STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS TO THE COMPETITIVE SERVICE
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
20
Document Creation Date:
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date:
August 15, 2012
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 1, 1978
Content Type:
MISC
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 2.57 MB |
Body:
.1 ? ? .?
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/15 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5
I???
k
el
? ? '44 -*
STATUTORY ? EXCEPTIONS.
? ?- TO THE
COMPETITIVE - SERVICE
? ? ,
Sitl. ?
4 ./.1,;. I ?44
' ". ?
? ?????1, "z . ;
'A REPORT REPORT
.?
? ? d
- ?
? ? ? r:! ,,TO THE.
? ? .,. ' ,
.?,?- COMMITTEE ON
? ?
POSY; OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE
?
? .."2f e.or TEE
? ?
" UNITET) .STATES SENATE
el. ?
BY THE
?"1":,.F 1
S CIVIL 'SERVICE COMMISSION,A
,
? ,
. 17, JULY ? 1978
t; ? ? ' '
. ? ')!
t? ? ? .
?? ?
? ? 1>L1.1,1,. ? ?
? ? .--11(r74.toT .
?????
'
? , ?t? .
?
'''.' ? ?: ..f L.
t"
? ?
%.0)?411j??
?
.3,a1?:-. ?
?
7;'31-41130
? .?
? Printed for the uaiof the Committee on Poet Office and
Cl.Service?September 1978 .
??,, ? *lift' ? '
?
11.8.1GOVERNMEN'T PRINTING OPIrIOE
t
4 41.:01 " WASHINGTON g 1978
--10,1.??
itt%; ? ? l? '
1;1:1:241, ?
.; . P.44.04AIM:V.V..g.i......,..11.Y.A. ? . . . 4. A:
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/15' : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5
'7E.I'N1(7i1FV;CW4`.'111 VIEWS OF THE. -.0,31. SERVICE 'COMMISSION ???.
V4I's1,13;:r.Vi?
? ? !:,r;.!?4 4344? : ' '???
? I ? 1 ;
":Z.- ? ? 4"1,c..q.A:k,-
. This concluding section summuarizee the views of the Civil Service ).
? ?
.Commission .on? the major statutory; exceptions from the competitive 7...
???'
. !;i.These opinions were??eresched 'after study of the agency ?
.."-7-teporta'ithat .are reproduced two-volume appendix ? to this re-
port./1'PT,A! ? ? ?? ?
? ? ; ? ? ? - - ? lt,14. '44 %?
?
1,1,1 Basis for the Commission's Views ? ?.
?? ? ? ? ?
The--Comidission's views are tasid?'.on an evaluation of the, reasons pre-
. .
?i?sented by 'the reporting :agencies; ./the'!vi-ews are not .based-'on investi-
,V?rgittrolf-4ndi-evatuatieffrafersonne.1 polities and practices of the
..agencieti.? -We: do not nuestionitthe.-historical reasons . for the exciatioD.
n.
:',we 'do exam c.e:statemen a o ? sent c rcumstances in support. o each ? ?
cceptiotitov !n h8S madii no mpt-7to take into-.
;account'- aaministrative :convenience and other non-personnel- considera-
clone --.71Por 'these reasons,- the views are. .ubmTd not as legislat ve
"recommendations but as, technic.al?opinions? of the Commission. ? ??
- ? ??? .?,;
? ,????!, t ? ? ??? '
.?. .? t :1, s ?
.tiatfien Malone. for Continnink Exceptions ????.:,.? ?
? ?;? -? ?
Almost !no, agency wants to be deprived of the, freedom to act with ? a
minimum -of 'legislative or 'regulatory- control,' .expecially control that
isl.exercised! by. another agency'. 11.With but' few-exceptions, the agencies
i'?recommendedithat? their statutory exceptions. from the competitive service
be':cOntinued." ...This the Commission can understand. ,The Commission is
;i r1Jconcerned.: however,' over the' agencies' apparent .inabiTity to artiZUrra e
specificreasons for continuing-the statutory ons. , ?
s?? . ?,.?..? ? ? ; , ?
Many. of the i reasons for continuing the statutory exceptions from the
!:-? competitive? service were stated .in -vague and general terms. A' number
s?A
of .7the. reasons-pertained to..exceptions from the classification and pay
.;-provisions'iof title 5, -or were . otherwise ?not?pertinent to .a. statutory
,exception:!froe the 1.aws! regulations - governing. examination, appoint-
-1; menti!tselentiono'promotioni!and 1%. ?;
:;? ' : .
??f t1.4::41A?ti;e,. : .y14 I: ? / ?
qt. livm?Forty4Our'ingimcietarliniiii' 4sked..".terfnubmit informs tinn on: statutory
'exceptions. Reports' were 'received from 43.! Three 'of these agencies
."reported no significint -stautOry exceptions (the Federal Deposit
.:?,1?0??,.:i?I'Insurannit'?CorporationPithatovernmetA 'Printing, Office,- ?and-the Rail-
? Yeli*;road-Retirement ? Board)"V. .One-?;egency?filed no? report (the Equal
Employm. ent Opportunity ? COammission). , ?
? ? ? .
?
, ? ???!: Decia's?sified and Approved FOi---re'ea'se'2612/08/15 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5
ommission'does not considee.such reasons as,the source of fundi
ayment of employees, the overseaslocation'of a duty station, /2 ii.-719t,
tement that a written examination.iwinappropriate for a group,:.
sitions, or the need for.unexplained flexibility, for example, ,;;;24,11
. 004:
valid reasons for continuinean,exception. ?
' ,! -e tt..?:?? : f: ,
., ?-?.!,:
nmmisalon firmly believes that'thereare:few circumstances at';'".?
nt which require that an agency or'sroup'of,positions be excepted,'
the rules applied to Federal agenciespand'positions in'generale,n.?'
? , ?.?., .. ,? ? ? ?? :'.) .cf-??::-.,,i,':::1'
ation of the Competitive Service''' ? o:.e...'.
. ... , ''' ..,, :?'.5.
% , ? .I.... `JO,' '
.: ? ' '''. - . "? '? .-I?? ? ...: i - " .. . ? l'.'r'..1:,
nmpetitive service is 'based on.thepublie!Anterest in the appli?. oi,
,t of merit.principles,of open competition'ifor Federal employment:
pplication of uniform qualification standards, and the selection ....., .
1 best qualified from among those for appointment, The :!;,,-' ".(''.;'.? . ? -?-.J.,;.; ''!..'f:fr . ?-? '? ':, '?? '?:. (;.;;I''j:.1:..; ?:,.. ,-., ,. ? /.. ,,,: . i ..???? .:, ? ,.;, , - ..
..1'.,?:-.?,..ac '':`,1i?P e7 *.:4 :?''' ''.'41 Tril.4rntr. -,???? .? ? ' ,/ .? ? .. ,T ? , ? . ? .. 1 .. , . ..
titive service also provides for-equitable:treatment of employeell,
ire tenure, eligibility'for'transfer and reinstatement, and'! '.?'' ."..?, :?,7--- t, x; ?si-???0;?? ; ?-, ? ? .? 1 1 ' ??:.!-(...-.4.1, . ,ir...; i..,. , ,A.? : ? . 5 ,.. I .. - .... . , ; .... , :? ? f,. .,6 . ..
It or employees in adverse-action and reduction-in-force sittl "..:; ? ' "''((;:.f..t?!.% ? ' ? , ? ?? t ?,i. ''..1-?.? ''... ..,1 . .' T. .. .. . ,.. : , . 1 ? . "
..i.central,personnel-systemllii.i.,eolie,4dvantage.'For open competition
ts . ,????,., tf,;:t? ',,,,,ej;1:4,71-",:?.",.:,-' to be successful, it is neeesiiiy,for,the?administrative agency to be
. ? ' , I ? ? , ( . . 0 ,-., . ? .....l...7..? (.t i . . ,,I; .!' 4.4 il ? , -1? l':.able to provide readily available' information,on.a widely dispersed;
., ? .? ,, . ??? ...,.,.;.1,?'!P,,-? .. ;??:','-?-;,,;??!;,,,r.t. i ?. .?,,:- ...ti,Iti...- .(,,,`v!),?,,,
? t.,.1,, -'/':T-ReogilujITEMERil a 'One agency, with large number orIcTcM?Orirge
,-s,"?'
tatives to Statutory Exceptions from:the Competitive Service. ,?$1,.iir
. 1, ,?-?,,,,..-?..-?:,. --???? -, -:
?,444:,,_2.71,y,?,.:!;??.-t,; ,,,, ,,;,, ,...;1,,..: .
i.