LETTER (SANITIZED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 11
• Document Creation Date: December 27, 2016
• Document Release Date: February 19, 2013
• Sequence Number: 56
• Publication Date: May 6, 1987
• Content Type: LETTER

Declassified in in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
to;
Ktshinglon. D. C. 20505
General Counsel
Defense Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20301-6111
Dear Bill:
OCA 87-1930
May 6, 1987
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Distribution:
Original (s)
1 -
1 -
1 -
1 -
CCA/Leg,
Sincerely,
eg1
II ?
Office of Congressional Affairs
of attached letters to: Addressees
D/OCA
OCA Registry
RH/Signer
OCA/Legislation Subject File: Small Business/Procurement
(6 May 1987) SI-AT
STAT
STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
IL) %..CT1Uell 1111.0116011-C ky
WasttrigorinC209M
May 6, 1987
OCA 87-1930
Mr. John H. McNeill
Associate General Counsel for
International Affairs and Intelligence
Department of Defense
Washington, D.C. 20301
Dear John:
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
U
Mr. Dennis Foreman
Attorney Advisor
Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20520
Dear Dennis:
-
-
Washington11 C 20505
May 6, 1987
OCA 87-1930
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
qinrarc.11/
STAT
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
ki Lenuai intemgerxx "Epic),
Washington. D. C. 20505
Mr. Ronald S. Klein
Attorney Advisor
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D.C. 20535
Dear Ronald:
1.14y 6, 1987
OCT 87-1930
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
46) vommummibumcns
WW1110x120X10505
Office of General Counsel
National Security Agency
Fort Meade, Maryland 20755-6000
Dear Patty:
OCA 87-1930
May 6, 1987
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
%.11:111.1d1 IIIIUIIP.C rt6c1
WWwpon.D.CANDS
Mr. Robert Winchester
Special Assistant to the
Secretary of the Army
Office of the Secretary
of the Army
Washington, D.C. 20301
Dear Bob:
May 6, 1987
OCA 87-1930
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
STAT
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
R 87-1930 and 1931 for
sending FAX
Please send the same letter to the following people:
Ms. Kimberly Allan
Legislative Counsel for the
Office of Legislative Affairs
Department of Justice
Room 1139 - Main Justice Building
Washington, DC 20530
Mr. John H. McNeill
Associate General Counsel for
International Affairs and Intelligence
Department of Defense
Room 3E963, The Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301
Mr. Dennis Foreman
Attorney Advisor
L/LEI
Room 5419A
Department of State
Washington, DC 20520
Mr. Ronald S. Klein
Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Room 4843
Washington, DC 20535
Intelligence Community Staff
Room BWO9
Washington, DC 20230
Office of General Counsel
National Security Agency
Room 9A187-4
Fort Meade, MD 20755-6000
Mr. Robert Winchester
Special Assistant to the
Secretary of the Army
Office of the Secretary of the Army
Room 2C631, The Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
STAT
STAT
STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
4...4;111.141 rV5F.I
WW*OmDCWSW
May 6, 1987
OCA 87-1931
Ms. Kimberly Allan
Legislative Counsel for the
Office of Legislative Affairs
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dear Kimberly:
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As I indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
z
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Distribution: (same as OCA-87-1930)
Original (s) 1 - Addressees by LOX frau Operations Center 6 May 1987
1 - OCA Registry
1 - RMH/Signer
1 - 0C /Leg/Subject File: Small Business/Procurement
OCA/Leg (6 May 1987)
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
STAT
STAT
? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ???? ? ? ??? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? 7a.??? ?? ? ??? ????????????????????????????? ?? ????
0101?14?? MN. .00
I
? beclas?srfie1 in 1=1;7:-Sanitized Copy Appro\Ted-for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
. .
?
?
011D
CIA
OPERATICNS CENTER
SITE A
WASHFAX MESSAGE RECEIPI
?
TRIN
STAT
Legislation Division - Office of Congressional Affairs
Central Intelligence Agency Tel:
SUBJECT
Proposed Language to Internal Revenue Code Section 6050M
? STAT.
6 .MAY 1987
CIASSIFICATICN-- --.
1
PA M
One
..)
SEW
TO: I
DELIVER TO:
ECIENSICN
.
ROOM
MS. Kimberly Allen, Legislative Counsel, DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE - Main Justice Building
898-1539
1139
.
,
. .
.
.
.
?
-
-
. ?
. .
?
.
.
?
.
?
-
?
-
,
-.
-
.
?
. -.
?
-
,
REMARKS:
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/02/19 : CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
cl
Wishingon II C. 20505
Intelligence Community Staff
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20230
Dear Bob:
May 6, 1987
OCA 87-1931
In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, I am sending you a
copy of the proposed language we discussed as an exemption to Internal Revenue
Code Section 6050M. That language follows:
This section shall not apply to any contract when either the subject
matter of the contract, or the fact of the contractual relationship
between the Federal Executive Agency and the contractor itself, is
classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356 and its successor orders
or is otherwise protected by statute.
We have presented this language to members of the Joint Committee on
Taxation and the Senate Finance Committee. Their initial reaction was that
there should be no problem with respect to exempting contracts when the
contractual relationship is itself classified. We are in the process of
arranging a briefing in a classified forum regarding the need to exempt
contracts when the subject matter is classified, but the contractual
relationship is not. I will inform you when this briefing will take place
so that you may attend.
As 1 indicated during our conversation, we hope to have this exemption
presented as part of the technical amendments package which will be introduced
in Congress within the next two weeks. Accordingly, please indicate by early
next week whether the proposed language is sufficient to address your needs.
Sincerely,
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5
? ?
??????? ??????????
? :Declassified in Part - Sanitized Cop; Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-14b1=789T00234R000200280056-5
/41) NW.. Vide
? ?Illf
CIA
OPERATICNS CENTER
SITE A
WASHFAX MESSAGE RECEIPT
???
??
RCM
Legislation Division - Office of Congressional Affairs
Central Intelligence Agency
SUPJECT
Proposed Language to Internal Revenue Code Section 6050M
STAT
STAT
CLASSIFICATION U p.-, 1,C./. A c. c. ' 7 -"D
PACS
SEW TO:
DELIVER ID:
EXTENSICN
ROCM
Intelligence Community Staff
STAT
FAX A-4
1314-09 STAT
.
-
-
? STAT
.
.
. .
?
.
. .
.
?
? ?
.
. .
..
?
REMARKS:-
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP89T00234R000200280056-5