THE EL SALVADOR RIGHTS CAMPAIGN BEGINS TO FADE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000707170013-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 23, 2010
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 6, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000707170013-7.pdf104.28 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/23: CIA-RDP90-0 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL 6 AUGUST 1982 The El Salvador Rights Campaign Begins to Fade "We've won," said an administration foreign policy aide wryly after the El Sal- vador hearing this week. "We've suc- ceeded in making the issue of human rights in El Salvador boring." It was hard to fault his judgment. The administration has just made a de- termination that the Salvadoran govern- ment is making progress in human rights, and thus qualifies for more U.S. aid. Last week the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a lively hearing to examine the certi- fication. This week the drama moved to the Sen- ate, where the Foreign Relations Commit- tee staged its own hearing on the issue. Here the press coverage was leaner. Most of the Democratic senators-Biden, Sar- banes, Cranston-didn't show up to see the administration's witnesses. The most important event of the day was that Bianca Jagger was in the audi- ence. She was working on the problem of Central American refugees, she said in a throaty voice. And "beyond the refugees," she went on, she was interested.in "the Im- plications of the U.S. military presence" in the region. Ms. Jagger and the rest of us got to lis- ten to exchanges between senators and ad- Capital Chronicle by Suzanne Garment ministration officials that went something like this: Sen. Paul Tsongas to Assistant Secre- tary of State Elliott Abrams: To the ques- tion "What are we doing there?" you made the statement that we are basically trying to support the center against the extremes. It's difficult to figure out who the extremes of the right are. A: I would define the extremists as I Since the mid-1970s, the left has em- those who are attempting to use violence to ployed human rights issues to beat up on achieve their goals. the right, and in El Salvador the left Q: So you'd have to be to the right of thought it had found itself a ripe and typi- (Constituent Assembly President Roberto) cal target. D'Aubuisson to be considered an extrem- But two sorts of events Intervened to ist? top this particular bandwagon. First, of A: You'd have to be engaged in mur- course, came the Salvadoran election: It der; you'd have to be working against, decisively repudiated the guerrillas and rather than in, the political system. suggested that this time the U.S. govern- And a little later on: ment may not have backed the wrong Sen. Christopher Dodd to Assistant Sec- moral horse. Most foreign policy interest retary of State Thomas Enders: Who do groups on the right or the left really can't you think is really running El Salvador to, mobilize their energy for .more than one day? big issue at a time; the elections made the A: El Salvador is run by a coalition El Salvador issue seem like a good one to government. They all interact; it is a plu- drift away from. ralist government in which there is no one Second. the administration knew how to .single individual who dominates all the expiolt this situation. It grabbed for the rest. That was the kind of government we high moral ground. The State Department tried to foster. produced a certification report that was Q: Who's running the country, Tom? full Of charts. tables of evidence, graphs This was pretty tame stuff. There were tabulating the accusations made by both no direct confrontations: There were none friendly and unfriendly human rights of the usual suggestions that the Reagan to label Athdeir ddeecrsionntcertify El Salva. administration's El Salvador policy was dor as anything more enthusiastic than a cruel, dishonest or both. "close cal.." They did not give their oppo- Rep. Gerry Studds came to the House nents any easy targets for outrage. El Salvador hearing last week backed by a In fact the Reaganites took the offen. resolution he was sponsoring to declare the slue, arguing that the certification process administration's certification null and is a distinctly unsatisfactory way to make void. He had already gotten 84 of his fellow our aid decisions. All these tactics together congressmen to sign it. By this week his severely depleted the fund of high dudgeon luck had changed, and he was able to push needed to launch a successful attack. The administration did not win a flashy the total only up to 97. victory in El Salvador. But it did give n oo- Former U.S. Ambassador to El Salva- lice that human rights policy is not going dor Robert White, now a professional critic to be such an easily available cudgel in the of the administration's policy toward that hands of whichever side in the political de- j country, m last week to accuse the CIA bate can summon up the more convincing r illlegitito interference in Salvadoran case of moralistic rage. ejections on the grounds that the agency aa8 provided equipment like t e invisible system a was used to prevent voting rau . this week or e had not found any appreciable audience. El Salvador was once a matter of burn- ing concern to the administration, the me- dia and a whole collection of foreign policy and civil rights organizations; now it at- tracts major attention from just a few con- gressmen and their attendant special-inter- est groups. The rapid change tells some- thing about the way human rights has been used in Washington and about its limita- tions as a weapon of partisan warfare. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/23: CIA-RDP90-00552R000707170013-7