CONSOLIDATING EVERY ADVANCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490068-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
68
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 7, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490068-1.pdf104.89 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490068-1 WASHINGTON TIMES 7 February_ 1986 CORD MEYER CONSOJIQATI NG AD EVERY NCE General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev knows how to speak softly about the need for nuclear disarma- ment and has improved the Soviet image in the West by a more civilized tone of voice. But where Soviet power and prestige are at stake in the Third World, Mr. Gorba- chev has proved that he carries a very big stick and is quite prepared to use it. From Afghanistan to South Ye- men, from Angola to Ethiopia, from Cuba to Nicaragua, the new Soviet leader has now demonstrated his de- termination to consolidate every geopolitical advance made by his predecessors and to tolerate no backsliding from one-party Marxist regimes, where they have been es- tablished. The announced Reagan Doctrine of providing support to anti- Communist guerrillas and freedom fighters in nations temporarily un- der Marxist rule now confronts a hard reality. The Kremlin is pre- pared to raise the ante and to provide huge additional supplies of modern armament and expert military ad- vice to beleaguered Communist re- gimes in the underdeveloped world. On the basis of a case-by-case analysis, Reagan officials have re- luctantly come to the conclusion that since the Geneva summit, there is no evidence that the Soviet general sec- retary has backed away from any of the regional confrontations about which the American president warned him. In Afghanistan, the ambiguous Russian hints at Geneva about a will- ingness to compromise have proved totally misleading. A steady im- provement in Soviet armament and tactics endangers the Afghan resis- tance, while Soviet bombing across the border and bribing of dissident tribes within Pakistan make the Pakistani government even less will- ing to allow the delivery of effective anti-aircraft weaponry to the guer- rillas. - The strategic rewards of victory and the fear of the consequences of withdrawal have apparently per- suaded Mr. Gorbachev to escalate a war that he did not start. In the recent bloody infighting among Communists in South Yemen that left more than 10,000 dead rot e ruins of Aden, the Kremlin es- titat on momentarily be ore in- tervenin?effectively on the side of the hard-line Marxist rebels by pro- viding them with critical intelli- ence and with technical support to the air force. Mr. Gorbachev was prepared to take no chances with a Communist regime that he judged to be less than totally reliable. In Angola, a similar hardening of the Soviet line and escalation of mili- tary force is described by Jonas Savimbi during his current visit to Washington to obtain U.S. support for the UNITA guerrillas. American intelligence confirms Mr. Savimbi's warning that the Soviets are pre a- ing or a massive new assault this s ing on JNITAs main southern base with a combination of modern Soviet armament, Cuban troops, and Portuguese mercenaries. In Ethiopia, the Soviets have con- tinued to supply the Marxist regime of Chairman Mengistu Haile Mariam with the arms necessary to contain the tribal revolts, while the West tries to feed the starving mil- lions who have fled the drought and the enforced relocation and collec- tivization. Through the Ethiopian re- gime, the Soviets are also sending arms to support Col. John Garang's rebellion in the southern Sudan in order to destabilize the shaky mili- tary government in Khartoum. Since Mr. Gorbachev took over the reins in Moscow, the Soviets in Nica- ragua have sharply escalated the quality and quantity of their mili- tary assistance to the Sandinista re- gime. Steady encroachments on the few remaining rights of the Catholic Church and the internal democratic opposition have been combined with the commitment of Cuban-manned Soviet helicopter gunships in the fighting against the "contras;' who now receive only non-lethal aid from the United States. In the face of this Gorbachev of- fensive that depends so heavily on raw military force, President Ronald Reagan is faced with serious dilem- mas in trying to give the freedom fighters the weapons they desper- ately need to have a chance of dis- lodging the radical dictatorships they oppose. In agreeing to help freedom fighters in Angola and Nicaragua, the neighboring countries through which the American assistance would have to pass to reach the guer- rillas cannot permit the openly ac- knowledged delivery of U.S. military aid across their borders. The gov- ernments of Zaire and Honduras would both insist upon the protec- tion of deniability and would require that any American arms be shipped secretly. Since the chairmen of both the Senate and House intelligence com- m1ttT ees have pu is y state t ear 0 osition to covert milita fund- i Presi ent Rea an faces bi pro ems on t o i i a attempts t EEanne arms se ilx-t9 alt Savimbi's guerrillas and to the' con tras" in Nicaragua. Moreover, the draconian impact of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings will make it even more difficult to per- suade the Congress to commit the resources necessary to begin to match the Soviet effort. The Reagan Doctrine is in deep trouble, and only the man who an- nounced it can now save it by a strong personal campaign for non- partisan support. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490068-1