THE SALT II AGREEMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 16, 2004
Sequence Number: 
39
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 12, 1979
Content Type: 
TRANS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9.pdf143.25 KB
Body: 
d For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9 A""v RADIO TV F PRTS, INC. NBC Nightly News STATION NRC TV NBC Network DATE June 12, 1 979 6:30 PNI CITY Washington, DC The SALT 11 Agreement JOHN CHANCELLOR: Public opinion polls have shown this year that the American people believe the Russians are likely to cheat on the SALT II treaty limiting nuclear weapons. This is a widely held bel ief despite the fact that officials in a position to know, including former Secretary of State Kissinger, say the Russians did not cheat in any meaningful way on the first SALT treaty. In any case, verification of the treaty will be one of the key issues in the Senate debate on the treaty, and we've asked Ford Rowan to look into the whole business. FORD ROWAN: What if the Russians cheat? Suppose they build bigger and better weapons than allowed by SALT? Would the United States find out? The United States relies on space satellites and other electronic monitors to watch what the Soviets are doing. Pictures ,r 1n-the-sky satellites are secret and much more detailed from spy and revea 1 i ng than these unc I ass i f i ed photographs. But the se- crets have been compromised. In two espionage cases, the Russians bought information about three satellite systems: Keyhole, which takes photographs; [unintelligible], which listens to missile telemetry; and Argus, monitors radio transmissions. But the biggest problem started back on Earth, in Iran, when the U.S. was forced to close down monitoring stations near the Soviet border, a major Ioss, according to the former head of Air Force Intelligence. OFFICES IN: NEW YORK ? LOS ANGELES ? CHICAGO ? DETROIT ? AND OTHER PRINCIPAL CITIES pPr,,gved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9 Material supplied by AF d apons, Inc. may be used for file and reference purposes only. It may not be reproduced, sold or publicly demonstrated or exhibited. Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9 2 GEORGE KEEGAN: The SALT treaty, as I presently under- stand it, cannot, in any way, be verified. The assumptions and public statements made by this Administration regarding verifi- cation, in my best judgment, are fraudulent and so intended to deceive the American people. ROWAN: The new SALT treaty would limit the development of new and bigger missiles, as well as the number of multiple warheads (M9IRVs) that can be placed on missiles. When the Russians launch a missile at their test site in Turatam (?), American infrared satel I ites pick up the heat of the rocket engines. The two Iranian listening posts are missed at this point because they had a clear look at the test site and the early stages of flight. But as the missile gains altitude, it is monitored by radar stations farther away in Turkey, by other satellites, and, as it nears the Pacific, by ships and radar stations in Alaska. Former CIA officer Herbert Scoville says these down- range monitors can check to see if the Soviets have violated SALT Iimits on MIRVs. HERBERT SCOVILLE: I am absolutely certain we can verify the SALT II agreement, as it is now written. Not only do we have alI these capabilities, but the SALT II agreement has specifically written into it a large number of provisions which facilitate verification, which actually will improve our intelligence over what we have today. ROWAN: To improve intel l igence, the Administration has ordered a crash program to use such things as U-2 spy planes along the Soviet border to make up for the loss of the Iranian bases. But some say it would not be enough to compensate for the losses in Iran. DANIEL GRAHAM: I think it's fraudulent for the Admin- istration to come forward and try to give the American people the impression that you can replace those capabilities. Those capabilities gave us a 24-hour watch, with alI sorts of sensors, over the two most important facilities in the Soviet Union for verification. ROWAN: CIA Director Stansfield Turner has angered some leaders in the Administration by conceding that it would take five years before the CIA recovered the capabilities lost in Iran. Furthermore, Turner says there's no way he can be certain SALT can be verified. Is SALT worth the risk the Russians will cheat? In a recent speech, Turner said he'd leave that up to the President and his advisers. Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9 Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9 ADMIRAL STANS F IELD TURNER: The pot icymaker must a! so say, in view of the fact Turner hasn't got 101 percent assurance on any of these t'h i ngs, are' the risks to our country worth it? Are the benefits of having these controls worth whatever degree of possibility there is from the monitoring evaluation that it could be circumscribed, or circumvented, or whatever the right word is -- cheat. ROWAN: President Carter and Defense Secretary Brown have insisted that the United States will have the ability to adequately verify Soviet actions under the SALT agreement. They argue that without SALT and its rules forbidding concealment, i-1- would be even harder to find out what the Soviets were doing. CHANCELLOR: Senator Henry Jackson released the text of a speech today in which he mounts a very tough attack on the Carter Administration's stand on the SALT treaty. The White House is saying that if the Senate votes amendments and changes to the treaty, that will force the Soviets into new demands, which couid kill the treaty. Jackson, in his speech of today, says that attitude is appeasement -- his word -- ominously reminiscent, he says, of statements made by an unprepared British Government as Adolf Hitler prepared for war. Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370039-9