INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE: ED MEESE DISAPPEARED, AND THEN THERE WERE TWO

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000404180006-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 6, 2010
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 1, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000404180006-0.pdf137.4 KB
Body: 
! Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000404180006-0 ON PAGE June 1982 STAT STAT , President Reagan. has become the Hamilton Jordan of today's White House: Nobody knows what he does except stay on the good side of the President. With William Clark taking over the National Security Council and with the White House office of domestic policy in disarray, Meese is stranded without any signifi- _CA1PIT1.36Lj&C0MMpJNT INSIDE,THE HOUSE Ed Meese Disappeared, and Then There Were Two Edwin Meese III counselor to cant operational authority. When asked about Meese, White House colleagues invariably say some- thing about his being "free to concentrate on the issues." As White House watchers know, that is the road to oblivion. When Meese first arrived in Washington, he was warmly greeted by the press. His avail- ability and chubby countenance imparted a sense of trustworthi- ness and a lack of Machiavellian guile. The New York Times said, "He is very much a manager. 'Disciplined' and 'organized' are the adjectives used most often to describe him." The Christian Science Monitor reported, "Mr. Meese will, in effect, be 'deputy President.' " TRB in the New Re- public said of Meese, "You won't see his name so often in the head- lines or. his comfortable, intelli- gent, slightly pudgy face on the front page. He is merely general manager of the United States. He gets his authority because he is a detail marl. . " During the first year of the Reagan administration, the Big Three-Meese, chief of staff James A. Baker 111, and deputy staff chief Michael K. Deaver- worked in harmony. But the White House was then focusing its at- tention almost exclusively on taxes and the budget. At the end of 1981 and begin- ning of 1982, the White House was overrun by events and crises- Libyan hit squads, turmoil in Central and South America, mounting unemployment, grow- ing deficits, controversy over a new voting-rights bill, and de- bates over defense and nuclear parity. It became evident that Meese's talents were not in management and organization. Around the White House, Meese's briefcase was referred to as a "bottomless pit" into which papers vanished. James Baker standin) and Edwin Meese Government Triumvirate oesn l or Meese was instrumental in sev- eral major miscalculations: pro- posing Social Security cutbacks that were withdrawn almost as soon as they were unveiled; al- lowing the President to sleep while US planes shot down two attack- ing Libyan warplanes over the Gulf of Sidra; adopting, then reversing a plan to give tax exemptions to segregated private schools. Meese also sigped a fund-raising letter on White House stationery on be- half of the conservative Heritage Foundation-an action reeking of ideological politics. Meanwhile Baker, the smooth, trim-looking Houston lawyer and experienced Washington political hand, came to the forefront as the key figure in devising legislative strategy, administering the White House, and managing media af- fairs. Today, the Big Three is a shell of what it was, and Meese is the loser. In building a "troika" system, Reagan adopted an innovative ad- ministrative design, certainly worth trying. But now, well into its second year, the trial has run its course. When Reagan declared at a press conference last Novem- ber that his White House staff was "a very happy group" and that there was "no an imus ... no bickering or back-stabbing going on," Washington reporters, nor- mally at least somewhat self-con- tained in deference to the presi- dential office, hooted with laughter. Why is the Big Three system not working? ^ The troika system conjures a popular image of a President di- vorced from significant deci- sions, dominated by his senior staff, and insulated from unpop- ular developments. ^ It clogs the policymakine White House memo ise routed, to each of the Big Three,who in turn, must act on it. ^ It encourages in-house cliques and leads to empire-building. Each of the triumvirate has his own loyal gaff jockeying for jurisdictional turf. ^ It underscores divisions and disagreements within the White House because of personal and Philosophical differences among the three senior aides. Ideologi- cally, Meese is the hard-line con- servative, Baker the moderate, and Deaver the swing man, whose primary concern is the happiness and well-being of Ronald and Nancy Reagan. ^ It carries the potential for po- litical disaster. The inflated stat- ure of presidential aides during the past several administrations and the centralization of authority within the White House tend to convince many aides that they are invulnerable to outside faces. ^ It inhibits the orderly for- mulation of policy. Under the ini- tial setup, the chief White House foreign- and domestic-policy ad- visers reported to Reagan through Meese, who had neither the spe- cialized staff nor the personal background to handle the kind of interagency issues that rise to the presidential level. With Meese's loss of influence, the principal policy advisers have lost direct access to the President. It is uncertain where Meese will o from here. There are rumors that will a oint f eci tary of Defense or ttt ie en- eral or be named to succeed CIA Director William 3. Casev Yet the New Right is anxious to keep Meese in the White House, where he is their main line to the Pres- ident. It seems unlikely, how- ever, that he will continue to play the role of a wandering trouba- dour reciting sonnets to the ad- ministration. Recalling how Meese bested John Sears for the top spot in the Reagan campaign, a White House aide counseled: "Don't sell him short." Nonetheless, Meese has dis- covered that Washington politics are not the same as state politics. Hamilton Jordan made a similar discovery-but by then it was too Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000404180006-0 F