DECISION OF THE COMPROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 28, 2003
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 21, 1951
Content Type: 
REGULATION
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5.pdf192.23 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/04/23 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5 UNCLASSIFIED DECISION OF THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES B-106516 (31 Comp. Gen. 191) November 21, 1951 The extraordinary powers conferred upon the Central Intelli~?nce of 1949, to carry out its functions do not include authority f or Payment to the Agen 's employees - not sub ect to the Classification Act of 19 9, as amended - of retroactive increases in compensation equivalent to those authorized by the Classification Act to be paid to employees oceu rin positions subject to the act. COMPTROLLER, GENERAL WARREN TO THE DIRECTOR OF :CENTRAL- Z.NTE LIGENC1! Reference is made to your letter=.of-November 13, 1951 requesting an opinion as to whether there is any-legal objection to the payment, pursuant to authority conferred by section 10, Central Intelligence Agency Act of 19+9, 63 Stat. 208, to employees of the Central Intel- ligence Agency of retroactive increases in compensation equivalent to those authorized by Public Law 201, approved October 28, 1951, 65 Stat. 612, to be paid to employees under the Classification Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 9511. Your letter outlines the history of that part of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 which resulted in the conclusion by the Congress that employees of the said Agency should not be subject to the classification act. Also, it points out that, not withstanding the freedom of action granted the' Agency in that regard, an administrative policy of adherence to the provisions of the classification act was adopted shortly after the above-cited legislation became law. Careful consideration has been given those matters, and the discussion thereof, but they seem to be no-::different basically than the matters discussed in decisions B-106332, B-106+49, and B-106525, dated November 6, 15 and 20, 1951, respectively, wherein it was concluded, for reasons stated therein, that retroactive increases to the personnel involved were not authorized.. Here, as there, the undisputed and controlling facts are that the employees are not Approved For Release 2003/04/23 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5 Approved For Release 2003104/23 : CIA-RDP90=00610R00010016OOi4= e Comptroller General's Decision-B-106516 subject to the classification act, as amended, are not included in._ Public-Law :-2Cil, expressly or by necessary implication, and there is no specific statutory authority for granting them retroactive salary increases. To those facts there must be applied the long established and recognized rule that retroactive salary increases may be granted only by express authority of the Congress and may not otherwise be granted administratively. retroactive increases, you urge that you are authorized to pay such increases to the Agency's employees by resort to the power conferred by section 10 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 212, which reads in part, as follows: "Seca 10. (a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, sums made available to the.Agency by appropriation or. .otherwise may be expended for purposes necessary to. carry out its functions, including "(1) personal services, including personal services without regard to limitations on types of persons to be employed However, notwithstanding established law with reference. to 41(2) supplies, equipment, and personnel and contractual services otherwise authorized by law and regulations, when approved by the Director. "(b) The sums made available to the Agency may be-expended without regard to the provisions of law and"regulations relating to the expenditure of Government funds." The extraordinary powers granted to the Central Intelligence Agency by section 10 and other sections of the 1949 act and this I am sure you will agree.. result solely from-the congressional recog-, nition of the extraordinary functions assigned that Agency by the. the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 was pending before the. This Office recognized that fact when the bill which became UNCLASSIFIED Approved For Release 2003/04/23 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5 Approved For Release 2003/04/23 CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5 UNCLASSIFIED Page 3 d Comptroller General's Decision B-106516 Congress and for that reason:did not object to the grant of what must be conceded as unusual authority. But I feel certain.it was not con- templated by the sponsors of the bill or by the Congress that this broad authority would be resorted to, or that it even contemplated a disregard of any control with respect to the normal administrative or operating problems which confront the ordinary Government agency. -.On the contrary the act itself specifically and'in considerable detail delineates the increased, authority of your Agency in those matters. To adopt the view suggested in'your letter would be equiva- lent to concluding that your Agency is authorized: to grant retroactive increases, bonuses, or other perquisites to ariy or'all of its employees with such frequency, or at such times, as desired, contingent only on the availability of funds. I cannot attributer any 'such intention to the Congress. Under the circumstances, it must be held that the proposed retro- active increases by the Central Intelligence Agency are not "necessary to carry out its functions" within the meaning of the said section iC and therefore, would be subject to legal objection. Approved For Release 2003/04/23 : CIA-RDP90-00610R000100160014-5