REAGAN S CONTADORAN CATCH-22

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490040-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 26, 2010
Sequence Number: 
40
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 22, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490040-1.pdf100.86 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490040-1 STAT AtE~IlYt~pPEAMM''~ o.ee ( . . 22 May 1986 Reagan's Contadoran Catch-2T__ Charlotte Saikowski its neighbors. If Nicaragua signs the accord, the Penta- Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor Washk pton President Reagan faces a dilemma over his policy in Central America - and his aides are deeply divided on how to resolve it. ? If the United States sup- ports a treaty being hammered out by the so-called Contadora countries, it will have to aban- don efforts to help the Nicara- guan "contra" rebels. The treaty is tentatively scheduled to be signed by the five Cen- tral American countries on June 6. ? If the US does not em- brace the treaty - and hard- liners within the Reagan ad- ministration oppose such a course - it will be viewed as blocking a diplomatic solution to the Central American con- flict and prospects for con- gressional approval of contra aid will diminish. The House is expected to vote on the aid issue in early June. At the moment Nicaragua itself indicates that it will not sign the accord being prepared by the Contadora group (Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, and Mexico). And it is not clear how the agreement will resolve such sticky issues as verification, reduction of armies, and inter- nal democratization. But if the Sandinista gov- ernment decides to back the treaty, the US will be in a bind. "The administration's lip ser- vice to the Contadora process is now costing them," says Pe- ter Hakim, staff director of the Inter-American Dialogue, a private group that favors a diplomatic settlement in the region. "They had not ex- pected that signing of the agreement would occur at about the same time as the aid vote." The internal dispute ex- ploded this week as the Penta- gon released a study stating that a Contadora peace treaty would not prevent the Sandin- ista regime from cheating on its provisions and continuing to foment insurgencies against gon says, the US in three years' time would have to commit 100,000 men and up to $9 billion a year to contain Nicaragua. The State Department quickly stated that the report was "an internal study" and had no standing as a US document. A Senate Republican leader called it a "seri- ous error in judgment." And the White House joined the fray, minimizing the importance of the report and denying there were differences within the administra- tion on a peace agreement. But many lawmakers and diplomatic observers see the Pentagon study and the conflicting voices as unmis- takable evidence that right-wing conservatives want to thwart any diplomatic sdlution, desiring instead to overthrow the Sandinista government. Democrats charge that US special envoy Philip C. Habib is actively supporting efforts to conclude a peace treaty but is meeting resistance within the administration. A hundred House Democrats have in fact sent a letter to President Reagan urging him to support a Contadora agreement that meets the "legitimate security consider- ations" of the US and to start negotiations with Nicara- gua in the Contadora context. One Republican, Jim Leach of Iowa, also signed the letter. Rep. Jim Slattery (D) of Kansas says that it remains to be seen what emerges from the Contadora process but that "the administration should be more forthcoming regarding under what conditions it is willing to termi- nate aid for the contras." While the US would not be a signatory to the treaty, he notes, it could sign a protocol that pledged adherence to the treaty. Those who oppose aid for the contras argue that the contras are not a credible force for bringing about change in Nicaragua and that, instead of trying to overthow the Sandinistas, the US should work to contain Nicaragua. Rep. Lee Hamilton (D) of Indiana, chairman of the House to Aence Committee- says that US-Nica- raguan negotiations should focus , icaragua s commitment to stop "certain external a_nc_o- nduct- " and in return, we will permit the Sandinistas to exist. The administration, sensitive to charges that the contras are ineffective and poorly led, is pressing for reform of the United Nicaragua Opposition, the Miami- based political arm of the contras. Negotiations over such reform are under way. Meanwhile, diplomatic observers are puzzled as to why Nicaragua has not rushed. to back the Contadora agreement, as such a move would put Reagan on the defensive. It is speculated that the Sandinistas are dis- trustful of the US, remembering 1984, when Nicaragua signed a Contadora pact and the US pressed other Cen- tral American nations into objecting to it. In the opinion of some analysts, the hard-line Marx- ists in the Nicaraguan leadership have no interest in stopping the- conflict and being rid of the contras, who serve as justification for the regime's authoritarian poli- cies. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00552R000302490040-1