A&E EVALUATION BOARD MEETING
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
June 27, 2008
Sequence Number:
74
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 22, 1982
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6.pdf | 55.37 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6
SUBJECT: A&E Evaluation Board Meeting
1. The architectural and engineering (A&E) Evaluation Board met on 10
March 1982 to evaluate 35 A&E proposals submitted in response to the project
announcement in the 9 February issue of the Commerce Business Daily. The
following persons attended the meeting:
STAT
2. All Board members with their technical teams had completed for
assigned criteria evaluation of the 35 submittals based on the criteria
published in the Commerce Business Daily. Results of these evaluations were
compiled by the Building Planning Staff.
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6
3. Each Board member reported on his assigned criteria by describing the
method of evaluation, and the results were displayed for review by the Board.
Following the criteria presentations, the Board Secretary presented a chart
showing the rank order of all firms with respect to the total weighted scores
and a graph depicting the score groupings.
4. Following general discussion, the Board agreed to the evaluations
presented and then focused on the rankings and total weighted scores. Since
total weighted scores showed a tight grouping of the top three firms, the
Board selected the following top three firms for further consideration:
CRS/Sirrine, Joint Venture
Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.
The Association of VVKR, Inc./Dewberry & Davis/
Everett I. Brown
5. It was determined that all communication with A&E firms concerning
the evaluation will be conducted through Chief, Production &
Services Contracts Branch, Procurement Division. Any requested debriefing
will be attended by and a representative of the Building Planning
6. Board members were requested to submit suggested revisions for the
project questionnaire and final evaluation criteria to the Building Planning
Staff within one week.
Secretary
A&E Evaluation Board
Distribution:
Orig - OL/BPS (Official)
1 - ea Evaluation Board member
1 - ea team member
1 - OL Reader
1 - OL/BPS Chrono
1 - Mr. Bernier,GSA (sanitized)
OL/BPS/ (19 Mar 82
STAT
STAT
STAT
STAT
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260074-6