MORE ON OL VIEWS OF BARS/CLAS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00191R000100060002-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 24, 2013
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 29, 1987
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00191R000100060002-5.pdf470.88 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/10/24: CIA-RDP90-00191R000100060002-5 STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT CON FJTI AL FOR BACKGROUND USE ONLY MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM: SUBJECT: More on OL Views of BARS/CLAS 29 June 1987 1. I met briefly with today and got some additional feedback on BARS/CLAS. He in cated that the October 1988 target date seemed to be increasingly unlikely given the slippage that had already occurred with the loading of the 1.2 packages. He said that he still favored an all-up implementation rather than a phased approach but he had not closed his mind on the latter method. He noted that full funds control appeared to be essential to the system and that without that capability there would be an excessive number of interfaces and bridge programs required to FRS. 2. He said that in his discussions with John Ray that it was agreed that it would be well to leave the project direction in the said that he had raised with hands of OIT. the suggestion that with the majority of the members of the CLAS teams. work full time at 3. said that Newsome of Cullinet had recently indicated that Funds Control would not be an overlay of the 1.3 packages as originally envisioned but would only operate with the 1.3 programs. Newsome also said that the schemas (i.e. descriptions of the databases) of versions 1.2 and 1.3 are so different that it would probably take at least four months to migrate from one to the STAT other. For this reason, has begun to explore with Cullinet the possibility of getting a vanilla" version of 1.3 as soon as possible so the prototyping efforts of the CLAS teams would be of maximum value. It seems that Cullinet is not likely to accommodate us on this request to get the benefits of being a beta site without also agreeing to provide the test time and structured feedback. STAT STAT STAT 4. felt that the recent sessions with OIT had cleared the air and he urged me to explore what Finance had garnered from its meeting with OIT last week when met with believes that OIT can indeed serve as a kind ot arbitrator between Logistics and Finance and that is the reason he had initially proposed that an OITer serve as Project Director. He said that OIT now appeared to acknowledge that the implementation planning group was premature and he expected some change in the mechanics of project planning and direction over the next few weeks CIC\ .14n