THE SOVIET UNION IS UNDERTAKING A LARGE-SCALE EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF ITS HUGE WAR-FIGHTING APPARATUS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 10, 2010
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 1, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7.pdf315.22 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7 THE SOVIET CONNECTION I DEFENSE 82 U.S. DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE FEBRUARY 1982 STAT STAT THE SOVIET Union is undertaking a large-scale effort to improve the technological quality of its huge war-fighting apparatus. The assessment of the Department of Defense and of the Reagan Administration is that this highly coordinated Soviet effort is being carried out at the expense of the Free World by a raid on our technology base. Soviet leaders have learned that they have access to Western tech- nology both through legal and il- legal channels. Under the guise of purchases for benign, civilian objec- tives, the Soviets have obtained a The USSR has taken advantage of our loose export controls and- legally or otherwise- acquired vital goods and equipment. got off with modest fines. The result? The Soviet raid on our technology base not only con- tinued-it increased in scope. Let me describe for you how all this occurred, how the Soviets, prof - ited as a result, and what we are doing about it. We would do well to recall that By Richard N. Perle Assistant Secretary of Defense For International Security Policy wide range of equipment critical to 'LLLy a uc%.auo as" LL, wazo iaaiiiuiiaujC their military program. Where they to believe the Soviet Union would have failed to get what they want shift its emphasis from military pur- openly, they have resorted to a well- suits to improving the material well- coordinated, illegal acquisition pro- being of its citizens. Many felt the gram. Using agents, co-opting citi Soviets, with the right encourage zens, taking advantage of unsus- ment, would manufacture fewer pecting business men and women, guns and, instead, produce moving goods through neutral and consumer goods greatly desired by third world countries, exploiting the their people..ingly, national and internatioonal nalco controls were re- weaknesses in our control system, structured to give the Soviet Union they are gaining access to Western more access to Western technology technology on an unprecedented and products. scale. Sophisticated goods and equip- Until now, the West has failed to ment were sold with winks and nods respond to this challenge. Our ex from Free World countries. Indeed, port requirements were too loose. it is a sad fact the United States Our enforcement program was lax. actually requested and received Too many loopholes in our interna- more exceptions to the international tional control system persisted. control list than any other partici- Clear-cut violations of international pating Western nation. It is even export laws were forgiven and for- more grim to note, in retrospect, gotten. Violators, when they were many of the exceptions granted to caught, were either not punished or the United States under the interna- Frnm congressional testimony. November 12. 1981 tional control program contributed directly to Soviet military moderni- zation. Today, we can see the result of the laissez-faire attitude of the last decade in the size and in the technological capability of the Soviet armed forces. The Soviets have introduced new generations of smart weapons, dramatically improved their airlift capability, made their nuclear weapons more accurate and deadly, and enhanced their command and control with better computers and communica- tions. The Soviet Union fields some 50,000 effective main battle tanks and over 20,000 artillery pieces, all of which are protected by a sophis- ticated anti-aircraft net which can move with the Soviet land army. There are more than 5,000 heli- copters supporting the armed forces including helicopter gunships, some of which are in service in Afghani- stan. In Eastern Europe alone, there are 3,500 advanced tactical bombers, interceptors, and fighter aircraft. In the last eight years, Soviet military industry has turned out over 1,000 fighter aircraft each year. The operational supersonic backfire bomber can support Soviet land and naval forces in critical areas such as the Middle East and Persian Gulf. In addition, the Soviets are ex- panding their nuclear arsenal. cow' Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7 2 :Western Europe. Japan, and China are under the shadow of a new family of Soviet SS-20 intermediate range ballistic missiles. Each missile is equipped with' three independently targeted nuclear warheads. Despite the evidence showing that the Soviet Union continued its military build-up and modernization program, the liberalized system of international export controls was al- lowed to persist unchanged. As a result, the Soviets continued to use Western technology to support their burgeoning military-industrial system: Today, there are over 135 military industrial plants operating in the Soviet Union, spanning over 40 mil- lion square meters of factory floor space and turning out more than 150 major weapons systems. In ad- dition, there are hundreds of fac- tories producing both civilian and military goods, with the first priority always for the military. And, there is a stand-by system of dedicated factory space to pick up military production in wartime. Since 1970, despite "detente," the USSR has increased its military. manufacturing base by 40 percent. In the comparable period, our mili- tary industry shrank as our defense investment declined. While we struggled over what weapon - systems to produce, and cancelled many important programs, the Soviets pushed ahead dramatically. . Nor did their effort stop with adding manufacturing capacity. The USSR has been enlarging its research and development structure to support its growing military in- dustry. In aerospace alone, in this past decade, they have expanded their research and development capacity by over 30 percent. The manpower pool of scientists and engineers for research and de- velopment is also expanding. In 1980, this base of professionals con- sisted of 900,000 engineers and scientists-the world's largest. It is sobering that for 1980, the Soviet Union graduates an additional 300,000 engineers to buttress this undertaking. Even with her massive domestic effort and the help she gets from the Warsaw Pact countries such as East Germany and Czechoslovakia, the Soviets cannot, nor are they trying, to go it alone. They rely heavily on Western technology for industrial modernization and new products. From the Soviet point of view, there are immense benefits from ex- ploiting the West's advanced tech- nology base. These benefits to the Soviets include: ? Saving billions of dollars by acquiring proven Western technology, ? Saving years of research time, ? Avoiding mistakes and errors that are costly and time-consuming, ? Knowing in advance that new systems will work properly and, alternatively, knowing where to look should a particular project get in trouble. The list of technology-for military use acquired from the West is a long one. It includes high-speed computers used for designing weapon systems, signal processing, command and control and iritelli- gence gathering; semi-conductor manufacturing know-how used to make Soviet weapons more reliable and precise; guidance technology for aircraft, ships, submarines, and mis- siles; and equipment to improve the Soviet military industrial base- ranging from precision machine tools to process know-how technology. Much of this has happened because our international control system has broken down. That' control system is centered around a voluntary organization called the "coordinating committee," or COCOM. Under COCOM controls, critical goods were legally exported to the Soviet Union'. Some examples include: ? Western shipbuilding know- how and equipment including dry docks, expanding their naval con- struction, and repair capabilities. ? Heavy vehicle construction plants and plant support facilities giving the Soviets a quantum jump in load durability and reliability and far better mobilization potential. For example, Kama River trucks are used by the Soviet army in Afghani- stan. 0 Western semiconductor and micro-electronics know-how, giving the Warsaw Pact an electronics manufacturing system that is operating in support of the military. In addition, modern printed circuit facilities were exported to the Soviet Union. These legal acquisitions are sup- ported by even more far-reaching il- legal acquisitions. For example, only this past summer, millions of dollars worth of high grade elec- tronic polysilicon were diverted to the Soviet Union to fill military needs. Illegal acquisitions are taking 'place across a wide front. To give just one example, the Soviet Union illegally acquired IBM 360 and 370 main frame computers from the West. Their objective was to use the IBM computer as the base design of their own Ryad computer series. The copy was nearly exact, and for a ..very good reason. They wanted their computers to work with future generations of Western equipment. It is interesting to note the Soviet Ryad computer series uses the same .repair manuals as the IBM. There are many ways the Soviets acquire embargoed equipment. One is to'have the goods sent to a neutral or non-aligned nation and ' then divert it to the Soviet Union. Neutral countries generally do not maintain embargo laws. Some very sophisticated electronic gear and manufacturing equipment have been transferred this way. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552 R000505010005-7 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7 The Soviets support the illegal acquisition drive through controlled "front" corporations, by co-opting business men and women and fac- tory workers, through bribery and shady deals. They also maintain an intelligence., system keyed strongly on emerging ' technologies of high military value. They-keep a close watch on the latest developments in the computer industry, in advanced large-scale integrated circuit design and manu- facturing know-how, on magnetic bubble memory technology, on de- velopments in genetic engineering, fracture mechanics, and superplas- ticity. One part of this collection system. is devoted to exploiting Western technical literature, including tech- nical information published by our own government. 'The Soviets also are participating . in commercial and scientific data ex-I change programs. Through such means they have access to a very wide range of information about Western business, industry, and i science. Richard N. Perle Mr. Perle is a former staff member of the Senate Perma- nent Subcommittee or. In- vestigations; Subcommittee on Arms Control, US Senate, Committee on Armed Services; and Subcommittee on National Security and International Operations, US Senate. He was a consultant prior to assuming his present position. Earlier he had been a consul- In sum, the Soviets are managing. an exploitation network essential to improving the quality of their mili- tary weapons and to the military- industrial base that builds the weapons. They are taking advantage of the gaps- in our export control sys- tem and the vulnerability of the West to easy exploitation. They are using our free institutions and our open system against us. And, because our own national defense system has not modernized fast enough, the Soviets are exploit- ing many civilian technological breakthroughs yet to be used fully to upgrade our own military hard- ware. It is here we face the greatest danger. While we have committed ourselves to rebuilding our national defenses, it is going to take us time to do so. It is essential, while we im- prove our own defenses, we close down Soviet access to the technology they want for their mili- tary build-up. At stake is our ability to maintain the balance of power and protect thel peace. M tant with Advanced Studies Group, Defense and Space Center, Westinghouse Electric Corp.. and with Sandia Corp. His education includes a BA (Inter?- national Relations) from UCLA, Honors Examinations at London School of Economics and Political Science, and an MA from Princeton Univ., Department of Politics. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/10: CIA-RDP90-00552R000505010005-7