LEAKS LEGISLATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 28, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 17, 1986
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2.pdf223.17 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 ~Jc~ 17 March 1986 OCA 86-0100/4 t~ED7ORAA'DUt: FOR: Director of Central Intelligence FF?Ot': Director, Office of Congressional Affairs StTBJECT: Leaks Legislation 1. As you kno4:, the Administration has been discussing leaks legislation for the past several years, but no consensus has been reached on the need for leaks legislation or how it should be drafted. Last week, the ADCI reluctantly agreed to withdraca leaks legislation from FY87 Intelligence Authorization Bill because of intense opposition from other agencies, especially DoJ, to our proposal. (See I,ettEr to OP1P~ Director tiller at Tab A) 2. It is obvious that we will make no progress toward obtaining leaks legislation until we reach a high level consensus on ttie need for such legislation. I believe the Agency could play a central role in forming a consensus and recommend that we take the following action forthwith: --Lnlist the Secretaries of Defense and State to support the need for leaks legislation and have them join a call for a meeting of the P?SPG to decide the issue. --Send the attact;ed letter to the Attorney General (Tab B) reiterating-your conviction that leaks legislation is needed and informing him of your intent to bring the issue up for consideration by the highest levels of the Administration. --Press Admiral. Poindexter for the meeting of the t'SFG by mid-P_pri~l to decide whether the Administration will commit to Leaks legislation. Davi D. Grles Attachments: as stated Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Distribution: Original -Addressee (w/atts) .l~- DCI 1 - D/OCA " 1 - DDCI 1 - DDL/OCA 1 - E?~IR 1 - EXO/OC: A 1 - ER 1 - OCA Ch 1 -LEG/SU rono B/OCA - Leaks FY 87 Intel Auth - er LEG/OCA 'b (17 r~iarch 1986) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Caxral Mna /1~cv 6 March 1986 The Honorable James C. Miller III Director Office of Management and Budget Washington, D.C. 20503 C I know that you share my concern regarding the increasing threat to our national security posed by unauthorized disclosure of classified intelligence information. The compromise of our intelligence sources, both human and technical, has placed lives in jeopardy and rendered expensive technical collection systems ineffective. Unfortunately, we have not been able to take effective steps to punish those who have violated their obligation to protect classified information and this has created the perception that nobody cares. We simply must restore discipline to the handling of sensitive information. While there is no single solution to the problem of leaks, one step that can be taken is to enact legislation that would criminalize the reprehensible conduct of disclosing classified information to those outside government who are not authorized to receive it. Enactment of leaks legislation, combined with a vigorous effort to detect those who are engaged in disclosing classified information, will restore an element of risk to those who misuse classified information. We have proposed leaks legislation as part of the draft Intelligence Authorization Bill for the past two years. Last year, objections were raised to the inclusion of leaks legislation in the Authorization Bill because the issue needed to be studied more closely and a consensus reached within the Executive Branch on whether we should attempt to enact leaks legislation. To date, I am not aware that any action has been taken to reach such a consensus This year we again proposed leaks legislation as part of the Authorization Bill. Once again, we were told that consideration of leaks legislation should be postponed. I do not believe we can continue to indefinitely postpone taking effective action. Too many of our nation's secrets have already been compromised to continue a business as usual attitude. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 - - -,, - - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Given the exceedingly compressed time frame imposed on the authorization .process by Gramm-Rudman, I do not want to jeopardize the rest of our FY 87 authorization bill because of another internal debate on this issue. Therefore, I reluctantly agree to the deletion of the leaks provisions from this year's bill. In return, I Lrust that OMB will support and facilitate the enactment of strong leaks legislation this year. Sincerely, Ac Ong Dir for of Central Intelligence Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Central Intelligence Agency r2.5 MAR 1986 The F?onorable Edwin Meese, III The Attorney General 6dashington, D.C. 20530 I know that you share my concern regarding the increasing threat to our national security posed by unauthorized disclosure of classified intelligence information. The compromise of our intelligence sources, both human anc' technical, has placed lives-in jeopardy and rendered expensive technical collection systems ineffective. Unfortunately, we have not been able to take effective steps to punish those who have violated their obligation to protect classified information and this has created the perception that nobody cares. j.,~e simply must restore discipline to the handling of sensitive information. ~?~hile there is no single solution to the .problem of leaks, one stef~ that can be taken is to enact legislation that would criminalize the reprehensible conduct of disclosing classified information to those outside the government who are not authorized 'to receive it. Pnactment of leaks legislation, combined with a vigorous effort to detect those who are engaged in disclosinc classified information, will restore an element of risk to those who misuse classified information. ~~~]e have proposed leaks legislation as part of the draft Intelligence Authorization Bill for the past two years., Last year, the Department raised objections to including leaks legislation in the Authorization Bill because the issue needed to be studied more closely and a consensus reached within the Executive Branch on whether we should attempt to enact leaks legislation. To date, I am not aware that any action has been taken to reach such a consensus. This year we again proposed leaks legislation as part of the Authorization Bill. Once again, the Department questioned the need for the legislation and raised objections to the substance of our proposed bill. Last week, in a letter to the Director of the Office of P?anagement and Fudget, the Acting Director of Central Intelligence reluctantly agreed to the deletion of the leaks prevision from the F.uthorizatior. Lill. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28: CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2 I do not t,elieve we car, continue to inc?efir,itely postpone takino effective action. ^'~o rnanv of our nation's .secrets have already been compror~,ised to continue z husines~ as u:-~ual attitu~e. Eecause this issue can only he cecic~ec at the hig},est levels of the Administration, I intent? to press for a meeting of the P!SPG at the earlie.=,t possible date to at~Cress tl,e question of whet}~,er the Administration i~ willing to ~rerk for enactment of leaks legislation. For the reasons set forth above, I am convinces' that new legislation is a i;ey first step in tackling this problem, and I hope I can count on your active support in accomplishir:g this goal. I ar; sure that we can e~ork together to prepare effective legislation. I '_ook forward to hearinc from you ter. this matter in the very near future. Sincerel}~, 4?illiam ~~. Case;' Director of Central Intelligence cc: Secretary of Defense Secretary. of State P.ssistant to the Fresident for 2aationGl Securit}~ F~ffairs Director of t'anagement and L~udget Distribution: Original -Addressee ~ - DCI " 1 - D/OCA 1 - DDCI 1 - DDL/OCA 1 - FAIR " 1 - EXO/OCA 1 - ER " 1 - OCA Chrono 1 - L1~7G/OCA/SUB -Leaks FY 87 Intel Auth er LF)G/OCA b (17 P~larch 1986) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/28 :CIA-RDP88G01117R000100070001-2