061OR000200080024-2. OGC 63-1190 25 April 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence 1. 1 understand you would lute nay views on tiro points raised in John Bross' memorandum to you of 24 April 1963. 2. On the first point of what will be the membership of our Subcommittee. I have checked almost weedy and checked again today and there is still no word as to whether anyone will be added to fill Mr. ' Taber's vacancy, or whether the Chairman will be changed. 3. In view of the position of Stature which Mir. Cannon occupies and his relationship with the Agency over the years which he regards as intimate and which he has jealously guarded, I believe there would be serious disadvantages if the DC1 were not to appear before him and the Subcommittee in connection with our budget presentation. Without recounting. the entire history of Cam-ion's relationship to the Agency, it is sufficient to say that he has always been most helpful and sympathetic with our special problems and alone of all members of Congress took the .floor after the U-2 incident of I May 1960 defending the U-2 project and pointing out that his Committee had appropriated the money and, therefore, the entire Congress shared responsibility for the program. 4. Compromise possibly could be coax idered ouclh as having the Director appear and open the presentation or the Director could call on Mr. Cannon personally prior to the presentation and raise the question of the DC! not being involved in the budget presentation.. 5. Mr. Cannon has been heard to say in effect "if an agency head is not sufficiently interested in his appropriation to appear personally to defend it, maybe he does not need an appropriation." Having regard for the above factors, I believe it would be a serious mistake for the Agency to respond to Mr. Cannon' a request for a budget presentation without the DCI personally involved uzleso adequate preparatory steps were taken in advance. cc: Ex Dir JOHN S. W 'ARNER Comptroller Legislative Counsel ~~,~OGC/LC Subject OGC/LC:JSW:mks MORI/CDF p9cA $02006/07/27: CIA-RDP90-0061 OR000200080024-2