LETTER TO JIM COURTER FROM WILLIAM J. CASEY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 15
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 8, 2011
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: September 30, 1986
• Content Type: LETTER

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
~..
EXECUTIVE SEC: TARIAT
ROUTING SLIP
ACTION
INFO
DATE
INITIAL
1
CI
X
2
DDCI
X
3
EXDIR
4
D/ICS
'S
DDI
6
DDA
7
DDO
X
8
DDSBT
9
Chm/NIC
X
10
GC
11
IG
12
Compt
13
D/OLL
~(
14
D/PAO
15
D/PERS
16
VC/NIC
t 7
Dp
X
18
C NE DO
X
19
CAF DO
X
20
21
22
30 September ~~986
Date
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy_ Approved for Release 2011/07/08: CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
r The Dingy of ~ ~~ Medlibenoe
6aai6r~ R~gisiry
30 September 1986
The Honorable Jim Courter
U. S. Hodse~bf Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Jim,
Thanks very much for sending me copies of your
summer output about Star Wars, contras, Angola,
terrorists and Yugoslavs. They are very good and
you should have more people speaking out on these
issues.
Keep up the good work and if I can help you
let me know.
Yours,
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08: CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08: CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
+ t y.Y JERSEY
.~
~on~r~~~ of the ~nit~~ ~tat~~
~1ou~e of `1~e~re~entative~
~Daohin~ton, ~~ Zos~s
September 15, 1986
The Honorable William Casey
Director
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C. 20505
Dear The Honorable Casey:
ARMED SERVICES
SELECT COMMITTEE
ON AGING
Ex~~lr~-r~ ~~~~~~~:y
86- 4159 X
Over the summer I continued work on a variety of national security
issues which may be of interest to you, and I want to take a moment to send
you a selection of new articles.
A number of the enclosures concern two public issues which have much
absorbed our attentions, strategic defense and aid to the freedom fighters
of Nicaragua and Angola. These remain causes of strong interest to the
American people which we have a clear duty to advance during the precious.
last years of the Reagan Presidency.. Other articles concern another subject
of much past work in this office: terrorism.. The long-deserved respite won
by the President's air raid on Libya on April 14 may have come to an end
with the events in Pakistan and Turkey. Now there may be other crimes
against innocent people, and America may again be required to take harsh
action against the states and individuals which are responsible.
If you wish to set aside time to discuss these issues, or others in the
national security area, I-would be glad to have you call Kathy Kish at my
office and arrange an appointment.
IM COURIER
Member of Congress
JAC/ch
Enclosures
2422 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 [phone]
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08: CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
tYhile.Soviet `SDI'Moves Ahead
Contem ~ lates
U.S . p _
Surrendern ~. `Star Wars
By REP. JIM COURTER (R.-N.J.)
Human Event
~.
Oorosso MltratNa M asehargo for a Sovlt PbdOo.to art t-aetr oftoootw artcNat
areaaata, tHraaao Satrotary WdaO?tOK frreAU to !b~aah ?ppoaooi to srrea a:
Not too long ago. the chief of the
Soviet General Staff, Gen. Nikolai
Chervov, arrived in London to tout the
latest Soviet arms control proposal.
At a pros conference and an appear-
ance before the House of Commons
Foreign Affairs Committee. t;herirov
announced that "on 'Star Wars.' the
Soviet Uitioa has actually trade a very
specific compromise." While the pre-
vious Soviet position had been that
??everything was to be banned. includ-
ing research." Chervov said. the new
Soviet position says "la's limit it to
research is laboratories." -
It should be noted that the. 1942--
ABM treaty already permits SDI-type
research and even some testing, so the
"new" Soviet proposal is: in a very teal
sense. more than 14 years old. Even so,
Chervov's announcement arria with'.
,y. the t.n 1'.?atinn that the Soviet I it~ee
is doing nothing more sinister than SDI
research, and it is the U.S_ that must
rein in. iu ambitious strategic defense
program if an arms control agreement
is to be reached.
Uaforntnately, the Soviet SDI pro-
posal is. cooking. murmurs of interest
and even approval from ccrtaia quar-
ters within the Brogan Administration.
Specifically, Secretary of State George
Shultz and arms control adviseF Paul
Nltze -have reportedly been Itrging a
positive U.S. response to the Soviet
sctreme, either in a presidential letter to
Mikhail Gorbachev or in Geneva when
the arms control talks resume in Sep-
tember. Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger is strenuously opposed.
Apparently the prospect of deep
strategic offensive reductions,
even at the alarming cost of a aip-
Rqa. Cou-n-. ? roaklwe atdatKr o/ tAr Ho.ao
? ~ a~e.u ow u Ste. ~ a~id~So.w~~dd w
propoaaL .. . _ .
pled SDI program, b so Irr+atstibk
..that home sector. Admlaistradoa
ottidale are losing their apptecia-
tioa of the teal dangers involved:
[n conjunction with their campaign
agairut our SDI program. the Soviets
have become noticeably more modal
about their own strategic defense
aceompUshments. But as early as 1967.
Soviet official publications were brag-
grog about having already licked the
most nettlesome strategic defense chal-
lenge.
"The USSR has far ouutripped=the
United States not only in the aeation of
intercontinental and other rockets. but
also ia? the area of anti-missile des
[ease," said the authoritative military
publiation Soviet Rocket Forcer. "In
our oamtry, we have suoeessfully solved
the problem of destruction of rockets
in flight." .
How One Man
1~'ought Anti-Business
Media. Bias?
Almost 20 years later. it is enlight-
ening toreview the strategicdefense ad-
vances the Soviets have made. and the
oaa that theyare Ukdy to make before
the rnd of the century.
Sovia SDI etforu can be divided
into three geaeral'categoria: activities
related to the. Moscow ABM system:
deployed systetas. for Possible ttadon-
wide ABM defettsa: and work on ad-
vanced systems, most notably directed
energy weapons.
AU of this work is driven by Soviet
military doctrine, which holds that stra-
tegic defensive forces ue to be used to
destroy any incoming strategic offen-
sive weapons which tray have survived
the Soviet ftnt strike. The protection
provided by strategic defensive systems
is nor expected to be total: only essen-
tial leadership. military and core iadur
trial seaters are to be defended on a
priority basis. The proletariat would be
kft to fend for itself.
The flagship o! the Soviet SD[ system
is the ABM iaeenceptor system de-
ployed around Moxow. A major
d in 1978
' l
pa
~In this
issue...
? Court Shreds Reagsn's
Cfril Rights Policies ........ 3
? Wip Kerry Filibuster
AW to Contras? ........... 3
? Gran Retorms
Betnq Blocked ......... .. 3
? "Global Eduation"
Pu:hed In High Schools . ? ? ? ? 4
? Pornography Commission
Issues Final Report ........ 5
? Commissioner Dobson
Blasts the ACLU ...... ? ? ? ? ? 8
Unked to AIDS ..........: 6
? Who Made Ted Turner
Secretary of State?
h Naa~ord Cone ......... ... 8
? Atao
"Racial Balance..
Turns lavr:lnside-0ut
-'' By M. StsMen Evora .:........ .. 7
Glamorizing Drugs Played
Part (n Athletes' Deaths
ey.lon^ lotto! ?.:--._:........ .
Anti-Business Media Bias
By Mean C. [4rovtMo~d ........ ... 10
Who WIII Succeed
Stroessnerin Paraguay?
BX ynloi Hompstono ......... 11
pro-Sandinista
profe4sar at UCLA
8y Los CsarW 111 ................12
WIII YaOe Fight
Disciplinary Probation?
~ ,Nttr.t Hart .................. 12
Equal Time for
Evolution and Creation?
h Jsmos J. Kepotrkk ............ 16
Capkal8rlefs ............... 2
This Week's News
From Inside Washington ....... 3
Potltlcs'gti .................. 13
Rags of.the Week:
Dunn vs. Carr.
Traywkk vs. OAo .......... 14
BaNenper vs. Rork ........ 15
Consetatlw Fotunl .......... 18
Book Renew: OooQbre
To the Low ProMe
4 e?eut scr..rt: ............. 10
e
system upgrade was uu
Re6eags:
and is due to be completed by 1987. The Senate. REA Lows ......:. 18
completed system will consist of 100 Hance: SALT 11 Um1ts...... tg
launchers of two varieties.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5 Ipl 1?a??? ? ? ? ? ? s
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
rS. TO SURRENDER `STAR WARS}~ IFrompagel
Mors at ballistic .missile warheads outside the
arch's atmosphere. The GA2.ELLE launchers
ilil deploy interceptors designed to stop wuheads
itl+in the atmosphere.
$ecause only launchers and not the actual inter-
:ptorsare limited by the ABM treaty, the possibil-
yexists for the launchers to be reloaded and fired
fain. In fact, two advanced atmospheric ABM
~terceptors have been fired from the same test
uncher in less than two hours.
The launchers are supported by a sophisticated
igagement, guidance and battle management
tdar network. designed to maximize the potential
tr successful warhead intercepts. The stew early
arning radar at Pushkino will be the
bell-ringer for the Moscow ABM system; the
BOG HOUSE and CAT HOUSE radus wiU track
to incoming warheads; and the 24 TRY ADD
tdars will have actual battle management respon-
bilitics.
The Soviet party elite are evidently quite pleased
ith the Moscow ABM system. They awuded one
f only three senior military promotions in 1985 to
.natoly Konstantinov, the commander of the
toscow Air Defense District, whose primary
:sponsibility includes maintenance and improve-
tent of the Moscow ABM system.
Arrayed at more than a thousand locations
round the Soviet Union ue the more than 10,000
~rface-to-air (SAM) missiles and associated
rdars which constitute the Soviet "air defense"
stem. But true "air defenses" are intended to
twut attacks by. "air breathing : _3Ystems~such. as _
o~? and his colleagues have never explained why.
~r example. between 1973 and 1975. SAM missiles
sere tested 50-60 times at altitudes as high as
00,000 feet, when it is well known U.S. bomber
nd cruise missiles fly at much lower altitudes. [t
as also never been explained why SAM radars
+ere used in ABM-related testing activity, which is
probable violation of the ABM treaty.
Like the Moscow ABM system. the territorial
efense SAM systems and radus are being cx-
anded and modernized. The new SAM missile,
ne SA-12, is projected to have the capability to in-
ercept shorter-range balliuic missiles, u well as
ome submarine-launched and land?based inter-
ontinental ballistic missiles.
Of particular concern is the reported deploy-
nent of the SA-12 t0 defend SS-25 mobile
CBMs. Consistent with Soviet military doctrine,
heSA-12 could greatly augment the survivability
~f a mobile ICBM "strategic reserve" force,
"hereby enabling the Soviets to acetate a second
strike after absorbing a U.S. retaliatory attack.
Incidentally, the deployment of mobile radars to
operate the SA-12 in an ABM mode and the de-
J ployment of the SS-25 itself are violations of the
ABM treaty and the SALT II treaty respectively.
A great deal of attention has focused upon the
six new large phased-array Pechora-class radus.
five of which are deployed around the periphery of
the Soviet Union. These radars are intended to pro-
vide early warning of U.S. and Chinese ballistic
missile launches, as well as missile tracking data.
Because five of the radars provide little or no
coverage for the Soviet interior, they are judged to
have little or no ABM capability.
The same cannot be said of the sixth radar, de-
ployed near the town of Krasnoyarsk in the mid-
dle of the Soviet Union. This radar complex is
located 3.700 kilometer cast of Moscow and 750
kilometers aocth of the Mongolian border. But it
is aimed towaid the extreme northeastern tip of
~ the Soviet Union,. more than 4,000 kilometers
away.
i The Soviets claim that the Krasnoyarsk radar
serves the same early warning function as the five
i other radars, but the ABM treaty requires that ear-
' ly warning radars be located on the Soviet border
and pointed outward. Consequently, the Kras-
noyarsk radar is widely acknowledged by most
Western observers to be the Soviet Union's most
blatant ABM treaty violation.
More importantly, the location and capabilities
of the Krasnoyarsk radar present the threw of an
evolving ABM battle management radar network.
The Krasnoyarsk radar is located in the vicinity of
------ae-leave--:~~Flr'>3M fields 9~d 9} trst} AA S/~M
deployment area. The radar's coverage "fan" may
include potential U.S. ICBM attack corridors.
the laser weapons program appears to be the
largest of the Soviet exotic SDI efforts. More than
10,000 top scientists and over SI billion per yeu
arc devoted to laser activity, which is conducted at
six major centers. The largest ~ center, at Sary
Shagan. already boasts two ground-based Insert
whicfi could be used to interfere with U.S. satellites
in low earth orbit. Work is also proceeding on
three kinds of gas lasers. excimer lasers. nuclear
weapon-driven X-ray lasers and ugon ion laser.
These efforu could culminate in a space-based
laser deployment by the year 2000.
The other exotic weapons efforts appear to be
smaller and even .more closely guuded than the
laser program. Panicle beam weapons. for in-
stance, have been tested at laboratories in Sarova
and Leningrad. Research on radio frequency
weapons for damaging fragile missile and satellite
electronic components may lead to tests in the
1990s. Guns for firing kinetic energy weapons, or
"smart rocks," were developed in the 1960s and
could be deployed on space platforms in the
mid-1990s.
The military significance of the total Soviet SDI
program is considerable. Successful development
and deployment of increasingly effective SDI
systems, in conjunction with the continued deploy-
ment of sophisticated and mobile strategic offen-
sive forces, would represent the fulfillment of the
Soviet strategic military doctrine; that is, to inflict
maximum damage on the imperialists' offensive
forces and then provide maximum protection far
important military and political assets in the fact
of the imperialists' retaliatory strike. ?
As Mikhail Gorbachev put it recently, "The
interrelationship between offensive and defensive
arms is so obvious as to require no proof."
Gen. Chervov is, no doubt, aware of this inter-
relationship. as well. No one expects the Soviet
Union to abandon its vast and multifaceted SDI
research, development and deployment program.
Similarly, no one should expect the U.S. to aban-
don its embryonic SDI program.
The success or failure of U.S. efforts to build a
defensive system will depend upon the Administra-
tion's ability to resist the siren's song of deep
reductions in exchange for SDI limits.
Certainly, there are those who recall the inviting
:promise of the ABM treaty: strict limits on ABM
activity. is exchange for detp reductions in stra-
tegic arsenals. Those same officials now know the
cost of this treasured belief: The Soviets, through
-deceit -and -ucategic arms violations._greatly ex-
anettal, leaving this nation vulnerable to a Soviet
first strike. The question left unanswered is: Will
the mistakes of the past be repeated? It is a ques-
tion only the President can answer.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
111isgr~ided allies
~Cte ~~titabrE~~tta ,~~tquirer
Op~ed Page
Monday, August 11, 1986 Page 13-A
...aid l~~k mho is a~di~g 1V~anag~a
By Rep. Jim Coarter
Not many Americans would be
shocked to learn that Czechoslovakia
boasts of giving the Sandinistas St00
million in aid stare 1979. After all,
Czechoslovakia is a member o[ the
Warsaw Pact and a colonial posses
sion of the Soviet Union. Americans
are well aware that Soviet bloc
spending oa btanagua's Dfarxists is
immense. indicative of an invest-
ment as important to the Kremlin as
is Cuba.
What most Americans do not know
is that Sweden, a gentle detaocrac~r
that most frequently makes the news
because of Soviet submarine espio
nage, has pro~?ided or pledged 5100
million to the ~iwraguan regime
since 1979.
This disturbing parallel between
Czech and Swedish assistance illus?
ttates the degree to which many of
oar Western European friends are
our eyes .
For them, it would seem, Washing-
ton has not gone tar enough by aban?
doniagthe Monroe Doctrine and per?
mittiag the construction of two
communist states -Cuba and Nica?
ragua - a fep hundred miles from
US. borders Instead, Americans are
expected to endure the financial sup?
port of one of those go~?ernmenu by
our democratic allies across the At?
!antic.
Sweden is only one offender
among many. Norway, which has its
proper doubts about the growth of
Soviet power, is nonetheless iacreas?
Ing aaistaace to Managua. This year
S11 mtlllon is government money
will be spent to send fertilizer, paper,
machiDes and direct technical assist-
ance.
Finland, wtth a geopolitical posi-
tion that condemns it to continual
sad wary study of the Soviet bloc,
increased to contribution to Nicara-
gua to S20 million this year. Aad
Denmark granted Nicaragua 59 mil-
lion to soft loatu last October far
agricultural development. klost such
std goes to state colletitives
Spain gives more aid to Nicaragua
than to any other Central
nation and is increasing
-
-_-
.?~ J.... _____
~~~.~--0 ____ _
ing to the Sandinista daily Nuevo meat to promote inter-Nicaraguan geopolitical problem. Outs is a time
Diario. Agriculture, cooperative dialogue because, in his opinion, when the shits in the correlation of
and health sectors are the Spain supports the Sandinistas. forces makes the United States un?
i
h
ous
ng
s have sure of iu ability to defend Western
ti
ib
at ? It ~~ h~
efr
u
on
Other financial contr
bung adeed tsee S, h w Europe against Soviet attack.
p
overnments of Aus
the
f
g
rom
only recently put the tear of military come
juntas behind it, actively aiding the trio, France and HoIIand and from
success of a junta in Central Amer? private interesu like the Federation
ica. of Social Workers of Denmark. a free
d all
a sm
li
The European aid is of "nonlethal"
kinds, o[ course. That makes it less
offensive to friends of freedom for
Nicaraguans, but no less helpful to
the Sandinista communists. Any aid
e
ver
labor anion that de
sum to a non?tree Sandtaista "trade
union" on May Day this Year?
In all, Western Ettropeaa nations
are expected to send ri00 miWon to
permits them to reallocate indigo- , Nicaragua is 1986 That bide m m
nous resources to "lethal" realms. !i amount President Reagan
there Is more to
t
~f
~
ree,
butter comes
enetages of
hard to obtalnfor the
spend on guns.
Sandinista rule, the contras. (And
Second, the ultimate effect on the
political opposition and besieged in-
dependent labor activists is no less
discouraging than would be direct
donanons of weapons to the Saadi-
The Spanish foreign minister dis-
covered this in January. After sign-
ing the new aid agreement in Maaa-
gua, he ventured to balance Spanish
policy by meeting with oppostuon
parties. But the secretary general of
food aid to be a119cated to Latin gov
ernments this year.
Lamentably, the EEC has been
nearly this generous to Nicaragua
ever since the 1979 revolution. But it
is still unfathomable that this year's
EEC food consignment should not go
to the hungry in Haiti, where democ?
racy has iu first opening in decades,
instead of Nicaragua, where the San-
dinistas have been closing cell doors
on democrats for years.
Fatting that, could not the aid go to
the troubled democracies of Central
and Latin America? And if it mast go
to Nicaragua, why not at least to the
dwindling private sector, as agains{
government entities which benefit
only the Sandinistas? In short, why
are our European friends not re?
warding free enterprise and .democ?
racy instead of collectivist repres?
sion?
American ~ the Social Democratic Party, Luis Ri? There is irony in these free na?
its assist- vas Leiva, told .him ,that Spain is lions' aid programs for revolution-
they do not have it yet).
Under Americas pressure and re-
lentless Sandinista thievery of the
treedoms. properties and dignities of
the Nicaraguans. France. Germany
and Italy, at least, are decreasing
their eooaomk assistance. But even
as these countries close down bilat-
eral ai4 that are yielding np gifu
from another pocket; the European
Economic Community has just prom-
ised the Sandinistas half of all EEC
of vision allowed Cuba to become a
direct and immediate danger to
American defenses and American
plans for the resupply of Europe in
the event of war. Today Europe is
witlessly helping the Soviet Union
build a second Cuba, another plat-
form from which Soviet bloc air and
sea power could Interdict American
air or seaborne assistance to Euro-
peon armed forces.
The answer b not is nay renewal
of discussion about decreasing the
American commitment to Europe.
We can permit that no more than can
the Enropeans. However, we can do
that which oar ambassador to the
EEC is now attempting: ratchet up
the diplomatic pressures against oar
allies for their contributions to our
enemies.
(Rep. Jim Coarttr, vho reprtstnu
New Jerseys 12th ConYresstona! Ihs
tries, is a member of the Hoteu Armed
Strvtces Committet~
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
In the first paragraph of his open "Letter
from the Ambassador of Nicaragua to the
U.S." [June 1986]. Carlos Tunnerman de-
picts the Sandinista revolution as aimed at
independence and liberty. a revolt akin to
the American one of two centuries ago. I
wish that it were. Certainly other Central
American republics such as Costa Rica and
the renewed EI Salvador have demonstrat-
ed that constitutional democracy needs no
United States imprimatur to work welt. Its
principles are as universal as our founders
declared them to be.
But the principles of Marxism-Leninism
are also held to be universal, and it is they
which guide certain modern revolutionar-
ies, the Sandinista chiefs among them.
Members of the junta bared their true alle-
giances at celebrations in Cuba a few days
after the triumph over Somoza in 1979.
The irony of the visit was that Cubans had
3vZr-tiro v~n'SaTifta'rn'--fFie name o
pcndence and democracy. Within a few
years Cuba had neither. and Castro, who
spoke in 1959 of an "olive-green revolu-
tion, as Cuban as the palm trees," admit-
ted that his guide was the ideology of
Marxism-Leninism.
Look at Nicaragua. As early as 1981 La
Prensa's Pedro Chamorro? declared that
the new rulers "practically idolize Cuba.
They say that someone needs to teach us
'the Cuban way' ...There are moral and
ideological ties that cannot be broken with
Cuba, Russia. East Germany, Bulgaria,
Hungary. Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia."
Today the Nicaraguan revolutionaries are
counterrevolutionaries whose powers are
concentrated in the East German-advised
secret police, the militias, Cuban-style
block committees, Red Guard?style youth
mobs, state socialism, and the quiet death
of the last independent presses and radios.
The Sandinista-run elections of 1984 of
which Tunnerman makes so much did no
more to protect and preserve democracy in
Nicaragua than did the elections of 1948 in
Czechoslovakia.
Mr. Tunnerman extols the battle against
Somoza because he imagines that Ameri-
canswill remember their own rebellion and
believe, adapting Gertrude Stein. that a
revolution is a revolution is a revolution.
But some revolutions make men free, and
others make men the subjects of new dicta-
tors. The difference is in the revolutionar-
ies' principles: either they base govern-
ment on tni: principle of equality and.limit
the powers of their own governorship, or
they base government on the principle that
history anoints some to rule others, and to
rule with irresistible means. Washington
and Madison did the former. The Bolshe-
viks, the Castroites, and r2ow the Sandinis-
tas have done the latter.
Jim Courser
Member of Congress (R)
/2rh District, New Jersey
Regarding yourJuly 1986 article on Mor-
gan Fairchild by Bruce Brady: Please, give
us a break. Your characterization of Mor-
gan Fairchild as the actress-activist "at
war" with the Hollywood stereotype, but
nonetheless willing to buck the system in
pursuit of her "ideals," is really too much.
In fact, the ideals that Ms. Fairchild es-
pousesare exactly those which Hollywood
holds nearest and dearest. First, Ms. Fair-
child is "pro-choice". This is not surpris-
ing, in view of the fact that the entertain-
ment industry as a whole endorses the idea
that men and women should be able to do
what they want, when they want and how
they want without regard to the conse-
quences, particularly in matters of sex.
Ms. Fairchild is obviously no exception.
Second, Ms. Fairchild is anticensor-
ship, and if it means allowing pornogra-
phers to distribute films, magazines, vid-
eos and what-have-you through the mass
media, who is she to say it's wrong? Third,
Ms. Fairchild is anti-school prayer. Yep,
school is for reading Thoreau, Emerson,
Jefferson and Franklin. Let's just make
sure that we avoid those portions of their
works which refer to God, the Almighty,
the Creator, etc.-or would we be flirting
with possible censorship? Obviously the
reading, of such highly moral and instruc-
tive works presents a knotty problem for
GMs. Fairchild, who doesn't like fundamen-
talist Christian-type ideas.
That's all right, because kids in school
are smart enough to make their own
"choices" about what constitutes right
and wrong, good and evil, moral and im-
moral. They don't need religion, they can
listen to their inner voices. Or to shows
such as Falcon Crest.
Bruce Brady's article would have put
Ms. Faitchild in a kinder light had he stuck
to the more basic things we are all just
dying to know about Morgan-her weight,
true age, dress size and make-up tips. I can
believe she cares deeply about those.
Mrs. Kerry Carter
Alexandria, VA
Copyright, /986, Austin American-Storesman.
Repriartd Kith permissio~r of tJnivtrsa/ Prtss
September 19 86 syndicar~. Alt rights r~servtd.
- - AMERICAN POUT/CS
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
THE WALL Si'REET JOURNAL, r'RIDAY, ~JU.YE 6, 198b
European Edition
A Look at the Yugoslavia-Libya Link
By Jrx CouxrEr< the war ended. The Soviets and Libyans Subsequently. when the EgyptAlr airliner
WASHINGTON - A week after American both wanted closer rclatlons, and may have was hlJacked to Malta, Greek police were
warplanes struck at Libya, the foreign ban rewarded for theft efforts. The Soviets Bald to believe that the leader and sole
sarctary of Yugaslavla amved In Tripoli to had set precedents for use-with minfrttal survivor of the pro-Libyan Abu Nidal team
denounce Ne UNted States' "unprovottd testtictfons-ot Yugalav ports and air- bought his ticket in Belgrade. The other two
aggresslon." The cltaricterizatlon of the fields. Soviet mllftary persoitrtel have ban members of the troika had come from Libya
long overdue retaliatory act was part of a .reported at bases on more than a fear w mat him to Athens.
Joint detlaratlon issued by vWtiag foreign occasions, and a ttaading agreertteat per- There have been three outer recent
ministers of a small delegation from the colts Sovkt surface ehlpa artd submarLres to Inddeats involving Arab or Palestinian
Non-Aligned Movement countries, among ?come to Yugoslav ports for service and arco~ operating from or passing
them Cuba. ~mogh Yugoslavia. Given the repeated
~rs? declaratlotu by TripoU and .Belgrade of
The UNted Natloas Security Council Belgrade's relatlone w1Ur the Libyans support for Arab and other Mediterranean
debate >n New York followed, and the remain strong despite the death of Tlto fn Ubetatlon movements, news of a Feb. 20
Non-Aligned Movement sent a delegatlon agreement ptomisirtg "closer t:ooperatlon
as a show of support for Libya. Five foreign Pefjia S we S{iOtild ask on security matters" between the two
ministers were expected, but Ghana and the p countries is of no small concern.
Congo withdrew, leaving three hardier tf YtlgOtlaiJia hasn't trade Amerit:ant are no longer surprised by
arrivals: Clrha, Senegal and Yugoslavia. the mathloatioas of Cuba and Libya and
In the meantime. word escaped of too mfiCh Of holding MOt- Syria and other rigorously aligned '~ron-
Colonel QadhaE's deep diaplessure at the cow at a distance while a~~~ nuies. They are less aware ot,
ineffectual performance oI h1s m!lltary ~ Cognizant, more delicate about
forces during the American rata. C7.echosto? tindul to Moscow's closest YugosiaWa. This Ls not without reason.
vakia and Yu lavia were the two (riendl g g Yugoslavia is more independent, and less
e~ Y anti-American allies. dtreetly eooperanve with the Soviet Union,
countries w which he turned [or analyses of than Is (lrba. its leaders, unlike Fidel
his nation's military deCtdencies. 1980. Stall MaJor Abd alSalam Jalioud, who Cutro, do not speak of the American
TripoU?Iiel;rade Axis today appears W be the second [nodt president u a "legltirnate heir of Hitler."
These details. so Inconspicuous within powerful man tnLfbyan pollUCC, Hsited and The government has received American
the mass o[ press stories on the Libyan made undlaelaaed agreements with both ~~ ~~ ~r Weinberger. and
affair, are tndlcators of something almaat Moscow and Belgrade fa Julli 1961. Libya ~~ ~~ ~ call ~ Yugoslav
i tuuroUced: the strategic alliance between and Yugoatavla atutouxed an agteert-ent on ~ Year.
Ubya and Yugoslavia. Over the past mliituy cooperation that OCWber. Within ThH ~~? bright corner to We big
decade, events In the Mediterranean and ~ picture ~ t~~Y ~ trstrlt of as Immense
space of the next year atone. there were and expensive American commitment W
business In the Non-Aligned Movement, of visits to Tripod by the Yugoslav president, ytrgaalav Independence after the 1948 break
whldt both Libya and Ytrgaalaria are the Yugaalav federal secretary for national between Tito and Stalin. A1d Glowed drastl-
members, have often taken a tarn around defense and the vke president of ,the tally 1n the ttdd-1960x, but Belgrade still
the Tripoli-Belgrade axis. Yugoslav federal executive wuneU. P moat favored natlon trading
The reasocu for this are .severest. Both status. A decade ago. Laurence Silberman.
Libya and Yugoslavia are seltdescribed Ikvdopmart of ubyan?Yttgoalav tda- the [corner UJi. Ambassador w Belgrade,
revolutionary socJallst posers. Both tom? tiorts has bees paralleled by development of dared to suggest "that Washington should
moaly adopt antl?Amertean posltlons on mtlltuy ttlaUons with Watuw Pact mew- Rexudne Its reiatloas according to Ne
foreign polity issues and routinely vote ~' Ltbya's tight 'relatlans wth East udted States' true faterrsts" because
agatast Ne U.S. In U-e U.N. Lbya is a Germany dad 44erboatovakla. whose per "Yugoslavia had consistently sided wIN
hard-line and consistent Soviet ally; Yugo- sand wort In I1bya dad to the Libyan ~ 's enemies in the world." The
tlavta - whUe more lade cot-bolds oD- ~' dad security serHw 1n eaorrttotrc ~t> ~D~rr!ent dlsassochted itself from
bend y~~_ ~ITi s Hews Bat he hsA ^.e,.~rt
-$~te Ct0 w'D!n COfOnfJ ~ flsDOtJ n!w atiUtary ind K to still trite, that Helgrade'f toting
nomic bloc. Both totuttries ate rellabk record m the UJQ. Deus out his Judg-
polltieal supporters of radical Soviet allies .dad eoooank agraettlmta with Soviet mmt.
who bold task to Urelr t:ertiticates of kader Cot~chev m Iitosaow Dui October.
But there were other state vWts >n 1f6S. ~ Some Alignments
nonaligned status: txanttles Ulu Arba, Ail the pteoeding is as attempt to
Nicaragua and Syria. Both have triUitary Oae dLawelan at YugosMvtas fnterrst adumbrate sane much aegtected realltla
relations with North Korea, which 1tte11ties ~ Libya b mlUtary hardware sales. Llbia of Yugoslav taefgn policy. They do
increastngty toward the Sovkts. Both aI~Y Dossessa Yugaelav Galeb aircraft, not accord eaaUy with the opinions o[ those
openly support Palestinian terrorist orYad- dad Dace scot air iota cadets fp Yugoslavia who have few second thoughts about Yugo-
adores, the Namibian South West Africa for tralnfot. Now Libya has reportedly slarla's taaventlooal designation as re~t-
People't OtYantzatlon and the Salvadoran ordered tour P400-class tnlssUe wtvettes augned. Perhaps American poUcy makers
frwn Ure Yugoslav yard u XtalJevka. should. ass whether ? Ytrgaslavta has not
communist F'NQJ4. Tone -are "splendid Uttk sAfp Idllets, publkly made too conch of holding Moscow
The origirrt of this strategfe exit. this D~+i a Irigate punch In SZSton huiltl" at a dlstaria whlk simultaneously indulg-
Medlterraneaa marriage of geopolitiea! writes the privately pubUsbed pertodleal ~ ltaaeo.rs eldest and-Atneritan al-
fnterests, seem to 11e in the Mideast Wars. ~-
' Libya turned against Israel and the US Naval 1as13ttrte Proceedings. Otrce that gttestlon fs aasvreted, Nerc is
West otter 19~ whm Colored Qadlratl And then there are Yagalsvla's well- another, more dlttfeult one: G1ven the
unseated Kin[ Idris io a Loup. BY then enfttd midget snbmar4tn, the sort oI Yugaelav penchant for txxrrtlng the West's
Yugoslavia's Tito had long favored Egypt's weapon and tceartnat::anee vehkle Ural totalttariaa enemies, and according them
Interests. He assured President Nasser's SoHet frogmen dad eorttttundo (tarns have support they'd never dream of letdfng to
ambasssdor w Belgrade during the 19Q war toed rcpeatedty In Sweden's coastal waters. the US. demoetsey, should America rcduee
that "as tar as Egypt H cooeerned. I am rat The submattnn' capabUltles lndude sabo- Its slender ties to Belgrade' Or. u with
noa-aligned.-- T1to proved It Dy granang ~ aetlons wed as tDe laytng of mlaes to Chtaa, should It labor W trtake the Dent oI
overAlght and refueling rights to Soviet harbors. torpedo IattncDtrtg, noel tMltratfen an awkward relationship wlaae future wtU
transports and fighter aircraft. of o0rntrtandea. According f0 the pu011catbn always be uncertain'
Yugoslavia's generosity with Its air- Jane's fighting Ships. two of the R-t Males I Ddiere the answer is that In a worid
space - a Denefteenee which has reeve- been t:iass midgets Dare been transferred to where Solid mlUtary power >: the supreme
extended to American warplanes-wu UDya. Ttrerc't also as unconCtmed report ~' the latter fs the betur course.
even mote ronounced In the Yom Kl r that YugOalavta (nay have already trained But America should make better use o[ what
war of 19T]. 8y one report. 1.(100 Sof et Libyan aatlons noel Palestine alteration tnDuena It has. A good beginning would be
to let Belgrade Iarow that what It gains from
planes used Yugoslav eorrtdors during a Orgaatratlon personnel tit midget sub opera- American relations - ItxJuding moat ta-
two-wok period to October of that year. ~? voted nation trade status, markets (or Its
According to anoNer, the Red Atr Force Such cooperate, vrtth ~ Its Unplka? contact' cars, and government assistance
airborne unit which had Dan the vanguard floes for terTOrum In Europe and the In telling over Yugoslavia's S20 DlUlon
of Ute 1966 Invaslo" oI Q.echaslovakia wu Mediterranean, would rat be outafde the debt-mod bec?`ne Condngent.upon abate~
readied (ot posslWe use In the Middle realm of normal Yugoslav relations with tnent of certain of the more Insuttetabk of
East. ? - either ubya or the PiA. In the wake of last Yugoslavia's foreign alignments.
- .. . _ _..
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5 `:~'"?"
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
Section One: Page 46
JERSEY ON THE POTOMAC
Covrter and Chevron debate
palitics of oil in war-torn Angola
By J. SCOTT ORR
Ster?ledper WesAtnyfan bureau fense Department's ability to readily
WASHINGTON -Rep . Jim obtain essential petroleum supplies
Courter (R?12th Dist.) is taking on one around the world;' Keller added.
of the nation's major oil companies in a Kelley's letter went on to point out
dispute over oil fields in war-torn M? that the company has operated in Argo-
gola. la for 30 years and that the company
The dispute centers on an amend- "has always maintained a position of
meat sponsored by Courter that would strict neutrality with regard to political
prohibit the Department of Defense .matters in Angola and has acted in ac-
from buying oil Erom any company that cordance with the expressed foreign
pumps oil m or sells oil from Mgola. policy of the U.S. towards Mgola."
Courter's amendment is intended ~ Courter responded earlier this
as a slap at the Communist government month that he would be "surprised" if
of Angola and its use of Cuban troops Chevron has maintained neutrality and
and Soviet officers to protect itself pointed to an editorial distributed at
against resistance fighters, the company's annual stockholder
what is necessary for our security.
"This is much more than a busi-
ness question. It is a moral and geoppoo--
litical question. Your concern is profit-
ability, while mine must be the Ameri-
can taxpayers' subsidization of our ene-
mies.
"Your corporate officers' eyes are
fixed-not Improperly-on the bottom
line; mine are fixed upon the strng~le
against the Cuban, Mgolan and Soviet
forces which are the enemies of Mgo-
lan freedom and American security;'
Courter wrote.
Beside Chevron, Texaco Inc. also
has a significacrt investment in Angola.
Shell--Ail-Gor-has-a-amalletinvestment; ----
and Conoco has a plant there but would
not be affected by the amendment be-
cause it doesn't pump Angolan oil, ac-
cording to Courter staffers.
~~whilp ~r rhic Y2rIC-R10ment-tile-~~~mg. -- - ---_
democratic resistance is battling a
major offensive by the Cuban, Soviet,
East German and Angolan Communist
forces, private American companies
are indirectly underwriting that offen-
sive," Courter said in June when the
House Armed Services Committee ap-
proved the amendment as part of the
Department of Defense authorization
bill.
The bill, with the amendment,
later passed the House and was sent to
the Senate.
The action setoff an exchange of
letters between Courter and Ceorgge M.
Keller, chairman of the board of Chev-
ron Corp.-the correspondence was not
exactly friendly.
"You should be aware," Keller
wrote, "that driving Chevron and other
U.S. companies out of Mgola will not
appreciably harm the Angolan oil in-
dustry nor affeM government revenues
there.
"Furthermore, this amendment
could pose a potential threat to our na-
tion's security by restricting the De-
tribe against the Mgolan resistance
and what it called the `radical right in
the U.S.' which has the temerity to find
virtue in (the) straggle for Mgolaa in-
dependence," Courter wrote.
He went oa to point out that the
American general manager of Chev-
ron's Cabinda Calf Oil corporation, Will
Lewis, has been quoted as criticizing
the Reagan ~dmmistration's support
for Jonas Savimibi, leader of the resist-
ance group UNITA, the national union
for We total Independence of Mgola.
"Permit me to inquire whether
your office has remembered to give Mr.
Will Lewis the same guideline you have
described to me concerning Chevron's
strict neutrality oa political matters;'
the letter said.
Courter said in the letter that he is
concerned abort what would happen to
Angolan oil sales it U.S. companies
leave. "bnt I am more concerned that I,
as a representative of the U.S., do not
begin making decisions based on what
is good for our corporations rather than
Mobil Corp. divested itself of its
holding in Mgola about three months
ago and got out, the staffer said, adding
that the company has said it is making
a conscious effort not to buy Mgolan
oil.
Though Courter has heard little
from Chevron in recent weeks, staffers
said they don't believe Wey have heard
the last of the company's objections to
the amendment
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
? A10
_Nlt~__YQRK_TIM~~_..1'x~day ~'~ugsut 22, 1~)f;fi
Briefing
A Let t er to Rea~ail
' Q-i in the Iiouse of Representa-
L rives have urged President
Reagan to pmmote talks oft power-
sharing betwckn? 'te Government of
South Africa and "nonviolent South
African groups representing blacks."
In a letter to the President this
week, the lawmakers suggested
i specifically that the South African
~ Parliament be expanded from three
( to five chambers, with one of the two
new bodies elected by blacks. The ex-
i fisting three chambers are elected by
j whites, people of mixed race and Jn-
dians. The second new house would be
a Senate, with equal representation
for each province attd homeland in
the country, to be elected by their
residents. Legislation could be passed
by three of the five houses.
i "we are not recommending that
the United States dictate a constittt-
i tion to South Africa," the letter said.
i "Rather we urge you to propose some
j constitutional plan in order to begin
the process of negotiations, making it
unmistakably clear that what we seek
' is any reasonable Corm of democratic
~ black power-sharing."
' "There is no reason to insist on the
'
n
stantly,
which tew on a
y side of the
debate think is realistic in the current
context and should be ?allowed to
evolve once black power-sharing has
come about."
The appeal was initiated by a e-
'v ~ u[ New ersey
an signe y epresentatives Dick
Armey of Texas, William F. Clinger
Jr. of Pennsylvania, Bob Dornan of
California, Newt Gingrich of Georgia,
John Hiler of Indiana, Robert J.
Lagomarsino of California, Tom
Lewis of Florida, John G. Rowland of
Connecticut, Barbara F. Vucanovich
of Nevada and Robert S. Walker of
Pennsylvania. No response has been
received from the White House.
The C.~tlicu Quf?sliun
eports fmm the California
White Huu.c? that unc of the
three newest members of the
probably nut. Accurdin}; to experts in
this arcane area, it is genetically nll
but impossible fur a tt+ale offsprinl; of
any feline uniuu, however checkered,
to carry athree-color calico coat.
Reached in Santa l3arbar:+, Blaine
Crispcn, Mrs. !te?aga+:'s press secre-
tary, reported that thr t~~?u other new
cats, Cleo and Sara, had been estab-
lished as female c.:+lico kittens. But
since the cat story tJYoke earlier this
week, no one has ventured up to thN
Reagan ranch to m;~k~? :+ cluu?r in-
spection of Alorris's markings, nor
has he or she been ph+nul;r.:phed. 111x.
Crispcn said that Clco, Sara :nut \1ur-
ris, ut whatever color ur cunfigura-
lion, were co-existing pe:u?rfully with
the considerable Reagan dug-p;+ck at
the ranch: Lucky, victory, Millie,
Freebu and Taka.
Money, Mone}', ]~lone}?
From the Democratic point of
view, the bad news is that Re-
publican political committees
raised 5.3 times as much money us
their Democratic equivalents (S18G.1
million to 535.1 million) from January
of 1985 through last Junc. Tltc good
news is that the disparity was better
than it was in 1981-82, when, accord-
fn
Sion, the Republicans raiscxl G.S times
as much as ttte Democrats (5161.2
million to 524.8 million).
Public Opinion for Sale
he American F nterprise Insti-
tute, aWashington-based con-
servative resrarch group that
has recently been experiencing finan-
cial problems, is uttering its bi-
monthly magazine, Public Opinion.
for sale. The principal prospective
buyer so far is Dow Jones & Compa-
ny, which publishes The R'all Street
Journal and has been seeking tltc ac-
quisition for some time.
Sources close to the negotiations re-
port that the staff of the magazine
would probably continue U+ work out
of offices at the institute but th:+t fk,w
Jones would assume management of
the magazine. Wnll $U'lY`l Journal
editors are said to bey mtcrestcd in ub-
tainingdirect access to the polit+l; in-
funnatiun that makcw up the "(tpin-
ion Roundup" section th:u has hr~?n ,+
feature of Public Opinion.
Established in the late 1970'x, I'ub_
Iic Opinion now has a press run of
about 7,81)0 Copies, of ~~~lurh a little
more than half is paid circul:+uun and
the rest is compliment:+ry copies
given to Government ufl+ci:d~, lour-
nalisls and the like.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
ddb O d 0b y O 7'b ' W Q d >,.~ O O d
?,_ac -O o.S?EvV~~d~E ~a~o3E~oy~
W ?, S ~ ~? ~ ? ?W?cn ~ s =; c,?? ? 3 a ~, ami a a?Di ?d ~' ? E
a3ic I aoi ~c Ec~~c~daat _p~~~?'~'e'3UE
m ~ a.. ~, d 8 ~ ?, E
3? ca~a~,tya$EQ.,a?ip,C7'S,~?om ~c'.+Sy~'''8oq?'?.
O. aoi~ oo'd~ag~ ~y'n~~da?n~~OQ.w. o~"~~-~ etaQ
~ EIS ~ `c~ 3~M;otn.ny."3 v?, boo, S~ a cg~3 ao?~O~c 5
b d O~ p..r a.Ou?.d 4. a 'p ~~'
a ~ W
b ~ ~ ~ ?~ O tOi w ~ ~. ~ 5 ~ d Q.O. ~ 00
O~~ q?d.dGO....? {rd~u~:
g O O p Rf M ~ ~~ sr. ~O~
~ 'w ~ b ~? ? ~ _ _ ?
?~ {, ti ~ ~ ~
,b?t C V d~? Q~?
a ~. d_l V y a .-~ ?C
O~$t~~~~ d;3
d??$ ow ~?g
?
+
~
v
do $ j V ww5 ~a E a `?a
daE"cc~ o?'S?M~_ ~?_ p r ~ ?~?~EV ~c?~do? }C+~?p'9Qa
?dE~~~d~~V oN;~OOV~O.~G ~+~~~XyDOOM~ w~~d~"~~R.
5oa?~dE~??a. ~Q.`?ec?ae~ao:~ ~"+?'~`?`?2a?'v `?-c,,Qca~p_
TcQ ainb yOj ~ R ~?0 OOD? C ~ ~ ~~ a vi~??~.~O. dxC ~'~~ O~-.C C O~ %Q O Q,C
to CC o0 O ?a tC ?
"" N ~ d a y~ E ~ ~?O ~OW61 a?j ~M.-. ~~.. 00~ ~~ C O O~ ~ ~ 0~~..~ d ~c c O
~5::~ E ~,_ ~3 G.~?v as3 a ~...$~ oG 3_~Vdaa m o o~aQ o.~
~.
00 ~ Oq -~1
~. ? .~
V1 .C. ~.?? ~ a. ?O 1. ~ N t0
~'d ?
~ o?~?v~ d cp o ~ a E ~,~~M ~~ ~ ~ ?+r'p~ o ?a~po~ e a ao~~. aci ~ eoi? ~
.~LLO ~~r E d?.~'~.p.Ex a? a~~._": o a
~'C c~ ~ vOi d V ~ d C
E ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~
xEdca`'iM
~?oocao~~~?~?.E
h
?'hp h' E
aOd.~tOap?~ CyCdcc
`ern
aci i y C c Ei..
?~'~'b?.M ar~~ ~~ Q W~ a?
u t.
-- ~vb c-
~
E
hdE-~E~E ha., ~,Geao>a~ac~
S
E
~aua
c
'
a
~
Ma~
~
~
-cg>~Ep~
~25
~~:
8
ti ~ ~?~v
~ O
~~~~~~~.
sy by
~? d "cap' ai d~o W Yd 3 3 q v a~i o ~' a ms
?
p,~~EaWO~iUa?c a~_E~~~~ +5 '?~~ov?~W
~ wSV? a0 a~'C cam. ~,,cp h?-.- 033 p, ~5'~'0 mV ? c?7i~ ?
ep ?cti. a~ ~? d v ~ x o a?~p ~ a
vV EEM ~.r a ..- c ~ ? ~,aoV hw
t n w~ ,p.o'C W S
o e
v
??w~o?? ooa~aO~
~i o c ~ aw c.cv o V ~' ~'~ d
?~~8~~a3=E oc a~~h~m ~
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/08 :CIA-RDP88B00443R002004480002-5
O G :: 00 n f~~Dp vGi aC 8 ~ p, rj f~tiD (~1D Amt ~ ~ z A
O C1 y ~t yy f0 A O ~ ~" d ^t f9
A w Vi a w O.~~ ~ '~' G w N w~ ~!
~e ~ m ~ ae ti~~?~' you c ., a~ ~ ~ a~
.? w ~ ~ m .".. ~ ?~ A - a Rio A 7~? a? :~ C`~- G ' ~
~;?o