QUESTIONNAIRE FOR INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT SUPPORT STAFF MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVE ON "OL IMAGE ENHANCEMENT."

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00379R000100150001-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
69
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 9, 1985
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00379R000100150001-8.pdf2.46 MB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 9 July 1985 Chief, Data Administration Service Information & Management Support Staff, OL P ans, Programs and System Staff Printing and Photography Division, OL Questionnaire for Information & Management Support Staff Management By Objective on " OL Image Enhancement. " REFERENCE: Memo from C/IMSS, dtd 4/22/85, Subj: Reassignment of Directorate-level Objectives 1. Attached you will find a consolidated response from Office of Logistics, Printing and Photography Division's (OL/P&PD) Managers who filled out the questionnaire individually. Also, enclosed is a copy of the Customer Survey conducted by OL/P&PD, with results included. 2. If you have any questions regarding any of this information please contact me on Attachments: A. Reference (OL 4066-85) B. Questionnaire C. P&PD Customer Survey (OL 11085-84) 25X1 UNCLASSIFIED WIIFN DETACHED FROM SECRET ATTACIID~ENT S~F2'I2ET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 STUDY OF OL's SERVICE ENVIRONMENT AND WAYS TO ENHANCE OL's IMAGE The Director of Logistics has asked IMSS to undertake a directorate-level objective to enhance OL's image as a service organization. The following questions serve as a point of departure to help us determine how OL can improve its services/support....or better acquaint other components with our role in the Agency. Feel free to tailor the questions to your component or expand them as you think best contributes to this effort. Please add continuation sheets as needed. 1. In your component, what activities/products/services act as "image creators" for you and OL? Planning Staff/Printing . Planning Staff/Photography . Design ~ Presentation Center (D$PC) ? ETECS (GJ-56) e? Bindery ~ Reprographics Center (B~RC) ? Systems Staff ? Publications (recruiting Brochures, CBJB, NID, PDB, NIE's) Photographic Products (prints, microfiche, slides, video replication, MP`I'V, etc.) Visual Aids (slides, vugraphs, charts, posters) Still Photography SECRET (when filled in) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 SECRET (when filled i , QUESTIONS FOR OL DIVISIONS/STAFFS (page 2) 2. What do you think are your customers' perceptions of your component's services and image in each of the above areas? Key your answer to the appropriate letter in Question 1. a. Sometimes unreliable in meeting due dates b. Generally good c. Unreliable, non-responsive d ? Good e ? Good f ? Good g? Excellent h. Good i. Good j. Poor Turnaround Time 3. In which areas could your component project a better image or provide a better service? How? (Key your answer to the appropriate letter in Question 1.) - j. Better response Planners and schedulers throughout the Division (including D~PC) do not have sufficient data available to accurately forecast ability to meet customer needs. With a good plant loading module in the MIS, P~PD's capabilities would be better known to planners and realistic due dates established for the completion of jobs. This would allow better response time due to better planning. SECRET when filled ire} Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 SECRET (when filled ~ 1 QUESTIONS FOR OL DIVISIONS/STAFFS (page 3) 4. What additional services/support could your component add to improve customer relations and enhance OL's image? Please indicate priority. Achievable with present resources a? Seminars Conferences with selected groups of customers (P~,PD is doing the best job possible in supporting customer needs (which is an image making service) with existing resources.) Achievable with additional resources (s ecify resources) a? Reduction of backlogged unclassified work with additional positions. ' b? Centralized television post-production facility (equipment ~ positions) SECRET (when filled in) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 SECRET (when filled i QUESTIONS FOR OL DIVISIONS/STAFFS (page 4) 5. What other factors do you think influence OL's image? How can they be changed to enhance OL's image? a. General Business Conduct - Improve via training b. Professional Dress Code - Improve via awareness ~ c. Lack of sensitivity to quality of work - Improve via awareness ~ d. General perception that OL standards for employment are lower than other component standards. Raise standards or perception of standards. e. OL's grade structure vs. other DDA components. Super grades are rare in OL. Compare to OS, OC, OP, OIT for example. PMCD clobbers OL. f f. Performance is a key factor to OL's image. Good performance enhances image. Poor performance detracts - Stress good performance. 6. How can we best communicate to others in the Agency the scope and importance of OL's services/support? a? Advertise through posters, slide shows, briefings, seminars etc. We can't turn 40 years of "grunting" around overnight. Away has to be found to impress new Agency EOD's. We ought to request a couple of hours for presentations to employees (Agency-wide) upon their first few days in the Agency. To attempt a turnaround at the "old timers" level rather than at the EOD level is probably useless. Otherwise, P$PD's option, with approvals, would be to carry an imprimatur of sorts on every printed publication, training film, photographic product, etc. SECRET (when filled in) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 SECRET (when filled i QUESTIONS FOR OL DIVISIONS/STAFFS (page 5) 7. What public relations tools could you suggest to enhance OL's image (e.g., employee bulletins, posters, brochures, video presentations, briefings)? a? Briefings, tours, seminars at all levels that are professional and interesting. 8. If we were to conduct a voluntary random survey of the perceptions of OL within the Agency, who would you recommend be queried and with what specific questions? a? All IG's who have statistical data on OL's performance to determine exactly what the perceptions are. b. All major users of OL resources. c. In P$PD this would be editors, analysts, senior managers of organizations such as OCPAS, NIC, PDB Staff, NPIC, FBIS, DDO SECRET (when filled in) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 . SECRET (when filled i QUESTIONS FOR OL DIVISIONS/STAFFS (page 6) 9. Has your component conducted a customer survey within the past two years? Yes If "yes," please make copies of the survey and results available to IMSS. (Elaborate, if desired, on any changes made as a result of the survey or any changes suggested but not implemented.) 10. What other suggestions do you have for enhancing OL's image that are not specifically addressed in these questions? a? Too often OL is its own worst critic. This may be a result of low self-esteem of many employees. Recognition for jobs well done are apparently scarce. In PF~PD for example, medals upon retirement have been nearly non-existent. QSI's are rare. Despite numerous additional projects and responsibilities the grade structure for managers have been unchanged over the years. The correction of all, or some at least, of these conditions would raise the level of employee esteem and would motivate them to further excellence. SECRET (when filled in) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 ~G"1 ~. 24 May 1984 btENIORANDUM FOR: Director of Logistics 1. The purpose of this memorandum is to forward the final report of findings and recommendations concerning responses to t}ie P~,PD/OL Customer Survey Questionnaire, published in August 1983. The customer responses were input to a statistical database by t'~e Psychological Services Division, Office of Medical Services (PSD/Ob1S). This action materially assisted us in focusing on substantive issues identified by respondents. 2. The major finding of the Report is that the Division is perceived as being responsive to customer needs, both in terms of quality and timeli- ness. The following table from Question l0 of the attached Report supports t}iis statement: REPLIES POOR FAIR GOOD EXCELLENT TOTAL REPLIES Responsiveness 2 18 93 65 180 Quality of Product 5 10 87 74 177 Professional Assistance 1 13 83 68 173 Initiative/Voluntary Helpfulness 1 31 78 53 174 Courtesy 0 12 74 87 178 Concern for Customers' Needs 1 18 90 65 177 3. We intend to followup with those Offices who chose Poor/Fair categories. In the-majority of cases, a respondent rated all categories consistently negative. We also intend to conduct random product surveys by attaching a self-addressed questionnaire to finished jobs. 4. A second major finding was that our customers would like more infor- mation concerning services available .from PF,PD/OL. A brochure outlining products and services will be published in June. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 STAT STAT Printing $ Photography Division, Office of Logistics (P~,PD/OL) Customer Survey Questionnaire S. Finally, a significant concern identified in the Report by some respondents is the lack of credible information concerning job status (see Question 18 in the Attachment). We have already instituted a man- datory requirement that PF,PD planners inform customers when requested due dates will not be met. We also propose to permit, at least our major customers, access to the job tracking module of the new MIS system. 6. I would be pleased to discuss the attached Report further at your convenience. Attacl~rient Survey Questionnaire Distribution: Orig - Addressee 1 - OL Registry 1 - OL/P$PD Official 1 - OL rono ~~ OL/P~PD/PP~ OL/P~,PD ~24MAY84) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Report on the Results of the P&PD Customer Survey Questionnaire STAT PP&SS/P&PD OL March 1984 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Executive Summary Results of the P&PD Customer Survey Questionnaire 1. Background The P&PD Customer Survey Questionnaire was an outgrowth of the Division's Quality Circles (QC) Pilot Program and represented the first time that P&PD had ever conducted an Agency-wide survey. Considerable time and thought went into the questions and response choices. The questionnaire distribution was directed to all "Division " level addressees as defined in the 1983 Agency Telephone Book, and other easily identified P&PD customers not of "Division " organizational identification. A total of 192 responses were received from the 864 questionnaires sent out, resulting in a 22$ response rate. 2. Results Basically customers indicated a high degree of satisfaction with P&PD products, services, and personnel. The following summarizes the questionnaire results: Products - Most printing and photography products were rated excellent, with 91$ of survey responses falling in the Good- Excellent range. Surprisingly, quality was rated more important than timeliness. P&PD products are always packaged and received in good condition. Responsiveness - Customer perception of the Division's responsiveness was very good, with 87.8$ reporting in the Good- Excellent range. Services - Division services are most often used on a weekly basis. The most common method of contact is person-to-person. Personnel - Overall concern for customer's needs is very good, and personnel were seen as courteous and helpful. Initiative was somewhat lacking in comparison to other categories, with 75.3$ of responses falling in the Good-Excellent range. Forms - All P&PD forms were considered easy to~fill out, although there were some indications that Form 70 and 70C required P&PD assistance because the customers did not understand the required technical information. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Job Status - A small sample (15 of 131} of P&FD's customers have problems in checking the status of their jobs. Some of the complaints cited were: . The computer is frequently down. . Phone calls are not returned. . The MIS status information is not accurate. . P&PD needs more Planners. . Shift changes resulted in problems. Requirements Not Being Supported - Some of the customer-stated needs of concern are: . Motion Picture/TV - ability to change videotapes to a different format; replication of foreign standard videotapes; and improved video presentation materials. . ETECS - Increased support for. customers from ETECS personnel regarding formatting (textual readability, eye appeal, layout and design). . Bindery and Reprographic Center - Wire binding for map books; and 24-hour color copying service. . Graphics - Ability to enlarge graphics on mylar-type material; more imaginative graphics design unit to provide quicker, more in-depth attention to individual design requests; and artistic support service as part of the planning function in the main plant. Long Range Plans - Based on the fact that P&PD production requirements increased approximately 8-10$ in FY-1983, and the fact that approximately 30$ of the respondents indicated some degree of projected increase in printing and photography requirements in the future, it can be realistically assumed that workloads will continue to escalate. However, answers to the survey question did not disclose any potential large new requirements with the exception of NPIC, which may have a need for photographic prints from 800,000 negatives. Handbook - The survey indicated an overwhelming desire for a handbook of products and services. 3. Conclusions The P&PD Customer Survey has provided a much-needed insight to Division operations as seen by a critical eye - - - P&PD customers. While the Division can take satisfaction from most of the survey responses, there are nevertheless some areas that need attention to make P&PD a top-rate service organization in the ey s of all customers. Division managers and supervisors will be~asked to set the example. Complete customer satisfaction is P&PD's goal. Action plans are being developed to resolve identifiable problem areas. Where possible, customers will be Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 contacted to further discuss questionnaire responses concerning poor support. Follow-up mini-surveys will be occassionally inserted into publications. And finally, but most importantly, a handbook of products and services directed to the non- professional printing and photography customer will be produced. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 1. n~~r~,cse The purpose of this report is to summarize the results of the Printing and Photography Division's (P&PD) Customer Survey Questionnaire (CSQ), to identify problem areas, and to recommend corrective action wherever applicable. For the purpose of simplicity, this report will attempt to present the analysis results, as much as possible, in narrative form. However, because most of the analysis is based on the computerized statistical printouts as processed by the Research Branch, Psychological Services Division, OMS (RB/PSD/OMS), it is inevitable that a certain amount of reference to numerical statistics will be necessary. 2. Background The idea of an Agency-wide survey of P&PD customers grew out of a suggestion of one of the Quality Circle (QC) Facilitators during a P&PD QC Steering Committee meeting. A lot of thought and effort went into the content of the questionnaire, particularly in the wording of the questions and the inclusion of all facets of P&PD products and services. Nevertheless, in retrospect, there are things that probably could have been done better/easier/simplier. The distribution of surveys was accomplished by keying on the word "Division " in the Organizational Directory of the Agency's Telephone Book. Anywhere "Division " occurred, a brief explanatory memo and at least five (5) individual survey forms were sent to the Division address. In addition, several P&PD customers without the " Division " designation were also asked to participate in the survey. A total of 192 survey responses were received from the 864 individual surveys mailed out. This is a response rate of 22$. 3. Format This report will address total responses on a question-by- question basis with comments and recommendations as applicable. Individual Directorate responses will only be addressed when related to specific problem areas. Attachment A provides a question-by-question breakdown by respondent. It has been arbitrarily decided that negative-tXpe responses totaling 10$ or less of the responding population will be considered acceptable, and not require further investigation as to the customer's reasons for their choice of response; except in those cases where a narrative comment is provided. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 4. Findings Question 1: Do you utilize P&PD's Planning and Scheduling units (Printing, Rm. 154...Photography, Rm. G-65) for submitting a job for production? Response: Yes - 112 (59.9$) No - 75 (40.'1$) Total Replies - 187 Missing Replies - 5 Comment: There is no clear explanation as to why 40$ of P&PD's customers do not use this service. Many, whose work tends to be repetitive, such as Office of Personnel (mostly forms) and some photography customers, rely upon the Agency's mail and courier services to get jobs to and from P&PD, and never need to touch base with Planning and Scheduling because the requirements remain constant. However, both Planning and .Scheduling units see every job that comes into the Division except those jobs going directly to B&RC, COM Center, and D&PC. Recommendation: With the exception of an explanation of this P&PD service in a proposed handbook, no further action is recommended. Question 2: If you answered "Yes " above, does P&PD's Planning and Scheduling functions provide advice and guidance? Response: Never - 1 (0.9$) Seldom - 7 (6.2$) Sometimes - 30 (26.5$) Frequently - 41 (36.3$) Always - 34 (30.1$) Total Replies - 113 Missing Replies - 79 Comment: The OP was the sole respondent to the NEVER choice. The SELDOM choice was selected by respondents from DDI-BONA, -OGI and -OSWR; DDA-ODP, and -OMB; and DDS&T-NPIC. These respondents total only 8 out of 113, or 7.1$. Recommendation: No further action necessary. Question 3: Are P&PD personnel courteous and helpful? Response: Never - 0 (0$) Seldom - 0 (0$) Sometimes - 7 (4.2$) Frequently - 67 (40.1$) Always - 93 (55.7$) Total Replies - 167 Missing Replies - 25 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Comment: With 95.8$ responding favorably, there is little more to be said re this question. Recommendation: The SOMETIMES response falls well within the acceptable limits of 10$, thus requires no further action. However, since P&PD is a service organization, management will constantly stress the need for all employees to be service-oriented at all times to all customers. Question 4: Is there any type of printing, photographic, copying, or graphics support that P&PD does not currently provide that you or your component would like to have provided? Response: Yes - 19 (10.7$) No - 158 (89.3$) Total Replies - 177 Missing Replies - 15 Comment: Overall, response to this question appears to be a strong endorsement of the customer support that P&PD is currently offering. In fact, the 19 respondents (10.7$) just barely exceeds the 10$ factor for further action. Those responses are treated in Question 5. Recommendation: See Question 5. Question 5: If you answered "Yes" above, what are your projected annual requirements for the support specified above? Response: This question is an adjunct to Question 4 above. As stated, there were 19 affirmative responses. The complete response, identified by Office and Directorate, is covered on pages 3-5 of Attachment A. A summary of responses is as follows: a. Video concerns - 5 b. Design and graphics services - 3 c. Color xeroxing - 2 d. Lack of knowledge of overall P&PD support/ service - 1 e. Graphics enhancements (enlarging, large size copying) - 1 f. Increased customer support for ETECS planning and formatting - 2 g. Automated page makeup - 1 h. Wire binding for map books - 1 i. B&RC bi-weekly support - 1 j. Remotely sensed image color rectification and mosaic ability - 1 k. Speciality forms, certificates requirements - 2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Comment: It is interesting that video concerns outnumbered all others (5 of 19) This function falls under t!le Motion Picture/TV Center (r1P/TVC), Photography Branch, and is the iastast growing support requirement conFronting P&PD, particularly since assuming total responsibilty for the Headquarters Auditorium and Room 1A07, Hqs. The other areas mentioned by the respondents may, in some cases, just be a lack of knowledge of P&PD capabilities. Recommendation: Video concerns are well known and the Division is directing resources towards this type of requirement. Other areas need to be addressed through better communications to customers of P&PD services/support; ie, a handbook/notice of P&PD products and services. Question 6: Are the services that are offered by P&PD completed ? in a timely manner so that you can meet your requirements? Response: Never - 0 (0$) Seldom - 0 (0$) Sometimes - 27 (14.8$) Frequently - 83 (45.6$) Always - 72 (39..6$) Total Replies - 182 Missing Replies - 10 Comment: The SOMETIMES response was cited by 27 customers, 13 of whom were in the DDI. This is a 14.8$ response rate compared to a combined rate of 85.2$ for FREQUENTLY and ALWAYS (83 and 72 respectively). This response is not necessarily negative, but it does indicate that there have been times when complete customer satisfaction was not achieved, particularly by DDI customers. The source of dissatisfaction may be as simple as a missed duedate by P&PD, or because of constantly changing DDI priorities. Division management will look at this situation more closely to determine further action. It should also be considered that missed duedates are a way of life in this business, particularly since P&PD has'only so many resources to cope with vastly fluctuating Agency requirements over which the Division has little or no control. Recommendation: That P&PD management and production branches continue to strive to meet every due date, but nevertheless recognize that total perfection is not always attainable in a dynamic service environment. Division personnel will inform customers when it is known that a deadline/due date is going to be missed by 24 or more hours. With the implementation of the new MIS, selected customers will have direct query capability which should be helpful in resolving potential problem areas. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Resror.~e: ?ot ~n~licable Fovr Fair Good Excellent T'otal Replies Missing Replies 1'Rlrtl'IfJG CoTnl~osition/typesetting 41 0 5 38 63 147 45 Printing 25 0 4 52 79 160 32 Bindery (lied product finishing operations) 36 1 1 41 70 149 43 Copying and Binding (GJ-56IIgs.) 36 1 8 55 52 152 40 YI K71'UGRA!'I iY Color Processing 33 2 10 45 52 142 50 Black F, White Processing 35 4 9 41 52 141 52 Motion Pictures 85 0 1 6 9 101 91 Teleprvduction (Videotaping) 84 0 1 8 11 104 88 Video Replication 80 0 3 8 13 104 88 Multi-media Shows 86 0 1 7 6 100 92 Microfilming 80 0 3 20 5 108 84 CUhf (Computer Output hficrofilm) 85 0 3 9 9 106 86 Gral~l~ics >`~ 1)esig-i, including Computer Grapl-ics 51 0 3 32 35 121 71 Comment: The first comment is that this question is a good example of how we might have done things differently. For example, the NOT APPLICABLE category serves no useful purpose as a response choice, but because so many respondents chose this answer it detracts from the significance of the TOTAL REPLIES (particularly in the MP/TVC responsibilities). The result is a smaller responding population upon which to base a meaningful analysis. However, in the areas of Color Processing and Black and White Processing, there were POOR responses of approximately 1.5$ and 3.0$ respectively. These same components also registered the highest FAIR responses, 10 (7.0$) and 9 (6.4$). In addition, the Copying and Binding component also received 8 of 152 (5.3$) FAIR responses and 1 (0.6$) POOR response. These areas should be studied further to determine the source of dissatisfaction and take corrective action. Recommendation: That respondents referenced immediately above be contacted to further discuss the reasons for their response, and to provide insight to P&PD management for corrective action to improve the customer's satisfaction with P&PD products. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question 7: ~.~LD ~z-_s t::e fcilc;wing three definiticr_s in ,, handling customer requirements: Deadline: Top Priority. Absolutely must be completed by the time and date requested. Usually an overnight or ' next day priority. Specified Date: Must be completed by the date requested. -Routine: Will try to meet the requested date if possible. Job will be worked on a "time available " basis. (a) Given these definitions, what percent of your work falls into these categories? Response: $ of Work Deadline Responses Specified Date Responses Routine Responses 0-25 68 (60.9_$) 42 (27.0$) 66 (50.75) 26-50 14 (12.6$) 33 (21.0$) 22 (16.9$) 51-75 10 (9.0$) 20 (12.7$). 18 (13.8$) 76-100 20 (17.9$) 61 (39.1$) 24 (18.5$) Totals 112 (100.4$) 156 (99.8$) 130 (99.9$) Missing 80 36 62 Comment: The most significant figures in the above statistical summary show that: (a) Most customers, 68 or 60.9$, have up to 25$ of their work fall into the Deadline category; but only 20 (17.9$) customers have between 76-100$ of their work in the same category. (b) In the Specified Date category, the trend reverses in that 61, or 39.1$, respondents have most (76- 100$) of their work due by a specific date; while 42, or 27.0$, have up to 25$ of their work in this category. (c) Most respondents, 66 or 50.7$, have up to 25$ of their work fall into the Routine category; with the remaining respondents, 64 or 49.2$, are pretty evenly distributed throughout the remaining distribution of percentages. Recommendation: The statistics provide an interesting picture of the distribution of work load requirements related to duedate requirements, and should be used to provide P&PD with additional insight for planning purposes. Question 8: Are the products being produced by P&PD of acceptable quality? (Please circle your choice next to each product as applicable.) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question 9: F:o;a often do you use P&PD services? Response: Daily 28 (15.2$) Weekly 52 (28.3$) Monthly 35 (19.0$) Quarterly 32 (17.40) Semi-annually 6 (3.3$) Other 26 (14.1$) Total Replies 184 Missing Replies 8 Comment: The statistics are self-explanatory. Of 184 respondents, 80 (43.5$) use P&PD daily or weekly; another 35 (19.0$) use P&PD monthly;. and another 32 (17.4$) use P&PD at least quarterly. Overall, 147 (79.9$) use the Division's services in the daily to quarterly categories. Question 10: Overall, what is your impression of P&PD support in terms of: (Please indicate your choice next to each category) Response: Not Total Missing Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Replies Replies Responsiveness (timeliness) 2 2 18 93 65 180 12 duality of Product 1 5 10 87 74 177 15 Professional Assistance 8 1 13 83 68 173 19 Initiative/Voluntary Helpfulness 11 1 31 78 53 174 18 Courtesy 5 0 12 74 87 178 14 Concern for Customer's Needs 3 1 18 90 65 177 15 Comment: There are some very impressive statistics in the GOOD and EXCELLENT categories, and the Division should be quite proud of these customer opinions. In every category except Initiative/Voluntary Helpfulness, the positive responses (GOOD or Excellent) f,ar outweighed any critical response. However, in an effort to provide the best possible service, the respondents choosing FAIR will be contacted to determine the basis of their choice. It may be a case of a simple one- time occurrence which has biased the objectivity of the response; or it may be symptomatic of a deeper problem. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Recommendation: That every effort be made to communicate with the respondent, determine the basis of the response, and take corrective action to provide a level of employee service commensurate with customer expectations. In this respect, P&PD management will define what is expected; and P&PD managers and supervisors will be accountable for proper employee dealings with customers and intervene in any issues to satisfactorily resolve problems. Question 11: Form 70 is the basic requisition used to obtain P&PD services. There are four versions of this form, plus Form 3487 for COM (Computer Output Microfilm) services. Form 70 P&PD Printing Requisition Form 70B P&PD Cartography Requestion Form 70C P&PD Photography Requisition Form 70D Bindery and Reprographic Center, (GJ-56 Hqs.) Form 3487 COM Requisition (a) Which form(s) do you use? (Circle) 70 70B 70C 70D 3487 (b) Is it easy to fill out? Yes NO Total Replies Missing Replies Form 70 107 (94.4$) 6 (5.3$) 113 79 Form 70B 30 (90.9$) 2 (6.1$) 33 159 Form 70C 83 (95.58) 4 (4.5$) 89 103 Form 70D 50 (89.3$) 5 (8.9$) 56 136 Form 3487 12 (66.7$) 5 (27.8$) 18 174 (c) What, if anyttring, don't you understand on the form? (Please specify) Comments: Verbatim examples of respondent's comments are on pages 13-14 of Attachment A. Basically the problems center around the form being too complex and technical to fill out without P&PD assistance, and customers not understanding the terminology of the printing or photo services. Recommendation: This question again surfaces the need for improved P&PD/customer communications. A handbook would fill some of this void, and employee initiative to educate and/or assist customers would also improve this problem area. Form 70C has recently been redesigned and is currently undergoing a customer test. Other P&PD forms will be reviewed to determine if they are up-to-date re reproduction processes, procedures, equipment capabilities, and customer convenience re filling out the form. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question 12: What do you think can be done to enhance thr~ug.".put time? Response: There were only 28 individual responses to this question. They are contained on pages 15-20 of Attachment A. Comment: The primary response concerned lack of P&PD notification to customers re duedates that were going to be missed. One response stated that a longer throughput time that could realistically be met is more acceptable than a promised quick turn-around that can't be met. Several responses suggested better planning by the customer. Better understanding of the customer's desires by P&PD planners was also suggested. More personnel was a popular response. There were several responses suggesting improved processing and procedures in the following areas: autofiche, video editing, color photography, dylux preparation, quality control of covers, fewer ETECS correction cycles, courier services, return of material to customers. Finally, one customer did remark about having to go to different P&PD components for different requirements instead of a centralized job control location. Recommendation: That P&PD management stress the need for responsible Division personnel to inform customers of obvious deadline problems and negotiate acceptable rescheduling. The Division needs to take a look at the planning, scheduling, and estimating functions in order to facilitate more acceptable customer relations. In the near future, some selected customers will have direct MIS query access re job schedules and status, and this will no doubt be mutually beneficial. Other responses mentioned areas in which the Division is constantly looking at methods and ways of improving production. Question 13: Are your jobs packaged and received in good condition? Response: Never 0 Seldom 0 Sometimes 5 (3.1$) Frequently 45 (28.1$) Always 110 (68.8$) Total Replies Missing Replies 160 NA Comment: There is little to be said re this question; 96.9$ of the responses indicated satisfactory service. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question 14: If you are a cus~omer wt~o uses maiiiny llscs, are they kept current by P&PD? Response: Never 21 (61.8) Seldom 1 (2.9~) Sometimes 1 (2.9$) Frequently 4 (11.8$) Always 7 (20.6$) Total Replies 34 Missing Replies 158 Comment: With such a high negative response, this question would appear to warrant further investigation. However, it appears that a significant number interpreted the question as to whether they maintain their own lists. Recommendation: None. Question 15: Are you aware of the four-times-a-day "Gray Box " service between the Main Printing Plant and the Bindery and Reprographic Center (GJ-56 Hqs.)? Response: Yes 57 (32.8$) No 117 (67.2$) Total Replies 174 Missing Replies 18 Comment: In retrospect this question probably serves no useful purpose. The "Gray Box " is a P&PD-internal delivery system, basically for the purpose of sending jobs between Headquarters and the Printing and Photography Building. It is supported by the Mail and Courier Branch (M&CB), LSD for the convenience of P&PD work. It is not intended to~be in competition with the M&CB. Recommendation: None. Question 16: If you answered "Yes" above, how often do you use this service? Response: Seldom 14 (25.9$) Sometimes 12 (22.2$) Frequently 18 (33.3$) Always 10 (18.5$) Total Replies 54 Missing Replies 138 Comment: See Comments to Question 15 above. Recommendation: Same as Question 15 above. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 QL1eStlOn 17: is your COntaC~ wl i.:7 ~ &rD uSilal%"L7 1:1 N2iS0:1, Via phone, or via mail? Response: Person 62 (38.5$) Phone 53 (32.9$) Mail 46 (28.6$) Total Replies 161 Missing Replies 31 Comment: What is significant is that nearly 40$ of P&PD's customers have personal contact with Division personnel, while a slightly smaller percentage have telephone contact with P&PD personnel. The type of service the customer receives can leave a lasting impression of P&PD personnel and capabilities. Based on the customer responses to survey question number 3 on courtesy and helpfulness, which .showed a combined positive response rate of 95.8$, there appears to be no problem in the area of customer impressions of P~PD personnel. Recommendation: That employees constantly strive to put their best effort forward, and that P&PD management and supervision provide the necessary leadership, example, and motivation to promote a first-class service organization. Question 18: Do you have?any problems in checking the status of your jobs in P&PD? Response: No 165 (91.2$) Yes 16 (8.8$) Total Replies 181 Missing Replies ~11 Comment:? Although there were 16 respondents indicating some problems with checking the status of their jobs, there were 18 individual replies addressing the issue. They are all stated verbatim on pages 21-24 of Attachment A. Basically, the comments fall into the following areas: the "MIS is down " excuse; phone calls are not returned; wrong or unknown due dates; and nobody in P&PD knows the status. Recommendation: The current MIS has been a problem. The new MIS will have increased capability which will allow all planners to track or locate a job anywhere in P&PD. An additional capability will allow major customers to also query the MIS for production tracking information. This enhancement should alleviate the complaints re duedate changes and delays, provide both P&PD and major customers with improved status information, and reduce or eliminate the problems re returned phone calls. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question '9: Are your jobs disseminated cer ir.s`ructions? Response: Never 1 (0.6$) Seldom 0 Sometimes 3 (1.9$) Frequently 57 (35.8$) Always 98 (61.6$) Total Replies 159 Missing Replies 33 Comment: Basically, P&PD received good marks on this question. Only 2.5$ responded negatively (NEVER or SOMETIMES). Since this is well within the 10$ acceptability margin, no further action is required. Question 20: Which is more important to you, Timeliness or Quality? Response: Timeliness 47 (31.1$) Quality 104 (68.9$) Total Replies 151 Missing Replies 4I Comment: This was an interesting question, with an even more interesting response. In fact, the response favoring QUALITY by more than a 2:1 ratio was most surprising, particularly in view of the seemingly endless customer queries re job status and due dates. However, it does provide an interesting insight to the requirements levied upon the Division, and reinf orces the need for proper training of personnel, employee responsibilities for quality products, and adequate equipment to respond accordingly. Recommendation: See next question Question 21: Recognizing that short deadlines may inhibit top quality, indicate your willingness to accept this tradeoff. (Circle one) Response: Willing 45 (24.9$) May Be Willing 101 (55.8$) Not Willing 35 (19.3$) Total Replies 181 Missing Replies 11 Comment: While approximately 70$ of the respondents to Question 20 stated that QUALITY was their primary concern, here we find that 146, or 80.7$, indicate a willingness to possibly compromise. The thought occurs that through tactful discretion the Planners might help solve some of the problems concerning missed duedates. For example, customers may not realize that there may be alternatives to their concerns for Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 realize that there may be alternatives to t?leir concerns for done," or, "I didn't know it could be done dir~er~~r.t1i." The response to ;uestions 20 and 21 ;nay also ue interpreted as being somewhat contradictory in that QUALITY was such an overriding issue that inflexibility is implied; yet, an even greater number of respondents indicated a willingness to "negotiate" quality for meeting short deadlines. It is therefore difficult to reach a conclusive judgement. Recommendation: This recommendation is intended for both questions, and simply says that P&PD management and supervision continue to stress the need for quality, as well as timeliness. Question 22: What are your long range plans/requirements for printing and photography support? (a) Increase... (Specify percent of increase if possible) _$ (b) __ Decrease... (Specify percent of decrease if posible) $ (c) Same as FY-82/83 (d) New Requirements...(Specify) (e) Unknown Response: (a) Increase - 55* (137 no response) 0-25$ of increase - 36 (80.1$) 26-50$ of increase - 7 (15.5$) 51-75$ of increase - 0 76-100$ of increase - 2 (4.4$) (b) Decrease - 2* (192 no response) 0-25$ of decrease - 0 26-50$ of decrease - 1 (100$) 51-75~ of decrease - 0 76 - 100$ of decrease - 0 * Some respondents did not indicate percent of increase/decrease. (c) Same As FY-82/83 - 94 (98 no response) (d) New Requirements - 17 (185 no response) (e) Unknown - 31 Comment: There is not much to be discussed about these results, as a more definite breakdown of the overall response to Question 22 is contained in Question 23. Recommendation: See Question 23 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Question 23: If (a) (`') er (c) was checked above, please check the categoy of work and circle the appropriate response. Response: Composition/typesetting Printing Bindery Services Copying (GJ-56) Color Processing Black ~ White Processing Dtotion Picture Teleproduction (Videotaping) Video Replication Ptulti-Media Production microfilming COM Graphics F, Design Services Other Same as Missing Increase Decrease 8Z-R3 Re lies Re lies is ~-~-~~9 40 2 50 92 100 22 2 29 53 139 16 3 40 59 133 19 2 36 57 135 17 2 29 48 144 Z 1 6 9 183 4 0 7 11 181 10 0 8 18 174 2 0 3 5 187 6 0 9 15 177 3 0 8 11 181 23 0 24 47 145 4 0 4 8 184 Responses to (d) (New Requirements) are specified verbatim on pages 26-28 in Attachment A. Responses range from simple requirements such as printing names on QSI certificates (OP/Info Div) and additional "PR" such as posters, bulletins, slides for briefings (DDA/OP/BSD) to more demanding requirements such as overnight bio's (OCR/ISG) and up to 800,000 additional photo prints, 1 each from existing neg (NPIC/RSD). There were 31 responses to the final choice (e) UNKNOWN . Comment: The data above is pretty much self-explanatory. At this point, further commentary would require additional information from customers as to specific plans and/or projections. Recommendation: Significant customer projections/requirements will be investigated by P&PD to ascertain their relevancy to management and production plans. Question 24: What type, if any, of computer graphics output support do you require? 35mm slides 33 replies 159 no replies Vugraphs 54 replies 138 no replies 16mm Movies 6 replies 186 no replies Color Prints 26 replies 166 no replies B&W Prints 17 replies 175 no replies Videotape 11 replies 181 no replies Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Comment: In all of the above categories, the DDA responses totaled the highest number and percent of individual responses than any of the other Directorates. This could indicate that DDA is more aware of the P&PD resources available, or it could indicate that throughout the DDA there are more valid requirements and projects. Obviously, the reader may see other indications from this data. Recommendation: The responses certainly indicate an increased awareness of the capabilities of computer graphics and the intention of using this resource. All of which points to a need for P&PD~to properly respond to indicated customer projections. Question 25: Would a handbook of basic products, sizes, and costs be helpful in determining requests? Response: Yes - 129 No - 27 Don't Rnow - 23 Total Replies - 179 Missing Replies - 13 Comment: The figures speak for themselves. Recommendation: That P&PD undertake this job. Obviously, since the Division hasn't done anything like this before, it should be well planned as to content, size, format, technical level, ability to update easily, etc. 5. Summary Recommendations 1. To ensure that customers receive a copy of requisition with promised duedate, and if a change occurs, that customer receives an update. 2. All responses indicating poor quality products and support will be thoroughly investigated (Q. 8 and 10). 3. To provide electronic access to the P&PD MIS for major customers for job status checking (Q. 18). 4. P&PD will explore projected new requirements of customers to ensure our capability to respond satisfactorily (Q. 23). 24) . 5. P&PD will create a Handbook of Products and Services (Q. 6. P&PD will periodically insert customer surveys into selected publications. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 P&PD Customer Survey Questionnaire Results (192 Questionnaires Submitted) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 If (a)lb) or (c, ~ ., ,. 23 -... ~ .,.~ .':n~ ., c. .. , fir. _ u,~ ... .:;s?:. . (a- ^ Composition/t~~pesetting lncrease Dec: ease Same as ~~-~3 (b) ^ Printing lncrease De:rc.~se Same as 3~-53 (c~ ^ Binder~~ services Increase Decrease S~, me pis R?-~; (d) ^ Copying (GJ-56) Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (e) ^ Color Processing Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (f) ^ Black & White Processing Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (g) ^ Motion Picture Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (h) ^ Teleproduction (Videotaping Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (i) ^ Video Replication Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (j) ^ Multi-Media Production Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (k) ^ Microfilming Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (1) ^ COM Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (m) ^ Graphics and Design Services Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 (n) ^ Other Increase Decrease Same as 82-83 24. What type, if any, of computer graphics output support do you require? (Estimated Projected Annual Volume) ^ 35mm slides ^ Vugraphs ^ 16mm Movies ^ Color Prints . ^ Black & White Prints ^ Videotape 25. Would a handbook of basic products, sizes and costs be helpful in determining requests? ^ Yes ^ Don't Know Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 ~1.! ~~;n?~r ;t ~n~~I:~n~i a)!~ ~ 1!1 '_1!]i~C!'.;ia: _t:;1:I':'~!~..i1i 1t'~C~LC"`;i~':;,ll:tii .~.. Fur::: R:;.:.:r'.:~ G.:i::i T......;: .... Form Remarks l2. What do you think can be done to enhance throughput time'' 13. Are your jobs packaged and received in good condition'? (Circle One) Never Seldom Sometimes Freouently Always 14. If you are a customer who uses mailing lists, are they kept current by P&PD? (Circle One) Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always 15. Are you aware of the four-times-a-day "Gray Box" service between the Main Printing Plant and the Bindery and Reprographics Center (GJ-56 Hqs.)? ^ Yes ^ ?No 16. If you answered "Yes" above, how often do you use this service? (Circle One) Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always, 17. Is your contact with P&PD usuall in person,.via phone, or via mail? (Circle one) 18. Do you have any problems in checking the status of your jobs in P&PD?. ^ No ^ Yes (Please Specify) 19. Are your jobs disseminated per instructions? (Circle One) Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always 20. Which is more important to you, Timeliness or Quality? (Circle One) 21. Recognizing that short deadlines may inhibit top quality, indicate your willingness to accept this tradeoff. (Circle One) Willing May Be Willing Not Willing 22. What are your long range plans/requirements for printing and photography support? (a) ^ Increase .... (Specify percent of increase if possible) (b) ^ Decrease .... (Specify percent of decrease if possible) (c) ^ Same as FY-82/83 (d) ^ New Requirements .... (Specify) (e) ^ Unknown Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 .~ die ~ilC ~i r.. .~UI.~J: L:. _ 1~Vv u~.CV J` i`_~. _~ ,. .._ _.+ ~~,;;~ : , ~ ._"_,_ ._,;, .,; :our choice next to each product .a uppiica~ie.i vot Applicaable ' Poor Fair Good Excellent Composition typesetting . Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Printing Bindery (Enu prcduct finishing operatiansj Not ,~pplicahle Peor Fair Good Excellent Copying and Binding (GJ-56 Hqs.) Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent PHOTOGRAPHY l Not Applicable Poor Fair Good ent Excel Color Processing Black & White Processing Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Motion Pictures Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Teleproduction (Videotaping) Video Replication Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Multi-media Shows Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Microfilming COM (Computer Output Microfilm) Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent Graphics and Design, including Computer Graphics Not Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent 9. How often do you use P&PD services? (Check one) Daily Semi-annually Weekly Annually Other (Please Explain) hl y Mont Quarterly 10. Overall, what is your impression of P&PD support in terms of: (Please indicate your choice next to each category.) Responsiveness (timelines) Not Applicable Poor Fair Good d Excellent t ll E Quality of Product Not Applicable Poor Fair Goo d en xce t ll E Professional Assistance Not Applicable Poor Fair Goo d G en xce llent E Initiative/Voluntary helpfulness Not Applicable Poor Fair oo xce t ll E Courtesy Not Applicable Poor Fair Good en xce ll Concern for customer's needs Not Applicable Poor Fair Good ent Exce 11. Form 70 is the basic requisition used to obtain P&PD services. There are four versions of this form, plus Form 3487 for COM (Computer Output Microfilm) services. Form 70 P&PD Printing Requisition Form 70B P&PD Cartography Requisition Form.70C P&PD Photographic Requisition Form 70D Bindery and Reprographics Center (GJ-56 Hqs.) Form 3487 COM Requisition (a) Which form(s) do you use? (Circle) 70 70B 70C 70D 3487 (b) Is it easy to fill out'' Yes No Form 70 Form 70B Form 70C Form 70D Form 3487 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 OFFICE DIViSIOv Please explain your job relationship to P&r"G (i.e., Publications Coordinator, Designer, TV' Production, Etc.1 I. Do you utilize P&PD's Planning and Scheduling units (Printing, Rm. 153 .... Photography, Rrn. G-6~1 for submitting a job for production? Yes 2. If you answered "Yes" above, does P&PD's Planning and Scheduling functions provide advice and guidance? (Circle one) Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always 3. Are P&PD personnel courteous and helpful? (Circle one) Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always 4. Is there any type of printing, photographic, copying, or graphics support that P&PD does not currently provide that you or your component would like to have provided? Yes (Specify) ^ No 5. If you answered "Yes" above, what are your projected annual requirements for the support specified above? 6. Are the services that are offered by P&PD completed in a timely manner so that you can meet your requirements? (Circle one) Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always 7. P&PD uses the following three definitions in handling customer requirements: DEADLINE: Top Priority. Absolutely must be completed by the time and date requested. Usually an overnight or next day priority. SPECIFIED DATE: Must be completed by the date requested. ROUTINE: Will try to meet the requested date if possible. Job will be worked on a "time available" basis. (a) Given these definitions, what percent of your work falls into these categories? Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 question Page 1. Do you utilize P~,PD's Planning and Scheduling units?....1 2. Does P~PD's P~,S functions provide advice and guidance?..1 3. Are PFPD personnel courteous and helpful? ...............1 -t. Is there any type of printing, photographic, copying, or graphics support that Pc,PD does not currently provide that you or your component would like to have provided? ...............................................2 6. Are the services that are offered by Pi;~PD completed in a timely manner so that you can meet your requirements?.2 7. What percent of work falls into the specified categories? .............................................2 5. Requirements not currently being support by P~PD........3-5 8: Are the products being produced by P~PD of acceptable .quality?.. ... .......................................6 A. Printing (l) Composition/Typesetting...:.... ...............6 (2) Printing ........................................6 (3) Bindery .........................................6 (~) Copying and Binding .............................7 B.' Photography (1) Color Processing ................................8 (2) Black ~, White Processing ........................8 (3) }Motion Pictures.. .... ....................8 (4) Teleprvduction (Videotaping) ....................9 (5) Video Replication ...............................9 (6) tiiulti-media Shows ...............................9 (7) :~icrofilming ...................................10 (8) COi~1 .............................................10 (9) Graphics and Design, including Computer Graphics ........................................10 9. How often do you use P~,PD services? .....................11. 10. Overall, what is your impression of P~PD support in terms of: A. Responsiveness ......................................11 B. Quality of Product ..................................11 C. Professional Assistance.. .........................12 D. Initiative/Voluntary helpfulness ....................12 E. Courtesy ............................................12 F. Concern for customer's needs ........................12 11. Is the form easy to fill out?....... ..................13 (c) What, if anything, don't you understand on the forms? ........................... .............13-14 12. What do you think can be .done to enhance throughput time? ...................................................15-19 1~. are your jobs packaged and received in good condition?..20 1-t. I~ you are a customer w,lo uses mailing lists, are they kept current by P~,PD? ...................................20 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 question ~ Page 15. Are you aware of the four-times-a-day "Gray Box" service between the :lain Printing Plant and the Bindery and Reprographic Center (GJ-56 Hgs.)...........20 16. If you answered "Yes" above, how often do you use this service? ..........................................21 1'. Is your contact with P~PD usually in person, via phone, or via mail? .....................:..............21 18. Do you have any problems in checking the status of your jobs in PF,PD? ................. ................21 If?yes please specify.... ............ ...............21-24 19. Are your jobs disseminated per instructions?...........25 20. Which is more important to you, timeliness or quality?.25 21. Recognizing that short deadlines may inhibit top quality, indicate your willingness to accept this tradeoff ...................... ............ ..........25 22. What are you long range plans/requirements for printing and photography support? ............:.........26 D. Vew requirements (specify)......... ..............26-28 23. If increase, decrease,~or same as FY-82/83, please indicate under category of work appropriate response...29 A. Composition/typesetting ............................ 29 B. Printing ........................................... 29 C. Bindery services ................................... 29 D. Copying. (GJ-56) .................................... 29 E. Color Processing ..... ............................. 29 F. Black ~ White Processing ........................... 30 G. :Motion Picture. ...... .......................30 H. Teleproduction (Videotaping) ....................... 30 I. Video Replication .................................. 30 J. ~~Sulti-`iedia Production ............................. 30 K. L. ~..Iicrofilming .......................................31 CO;A ................................................31 .~1. Graphics and Design Services .......................31 N. Other... ...... ............. ...................31 24. 6Vhat type, if any, of computer graphics output support do you require? ...................... .........32 25. Would a handbook of basic products, sizes, and costs be helpful in determining requests? ....................32 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 P&PD Customer Sur~~ey Questionnaire Results (192 Questionnaires Submitted) 1. Do you utilize P&PD's Planning and Scheduling Units? YES No Pct. NO No Pct. DDA DDI 30 41 163.8 ! 56.2 ~ 17 ~ 32 36.E 43.8 2. Does P&PD's P&S functions provide advice and guidance? No Never Pct. No Seldom Pct. No Sometimes Pct. No Frequently Pct. No Always Pct. DDO 11 52.4 10 47.6 DDS&T 16 57.1 12 42.9 DCI TOTAL 14 111.2 77.8 59.9 4 75 22.2 i 40.1 1 1 7.1 0.9 2 3 1 1 7 7 7 2 6 5 ~ 8 8 p 3 2 .7 2 0 .2 1 .9 3 214 , 26 5 11 19 2 ~ 7 2 ~ 41 . ~ r ~ 38.9 i 14.3 X36.3 9 8 7 3 7 34 30.0 120.0 63.6 16.7 ! 50.0 X30.1 3. Are P&PD Personnel courteous and helpful? DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Never No Pct. i Seldom No PCt. Sometimes No i 4 i t 2 ~ 7 Pct. ~ 6.9 I 5.0 ~ 11.1 4.2 Frequently No 16 31 ~ 11 6 6i Pct . 36 . -l 53.4 15.0 40.7 33.3 40.0 Always No 28 23 ~ 16 16 10 _ 93 Pct. 63.6 39. ;' 80.0 59.3 55.6 55.7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 4. Is there any type of printing, photographic, copying, or graphics support that P&PD does not currently provide that you or your component would like to have provided? DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL YES No 4 ~ 8 I 2 I 5 ~ ~ 19 Pct. 9.1 ~ 11.4 10.0 20.0 10.7 NO No 40 I 62 I 18 20 , ~ 8-~ Pct. 90.9 ~ 88.6 ! 90.0____1___ 80._0 100.0 89.3 6. Are the services that are offered by P&PD completed in a timely manner so that you can meet your requirements? Never No PCt. Seldom Pct. Sometimes No Pct. Frequently No Always No i . ~ _ 4 ~ 8.9 18.6 4.8 17.9 14.8 ~ 21 38 6 14 4 . 46.7 54.3 28.6 50.0 22.2 45.6 20 19 14 9 44.4 27.1 66.7 32.1 55.6 39.6 7. What percent of work falls into the specified categories? Deadline No ~ Pct. Specif ied No Date Pct. Routine No ~ Pct. ~ 52 10 17 I 11 I 112 46.4 8.9 9.8 99.9 ~ 6Z 16 25 ~ 14 156 39.7 10.3 ~ 51 11 ~ 20 I 13 130 2 8. 10.0 ~ 100.0, DCI TOTAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 5. Requirements not currently being supported by P&PD. DIR/COMP Comments DDST/OSO/PSD Capability to develop 16mm movie film created on the Dicomed. Currently in the testing phase DIR COMP Comments n.S(l~apn ('nnv videotapes change videotapes to di~farant format. 4 t0 6 a year. DIR/COMP Comments FBIS/EI.~'~AD Stron?er graphics design unit that can provide quicker, more in-depth attention to individual design requests, and with imagination. 1 to Z publication covers nr formats per year. DIR COMP Comments Q;~FF./~hics 74 ho ~r color !~erox_ Sergice by mail_ DIR COMP Comments FBIS L ~Ve would appreciate some sort of briefing on whar overall service/support PiiPD can provide. (hir understanding is limited. DIR COMP Comments OS~/AOD ('olnr XPrnx.- Pre classified bond paper. Cnl~r XArf1X S00 copies per year. _ Pre-classified bond paver 20 ap cks per Year. DIR/COMP Comments OGI SRD Enlarge graphics on ~1Ylar-type (transparent) material. Computerise the existing large format `Cerox. ~0 to 100 maps, charts, diagrams - 2 to 3 copies each, on an enlarging reproduction device. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 5. Requirements not currently being supported by P&PD. DIR/COMP Comments Dp,ST,~C_RiLSD Reol~cat~on of foreign standard videotaoe1 -[0~ ~i ~1" videotaoes - DIR COMP Comments DDI/OCP=1S/CDG Remotely sensed ima?e color rectificatio 1 and mosaic producing ability. DZR COMP Comments OGI/SRD Automated ~aQe make-u~, AboLt 3+ ~a~ers ner month_ DIR/COMP Comments CPAS CDG DIR COMP QCR/[1SSR/SCI Wire binding for map books. Comments Inr-raaca~ customer support for ETECS formatting DIR/COMP Comments OSWR/~VSSIC Gra hit s ort. 25-SO gra hits prepared or printing in reports. DIR/COMP Comments cx'I3/`~a,~,~ervices Biweekly cooving collating ~ sorting of 25 conies of 20-30 letters averaging 3 pages ner letter. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 5. Requirements not currently being supported by P&PD. DIR/COMP Comments DDA OD /~.aD A ~ranhic artist at PUPD to provide artistic service? i e Hake final products from rough ~-- 5 to 10 times a year. _ 1 r 1 l-?`1CJ DIR COMP Comments A OIS Sp i i Y forms t~~o~k (alrhrniah hi_?hly tin_ l i l.Pl y beCa~~~P riPmancl i S not gyaar enoueh~ =s previo years - DIR COMP Comments DDA/OD1S Conversion of European video system to American NTSC format At least 6-10 videotapes annually to support counterterrorist training ro ram. DIR COMP Comments DDA/OD_P_/ED$P ?-~''"e? comvarable to those provided to the ~,.r ,~____ _, new;..,, Rr~n~j/Graphics Desif2n Center; ?rn~-, ~1Pl~ ~ the ETECS area to include ~w Rn~ Lei v iic?.`z- ~ --' who would assist in planning ~ formatting al 6 to 8 a year. e DIR COMP text.for increasing readability and eye app Comments S ecial certificates, etc. __1 prove es 3-4 items per year DIR COMP Comments Improved video presentation materials. ^,Fficult to estimate. DIR/COMP Comments STAT STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 8. Are the products being produced quality? A. Printing (1) Composition/Typesetting Not No Applicable Pct. Poor No Pct. Fair No Pct. Good No Pct. Excellent No Pct. (2) Printing No t No. Applicable Pct. Poor No Pct. Fair No Pct. Good No Pct. Excellent No Pct. 21 27 ~ 8 ! 11 42.9 i 44.4 57.9 (3) Bindery (End product finishing operations) Not No Applicable Pct. Poor No Pct. Fair No Pct. Good No Pct. Excellent No P ct. 7 10 8 6 5 36 i 17.9 16.7 47.1 35.3 3I.3 24.2 1 ~ 2.6 1 i Z.6 i I I ! 25.6 35.0 1 17.6 ~ 17.6 I 25.0 ~ 27.5 ~ :. ~ ~ , 51.31 48.3 35.3 47.1 ! 43.8 47_~ 10 ''I 12 8 ~ i 7 4 ' 41 '~.0 1 19 53.3 41.' 23.5 ~~.9 ~ I _ I I , 3 8.1 3.3 ~ 3.4 . 12 I 19 ! 1 3 j 3 38 32.4 31.1 ~ 6.7 I 17.6 ~ 17.6 25.9 12 i 8 6 7 i 10 s 32.4 ! 45.9 1 40.0 41.2 58.8 42.9 DDA DDI by P&PL of acceptable DDO DDS&T DCI 6 6 7 4 2 25 14.0 9.5 38.9 21.1 11.8 15.6 4 6.3 2.5 j 16 26 ~ 3 I 4 3 i 52 ! 37.2 41.3 ~ 16.7 ; 21.1 17.6 32.5 TOTAL i9 - i 49.4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 (4) Copving and Binding (GJ-56 Has.) DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Not No i 7 I 11 i ~ ! 8 I 6 ~ 36 Applicable Pct. ~ 18 ~ 18.3 22.2_ ~ 44.4 33.3 '?3__ Poor No ~ ' 1 ! ~ ~ 1 Pct. ~ 1 ~ ~ 0. Fair No j ~ 5 1 8 Pct. S 3 ~ g ~ 5.6 5.3 _ Good No lg 22 6 3 6 5~ Pct ~ a; 4 ~ 56 ~ '~~ '~ 16.7 33.s 36.' r Excellent No ~ 11 ~ 21 8 ~ 7 5 j 52 Pct. I ~R_4 _~s_n a4.4 ~R.9 27.8 ! 34.2 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 B. Photography (1) Color Processing DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Not No 19 10 ! 3 ~ 3 i 8 i 33 Applicable Pct. X5.0 17.9 23.1 13.6 I 53.3 23.2 Poor No 1 ~ 1 ~ Pct. ~.7 4.5 ' 1.4 Fair No 2 5 3 10 Pct. Q 13.6 ~ 7.0 Good No 9 22 ~ 3 9 ~ 2 45 Pct. I 25.0 9. 23.1 40.9 ~ 13.3 ~ 31.7 No ~ 16 19 ~ 6 ~ 6 ~ 5 52 -r- Excellent I i Pct. __ 44.4 ~ 46.2__ 27_x__.____33.3 36.6 (2) Black & White Processing Not No Pct. Applicable Poor No Pct. No Fair Pct. Good No Pct. No Excellent Pct. (3) Motion Pictures Not N o Applicable PCt. Poor No Pct. No Fair Pct. No Good Pct. No Excellent Pct. 13 8 3 4 ~ 1 1 2 , ~ 1 5 i 3 i 9 21 3 6 27.3 20 36 ~ 7 11 11 ~ 85 80.0 90.0 70.0 ! 84.6 ~ 84.6 ~ 84.2 ~ ~ 1 I I ~ ! 1 ~ 2.5 ! 1.0 3 ! 1 ~ 1 1 6 12.0 ~ 2.5 ~ 10.0 7.7 ~ 5.9 2 i 2 2 ~ 1 2 9 7 7 15.4 8.9 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 (4) Teleproductio:.i (Videotaping) DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Not No ! ZI ~ 36 I 7 i 11 9 84 Applicable Pct. ; 5.0 90.0 77.8 ~ 78.6 69.2 80.8 Poor No ! , Pct. ~ Fair No 1 1 Pct. ?.S ~ 1.0 Good No 4 2 1 l 8 Pct. i I4.3 5.0 11.1: 7.1 7.7 Excellent No 3 i t i t 2 4 ~ 11 Pct. 10.7 Z.S 11.1 14.3 30.8 10.6 (5) Video Replication DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Not No 18 I 36 7 10 ~ 9 ~ 80 Applicable Pct. 77.8 83.3 ~ 69.2 ~ 76.9 Poor No PCt. ~ i Fair No 1 1 ~ 1 , Pct. ~ 3.7 I 2.3 11.1 ~ 2.9 Good No ; 3 ; 4 1 Pct. I 11.1 9.3 I ~ 8.3 ~ 7.7 ! Excellent No II S I 2 ( 1 Ec t. I 18.5 4.7 I 8.3 30.8 12.5 (6) Multi-media Shows DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Not No I 19 ~ 36 ( 9 11 ; I Applicable Pct. 76.0 ! 92.3 100.0 78.6 ~ 84.6 ~ 86.0 Poor No Pct. , Fair No ~ 1 I Pct. I 2.6 I ! 1.0 Good No ~ 3 2 I 1 2 T- Pct. 12.0 ! 5.1 ~ 14.3 7.0 Excellent No 3 i 1 2 ~ Pct. 12.0 ~ I 7.1 ~ 15.4 6.0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 (7) Microfilming DDA DDI DDO Not No 21 ~ 33 7 Applicable Pct. I '2.4 80.5 i0.0 Poor No j Pct. ' Fair No 1 Pct. ~ '_.4 20.0 Good No g :~ 1 Pct. ( 27.6 9.8 10.0 Excellent No I 3 PCt. 7.3 (8) COM (Computer Output Microfilm) Not No Applicable Pct. Poor No Pct. Fair Good Excellent (9) No t Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent No Pct. No Pct. ' No i 2 j 1 ~ Pct. ( 4.0 ~ ~ 7.1 ~ 2.5 No 9 ' 17 2 i 3 1 ; 32 Pct. I 2g,1 ~ 34.0 18.2 ~ 21.4 7.1 26.4 No 9 ~ 12 3 ; 4 ~ 7 35 Pct. 28. 24.0 27.3 28.6 I 50.0 28.9 21 ~ 35 ~ 9 DDS&T DCI TOTAL 10 9 ~ 80 66. 69 '4.1 J ' '.8 5 ~ 2 20 33.3 ~ 15.4 18.5 2 ~ 5 15.4 ~ 4.6 r DDS&T DCI TOTAL 9 I 11 85 I 84.6 69.2 80.2 No i 2 1 3 Pct. ~ 2.8 No 6 X 1 1 1 9 Pct. i 8.5 No 1 3 ': 1 7 8 Pct. .7 23.1 .5 Graphics and Design, including Computer Graphics DDA '14 43.8 DDI DDO DDS&T 19 6 6 38.0 ! 54.5 ~ 42.9 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 9. How cften do you use P&PD services? DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Daily No 3 21 ~ I ( I ~ 28 ~ I I 14 3 15 Pct. i . . weekly No ~ 10 , 73 ~ 7 9 -, 1 16 " g 3 '2 Pct ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3Z.9~ 33.3 3~. . _ ? Monthly No 11 ~ 13 7 ~, 1 3 ' 0 Pct. ~ 23.4 18.6 33.3' 3.6 16.7 . Quarlerly No ~ 10 ! 8 ? 9 , J2 4 Pct i ~ 3i 11 4' 9.5 ! ?2.1 16?x `' Semi- No I i 2 I 6 6 3 3 all A Pct 2 9 10.7 . -~. . y nnu Annually No ' 2 ~ 1 2 ; ~ ~ Pct ~ 2 9 ~ 3.6 11.1; 2.7 Other . No ~ 13 I 1 5 1 6 ~ ~ 26 14 1 Pct . ~ 27.7 ~ 1,_4 ' 23.8 ~ 3.6 33.3 . 10. Overall, what is your impression of P&PD support in terms of: A. Responsiveness (timeliness). D DA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI DOTAL Not No ; 2 I ~ I 1 1 licable A Pct. 2'g . pp Poor No ~ 2 ~ i 2 Pct. 7.1 1.1 2 2 18 Fair No ! 3 i 10 ~ 1 I 0 10 Pct. 6 5 14.5 5.0 7.1 11.8 . Good No 26 39 ' 9 ~ 15 4 93 7' Pct. I 56.5 56.5 ~ 45.0 ~ 53.6 I 23.5 i 51. Excellent No I 17 18 10 i 9 i 11 i 65 1' 36 Pct. i 37.0 26 1 '~ 50.0 32.1 64.7 . B. Quality of Product DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI iOTAL I Not No 1 6 0 licable A Pct. .5 ~ ~ pp Poor No ! 2 1 2 5 Pct ~ 30 ~ 50 74 2.8 F ir No 1 3 3 ~ 2 2 10 a Pct. ~ 5 6 ~ 4.5 7,4 11.8 5.6 Good No . Z 5 37 7 12 6 87 Pct ~ 54 3 55 ' 35 0 44.4 35.3 49.2 Excellent No I 18 24 12 ~ 11 9 ' 4 Pct. ~Q 1 35 8 60 0 ' 40 7 52.9 41.8 11 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 No t Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent ct D. Initiative/Voluntary helpfulness No t Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent No 3 ~ ? I g ~ Pct. 4. ', 7 ~_ No I { 1 " Pct. ' -, 8 ~ i No ~ 2 5 1 ; 3 2 ~ 13 Pct. 4.3 .8 5.0 ! 11.5 11.8 '.5 No 27 ~ 34 ~ 9 ~ 6 83 Pct. 58.7 53.1 45. ~ No 14 ~ 22 ~ 10 I 13 ~ 9 ~ 68 i P 30.4: 34.4 ~ 50.0 ~ 50.0 52_q ~ ~~_~ ~ No Pct. No PCt. No 7 14 1 31 PCt. ~ ~ ~ ~ No 19 33 9 78 Pct. 44.8 No 16 ~ 13 9 53 Pct. 34.8 ~ 19.7 47.4 30.5 E. Courtesy Not N Applicable Poor Fair Good Excellent o i 1 4 Pct. ( 2.2 5.9 No Pct. No 1 6 2 2 1 12 Pct. ' 2.2 8.8 9.5 7.7 5.9 6.7 No 20 33 6 8 ~ 7 I 74 Pct. ~ 43.5 48.5 28.6 30.8 41.2 ~ 41.6 No Z4 i 25 I 13 16 9 87 Pct. 52.2 ` 36.8 ~ 61.9 61.5 ~ 52.9 48.9 DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTS Not No 1 i 2 3 Applicable Pct. Z.2 2.9 1.7 Poor No j l ~ i t Pct. 1.5 I 0.6 Fair No 1 10 1 S ! 1 18 Pct . ~ ~ 14 . ;' ~ 4.8 19.2 6.3 1~, ; Good No ~ Z5 39 i 9 ! 10 I 7 ~ , 90 Pct. ! 54.3 ~ 57.4 ~ 42_~ ~ '~A_5 ~; s Sn R Excellent No 19 16 11 11 8 ~ 65 Pct. 41 __~ 25.5 52.4 :~ .. ~ 50.0 36.7 DDA 6.5 DDA DDI DDO 4 6 8.7 9.1 TOTAL 11 1 5 2.8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 11. Is the form easy to fill out? DDA Form YES No ~ 36 Pct. i q~ 70 No NO Pct. No Form YE5 Pct. 70B No NO Pct. No Form YES Pct. 70C No NO Pct. No Form YES Pct . 70D NO No Pct. No Form YES Pct. 3487 No NO Pct . 30 I 14 ' 14 I lj i 107 Q 8 ~ 100.0 87.5 100.0 94.7 ~ 1 I 2 6 ~ I ~ 5.~ 5 ?4 ~ I 1 ~ ~0 I ~ .0 90.0 1 - 1 ' 2 6.1 2g 21 13 17 6 85 95.5 1 1 1 1 4 4.5 17 15 10 4 4 SO ~ 0 0.0 89.3 3 2 5 33.3 8?~ 6 2 1 1 2 12 ~ ~ 4 100.0 50.0 66.7 66.7 1 ~ 3 - 1 5 14 3 ! 60 0 ~ ~ 50.0 I ~ 27.8 (c) What, if anything, don't you understand on the form? DIR/COMP Comments n~nTS/ur10 [n nd ?OC both require technical printing ;nfnrmation that in most cases can only be campl~Le.~hX- P ,PD . DIR COMP Comments ODP AD TS 70 - We don't lrnow the appropriate terminology or iargon in requesting specific services. DIR COMP Comments ODP/QAII 70 - The bottom portion of the form is comple:c and not easy for the average individual to decipher. I generall turn to e protesslona s in 154 or completion of tTiat part o t e Corm. DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIRjCOMP Comments DDa/uDPjEDjP ~u u -uD Previous versions oz these forms G CB/P ,;ere :Wore inclusive t an Curren revisea versions. DIR COMP Comments OTE/:~D/~IPB/BAS 0 -Sections "Composition", "~iap", "Press", an Bin erv DIR COMP Comments DDS~T/'~fPIC/RSD 70 - Too many extraneous questions. DIR/COMP Comments OSO AOD 70C - Difficult to state form of original to orm of copy. DIR COMP Comments 70C - I understand it but it seems to busy. DIR/COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 12. What do you think can be done to enhance throughput time? DIR/COMP Comments DDa/OP/Recruit- Tn ;nme instanc~eS I have negatives of t.~ie fflyers ment T ttianT =r;ntP~- T have found in cases that the ~~VPrS IvPT'P rPr~ ea (rsometimes with errorsl and T have to wait longer for the finished product. DIR COMP Comments DDA/OC/DND .ter glanning by the reguestor? DIR COMP Comments OL P Provide one customer interface for iob submittals. Don't run customers to several organizations to complete one iob. DIR/COMP Comments OIS/Rb~ID Be*_ter oreDaration of material by the customer j?efnrP it is sent to PPD. Time is lost truing t~ ;nter~,ret_ what the customer wants. An A?ency Forms SACt;nn could p~eoare camera ready copy negating the need for this to be done at P$PD. DIR/COMP Comments l Qi.~PFzPS ASC ,r hat everyone working on a iob fully ~,nr~PrctancTS what i s needed in an end vroduct. DIR/COMP Comments OPjPFjpi/PA$E Better estimates on lead time required and more realistic target tes or comp etion of the iob . Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments OP/ID/IGAB ~'ew autofiche procedure should help but we've had trouble with image clarity ~ahere num ers ~ letters run together. blur, etc. Photography is aware aid workine (?1 on problem. DIR/COMP Comments OC/CSD/PDB P~PD must question all forms; and by doing so will lessen any confusion on the part o t e customer or P~PD staffers. DIR COMP CommenCs Ob1 D Immediate feedback upon receipt of a project by PPD. On several occasions we weren t notified of a roblem until after t e ea hne~te, and consequently the iob wasn't finis a in time. DIR/COMP Comments ODP/ED/P F, CB/P More trained P~,PD personnel. DIR COMP Comments DDA/OTE/-4D/niPB/ Handlin re uirement block s ace added to VAS requisition ~, e.~cplanation of terms iste . DIR/CAMP Comments nn~FT~cc-oB/oS0 The throughrn~r r---~'"'--==aY be more of a problem cause than a solution. Our photographs are taken under somewhat adverse conditions, with little time or best conditions, so the quality of processing is uppermost. DIR COMP Comments FBIS/ELAAD More employees? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR;COM? Comments DDSuT,'G;~ci Graphics :More couriar nL-~s -for faster mail processing for outlying ui ings. DIR/COMP Comments EPIC/FtSD `lore personnel with higher morale and to complete t e renovations feria a goin~_on orever. DIR COMP Comment`s DDI/CPAs/PUBCTR 4-color press, and more compositors DIR/COMP Comments CPAs P Fewer etecs correction cycles DIR COMP Comments OCR LSD AB It would be helpful if the date that the work is e. ected to be co lete was more accurate. I mind less that a lob toot ~ wee tan t at was told it would take one. DIR/COMP Comments OSWR WSSIC Put a lot of improvement into quality control of covers. DIR COMP Comments CP_ J4ore people Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR~'COMP Comments DDt/OC?_~/CDG I do not understand why printed copies of maps/ g~phics often come back to us separately from the or~gg or negs. It would seem that it all materials r-ter a ~qb tracked toeether, there would be much less confusion, lost items, and wrapping $ mailing time. DIR/COMP Comments ncR~SS~ ~/~.SD/LY More eople in the binding shop. If you provide the service ou shoul have a st to meet the workloa -may a part-time or summer. DIR COMP CommenCs P.4S SG Get the laser late maker linked to Etecs. Try an I&~i 6670 1 e to tecs or sma iobs. DIR/COMP Comments 1 0 0 Advance warning that deadline date will not be met. DIR COMP Comments DCI/OEEO Given an idea of the unusually busy times so that we can p an our nee aroun ime. Be noti fie wen wor wont e finis e on time. DIR/COMP Comments DCI PAO Dvlux reviewed more carefully - typographical mist es DIR COMP Comments Improved video editing equipment. In-house rape co or p STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 13. Are your jobs packaged and received in good condition? DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Never No Pct. ~ ~ II Seldom No I Pct ~ ~ ' ! I ~ ' ~ Sometimes No I j ' ~ 1 1 ~ ~~ ~ Pct. ~ -~.3 3.6 4.S 2 8 , Frequently No 10 22 ~ 5 8 22 ! 60 Pct. ~ 8i 28.6 I 32.81 27.8 Always No 36 j 42 16 ~ 19 ! 42 i ' 125 ' ' Pct. 78.3 62.7' 76.2' 67.9 62.7 . 69.4 14. If you are a customer who uses mailing lists, are they kept current by P&PD? Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always No Pct. 6 75.0 8, 61.5 2 33.3 No Pct. 20.0 2.9 No 1 1 Pct. 7 7 2.9 No 1 1 2 ~ 4 Pct. 12.5 7.7 33.3 ~ 11.8, No 1 3 2 ~ 1 ~ 7 '~~ Pct. ~ 12 S ~ 23 1 ~ 33.3 20.0 ~ 20.61 15. Are you aware of the four-times-a-day "Gray Box " service between the Main Printing Plant and the Bindery and Reprographic Center (GJ-S6 Hqs.)?' DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL YES No 13 ~ 35 3 ~~ I ~ Pct. 32.5 50.0 15.0 ~ 14.8 ! 11.81 32.8 NO No 27 35 ~ 17 ~ 23 15 1 Pct. { 67.5 50.0 !~ 85.0 85.2 ~ 88.2 67.2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 16. If you answered "Yes " above, how often do you~use this service? Never Seldom Sometimes Frequently Always No ! ~ ' Pct. ~ I No 7 5 1 j 1 ! I 14 Pct. 53.8 14.3 33.3 ~ 50.0 25.9 No 3 7 1 1 ~ 12 Pct. 23.1 20.0 33.3 I 100.0 22.2 No 3 14 1 18 I Pct. 23.1 40.0 33.3 33.3 No ~ 9 ~ 1 ! 10 Pct. I 25.7 50.0. ~ ~ 18.5 17. Is your contact with P&PD ususally in person, via phone, or via mail? Person Via phone Via mail No Pct. 14 23.3 7 38.9 9 34.6. 1 - I 46 6.7 ~ 28.6 18. Do you have any problems in checking the status of your jobs in P&PD? YES NO TOTAL No 14 23 9 6 10 62 Pct. 3 8.3 50.0 23.1 66.7 38.5 No 13 23 2 11 4 53 Pct. 8.3 11.1 42.3 26.7 32.9 DDA DDI No 3 5 11 I 4 3 16 Pct. 6 4 I 7.5 ~ 4.8 ~ 14.3 16.7 1 8.8 No 44 62 i 20 24 15 165 Pct. 83 3 91.2 If yes please specify: DIR/COMP Comments DDA OILS PSD People don't return phone calls. 20 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments 0~!R4D/ROB/AS When jobs are only half done, we cannot be told status of unfinished Hart (timing, etc) }~v PF,PD . DIR/COMP Comments 0 S PDB apparently, the computor is "down" more-than normal? therefore a P PD staffer must search the rooms for a particular project to ec the status. DIR COMP Comments OTE/AD/biF'B/VAS The 2nd copy with scheduled delivery date is not returne to me. DIR/COMP Comments DDS~T/FBIS/ELAAD Nobody knows when they will be finished. DIR COMP Comments OD~,E Gra hits Need more planners - sometimes take a few telephone calls. DIR/COMP Comments ORD/PATG/IERD Often job cannot be found when I call. The person o ters to ca ac u i usua y t es a very ong itne o ge an answer DIR COMP Comments OSO/TSD Person who answered call didn't give a new (late) to for elivery as ~o s were ace up too far. Eventually got the photos ~ vugraphs in good nrdPr but if I remember about a month late. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments pnr[('P4s~CDG Often takes took long. yIS system results often vary from reality. DIR/COMP Comments CP.4S CDG Periodic long delays in returning calls. DIR COMP CommenCs ~CP.4S,'PDG/NIC Not with ETECS or GJ56, with P~PD 154. We have a contact erson w is es i eas . P?PD but not having t e c ose raison, hing has been lost rom our ranc . DIR/COMP Comments CP /CDG "The commuter is dawn" is a frequently used excuse when trying ~~ a ) . DIR COMP Comments CPAS/CDG Its always in camera. DIR/COMP Comments CPAS/CDG Often do not get a return call when enquiring aoutsa o a)o . DIR COMP ~ Comments OCR/ISG Not a big problem-but when you get an answer that ne ~ terminal, you don't feel like you have the complete picture. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments DCI'OGC Leg. Cannot remember details but P$PD had some trouble locating our iob. This has only_ happened once however, and to my knowledge has at no time happened at Copv Center. DIR/COMP Comments DCI/OEEO Vot being notified when work won't be finished on time. DIR. COMP Comments Problems only arose when there was a shift than e an to wait anti nex y o -speak to person w o i~a~ cal e me. DIR COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments DIR/COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 19. Are your jobs disseminated per instructions? DDA DDI DDO DD S&T DCI TOTAL Never No Pct. 1 ~ 1 '.5 I I 1 0.6 Seldom No Pct ~ i ' ' Sometimes No i 1 Pct. ~ '.5 3.3 1.9 Frequently No 12 24 7 8 6 57 Pct. .0 4 .0 36.8 33.3 ~ 37.5 ~ 35.8 Always No 26 34 12 16 10 98 PC t. 6S 0 S6 7 63 ~ ~ 66 7 62.5 61_.6 20. Which is more important to you, timeliness or quality? DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Timeliness No 13 19. 6 4 5 47 Pct. ~ ~ Quality No PCt. 28 f,R 33 13 84.0 64.3 p 6849 21. Recognizing that short deadlines may inhibit top quality, indicate your willingness to accept this tradeoff. DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI T0~ AL Willing N? Pct. 21.3 27.9 Z0.0 i 28.6 ~ 22.2 ~ 24.9 May be No 29 ' ~ ~ willing Pct. 61.7 57.4 65.0 44.4 ~ 42.9 55.8 Not No 8 10 3 8 6 35 willing Pct. 17.0 14.7 15.0 28.6 33.3 19.3 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 22. 'what are your long range and photography support? plans/requirements for printing DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Increase No I 9 27 ~+ 12 3 55 Pct. ~ 16.4 49.1 .3 '%1.8 5.5 98.1 i Decrease No ~ 1 i t ~~ 2 Pct . ~ 50.0 ~ 50.0 100.0 ' Same as No ~ 30 ~; ! 10 14 13 94 FY-8 2 /8 3 Pct . ~ 31 _ q 28.7 ' 10.6 14.9 13.8 99.9 New No I 6 3 i 1 S 2 ~ 11 ~, Reqmts . ct . 35 ~ 17.6 5.9 29.4 11.8 99.7 Unknown No ~ 7 16 5 1 2 31 Pct. I 22.6 5I.6' 16.1 3.2 6.5 100.0 D. New requirements (specify): DIR/COMP Comments DDA OP BSD Possibl additional P.R. - osters, bulletins, briefings with sli es. DIR COMP Comments OC'/nNn Notices to all components as required, perhaps bi-weekly. DIR COMP Comments OP/Info Div. In the future, OL/P$PD will be printing names on ity step ncrease er i ica es or DIR COMP Comments ODLS POD Microfilming, videoproductions Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments DDS~T CCOB/AOD Re roduction of viewgraphs for central (OSO) recor i ing DIR COMP Comments FBIS ~G Will soon be sending all printing requests on a ang s ette. DIR/COMP Comments ORD ISRD Printing of Symposiwn notebooks (S00 copies) DIR/COMP Comments NPIC RSD If a proposed plan is approved, GPB could be oar Bring up to a3di Iona ri~'f~ e~ existing negs. DIR/COMP Comments OSO OD Pre-frisketted photos DIR/COMP Comments 4Vi11 require new printing requirement in near future. DIR COMP Comments DDI/OCR/USSR/SCI Possible revision of ETECS software programs. STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP9O-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments nnI/OCPAS/CDG Possibly more deadlines. DIR/COMP Comments OCR ISG Briefing book bio requests (our overnights) ave een growing s ea i y or ,e DIR COMP CommenCs SSG LSD/LY Would send more to bindery if turnaround time was better. DIR COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments DIR/COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP9O-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 23. If increase, decrease, or same as FY-82/83, please indicate under catego.y of wor!~ appropriate response. A. Composition/typesetting Increase Decrease Same as FY-82/83 No Pct. 1 1~.3 11 55.o i 3 ~ so.o ~ No '_ 1 Pct. X8.6 5.0 ! No 4 8 5 3 Pct. 57.1 40.0 100.0 50.0 B. Printing Increase Decrease Same as FY-82/83 15 15 44.1 6 85.7 C. Bindery services Increase Decrease Same as FY-82/83 Pct. D. Copying (GJ-56) Increase Decrease Same as FY-82/83 DDA DDI DDO 7 19 1 ( 9 4 40 ~ ~ 4.3 64.3 30.8 43.5 2 5 35.7 9 69.2 2 2.2 50 54_3 No 5 10 1 5 1 22 Pct. 50.0 16.7 62.5 25.0 41.5 No 1 1 2 Pct. ~ 3.8 No 9 9 5 ! 29 ' ~n_n 45.0 83.3 54.7 37.5 _ 75.0 No 3 6 3 4 Pct. 17.6 31.6 ;.33 66.7 No 1 1 1 Pct. 5.9 I 5.3 11.1 j No 13 12 5 2 Pct. 76.5 63.2 55.6 33.3 i P ng rocess E. Color DDA DDI ~DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Increase No 4 i 5 2 7 1 19 Pct. - I ~ ? 33..E Decrease No ~ 1 i 1 ~ 2 Pct. ~ 3.5 Same as No 11 I 10 4 g ! 3 36 FY-8 2 /8 3 Pct . . 3.3 66 ? '' 87. 1 53.3 60.0 63.2 DDA DDI DDO Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 F. BlacK & ~7t:=~? Processing Increase P~ t. No Decrease Pct. No Same as Pc t. FY-82/83 I i~ 1 I 8 16.7 64.5 ~ 1- ~~.4 i ' _ - '~' ~ 11 8 3 5 ?9 a - 4 5 0 .0 60.4 G. Motion Picture DDA DDI DDO DDS&T No Increase Pc t . No Decrease Pct. Same as Pct. FY-82/83 H. Teleproduction (Videotaping) DDA DDI DDO DDS&T Increase Decrease Same as FY-8 2/8 3 1 1 33.3 33.3 - 22..2. 1 1 1 11 50.0 . 1 66.7 66.7 100.0 66.7 No Pct. 33.3 3 100.0 36.4 No Pct. 2 2 7 No Pct. 2 66.7 1 100.0 100..0 100.0 63..6 I. Video Replication DDA DDI DDO DDS&T No Increase Pct. No Decrease Pct . No Same as Pct. FY-82/83 J. Multi-Media Production No Increase Pct. No Decrease Pct. No Same as Pct. FY-82/83 3 4 1 10 60.0 100.0 33.3 55.6 Z 2 2 2 40.0 100.0 66.7 100.0 44.4 Z 2 100.0 40.0 1 ' I '' ~ 100.0 100.0 60.0 DDA DDI DDO DDS&T Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 K. Microfilming Increase No ' Pct. Decrease No Pct. --, DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI TOTAL Z 1 3 I. I 1 I 1 6 Same as No FY-82/83 Pct. ~~ ~n_n L. COM Increase Decrease Same as FY-82/83 2 3 1 i9 t00.n1 75.0 100.0 .60.0 No 2 i 1 3 Pct. No Pct. No 1 1 1 7 0 2 100.0 50 Pct. 00.0 00.0 . . , M. Graphics and Design Services No Increase Pct. No Decrease Pct. No Same as Pct. FY-82/83 41.7 58.8 100.0 50.0 25.0 48.9 I I 7 7 4 ~ 58.3 41.2 ~ 50.0 75.0 51.1 , No Increase PCt. No Decrease Pct. No Same as Pct. FY-82/83 4 3 i 1 4 75.0 ! 50.0 50.0 DDA DDI Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 24. What type, if any, of computer graphics output support do you require? (Number of resconses with requirements) 35mm Slides Vugraphs 16mm Movies Color Prints B&W Prints Videotape 16 - ~ ~ 1 33 P~t. 48.5 ' '-~.' I 9.1 15.' 3.0 100.0 No. 21 ?0 ? ~ g I i 54 Pct. 38.9 i 37.0 ~ 3. ;' ~ 14.8 100.0 ~ No. 3 1 1 1 ~ j6 Pct. 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 1100.0 No. 10 5 3 6 2 X26 1 Pc 8 19 2 11.5 ' 23.1 ~ 7.7 100.0 No. 6 5 2 1 4 ; 17 Pct. 35.3 29.4 ~ 11.8 23.5 o, $ ( 4 ! 1 1 11 Pct. 45.5 ~ ! 36.4 9 25. Would a handbook of basic products, sizes, and costs be helpful in determining requests? Don't Know TOTAL No ~ 35 43 1 14 25 112 129 Pct. 76 1 64 70.0 89.3 ~. 66.7 72.1 No 5 16 1 2 3 27 I Pct. I ' No ! 6 8 ~ 5 1 ~ 3 ! 23 Pct. 1'~ 0 !, 11.9 25.0 ~ ~_6 16.7 12.8 DDA DDI DDO DDS&T DCI DDA Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments DDA FIN Comp. above responses reflect our recurrent business with Pi?PD In addition we have from t;m? to time requested assistance/service in the production of video tape copies, grarthic-s for instr~cti_onal handbooks, a_S wPl1 as printing. This "ad hoc" business has been characterized by good service DIR/COMP Comments and timeliness (within resource constraints imposed on P~,PD). 1Ve anticipate additional "ad hoc" requests throug'r. OC-CSD/PDB .additionally. basic lead times required ~ FY-84, P~,PD for various proiects would be beneficial to planners. If P~PD decides to print such a book, this Office would like to be on the mailine list. DIR COMP Comments RECD I-1EB Usually request pho ograpt~;c work_ a han~ook would be of interest and might generate more work for P~PD h ~t 'm not ce fain ha s ~ h is the case. DIR/COMP Comments . SD/CD I think you will find that Agency personnel. upon determi.nintz that a product is definitely needed to support their requirements, will opt for the service regardless of the cost. If it's frivolous, or superfluous to their needs, they won't go for it: DIR COMP Comments F ~1PB/VAS I was not aware there i_s a distinct diff.r.nce between "Specified date" and "Routine". The should. EG~eciallv~ awn ,mdated han~hcok on paper. DIR/COMP Comments DDS"T ORD/ISRD This foam shows me there are more services available in P .PD hap I w aware of _ 4 handbook of basic services with esamoles world be helpful (a sales brochurel. DIR COMP Comments ORD P.aTG/IERD The condition of negatives and the dust visihlP on min s is a isgracP_ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments DDS~T/FBIS/L~RB Unfortunatel the bulk of our r uests fell into t e routine cate orv, not owin o t e o er two categories. DIR/COMP Comments Currentl lan to re are man of the technical STAT rie in s in vi eo presentaticn ormat, is wi rove courses a es an ma a riefings more recise. sew rove vi eo e tong as unportant actor in success o presentation. DIR COMP Comments " DCI OGC/Leg We have had two or three o ortunities to benefit from P PD's s eciahze re ro in ca a i hies. We find the Co Center to be a solutel essential a to the nature o the Division--regiurin t e constancy o producing documents o e very i est qua sty un er very tag t deadlines. " DIR/COMP Comments Unlolown The overall uality needs to be improved. I had a co re ort or upper managemen copied recently. atta e a s a roan as a gui en finished, not on e c ies ve a s rapes dawn the side, ut ey copse t e repo sty vs. timeliness? DIR COMP Comments DDI/OSWR/STD Do not know of all of our services ~ therefore cannot exploit all of your talents. Question on graphics quality: basic problem in past has been allure toTlave vugraphs proofread before they are released to me. Have often had misspell- ings; since I brief outside of Agency, this does not present our DIR/COMP Comments "best foot forward". Need more quality control. PAS CDG Question 20, timeliness or quality? A~ which meets a deadline ut lac quality can at times be worthless. U ortunately in cartography we usually need both. DIR COMP ~ Comments CP.4S/PC Question 25, handbook? For DDI products only; the cost intormation wou e a reve anon to the DDI customers/manas~er that are prone to requesting costly changes late in the process. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8 DIR/COMP Comments DDi OSirR/T~SIC On ttao occasions we have asked the printing plant to copy an is ri ure ocumen =o us. oth situations were a os iaen ica on e =first occasion our paper was isse:~in e ested - aissemination was genie ror e ~e aper. DIR/COMP Comments OS~vR/~VSSIC Roughly 40-50~ of the covers produced by PF~PD for our reports ave een one incorre --~ ~'aT of which would ave resu a in secu i v not sent them ac or reprin ing. ne ~.nvo es. .It is crystal c ear rom my star point t t t e qua ity control of preparation, DIR COMP Comments layout, and final proof of covers is in need of serious improvement. OGI/SRD ~ A co of a letter of a reciation for excellent a oc services y t e photographic ranch is attached to this questionnaire. DIR/COMP Comments OCR/ISG Question 19, disseminated properly? I assume our pro is are sseminate per our instructions ut n rea y aw--excep wen earn of some g gone wrong ut t is qtu a rare. DIR COMP Comments DIR/COMP Comments DIR COMP Comments Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24 :CIA-RDP90-003798000100150001-8