CURRENT INTEREST RATE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 27, 2016
• Document Release Date: December 2, 2011
• Sequence Number: 24
• Publication Date: January 16, 1986
• Content Type: LETTER

Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
--- Oa~a
R01~1'ING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP
btdl~ ofllea s~~' room numbar,
~ ~/~
23 JAN 86
EXO/DDA
1.
Initiab
i
a
DDA REGISTRY
Fih
Nob and Ratum
i
Fa Gaarana
Psr Conwrsatbn
uasbd
For Correction
h
lab
For Your Information
Soo Ma
nNnt
Inwsti
natunt
ieutbn
Justi
D/FINANCE RECEIVED AN INFO COPY,
STAT Cc -A f D ~'-' ~ ~ ~ ~' PAP ~j ~ ~ `~-
00 NOT ua tAis form as a RECORD of approvals. concurrancas, disposa~s,
claarancas, and similar actions
STAT
FROM: (Name, ors. symbol, Asonry/Posty,
w~t'lot O!''iIONAI FORM 41 (Rw. 7 76)
* u.3.O.v.O.: i9B3421-529/320 '~~~1 ~d O ~31~~
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/112/02:CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
 ., . .. ..s,.~
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
STAT
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
ROUTING SLIP
ACTION
INFO
DATE
INITIAL
1
DCI
2
DDCI
3
EXDIR
4
D/ICS
5
DDI
DA
X
7
DDO
8
DDSBT
9
Chm/NIC
10
GC
11
IG
12
Compt
X
13
D/OLL
14
D/PAO
15
D/PERS
16
VC/NIC
17
D Firlanc
X
18
19
20
21
22
xefuhve ecrefary
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
`' \JI/l? JIB ~ Administration Policy Washington, DC 20405
JAN 161986
Executive ReOist.y
86' 0239x
CIVILIAN AGENCY ACQUISITION COUNCIL LETTER
TO: Heads of Civilian Agencies, other than NASA
SUBJECT: Current Interest Rate
The Secretary of the Treasury has established an interest rate ~-~---'"
9 3/4 percent for the 6-month period beginning January 1, 1986,
and ending June 30, 1986, pursuant to Section 105(b)(2) of the
Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended by Pub. L. 92-41, dated
July 1, 1971. A copy of the Federal Register notice is enclosed.
This interest rate is used in computing amounts paid by or to the
Government under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978; the Prompt
Payment Act; and the various payment requirements throughout the
FAR at 31.205-10(a) (1) (ii), 31.205-19 (a) (3) (i), 32.407(a) (2),
32.407(b), 32.610(b)(2), 32.613(1), 32.614-1(c), 33.208, 49.112-
1 (g) , 49.603-3 (b) (7) (xiv) , 52.230-3 (a) (5) , 52.230-5 (a) (4) ,
52.232-12(f)(3), 52.232-17(a), 52.233-1(g), 52.249-2(1)(2),
52.249-3 (1) (2) , 52.249-6 (1) (2) , and 52.249-11(j) (2) .
LAWRENCE J. RIZZI
Chairman
Civilian Agency Acquisition Council
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7
Federal Rebister /Vol. 51, No. 8 / 1.londay, January 13, 19136 / Notirea
To conduct this study, information
will be needed on various aspects of
transborder trucking operations.
Specifically, information is being sought
on the following questions:
? 1. Approximately how many
Canadian vehicles with gross weights
over 55.000 pounds are engaged in
tranaborder trucking: what percentage of
iheae vehicles travel over 5,000 miles per
year in the United States (7,500 miles if
agricultural), and what percent of total
travel is typically in the United States?
2. Is travel in the United States by
Canadian carriers spread across many
States or is it concentrated in A few '
States? Which States? Are there
particular cities between which
significant shares of tranaborder
trucking shipments move, and if so,
what are they and what share of total
transborder trucking mileage by vehicles
with taxable gross weights over 55.000
pounds is between these principal
origins and deatinetiona7
3. Approximately how many United
States-based vehicles with taxable gross
weights over 55,000 pounds travel over
5.000 miles per year in Canada (7,500
miles if agricultural), end what
percentage of total travel by those
vehicles is in Canada?
4. Do tranaborder trucking operations
differ significantly from other operations
in terms of the types of commodities
hauled, the number of empty backhauls,
the type and size of carriers, or other
factors?
5. Do Canadian carriers purchase fuel
and tires in the United States in
proportion to their travel in the United '
States? To what extent do Canadian
carriers purchase tractors or trailers in
the United States? Do United States
carrier purchase fuel and equipment
subject to Canadian highway user fees
in proportion to their Canadian travel?
6. What provindal fuel taxes, motor
carrier sees, and other highway user fees
are levied on Canadian motor carrier
operations? Which of these taxes are
paid by United States carriers traveling
in Canada?
7. What data are available to estimate
the proportion of total travel by
Canadian vehicles with taxable gross
weights over.55,000 pounds that is in the
United States, and the proportion of
total travel by similar vehicles owned
by United States Carriers that is in
Canada?
8. What administrative problems
might arise in levying the full (oc partial)
heavy vehicle use tax on all Canadian
vehicles traveling over 5,000 miles (7,500
miles if agricultural) per year in the
United States and how might they be
overcome? What would be the Impacts
on transborder trucking of levying the
full or partial HVUT on ell Canadian
vehicles?
Comments and information on these
questions and other tranaborder
trucking issues being addressed in this
study should be sent to the docket
established by this notice.
issued on January 6,1988.
R.A. Barnhart,
Federal HighwoyAdministrotor, Federal
High woy Administration.
[FR Doc. 86-707 Filed 1-10-86; 8:45 emJ -
e+usw ~ aa+o-nar
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and
Flrearms
Delegation to the Regional Audit
Manager and Compliance Operations
Auditors of Authorities o1 the Director
In 27 CFR Part 70, Procedure and
Admin(stratlon
Delegation Order
1. Purpose. This order delegates
certain authorities of the Director to the
Regional Audit Manager and
Compliance Operations Auditors.
2. Delegolions. Under the authority
vested in the Director, Bureau of
Alcohol. Tobacco and Firearms, by
Treasury Department Order Number
221, dated June 8,1972 and by 28 CFR
301.7701J9, the authority to administer
oaths and certifying under 27 CFR 70.35
is delegated to the following:
a) Compliance Operations Regional
Audit Manager.
b) Compliance Operations Auditors.
3. Redelegotion. The authority may
not be redelegated.
4. For Information Corttoct Ralph W.
Johnson. Audit Programs Branch,1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Washington.
DC 20228.[phone].
5. Effective Dote. This delegation
order becomes effective on January 13,
1986.
Approved: January 8.1996.
Stephen & Higgins,
Director.
(FR Doi. 88-702 Filed 7-10-~e: 8:45 emJ
ea+.wo cone u+a+a-u
Renegotiation Board Interest Rate and
Prompt Payment Interest Rate
The Renegotiation Board previously
published the rate of interest determined
by the Secretary of the Treasury
pursuant to section 105(b)(2) of the
Renegotiation Act of 1951. a? amended.
Since the Renegotiation Board is no
longer in existence, the Department of
the Treasury is publishing the current
rate of interest. Also, pursuant to section
2(b)(1) of Pub. t~ 97-177, dated May Zl,
]982, the Secretary of the Treasury is
responsible for computing and
publishing the interest rate to be used in
cases under the Prompt Payment Act.
Therefore. notice is hereby given that.
pursuant to,the above mentioned
sections. the~Secretary of the Treasury
has determined that the rate of interest
applicable for the purpose of said
sections, for the period beginning
January 1,1989 and ending on June 30,
1988, 9'Ya per cerium per annum.
Dated: December 31, 1985.
~Genld Murphy,
Acting Fiscol Assiatont Secretory.
[FR Doc. ti8--085 Filed 1=108; 8:45 em]
aun+o coot u+o-asar
Fayettevitle~ NC; 120-Bed Nursing
Home Cara Unlt; Flnding of No
Slgn[flcant Impact
The Veterans Administration (VA)
has assessed the potential
environmental impacts that may occur
as a result of the construction of a_
Nursing Home Care Unit (NHCU) and
has determined that the potential
environmental impacts from the
development of this project will be
minimal.
i 4e VA is considering construction of
a new 120-Bed NHlrU comprised of
approximately 47.000 gross aqusre fcet
at the VA Medical Center in
Fayetteville. North CarolWa. The
preferred concept, which would be
implemented if the protect receiyesr_".
administrative approval and pending the
availability of budgetary resources,
would provide construction of a two-
story building connecting with the main
hospital by way of an elevated enclosed
corridor. Aasodated site development
would include exterior patient use. areas
and approximately 70 parking spaces.
Construction of thin project will have
impacts on the human and natural
environment affecting open apace and
air quality. Air quality impacts will be
short-term and minimal, resulting
primarily from construction activity. All
environmental attributes analyzed
would not be effected to any extent if
the "No Action" alternative was
selected. However, antidpated medical
needs would not be addressed it that
alternative were implemented.
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/02 :CIA-RDP88G01332R000801000024-7