STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS TO THE COMPETITIVE SERVICE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
20
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 15, 2012
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1978
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5.pdf2.57 MB
Body: 
.1 ? ? .? Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/15 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5 I??? k el ? ? '44 -* STATUTORY ? EXCEPTIONS. ? ?- TO THE COMPETITIVE - SERVICE ? ? , Sitl. ? 4 ./.1,;. I ?44 ' ". ? ? ?????1, "z . ; 'A REPORT REPORT .? ? ? d - ? ? ? ? r:! ,,TO THE. ? ? .,. ' , .?,?- COMMITTEE ON ? ? POSY; OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE ? ? .."2f e.or TEE ? ? " UNITET) .STATES SENATE el. ? BY THE ?"1":,.F 1 S CIVIL 'SERVICE COMMISSION,A , ? , . 17, JULY ? 1978 t; ? ? ' ' . ? ')! t? ? ? . ?? ? ? ? 1>L1.1,1,. ? ? ? ? .--11(r74.toT . ????? ' ? , ?t? . ? '''.' ? ?: ..f L. t" ? ? %.0)?411j?? ? .3,a1?:-. ? ? 7;'31-41130 ? .? ? Printed for the uaiof the Committee on Poet Office and Cl.Service?September 1978 . ??,, ? *lift' ? ' ? 11.8.1GOVERNMEN'T PRINTING OPIrIOE t 4 41.:01 " WASHINGTON g 1978 --10,1.?? itt%; ? ? l? ' 1;1:1:241, ? .; . P.44.04AIM:V.V..g.i......,..11.Y.A. ? . . . 4. A: Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/15' : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5 '7E.I'N1(7i1FV;CW4`.'111 VIEWS OF THE. -.0,31. SERVICE 'COMMISSION ???. V4I's1,13;:r.Vi? ? ? !:,r;.!?4 4344? : ' '??? ? I ? 1 ; ":Z.- ? ? 4"1,c..q.A:k,- . This concluding section summuarizee the views of the Civil Service ). ? ? .Commission .on? the major statutory; exceptions from the competitive 7... ???' . !;i.These opinions were??eresched 'after study of the agency ? .."-7-teporta'ithat .are reproduced two-volume appendix ? to this re- port./1'PT,A! ? ? ?? ? ? ? ; ? ? ? - - ? lt,14. '44 %? ? 1,1,1 Basis for the Commission's Views ? ?. ?? ? ? ? ? The--Comidission's views are tasid?'.on an evaluation of the, reasons pre- . . ?i?sented by 'the reporting :agencies; ./the'!vi-ews are not .based-'on investi- ,V?rgittrolf-4ndi-evatuatieffrafersonne.1 polities and practices of the ..agencieti.? -We: do not nuestionitthe.-historical reasons . for the exciatioD. n. :',we 'do exam c.e:statemen a o ? sent c rcumstances in support. o each ? ? cceptiotitov !n h8S madii no mpt-7to take into-. ;account'- aaministrative :convenience and other non-personnel- considera- clone --.71Por 'these reasons,- the views are. .ubmTd not as legislat ve "recommendations but as, technic.al?opinions? of the Commission. ? ?? - ? ??? .?,; ? ,????!, t ? ? ??? ' .?. .? t :1, s ? .tiatfien Malone. for Continnink Exceptions ????.:,.? ? ? ?;? -? ? Almost !no, agency wants to be deprived of the, freedom to act with ? a minimum -of 'legislative or 'regulatory- control,' .expecially control that isl.exercised! by. another agency'. 11.With but' few-exceptions, the agencies i'?recommendedithat? their statutory exceptions. from the competitive service be':cOntinued." ...This the Commission can understand. ,The Commission is ;i r1Jconcerned.: however,' over the' agencies' apparent .inabiTity to artiZUrra e specificreasons for continuing-the statutory ons. , ? s?? . ?,.?..? ? ? ; , ? Many. of the i reasons for continuing the statutory exceptions from the !:-? competitive? service were stated .in -vague and general terms. A' number s?A of .7the. reasons-pertained to..exceptions from the classification and pay .;-provisions'iof title 5, -or were . otherwise ?not?pertinent to .a. statutory ,exception:!froe the 1.aws! regulations - governing. examination, appoint- -1; menti!tselentiono'promotioni!and 1%. ?; :;? ' : . ??f t1.4::41A?ti;e,. : .y14 I: ? / ? qt. livm?Forty4Our'ingimcietarliniiii' 4sked..".terfnubmit informs tinn on: statutory 'exceptions. Reports' were 'received from 43.! Three 'of these agencies ."reported no significint -stautOry exceptions (the Federal Deposit .:?,1?0??,.:i?I'Insurannit'?CorporationPithatovernmetA 'Printing, Office,- ?and-the Rail- ? Yeli*;road-Retirement ? Board)"V. .One-?;egency?filed no? report (the Equal Employm. ent Opportunity ? COammission). , ? ? ? ? . ? , ? ???!: Decia's?sified and Approved FOi---re'ea'se'2612/08/15 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000300490006-5 ommission'does not considee.such reasons as,the source of fundi ayment of employees, the overseaslocation'of a duty station, /2 ii.-719t, tement that a written examination.iwinappropriate for a group,:. sitions, or the need for.unexplained flexibility, for example, ,;;;24,11 . 004: valid reasons for continuinean,exception. ? ' ,! -e tt..?:?? : f: , ., ?-?.!,: nmmisalon firmly believes that'thereare:few circumstances at';'".? nt which require that an agency or'sroup'of,positions be excepted,' the rules applied to Federal agenciespand'positions in'generale,n.?' ? , ?.?., .. ,? ? ? ?? :'.) .cf-??::-.,,i,':::1' ation of the Competitive Service''' ? o:.e...'. . ... , ''' ..,, :?'.5. % , ? .I.... `JO,' ' .: ? ' '''. - . "? '? .-I?? ? ...: i - " .. . ? l'.'r'..1:, nmpetitive service is 'based on.thepublie!Anterest in the appli?. oi, ,t of merit.principles,of open competition'ifor Federal employment: pplication of uniform qualification standards, and the selection ....., . 1 best qualified from among those for appointment, The :!;,,-' ".(''.;'.? . ? -?-.J.,;.; ''!..'f:fr . ?-? '? ':, '?? '?:. (;.;;I''j:.1:..; ?:,.. ,-., ,. ? /.. ,,,: . i ..???? .:, ? ,.;, , - .. ..1'.,?:-.?,..ac '':`,1i?P e7 *.:4 :?''' ''.'41 Tril.4rntr. -,???? .? ? ' ,/ .? ? .. ,T ? , ? . ? .. 1 .. , . .. titive service also provides for-equitable:treatment of employeell, ire tenure, eligibility'for'transfer and reinstatement, and'! '.?'' ."..?, :?,7--- t, x; ?si-???0;?? ; ?-, ? ? .? 1 1 ' ??:.!-(...-.4.1, . ,ir...; i..,. , ,A.? : ? . 5 ,.. I .. - .... . , ; .... , :? ? f,. .,6 . .. It or employees in adverse-action and reduction-in-force sittl "..:; ? ' "''((;:.f..t?!.% ? ' ? , ? ?? t ?,i. ''..1-?.? ''... ..,1 . .' T. .. .. . ,.. : , . 1 ? . " ..i.central,personnel-systemllii.i.,eolie,4dvantage.'For open competition ts . ,????,., tf,;:t? ',,,,,ej;1:4,71-",:?.",.:,-' to be successful, it is neeesiiiy,for,the?administrative agency to be . ? ' , I ? ? , ( . . 0 ,-., . ? .....l...7..? (.t i . . ,,I; .!' 4.4 il ? , -1? l':.able to provide readily available' information,on.a widely dispersed; ., ? .? ,, . ??? ...,.,.;.1,?'!P,,-? .. ;??:','-?-;,,;??!;,,,r.t. i ?. .?,,:- ...ti,Iti...- .(,,,`v!),?,,, ? t.,.1,, -'/':T-ReogilujITEMERil a 'One agency, with large number orIcTcM?Orirge ,-s,"?' tatives to Statutory Exceptions from:the Competitive Service. ,?$1,.iir . 1, ,?-?,,,,..-?..-?:,. --???? -, -: ?,444:,,_2.71,y,?,.:!;??.-t,; ,,,, ,,;,, ,...;1,,..: . i.