EXTENT OF UNIVERSITY WORK FOR C.I.A. IS HARD TO PIN DOWN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000300020001-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
NEWSPAPER CLIPPING
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000300020001-9.pdf135.83 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/12/19: CIA-RDP88-01315R000300920001-9 THE NEW YORK TIMES,?.SUNDAY, OCTOBER 9. 1977 U ve s Work...,for G.I.A.-m. Extent-of hi .Y $y JO THOMAS .y. to Pin Special to The Ne~ York Times , Down WASHINGTO,I, Oct. 8-Despite three ~ ?;, . -days of Congressional hearings, no one wet knows the degree to which some of the nation's most prominent universities -were ,compromised in the Central Intelli- gence Agency's secret mind-control re- search in the 1950's and 1960's. Adm. Stansfield Turner, the Director of Central Intelligence, said in Congres. sional ' testimony last August that the I,I C.I.A. covertly sponsored research at 80 institutions. including 44 ? colleges 'and universities,. from 1953 to 1963. The re- search was part of the; project .code-. named M.K-ULTRA, which sought to con- trol human behavior through such means: as hypnosis, drugs and brainwashing. The ' Senate Health Subcommittee, which .wanted to hear the academiicians'i reaction, quietly invited the presidents] of 20'institutions to testify at its hearings' Sept: 20 and 21. Only one president ac- he was not scheduled to.testify cepted; because all the others declined, explain ing that they had previous engagements. The list of the 80 institutions given to Senate investigators is still classified, but each of those institutions has been notified separately by the.C.LA. that in some way, knowingly or unknowingly. it played host to C.I.A. research, and 26 colleges and universities have acknowl- edged this publicly. ? ?:~.'Research Varied, Inquiries at these institutions disclosed that C.I.A. research on campus varied from innocuous sociological surveys to' tests aimed at finding better ways to ad- minister drugs to unsuspecting subjects. The attitudes of current administrators likewise ran the gamut from outrage to indifference: ., The passage of time, more than 20 years in some cases; the C.I.A.'s secretiveness during the .project and the fragmentary nature of the records the C.I.A. has made -available to universities have combined, in most ? cases, to make a reconstruction of what happened difficult or Impossible. At many universities, money for these projects- was channeled through founda- tions so that neither the university nor the professor doing the research knew the true sponsor or purpose of the work. Sociological, cultural and anthropological studies were financed through the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, based at Cornell University. Biochemical and medical research was often financed through the Geschickter Fund for Medical 'Research Inc.. headed by Dr. Charles Ges- ..1.:..L.,...- r-eor etown 1 iniversitv,-pa-' g thologist. or Release 200 e-9`2 i'c(~1Xrf ? - T 1 fl 00020001 9cr 5 Xt? 1f Sense of Injury ".?i feel that I've been done an'injury. personally, by the C.I.A.." said Dr. Antho- { ny J. Wiener, who in 1937 -received a- 1$12 000 grant from the Society- for the Investigation of Human Ecology. At.that I t'me Dr. Wiener was a guest at the Mas- I sachusetts Institute of Technoloa'.y's Cen- ter for International Studies;-w! -Herman Kahn, he later wrote th. "The Year 2000." "I would not have lent myself' kind of deception, and I don't thir should have practiced any sort of tion on me," Dr. Wiener said. When he first heard about the s Dr. Wiener said, he was lookii money with which..to continue a of the social role of Soviet scii Twenty 'years later he learned tE-. C.I.A. hoped to find out "what can be. developed in spotting and ing such persons as potential age cruits" from his study. . . "They made no attempt to poi in that direction," Dr. Wiener said I never gave them any material for fying potential defectors. That was interest at all 7 Projects at Stanford ? "We've been made guinea pigs, said Robert Freelen, director of g tingly lent its name to seven C.I. search projects. These ranged from vey of the literature on human groups to a project that simply chaff money to a psychiatrist, a . meml ,the Stanford clinical faculty, who ii paid for such enterprises as a sure the ways in which criminals gave x to the unsuspecting.. ... _~ .; . The Stanford _projects were fin, 'either' through foundations' or tl members, thus bypassing the univ A-c Mr. Freelen said he was not sur v the university could guard again: on the sources of funds and their credibil- ity," he said. "If they lie and you believe. I don't know how, that problem.- gets solved.., :. .*,. Stanford has been making public every piece of information it can gather about its past involvement with the C.I.A.'s mind control research.. It, was the first institution with any 'major. Involvement.: in the program: to da so, although' the: University of Denver;" which. hosted a: ,small experiment ?in hypnosis. tracked.