SUDAN: THE ARMED FORCES IN DISARRAY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
24
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 25, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 1, 1986
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0.pdf1.03 MB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Directorate of Secret Intelligence Sudan: The Armed Forces in Disarray Seeret NESA 86-10038 IA 86-10061 September 1986 Copy Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Directorate of Secret Intelligence Sudan: The Armed Forces in Disarray Office of Near Eastern and South Asian Analysis, ffice of Imagery Analysis. It was coordinated with the Directorate of Operations. This paper was prepared by Comment and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Arab-Israeli Division, NESA, 25X1 25X1 Secret NESA 86-10038 IA 86-10061 September 1986 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret in Disarray Key Judgments The military capabilities of Sudan and the quality of its armed forces' Information available leadership have reached an alltime low. The military can neither defend as of /4 August 1986 the country from external attackers nor maintain internal security. Khar- was used in this report. toum will remain heavily dependent on external suppliers even to maintain its current diminished capabilities. Military assistance issues are likely to figure increasingly as an irritant in US-Sudanese relations. The military has failed to score any gains against the two principal threats to the country's stability and security-the southern insurgency and Libyan subversion. Inconsistent strategy, inappropriate tactics, poor intelli- gence, low morale, and insurmountable logistic problems contribute to government losses in the south. Even when combined with the civilian security services, the armed forces' ability to contain Libyan hostile activity is hampered by inadequate resources and a lack of counterterrorist expertise. Sudan's ability to improve the capabilities of its armed forces is limited by its lack of resources and the reluctance of foreign donors to give more than token amounts of grant aid. Prospects for the regime of Prime Minister Sa- diq al-Mahdi to rebuild and strengthen the armed forces successfully-and gain their loyalty-are poor. Relations between the civilian government and the military will continue to sour as the military's problems mount and the government's fortunes decline. There is a strong prospect that the Army would return to politics either in a ruling coalition with the civilian government or, more likely, through a military coup. Continued deterioration of the armed forces, therefore, is virtually a certainty. Over the next two years this decline will add to Khartoum's problems with the south and could ultimately generate a large-scale mutiny among Army units in the southern commands. Splits in the military will intensify pressure for regional autonomy, especially in the south and west. The pressing need for equipment will drive Sudan into more deals with suppliers, such as Libya, that will exact a political price for assistance and add to frictions with the United States. The Sudanese Government, which has already backed away from its support for the Camp David accords, will be less supportive of US policy. Even a successor government run by senior or older middle-grade officers who favor the United States would attempt, at least initially, to show independence from foreign influence. Secret NESA 86-10038 IA 86-10061 September 1986 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Key Judgments The Decline of the Military Restrictions to Sadiq al-Mahdi's Control of the Military 7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Army: Mission: Defend country from external attack, maintain internal security, support internal security services. Ability to perform mission: Marginal, cannot defend against more than one threat at a time. Estimated amount of equipment operational: 50 percent. Authorized strength: 51,000. Combat units: three infantry divisions, four indepen- dent infantry brigades, one armored division, one airborne division. Location of headquarters: Khartoum. Air Force: Mission: Defend national airspace, provide close air support to ground forces, provide logistic and reconnaissance support to ground forces. Ability to perform mission: Incapable because of equipment shortages, low pilot morale. Estimated amount of equipment operational: 30 percent. Authorized strength: 3,000. Combat units: three fighter squadrons, one training squadron, one transport squadron, one helicopter brigade. Location of headquarters: Khartoum. Air Defense Force: Mission: Assist Air Force in defending national airspace, provide warning of hos- tile air activity. Ability to perform mission: Incapable, no early warn- ing capability, majority of equipment inoperable, no communications link to Air Force. Estimated amount of equipment operational: 20 percent. Authorized strength: 3,000. Combat units: two AAA brigades, one SAM brigade. Location of headquarters: Port Sudan Navy: Mission: Defend coastline, prevent smuggling, perform sea search and rescue. Ability to perform mission: Marginally capable, no ship-to-shore communications, no night navigation capability. Estimated amount of equipment operational: 45 percent. Authorized strength: 1,500. Combat units: three patrol boat squadrons, one land- ing craft squadron, one auxiliary and service craft squadron, one harbor craft squadron. Location of headquarters: Port Sudan. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret in Disarray Politicization, 20 years of fighting insurgencies in the south, and budgetary stringencies have steadily erod- ed Sudanese Army capabilities since the country gained independence in 1956. Field Marshal Suwar al-Dahab, the former Military Council chairman, told the US Ambassador in early 1986 that Sudan's military needs to be rebuilt, retrained, and recondi- tioned from the bottom up. Sudan's Army has suffered from having been drawn repeatedly into politics. The military-the strongest institution in a country rent by ethnic, tribal, and sectarian divisions-stepped in to take over from weak civilian governments in 1958 and again in 1969. President Nimeiri, who ruled for 16 years after his May 1969 coup, was especially instrumental in politi- cizing the Army, according to US Embassy reports. Nimeiri appointed officers to a highly corrupt Mili- tary Economic Board that administered most of the national industries and controlled much of the coun- try's foreign investment. He demanded that officers actively participate in his political party and in his efforts to implement Islamic law in Sudan after 1983. Nimeiri dominated the professional military, person- ally assuming key positions and favoring loyalty over competence in the selection of his senior officers. The current insurgency in the south, which began in 1983, has been even more destructive to military capabilities than previous rounds of fighting in the area. Combat losses, equipment shortages, and lack- luster leadership have sapped morale and perfor- mance. Most of the military budget supports counter- insurgency operations instead of needed military improvements. Major equipment-US-made F-5E fighters, helicopters, and armored personnel carriers, for example-lost in the war has not been replaced. Sudanese officials claim the war costs about $500,000 a day. Table 1 Operating Defense Expenditures Fiscal Defense Percentage of Cen- Percent- Year Expenditures tral Government age of (million Budget (current GDP US $) b expenditures) 1981 379.8 14.1 2.5 1982 419.0 12.1 2.8 a The Sudanese fiscal year begins on 1 July. b Dollar value converted at an exchange rate of 2.45 Sudanese pounds per US $. Projected. The abysmal state of the Sudanese economy and Khartoum's dependence on foreign donors for supply and even maintenance are major contributing factors to the current disarray in the military. notes that the diversity 25X1 of Sudan's equipment and suppliers has resulted in low operational rates and little compatibility among units. Khartoum has run the gamut in its sources of supply, ranging from reliance on the West from independence to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, to a close military relationship with the Soviet Union from 1968 to 1971, to dependence on the nonaligned world- principally China-from 1972 to the late 1970s, and then back to reliance on the West in the late 1970s. By any standard, the Sudanese armed forces are incapable of meeting the principal threats to Sudanese stability and security-the insurgency in the south and the Libyan subversive and conventional threat. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Figure 1. Airborne troops such as these are used in counterin- surgency operations. The Southern Insurgency Despite a commitment of 35 to 40 percent of its 51,000-man forces to the south, the Sudanese Army has made no headway against the insurgents in the three-year-old struggle. On the basis of Embassy reporting and insurgent radiobroadcasts, we estimate that the Sudanese People's Liberation Army (SPLA) now numbers 15,000 to 20,000 men, a significant increase over the estimated 2,000-man force that formed in late 1983 after southern Army units mutin- ied and fled to Ethiopia. Operating from bases in Ethiopia and, armed by such Soviet surrogates as East Germany and Cuba, the rebels control much of the southern countryside. They operate in all three southern re- gions and occasionally probe into adjacent regions to the north. Operating in their home areas, they are better able to live off the land and to put the terrain to better military advantage than government forces can. Khartoum's strategy to contain the SPLA is inconsis- tent and poorly managed, in our judgment. He reports that, at the field level, the Army has used the south as a dumping ground for less capable or untrustworthy officers and that recent efforts to reverse this trend have fallen far short. The government's efforts to take advantage of tribal rivalries by providing arms to those who oppose the rebels have proved to be only marginally successful. The US Embassy reports that the arms provided these tribes generally increase instability throughout the south. The tribes use their government-supplied weap- ons to settle old scores and confront central authority rather than to attack the rebels. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Figure 2 Areas of Influence and Activity, Summer 1986 Government-influenced area Insurgent-influenced area Refugee and dissident activity Refugee, dissident, and Libyan activity Refugee, dissident, banditry, smuggling, and tribal warfare activity Central African Republic Historic north- south line Despite the reinstatement of the Addis Ababa Accords in April 1985, sh mail Ad Boundary ^,I Lake Nasser _J it Ili 'n NPl ppe i e) Con o providing for one Southern =n , these remain three regions Lake military governors. Albert Boundary representation is not necessarily authoritative. Al Fashir Bahr al Gha Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Khartoum's attempt to use a group of about 5,000 Nuer tribesmen known as Anya Nya 11-named after the rebels who fought in Sudan's civil war from 1956 to 1972-who split from the Dinka-dominated rebel movement in 1983, has foundered on the group's inexperience and political unreliability. F_ but it has used the tribesmen primarily, and with limited success, to harass the SPLA. The use of inappropriate counterinsurgency tactics has hamstrung the Army's performance: military units in the south are primarily in de ensive positions in small towns and villages and conduct few offensive campaigns and little protec- tive patrolling. The Army uses its few tanks in defense of garrisons or airfields and other armored vehicles on reconnaissance missions without much success. ? Most of the government's forces in the south have no training in counterinsurgency tactics and little knowledge of the local terrain nfantry units are supporte y artillery-100-mm field guns and 105-mm and 122-mm howitzers-which we believe has been largely ineffective because of ammunition shortages and low operational rates. Both the insurgents and the Army favor mortars-primarily 81-mm, 82- mm, and 120-mm-but the rebels' use of them to pin down Army units in towns or garrisons has proved more effective than the Army's use of mor- tars to support its own forces. ? The government has failed to make effective use of its limited air assets against the insurgents or in support of its own forces. , an a ground attack capability was lost when Sudan's last two F-5Es crashed in 1985. Insubordinate pilots earlier had sabotaged the Strikemaster light attack aircraft to avoid having to use them in the war. little evidence of the use of helicopters for reconnaissance missions and fire support for ground forces. Logistic problems have also impeded the performance of government forces in the south. Because of a limited number of transport vehicles and manpower shortages, the Army cannot support operations in all three southern regions simultaneously and lacks the capability to provide sustained support for a major operation. The poor transportation network underlies many specific logistic difficulties in the south-roads and remote rail lines become impassable in the April- October rainy season, river transport is limited by a shortage of qualified crews as well as by poor security, and rebel landmines and destruction of bridges dis- rupt traffic. US officials note the Army's logistic problems are compounded by problems endemic to the military as a whole: lack of equipment accountability, little management and planning, insufficient funds to purchase spare parts and supplies, and lack of quali- fied supply and maintenance personnel. The Army's combat performance also suffers as a result of low morale, which, according to thcE::: all levels of the forces and, more telling than the loss of face, the troops' perception is that Khartoum is indifferent to their difficult situation and does not trust them. Khartoum, in an effort to reduce desertions to the SPLA, recently began to pull southerners out of the south for duty elsewhere. Libyan Threat The military-which is responsible for assisting the civilian external intelligence service in watching sub- versive activity in addition to its primary task of defending the country's borders-falls well short of 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret meeting the threat from Libya, in our judgment. Of the eight countries bordering Sudan, we believe that Libya presents the greatest subversive and conven- tional military threat. Although Tripoli ended its support to the southern Sudanese dissidents after the coup in Khartoum in April 1985, it still poses a threat. The US Embassy reports Libya has penetrated Su- dan's security services, and it recruits among the military to prepare for potential antiregime activities. In our view, military intelligence lacks sufficient resources and manpower to monitor subversive activ- ity in Khartoum, much less in more remote areas such as Darfur and Kordofan, where Libyans are working to gain influence. The military's 120-man counter- terrorist unit cannot do its part to contain the terrorist threat, Even the military and civilian intelligence services combined are inadequate to meet the threat. We believe that infighting within and contests for control of the new civilian security services that were formed following the dissolution of President Nimeiri's security agen- cies have crippled Khartoum's ability to protect Suda- nese and foreign interests. The military's ability to defend against the conven- tional threat from Libya-most likely consisting of limited military actions such as an airstrike, the occupation of a small area of Sudan, or the introduc- tion of troops to support a coup attempt-is slight. A Libyan military attack is unlikely, at least as long as Qadhafi believes that maintaining good relations with Khartoum favors his goals, but the mercurial Libyan leader has kept his options open for a more coercive policy. Tripoli bombed a radio station near Khartoum in March 1984. Although the attack did not destroy the station, it demonstrated Khartoum's vulnerability to air attacks. In the event relations sour again, Sudan's ability to defend against a Libyan airstrike is no better. early warning radars are rarely operational, We believe Libya established a supply depot in west- ern Sudan for contingency use in either Chad or Sudan. US Embassy an reported the arrival in Marcn o yan truck convoys totaling at least 150 trucks with some 1,100 "relief workers," including 160 soldiers. as many as 900 of them were pulled out of Darfur in August 1986 as a result of Prime Minister Sadiq al-Mahdi's requests during his visit to Tripoli earlier that moi has confirmed the withdrawal. If Qadhafi were to end his current support for the Sadiq government, he could rebuild the Libyan foot- hold in the west to exert pressure on Khartoum. Driving out the occupation force would require the government to reduce its military presence in other parts of the country. Although a force large enough to meet the task could probably be pulled from the 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 capital area and Port Sudan, without external assis- 25X1 tance the logistic burden of airlifting and supporting the units would require drastic reductions in counter- insurgency operations in the south. Khartoum's ability to retrain and rearm the armed forces is severely constrained by lack of resources and by dwindling contributions from foreign donors. Sadiq al-Mahdi has publicly pledged to upgrade the mili- tary's capabilities, but, given his less than firm grip on the government, he is even less able to deliver on such promises than his predecessors were. The difficulty of coaxing enough ammunition, replacement weaponry, and transport out of foreign donors is likely to derail plans for force modernization. Many suppliers, espe- cially the Arab countries, have given only token amounts of assistance. Rearming the Sudanese military will require prepara- tion and the taking of steps to increase its ability to absorb the equipment that are probably beyond Su- dan's capabilities. These steps include providing basic and refresher training; developing a permanent cadre of trained technical personnel, instructors, pilots, and others; and instituting a viable maintenance program. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Given Khartoum's extensive needs-and its $10 bil- lion debt- we expect Sudan to continue to seek military assistance from diverse suppliers. Even to- gether these assistance programs are unlikely to make much headway against the problems besetting the military. Khartoum considers the United States its primary supplier despite cuts in military assistance over the past year, according to Embassy reporting. US assis- tance in fiscal year 1986 has been geared toward rehabilitation of air defense radars, overhaul of C- 130 transport aircraft, establishment of a national logistic system, and sales of V-150 armored personnel carriers and limited amounts of ammunition. France, the United Kingdom, West Germany, and Canada are providing primarily nonlethal aid. Ac- cording to the US Embassy, this assistance consists mostly of training programs, instructors for Sudanese military schools, and support teams for major military equipment. US officials have noted that the West Germans are attempting to develop military industry in Sudan in the form of a small-arms ammunition plant in Khartoum, but production at the facility is limited by raw materials shortages. Among the Communist countries, China is Sudan's supplier of longest standing. Beijing has provided major equipment items such as tanks and aircraft as well as training and maintenance support. According signed an agreement this year to provide an aid package worth $7 million. the assistance consists mainly of ammunition and aircraft spare parts. Sudan since 1977, but indicates East European countries have continue assistance at low levels. We believe Moscow may restore some military aid in an attempt to gain influence with the Sadiq government. US officials noted Romania recently completed delivery of 20 Puma helicopters. Discussion on a new agreement with Yugoslavia for rehabilitation and maintenance of Soviet equipment, on the other hand, was suspend- ed-probably because of Sudan's inability to pay. 110 Figure 3. Colonel Qadhaji offered aid to the transitional government and continues assistance The Sudanese are looking to Libya for military assistance as aid from Western, Chinese, and East European suppliers dwindles. Although we believe Libya is not capable of providing the extensive assis- tance needed to upgrade significantly the Sudanese military, Tripoli has provided stopgap assistance- small arms, ammunition, uniforms, trucks, and pilot training. In addition, the US Embassy reported that in early 1986 Libya sent two TU-22 bombers for direct support of the Sudanese Army operating in the south. Egypt, despite a mutual defense treaty with Sudan, provides minimal military aid. Egypt provides instruc- tors for Sudanese military schools and positions in Egyptian military training programs for Sudanese. Cairo, in cooperation with Washington, attempted to upgrade Sudanese air defenses following the bombing of Omdurman, but it abandoned the program in 1985, claiming the Sudanese were not supporting the Egyp- tian program. US Embassy and that the Egyptians use Sudan as a dumping ground for obsolete equipment. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret The wealthy moderate Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have confined most of their assistance to nonmilitary aid-oil, money, and hu- manitarian relief-in the past several years. Small amounts of military assistance-geared toward coun- terinsurgency operations-have come from other moderate Arab countries such as Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan. Figure 4 Sudan: Military High Command Restrictions to Sadiq al-Mahdi's Control of the Military We believe that Prime Minister Sadiq al-Mahdi must address the military services' grievances-the south- ern insurgency, force improvement, and, to a lesser extent, the role of Islam-if his government is to retain their loyalty. Since Sadiq assumed office and the defense portfolio-the first civilian to do so since the 1960s-he has concentrated on weaning the Army from politics and winning its support. Specifically he is: ? Seeking to end the insurgency-fighting the insur- gents is the most serious grievance of the armed forces-by attempting to undercut foreign support to the insurgents. ? Making pleas for military assistance in state visits to donor or potential donor states. military leaders gave Sadiq a list of equipment needed to upgrade and modernize the armed forces. We believe Sadiq raised some of these topics during his trip to Moscow in August 1986, but no agreements were reached. ? Pursuing a "hearts and minds" campaign with the military. Soon after the parliamentary election, he began a series of visits to military installations throughout the country to show his personal interest in the troops. he was subjected to criticism and hard questioning at many of the meetings. A recurrent question that he re- So lereignty Council Chairman Commander of the Air Force Commander of the Navy Commander of the Air Defense Force Director of Logistics Director Director Director of of Operations of Administration Military Intelligence views of Islam, and ? Awaiting the right opportunity to take advantage of retirements and promotions in the senior ranks- part of an armed forces reorganization effort-to insert loyalists into the military hierarchy, Despite these efforts to woo the military, Sadiq will find it difficult-if not impossible-to consolidate his power over the armed forces. Constitutional restric- tions and party and sect loyalties will stand in his way. fuses to address is why he continues the southern The interim Constitution gives the Supreme Council, war. not the prime minister or defense minister, ultimate authority over the armed forces. The head of the ? Moving cautiously on the controversial issue of Islamic law. The role of Islam is a potentially explosive issue. Muslim officers are divided in their Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Supreme Council, Ahmad al-Mirghani, has constitu- tional powers as a check to Sadiq's control of the Army, according to the US Embassy. Mirghani is also leader of the Democratic Unionists, the political arm of the Khatmiyyah sect and a rival of Sadiq's Ansar The current officer corps, a product of the Nimeiri period when the Khatmiyyah gained strength at the expense of the Ansar, has little personal loyalty to or trust in the Prime Minister and even less commitment to parliamentary democracy. US Embassy reports suggest most senior officers are sympathetic to the Democratic Unionists and the Muslim Brotherhood, which is Sadiq's key opponent in the Assembly. The US Embassy reports the Army is increasingly dissatisfied with Sadiq's support for legal action against those who supported former President Nimeiri's coup in 1969. Military officers see the Prime Minister's move as a personal and Ansar- related vendetta hostile to military interests. the Prime Minister is also reinvestigating a 1971 Sudanese military attack on Jazirat Aba (Abba) Island, the ancestral stronghold of the Ansar. The attack, launched because the Ansar militia refused to surrender to government forces, resulted in numerous casualties and drove Sadiq into exile in Egypt. If carried through, the investigation would embarrass senior Sudanese military leaders, some of whom commanded the units involved in the attack. Outlook and Implications for the United States Improvement of the Sudanese armed forces is years away, at best, and in the meantime the deterioration of the military as a professional force will continue to pose significant dilemmas for the government in Khartoum. In the next year, we expect at a minimum that: ? The Army will be unable to provide a military solution to the southern insurgency if the civilian government, or even a successor military govern- ment, demands it. If the Military Steps In We believe relations between the armed forces and the civilian government will continue to sour as the military's problems mount. Assuming there is no near-term solution to the southern insurgency and the government's fortunes continue to decline, the sense of dissatisfaction with and blame of the new civilian leadership probably will grow within the officer corps. If, as expected, the government comes under increas- ing criticism in the coming year and cannot cope, there is a strong prospect that the Army will return to politics, possibly in a ruling coalition with civilians but most likely as a result of a coup. Although in 1958 Sudan's Prime Minister handed the reins of government to the military during a crisis, we believe Sadiq would not resort to this precedent. Instead, Sadiq would probably try to ward off a coup by asking senior officers to enter a coalition with the civilian government. Such a civilian-military coali- tion probably would not improve decisionmaking or stability. We believe that eventually the Army would dominate or the government would be removed through a coup. Younger generals and senior middle-grade officers are the most likely candidates to lead a successful coup against the civilian government. Such officers pressed their seniors in 1985 to remove Nimeiri. In addition, officers from this level have command over combat units large enough to stage a coup and to impose martial law. A seizure of power by junior officers is less likely and probably would come about only after a prolonged period of civil unrest and economic decline in which senior officers failed to take charge. In our view, such a coup would be bloody and would need the external backing of Egypt, Libya, Ethiopia, or the Soviet Union for the coup plotters to attract sufficient support to topple the government. 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret ? The equipment needs of the military will drive Khartoum into deals with suppliers like Libya-or possibly the Soviet Union-and into accepting at least some of the conditions these states are likely to attach to the assistance. Sadiq's recent rhetorical condemnations of the United States, for example, probably are part of the price exacted by the Libyans for the military assistance they have ex- tended over the past year. ? Sudan will remain vulnerable to subversive activity or to conventional military pressure, particularly from Libya or Ethiopia. Sudanese security forces, including the intelligence agencies and the mili- tary's counterterrorist force, are unlikely to develop into an effective deterrent to terrorist activity or to provide reliable security for foreign installations in Khartoum. We anticipate that the deterioration of the Sudanese military and tensions stemming from the southern war will contribute to bloody confrontations that will splinter the Army and strengthen pressures for re- gional autonomy. Carrying on the fighting in the south as capabilities continue to diminish is already generating an increasing number of desertions. In our view, if the fighting continues, it will ultimately spark a large-scale mutiny among Army units in the south. In the north, tensions generated by a prolonged southern war may spark clashes between conservative Muslim groups and southern Sudanese in Khartoum and possibly a collapse of public order. The police probably could not stop the violence, because most riot-control police in Khartoum are southerners who would not sympathize with the northern-dominated government. In addition, a split along religious or Even if Khartoum avoids these worst case scenarios, relations with the United States will be complicated by military assistance issues. Given the cuts in US assistance and Khartoum's search for alternative sup- pliers, Sudan will be less supportive of US policy initiatives. It has already turned its back on the Camp David accords. Most Sudanese elites are more com- fortable with the present policy of nonalignment than with Nimeiri's strong pro-Western tilt and the charges it drew of dependence on the West. Even a government run by senior or older middle-grade offi- cers, generally well disposed toward the United States, would attempt at least initially to project the appearance of independence from foreign influence. regional lines in Khartoum would pit rival groups within the military against each other. Further weakening of central government control would intensify pressures for regional autonomy. The southern regions already are handling many of their own affairs now that the insurgency has cut many of their ties to Khartoum. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Appendix A Factors Affecting Capabilities: Manpower and Training volunteer force, Volunteers serve a minimum of tree years with six reenlistments allowed. Specialists and techni- cians must serve nine years. Retention is a problem, especially among the specialists and technicians, as they tend to leave the military after their enlistment and follow more lucrative careers in the private sector in Sudan or in foreign countries. The government passed a conscription law in 1971 and has attempted to implement it several times since then. The latest attempt was on 1 April 1984. The economics and politics of registering the target popu- lation (males between the ages of 18 and 27) and enforcing conscription, however, prevented its imple- mentation. Although a 50-percent inflation rate and limited employment opportunities ensure a continued supply of volunteers, supporting an expanded military Once in the military, volunteers for the Navy, Air Defense Force, and Army go through six months of the Army's basic infantry training and then are sent to their own service schools. Air Force volunteers receive basic pilot and maintenance training by the countries of equipment origin-primarily China, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Prospective officers go to the Military College through a program emphasizing political and military science and physical training and then are commis- sioned as second lieutenants. Those who require more technical or specialized training, such as Air Force or Navy officers, go abroad to study. Officers receive more schooling as they move up through the ranks. Majors are required to attend a one-year course at the Armed Forces Staff College before promotion to lieutenant colonel. Colonels and brigadiers who are to assume high-ranking positions are sent through the 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1X1 force would be impossible. The 1971 conscription law provided for a reserve program by requiring that men fulfill an additional eight-year commitment in the reserves following ac- tive service. This also was never implemented, leaving Sudan without reserves. In addition, there is no evidence of a national mobilization plan to fill man- power shortfalls in a national emergency. Military High Academy to prepare them for their jobs and update their military theory. There are shortages of training aids, ammunition, equipment, and fuel. Aircraft fuel shortages in partic- ular have been devastating to Air Force pilot profi- ciency. The Air Defense Force has not conducted training against airborne towed targets for at least eight years, and so much of the Navy's equipment is nonoperational that there is little to spare for training. Shortages of funds also have forced Sudan to cut back ranges from six years of primary education to univer- sity training. Those with secondary to university-level education are considered for the officer corps people from the west and south are at a disadvantage because many are not fluent in Arabic, the primary language of Sudan and most of its military schools. its foreign training programs. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Appendix B Sudanese Armed Forces Order of Battle Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Table 4 Naval Equipment Total Operational Number Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0 Secret Secret Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/16: CIA-RDP88T00096R000300360001-0