CIA ASKING HILL TO CUT BACK PUBLIC ACCESS TO AGENCY'S FILES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000303290001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 29, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 29, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000303290001-5.pdf139.34 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/29: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303290001-5 A;`l T 1 c LE A.:'t ii..=%?'- Oil PAG3- THE WASHINGTON POST 29 February 1980 -"-.By George Lardner Jr.' washingtoD Post Start Writer On June 8, 1965, a CIA security offi- cer met with an informant in the Hil- ton Hotel in d)wntown Washington to discuss the progress of his spying on the civil rights movement and espe- cially on the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. The ? meeting, which lasted' nearly four hours, dealt with "highly deroga- tory information" involving King and allegations of "communist-directed in- filtration into the movement," accord- ing to a nine-page memo prepared the .next day for the chief of CIA's Secu- rity Research Staff-. The highly placed- informant, who-had "long provided in- formation on the Negro civil rights movement and its leaders" to the CIA, promised to stay in touch. Ile empha- sized he did not 'want to be `,`down graded" by being- asked to report to the FBI. The CIA's spying on King, which' `produced a file including some of his haberdashery bills, Diners' Club re- ceipts and notes.listing -phone calls and appointments, was never dis- closed in the extensive congressional or executive branch investigations of the agency conducted in recent years. It has come to light solely as the. re- sult of litigation under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Thousands of documents on CIA ac- tivities-from reports on =President Kennedy's assassination. to ? controver- sial mind-control experiments - and other excesses-have been made pub= Ile under FOIA since the agency was -effectively brought under the law five years ago Now the CIA is seeking to' halt all but the most limited disclosures. Un- der a bill pending. In both the House and the Senate, the agency has asked for' an, extraordinary. exemption that would put- its operational and techni- cat files: alriiost completely beyond -'reach of FOIA_ Even illegal activities. it appears, could.be legally covered up. 'Public inquiries could. be. rejected without any -.inspection' of. the.. docu- '_ ments sought- ?i Lawsuits .would be fruitless. The. files would be immune from court action, except for individu- als seeking..records about thenjselves. The CIA has described the proposal in more modest terns. According to .CIA Deputy' Director dank Carlucci. ,the bill would provide only "a limited -exemption to protect our most sensi- tive information." He maintains that `4the loss to the public from the re- moval' of 'these files from:the FO IA ?. -process would be minimal." Despite such assurances,- the law has forced the CIA to release a great deal of information that would still he buried in the agency's files if the bill it wants had been the prevailing rule. Some documents that have been made public expand, or contradict. what the CIA reported in the l975-76^ e investigations. Some deal with. issus that the investigators never touched, such as the CIA's spying on Dr. King. (That was disclosed in an FOIA law- suit brought..by author-critic-k Harold Weisberg of: Frederick, .Md.ti Item: The- Rockefeller Commission, appointed byi President, Ford-in 1975 to investigate, ;CiA: activities im the United'States, came, across`a program startediii I967.by the CIA's Office of Security "to identify 'threats to CIA personnel, projects and installations, especially those stemming from the anti-war movement on college cam- -puses. -.The commission was satisfied that, the. operation "used no infiltrators,: penetrators or monitors and relied` -primarily on press clippings, campus officials and police authorities. 'Records later released under t'he Freedom of Information Act'about the -program, which the CIA. styled "Pro- ject Resistance,", show that 'it ' used confidential informants repeatedly in Texas, California, , Washington,, D.C., and elsewhere. The CIA file even in- cluded a blank "Confidential ' Infor- mant Identification" form for Project Resistance: Item: The Senate investigating com- inittee headed by Frank Church (D: -Idaho)said. in its final,'report that Pro,. ject Resistance, which, lasted., until 1973,..,eventually:.deveio{?2fl?a 1latitln- *ide'liiddx of;12,000 to; 16;000 names. ' ?But_according to records later made'', public under ? FOIA,' the'CIA's- Office of 'Security' indexed 50,000-members of; the California Peace and 'Freedom'. Party 'alone,` primarily- college stu= dents ?In. Just. two. counties. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/29: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303290001-5 Item: The CIA told the church .f committee that the records for 1 IK- ULTRA, the agency's premier mind- control program, had- been destroyed- in 1973, reportedly with concurrence of then-director Richard Helms. Some 16,000-pages of records deal- ing with MKULTRA, and other CIA experiments with exotic drugs were` subsequently- unearthed and, turned o.er:to-.John Marks, a former State Department :'emptoYe and--frequent CIA critic, under the Freedom of Ih formation Act. - Testifying about some of the newly cliscovered-documents in 1977, CIA Di- -rector Stansfield Turner said they showed'the CIA carried out 149 pro- jects-involvina drug testing, behavior modification and secret administra- tion of mind" altering drugs at 80 -American and 'Canadian universities, hospitals, research: `foundations and prisons. But-he assured Congress that the mind- control work. had been al- most completely phased out In the mid-1960s. According to Marks,.. who kept pressing for more documents as he wrote a book on the subject, the CIA replacedMKULTRA with another -vide-ranging, supersecret behavior control project that' continued into the 1970s under the agency's Office of Research and Development. The ,CIA told b'Iar'ks in June 1978 it had discov. ered "130 boxes" of mind control. ma- terial, in response to his inquiry about the ORD:?project,`.but he is still wait- ing to. find out what is in them beyond a few, "trivial documents" that were ,released. "They've been diddling me "ever since," Marks says. "In effect, they've already repealed the FOIA,?at least as far as mind control is concerned." Item: The CIA's view of its once-se- cret war in Laos was reflected in still another release under" FOI:A. Its. posi- Lion was set down Oct. 30, 1969, in a memo' from CIA General -.Counsel Lawrence R. Houston regarding con- gressional-inquiries on the issue, espe-