WHO ARE THE CONTRAS?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000201100002-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 9, 2010
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 30, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000201100002-7.pdf49.03 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/09: CIA-RDP90-60552R000201100002-7 ARTICLE APJEARED NEW RE P UB L I C ON PAGE. -- 30 September 1985 CORRESPONDENCE WHO ARE THE CONTRAS? To the editors: Edgar Chamorro would have us believe that Nicaragua's "idealistic young peo- ple ... are being used as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy by the CIA ... and Somocista politicians who simply want to go back to Nicaragua to get back the money and power they lost in 1979" ("Confessions of a Contra," Au- gust 5). Arturo Cruz says, "Congress is sadly wrong if it imagines that it can obtain peace by cutting off aid to the Nicaraguan insurgents. The insurgency is no longer a product of United States intervention; it is the revolt of Nicara- guans against oppression by other Nic- araguans.' I believe that Mr. Chamorro stands virtually alone with the Sandi- nistas in his judgment. There was a time when the contras were a small band largely dependent on the CIA and ex-National Guardsmen. At that time it was not supported by prominent Democratic leaders such as Arturo Cruz, or ex-Sandinista patriots such as Eden Pastora (whose only com- plaint about the FDN contras now is that they are willing to negotiate with the Sandinistas). Nor were they connected with leftist political parties, such as the Independent Liberal Party. Today the resistance movement con- sists of every democratic political party, free labor union, and business coalition in Nicaragua. The church has offered to mediate a true national dialogue lead- ing to free elections in Nicaragua. And the people overwhelmingly support the church and oppose the government. It is hard to understand why THE NEW REPUBLIC, which has been so sup- portive of true national reconciliation in Nicaragua, would lend its pages to a traitor whose idea of reconciliation is "the abolition of the contra army." Clearly, there could be no quicker path to the permanent Sandinista dictator- ship, which the Nicaraguan people re- ject. No friend of democracy would ad- vocate such a solution, certainly not Cardinal Obando y Bravo, the most re- vered man in Nicaragua today. DAN BURTON U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/09: CIA-RDP90-00552R000201100002-7