'TO CALL US TERRORISTS IS A DANGEROUS FLIMFLAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000605830014-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 20, 2010
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 28, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000605830014-6.pdf89.11 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/20: CIA-RDP90-00552R000605830014-6 ICLL APPEARED C:1 PAGE-- THE WASHINGTON POST 29 August 1931 Ellen Ray, William H. Schaap and:'Louis Wolf ~ 'o Call Us Terrorists Is a. Dangerous Flifrfla The Posts recent editorial ("The Philip Agees, the Louis 4j,'clfs") is dizzying in its contradictions and shameful in its misrepresentations. As one of the targets of the so-called .In- teiligence identities Protection Act, we feel we must respond. We agree completely that the proposed legislation poses a dangerous threat to investigative journalism-indeed,.to the First Amendment in general But you must realize that your editorial concern is diluted, to say the least, when you call us "contemptible" and hope--vainly-that the bill will "respect the rights of journalists and'others whose good faith is not suspect." For one thing, we are journalists in the traditional sense, with good faith, just as much as your reporters are; and there is no way a law can distinguish between us. Your dia- tribe only highlights the gap between the editorial offices and the reporters, for your people are among the large number of working journalists from virtually all the major printed and electronic. media in the country who. call.upon.us daily for help, researcbinformation and, of all things; names of intelli- gence operatives in connection with articlestheyarewriting. i Ioreover, they"protections" in the act are no protection at all. You must know that the CIA takes the position that any disclosures of any .kind. impede their activities.. How could any journalist expose a major CIA operation-as The Poet has. done. on several occasions-without wit- r tingly understanding that the story would impede CIA ac- ' tivities? Whatever the language used; every version of the bill would' allow the prosecution of; for example,' The Washington Post and The-New York Times for stories they run nearly every week.-; But it is your personal attacks that are truly unjustfia- ble. To say we would consider it .a. ".great victory" if First Amendment liberties were abridged in our name is mind- less rhetoric based on an utter failure to understand. who we are, what we do and.why we do, it. We are opposed to the CIA because we are against- clandestine manipulation of the affairs ?of: other countries,'whethei accomplished merely' by bribery; corruption and extortion, or, recruit- ment of local citizens to'work for the,CIA, or as a resultof bombing, arson, paramilitary mercenary: groups,-torture+ training or assassination.. Coyertoperations are the raison d'etre of the CIA, and we oppose them. We have no quar- rel with intelligence-gathering in The traditional sense- but that isnot why the CIA-hascase officers and agents in everycountry. in the world:: To call us "terrorists" is a dangerous flimflam. You may. disagree with our contention that the United States--and' especially the CIA-is responsible for more terrorism,; more death and destruction, over the past several decades! i than any other single institution in .the world, but you could not read our publications without knowing that we are opposed to violence and terrorism-and as American: citizens fighting hard against that for which the CIA is re- sponsible.- Not: one single. person has:.been -physically harmed on, account of what we do, while the CIA has been. responsible for literally millions of deaths-in Chile, in. Indonesia, in Laos, in South Korea, in Guatemala, in Ja ' maica, to cite just a few examples. It is sad- that you think our purpose is: to ,"destroy; democracy," when the CIA represents the least demo- cratic aspect of the entire U.S. government 'It is editorials like yours that lend credence to the CIA's cause; and thati will allow for the passage of this act and asignificant blov;A against democracy. Tice writers are co-editors of CovertAetian In4' formation Bulletin ..'-+ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/20: CIA-RDP90-00552R000605830014-6