DIEM ASSASSINATION WAS A 'MONSTROUS BLUNDER'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01350R000200600001-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 2004
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 16, 1972
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01350R000200600001-7.pdf134.56 KB
Body: 
iJUttFULK, VA. Approved For Release 2004/10/13 : CIA-RDP88-01350 00 006 DO 7 J S, PILOT rQ~ Aric 10 WZ V) we M - 127,079 a1 S - 174,257 i ..D [- .p1 ov~cQs a,V1 e_ ^, _T7 "Yj By S. L. A. Marshall, r e f e r r i n g to them as "barbecues." 'Brig. Gen (ret.) Thus, in the summer of 1963, several of- fW h Times/Post News Service IN HIS WELT. POLISH1'i P;IEMOIR, "Swords and Plowshares," Gen. Max- 'well D. Taylor sees the murder of for- .mer South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother, Ngo Dinh Nhu, as a monstrous blunder in the Vietnam War, bringing about political c? o n f u s 1 o n that vastly prolonged the struggle. Though one might answer such a theo- ry in the words of the French diplomat .who said that it is an idle exercise in history to speculate on what might have happened had that which happened not -happened, the Taylor opinion stays no less weighty in the aftermath of the mil- 'itary coup and the killings. Taylor be- came ambassador to Saigon and had to cope with the consequent chaos. .( As he correctly puts it;-the inexcusa= ble mistake of all who c o n s pi r e?d to ;overthrow Diemwas that they had ,planned nothing better to replace him. The, passions and attitudes of that r summer nine years ago almost inevita- bly generated' a violent climax. Diem was under heavy fire. He was being vi- ciously assailed by the American press in Saigon, who waged their vendetta be- cause Diem scornedthenand they ,were being starved of news. ? . Public opinion in the United States, seeing Diem as a lesser evil,'vented its rage against Nhu because of his oppress 'sion of the Buddhists led by Tri Quang, ;who was just another Vietnamese rack- eteer in a saffron robe. The self-immo- lation? of several Buddhist monks in pro- test against Nhu's measures also served to fire American emotion. Though Tay- lor indicates that Tri Quang had con- ?-trived these sacrifices to topple Diem, 'Madame Nhu, already an object of par-ticular loathing to the American press, intensified the get-Diem movement by facial statements came out o as tng- ton that seemed clearly to signal that the U.S. government would welcome the ruination of Diem. Gen. Taylor's freshly minted memoir lifts the lid on that subject more than a little. On Aug. 24, when he was chair- man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, there came to his desk a U.S. State Depart- ment action paper already cleared and cabled to the embassy in Saigon. What he read alarmed Taylor as it did other defense principals. The authors of the already cabled in- struction were Undersecretary of State W Averell Harriman Assistant Secre- to form a cabal to gun' down Diem and Nhu with the approval of the United, States. Inside official U.S. circles there was no protest against the course so definite- ly set forth. Some of those directly con- cerned such as Taylor might in their own minds question the wisdom of the instruction or policy shift. But none said clearly: "What we propose to do is im- moral. It is beneath the dignity of the United States that we as a government would conspire to political assassina- tion. My conscience won't take it. So I will turn in my suit." One by one the principals fell' in line with what had be- come, if by default, White House policy. In the end, the deed was done. tary of State Roger H 31 s m a n and a Be it said in favor of the Vietnamese White House staffer, Michael Forrestal: m i I i t a r y brass that they were more They had cleared their paper with Un- loath to b e c o m e the executioners of Diem and Nhu than were U.S. generals dersecretary of.State George Ball while and diplomats. 'he was playing golf and with the late Taylor, however, in noting the luci- President Kennedy via telephone, which dent, writes: "I know of no evidence of signifies mainly that the clearers gave d i r e c t American participation in the only passing attention to a major and coup and certainly of stone in the assas- Significantly, the paper had not been - cleared with Secretary of State Dean Rusk, who was not anti-Diem, or the Central Intelligence Agency or the De- partment of nee: The sense of the paper sent to the new ambassador, Henry Cabot Lodge, was that the United States would no longer tolerate the presence of brother Nhu in the Saigon government. Dien, however, must be given a chance to. get rid of Nhu. At the same time, Lodge was to in- form key South Vietnamese generals about this change in the U.S. position.: Not only that, but if at any point the generals decided to get rid of President Diem, they were told the United States would directly support their action. So what was in essence this instruc- tion to the ambassador? Only a twisted mind would see it other than as a li- cense for the South Vietnamese military Approved For Release 2004/10/13 : CIA-RDP88-0135OR000200600001-7