NEW YORK TIMES COVERS AND AIDS 1953 C.I.A. COUP IN IRAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01314R000100350001-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 5, 2004
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 1, 1980
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01314R000100350001-6.pdf670.83 KB
Body: 
The Magazine For People Who Need To Know Vol.4 No-4 SPECIAL ISSUE -~.- SEPT./OCT. 1980 50 New Revelations: New York Times Covers CIA and Aids 1953 . Coup in Iran Iranians of different socio-eco- nomic strata and backgrounds vary in their grievances against the U.S. government but agree on the event of greatest disdain: the CIA- masterminded coup of August 1953. The coup replaced the constitution- al government of Mohammed Mossadegh with that of a pro-Nazi named Zahedi and marked the onset of 25 years of Shah-led dictatorial rule. An event of such historic impor- tance was. bound to generate contro- versies and consequences even three decades later. Indeed, Iranians' fears that the October 1979 admis- sion of the Shah to the U.S. for. "medical reasons" signalled another CIA-masterminded coup served as a catalyst for the embassy seizure. Following the embassy takeover, several U.S. government statements on the coup grabbed media headlines. President Carter, scoffing at the idea of apologizing to the Iranians, dismissed the 1953 coup as "ancient history". State Department spokes- person, Hodding Carter, repeatedly refused comment. The CIA officer who ran the 1953 coup, Kermit Roosevelt, disclosed his version of events in his book, Counter-coup: The Struggle for Control of Iran issued by McGraw-Hill in October 1979 and withdrawn-in November 1979 (three days after the embassy take- over) following strenuous--obiec- tieons by the British Petroleum Com- pany. After all the official versions, a number of questions remain unan- New C.I.A. Bill: Death to the First Amendment CounterSp3r magazine is issuing the following special report be- cause it poignantly illustrates the devastating damage resulting from collaboration between the press and the CIA, and because it addresses the present threat to freedom of the press and the U.S. Constitution posed by HR5615 and S2216 pending in Congress. These two bills make it a crime to name undercover CIA and FBI officers, agents, and informers or to pub- lish information that could lead to the disclosure of a CIA or FBI name, even if all the information is obtained from public sources. This report is about Kennett Love whose personal role in the CIA's 1953 coup in Iran was de- scribed as follcw;rs' by: Paul Nitze, a former Secretary of the Navy and an active member of the Com- mittee on the Present Danger. ':'There was a tank battle, and it wasn't going well, and the four pro-Shah tanks-were in the main square, stalled,_and Love went to the tank commander, knocked on the tank and asked him why he didn't attack Mossadegh's place. Love, who was only a reporten', had-just come out of there,Wand he had noticed it was undefended. So the tanks went rumbling towards Mossadegh's and Mossadegh went: over the back wall with some- thing like six people, one of whom. was a prominent professor at Teheran University'." Love's tide-tuning involvement in the tank.battle and other" as.- -ApprovedIFor(I4@1 &sre b4Abr1711 CIA-RDP88-01314R0.0010035006 fg"t. on pg. 6) swered. Roosevelt still claims that knowledge. In consenting or dis- the cost O tthef d -~ the t h o u s an roo ~ o ~f'egOe ~Ob~m'f'0'~12 : CIA-R[~88r0W~L@0(i~i 0?35~01r6 and future = U.S. policies towards Iran, Ame`ri- CIA officer, Andrew Tully claims cans need to understand the moti- the cost was more than $10 million. vations behind Iranian feelings In addition to the cost, the CIA and actions. As essential compo- personalities involved, with the nent of this understanding is exception of Roosevelt and Allen knowledge of the 1953 coup since Dulles, remain shrouded in mystery, it continues to motivate in part and very little is known of the the actions of millions of Irani- precise strategy and tactics em- ans. As Love himself stated: "The ployed. relevance of information on the New evidence, however, has American rescue of the Iranian emerged from the Allen W. Dulles throne to an understanding of papers, recently opened to a care- American-Iranian relations would fully screened audience at Prince- appear to be unarguable." Thus, ton University, which answers some we are presenting the following of the questions. Dulles was CIA information and analysis which we Director at the time of the August also feel is in the interest of 1953 coup. A 1966 file in the sec- world peace since an adequately tion of his papers containing cor- informed American people cannot respondence includes-a letter to be misled into war. Dulles from Kennett Love, a New We also feel justified in pub- York Times correspondent in Iran lishing parts of Love's account in 1953 and one of only two Ameri- as it was written for an universi- can reporters in Teheran during ty course at an institution which the coup. Along with the letter, claims that the free and open ex- Love sent Dulles a 41-page paper change of ideas and research entitled: "The American Role in should govern academic scholar- the Pahlevi Restoration: On 19 Au- ship. So, let us begin. gust 1953" which he wrote in 1960 First of all, according to Love, while attending Princeton as a the U.S. government initially be- Carnegie Press Fellow of the Coun- came involved in Iran for economic cil on Foreign Relations. Appra- self-interests which, in turn, priately enough, he wrote the pa- stimulated an unconstitutional, per for T. Cuyler Young, a Prince- violent coup and subsequent CIA ton professor covertly consulting repression. for the CIA. "It was the dispute between Iran The partially secret committee and the AngZo-Iranian Oil Com- which oversees the Dulles papers pany which drew-the United forbids publication of any mate- States toward its major involve- rial from the collection without ment in the Iranian scene..."The its prior approval. The committee experience prodded the United is chaired by Dulles' long-time States toward its cloak-and-dag- colleague and friend, Lawrence ger Persian adventure...Irani.an Houston, who served as CIA Gener- leaders were aware that the al Counsel from 1947 to 1973. We United States.was doing more for have not received permission to their economy than Washington publish.our report based on the would admit... It can be con Love materials, but we are pro- eluded that Wash~rngton, wanted ceeding with disclosure on the to joggle the Iranian premier principle that the American public with a blunt assertion that he has a right and a need to know the would have to settle his econom- details of their government's for- is difficulties himself if he-'-' eign policy operations. the U.S. remained intransient in the oil Declaration of Independence re- dispute... It (Mossadegh's con- quires that the government operate stitutional government) had with the "consent of the governed", eliminated all constitutional or Consent is meaningless without peaceable methods of removing 2''- counters roved-For Release 2004/10/12 CIA-RDP88-01314R000100350001-6 - - him from o fp&oeved.F,pr Release 2004/10/12: CIA-RRP~~~O?1Oa(1~3?g01l6ncZuding "It is probable that the Ameri- many who faced forced retirement, can role was decisive, that the and a reputation for decisive ac- Iranians who participated in the tion without too many scruples." royalist coup could not have (This is the same Zahedi whom succeeded without American help. Allen Dulles would call "dis- It is doubtful that the coup tinguished".) would have been attempted with- The CIA's brutality was also out American cooperation ... it seen in its assignment of George was a consciously planned accom- Carroll, hot on the heels of plot- plishment creditable to American ting violence in South Korea. Love Federal employees... Washington related the following. reacted, not by helping Mossa- "The organization of gangs, degh, but by kicking him out." armed with clubs, knives and "At the same time, the CIA stones, and occasionally a pis- agents who blue-printed the coup toZ or rifle.., was candidly against Dr. Mossadegh continued claimed by a CIA agent named to furnish technical assistance George Carroll, a six-foot-four- in quelling dissident movements inch 200 pounder who had arrived that threatened the stability of in Teheran from Korea, where, he the new regime. A year after the said, the CIA had been standing coup, American cryptographic and by while the United States was police experts'and a CIA agent organizing a popular uprising to played an important part in root- oust Syngman Rhee." ing out an extensive conspiracy Love also said that a colleague of Army officers that was close- of his described Carroll as "too ly linked to the Communist Tudeh unrestrained" but as the type the party." CIA uses "where they really don't In short, the U.S. government, give a damn...". Love's colleague using methods that were not "cony- also told him of the following stitutional or peaceable", con- post-coup involvement of Carroll. sciously intervened to install an "In the days immediately follow- undemocratic, royalist regime. The ing the overthrow of Mossadegh, raw cynicism and callous indiffer- Ardeshir Zahedi came to see ence of this operation is seen in Carroll, daily..." the CIA's reason for choosing "Carroll was also a buddy of Major General Fazlollah Zahedi to Gen. Farhat Dadsetan, Zahedi's lead the coup and the new govern- first military governor of Tehe- went. ran. I believe Carroll worked "General Zahedi had all the re- with Dadsetan on preparations quisites. He had been Minister for the very efficient smother- of Interior in Dr. Mossadegh's ing of a potential dissident first cabinet in 1951. He had movement emanating from the`ba-- been interned by the British in zaar area and the Tudeh in the Palestine during World War II first two weeks of November, because of pro-Nazi activities 1953." under Reza Shah. He had been As Love summarized: "There can twice accused of plotting be no dispute over the fact that against the Mossadegh regime, Mr. Carroll made an .Mportant con- the first time in October 1952, tribution to the royalist success when he escaped his arrest be- before, during and after the cause of his parliamentary im- coup." We should mention here the munity as a senator, and the sec- following statement by Love, viz,,;- ond time in April 1953-in con- "It was the prospect-of Soviet- nection with the murder of Gen- controlled communism becoming dom- eral Afshartoos by a group of re- inant in Iran that prompted the tired officers... Thus, he pos- United States to intervene." How- sessed adequate credentials as ' a ever, the credibility of ' t.h.is as- nationalist, useful contacts .?sertion was undermined by these observations f"LLo a self. Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP88-01314RO 01003500 t e rS py -- 3 Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100350001-6 "The communist threat was defi- in Teheran believed that there1 nitely secondary..." were only 15,000 to 20,000 Tudeh "He (Mossadegh) had been an anti- members in Iran in 1953. In a communist throughout his career." country of 25 million, this was "In the July 1952 crisis... the hardly a serious threat. Nationalists (Mossadegh's group) Love's doublethink, if you will, rebuffed the Tudeh and balked which shadowed his public report- Red plans in the streets, dis- ing at the time, stemmed from his playing a degree of organization personal participation with the and tactical ability." CIA in the coup. ,-love admitted "The Mossadeghists, then firmly his participation as a propagan- allied with Ayatollah Abol- dist and as a militarist in the ghassan Kashani's religious fac- following passages. tions of the National Front, "My first observation of the as- such as Dr. Mozaffar Baghai's sociation of the United States Toilers Party, occasionally or- with the royalist cause began dered attacks on communists at with a telephone call to me at public gatherings. Groups far the Park Hotel from Joe Goodwin, to the right such as the Pan- a CIA man attached to the em- Iranists and the fascist Sumka, bassy as a political officer. followed a policy of constant Mr. Goodwin called shortly af- attacks on the Tudeh. This pot- ter the 7 A.M. news broadcast icy met with only occasional and asked if I wanted to meet government (Mossadegh's) inter- General Zahedi to get the real ference. " version of what happened." "There was no real abatement of Love was taken in tow by Dr. Mossadegh's anti-communism Goodwin to see Zahedi on August until after his appeal to Pres- 17, two days before the coup. At ident Eisenhower." (only 2'~ the rendezvous, Love met instead months before the coup.) of General Zahedi, his son, "It is conceivable that the Ardeshir,who knew Goodwin. Tudeh could have turned the Ardeshir told Love that the Shah fortunes of the day against the had issued two decrees. One ap- royalists. But for some reason pointed Zahedi as prime minister, they remained aloof from the and one dismissed Mossadegh. conflict. " After witnessing the photocopy- "My own conjecture is that the ing of the decrees, Love took a Tudeh were restrained by the "handful" of the one declaring Soviet Embassy because the Zahedi prime minister and distib- Kremlin, in the first post- used them at the Park Hotel in Stalin year, was not willing to Teheran. In distriburing these take on such consequences as decrees, Love, a New York Times might have resulted from the reporter, consciously served as a establishment of a communist- propagandist for an dn-going, un- controlled regime in Teheran." democratic CIA coup. We say un- Given these observations, it is democratic because the Shah by all but impossible to accept that royal fiat was appointing Zahedi the coup was motivated by genuine and dismissing Mossadegh. fears of a Soviet-controlled com- Love's dual role as a propa- munist takeover. Not surprisingly, gandist was as unacceptable In the Shah did hold up the spectre 1953 as it is today. The incom- of communism. But, even Love, who patibility of the two roles waa,- recounted that "My life was saved highlighted by the-fact that Love by the driver, a card-carrying was the main source of informa- -Tudeh member...", claimed that tion to the American people at the Shah's threat was used as the time. How could-the-American "bait" to solicit U.S. support.. -people get independent-news cov- On e final pRPPI-6v l:& sb . O 4 / 0 / 1 2 2: CIA-RDM&4F3'f A01300gaQM t& r a c f-in-g at rdporting that the U.S. Embassy the direction-of the CIA ? Indeed;. _4 - CountbrSpy a.reading of Love's articles of down there where they would be August 1953 p Appmlated Fb - RereaS O04/10/12: CIA-FdPW--6f31 ~~ d00~ _ f s 2 t tin g -version" a la Zahedi and the CIA. idle at the ra 1~a station, They Love never mentioned any CIA in- declared my suggestion to be a volvement; glossed over Zahedi's splendid idea. They took their undemocratic appointment and did machines in a body to Kokh Ave- not mention his unscrupulous, pro- nue and put the three tanks at Nazi nature; and portrayed Dr. Mossadegh's house out of ac- Mossadegh as increasingly suscep- tion after a lively duel with tible to a Soviet takeover. armor-piercing 75 millimeter Love himself was apparently shells." aware of his compromising as he lied about his involvement 25 years later. According to the New York Times: "... Mr. Love said that shortly after the over-throw of Premier Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, he helped the CIA distribute copies of a declaration declaring Ardeshir Zahedi as Mr. Mossadegh's successor." But Kennett Love said he had not known at the time that the man who had asked him for help, "had been a CIA man and that he had never know- ingly done anything else for the CIA." As we saw, Love referred to "Joe Goodwin, a CIA man". It seems highly unlikely that Love did not know at the time that Goodwin was a CIA officer. This is particular- ly so since the CIA made Love privy to intimate details of the coup including the identification of "dirty tricksters", George Carroll and Howard Stone. Love was even told that Ayatollah Behbehani, one of the most influential reli- gious: leaders, "was the key figure in enlisting and organizing the bands of 'chaqu kashan' or 'knife drawers' who carried out Carroll's dirty work. Love's denial is further under- mined because he did do something else for the CIA in addition to his propagandizing. "Incidentially, I, myself, was responsible, in an impromptu sort of way, for speeding the final victory of the royalists... I told the tank commanders (one of whom Love said was named Ehteshamee or:Ekhteshamee) that a lot of people were being get- ting killed trying to storm Dr. Mossadegh's house and that they, the tank commanders, ought to'go Thus, it was through Kennett Love (and Associated Press corre- spondent, Don Schwind who worked with Love and Goodwin) that the American people were kept in the dark about a CIA operation - car- ried out in their name and through their taxes - which resulted in what Love himself called a "police state". Little surprise then "that Iranians are well aware of the American role although the Ameri- can public is not", as Love later cynically observed. The message is that the people in the U.S. should demand that the media sever its ties with the U.S. government, particularly the CIA in order that America will have the knowledge to function as a de- mocracy, i.e. with the "consent of Israel's Pentagon Papers . . Israel's Sacred Terrorism "a valuable service ... to those who are interested in discovering the real world that lies -behind 'official history.' -From Pioam Chomsky's Introduction MosheSharett, Israel's first foreign minister and prime minister from-1953 to 1955, kept a personal diary-a day-to-day candid record of how key Israeli policy decisions were made. Long kept unpublished, the diary reveals how Israel's "security establish- ment," men like David Ben-Gurion, Arik Sharon and Moshe Dayan, sought to destabilize neighboring Arab countries through covert military operations and terrorist activity, and plotted the takeover of South Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza. Italian journalist Livia Rokach'stpt~rought1ul analysis of the Sharett diary and other key docutn nts shatters longstanding myths about Israel and its security needs. Israel's Sacred Terrorism lays bare the political trend in Israel that. in the words of a troubled Moshe Sharett, raises terrorism and "revenge" toa "moral ... and even sacred principle." Order from: Association of Arab American University Graduates Y Sfi Trapelo Road. Relruuni. NIA 02179 (617) 984.5483 ,e Prepaid orders only. Adtl 5.40, be postage. Fri- catalogue of publications available upon re, iest. ~IA r%Ifl f AA. ~,., ,....,~.,., ~:; CounterSpy 5 A - --~"~- Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000100350001-6 the governed". This is especially needed at the present time with President Carter reportedly plan- ning other military action against Iran in the near future. This time if the American people are kept in the dark while covert operations and military actions are carried out by presidential fiat and in their name, there just may be a World War III. (cont. from pg.l) pects of the 1953 CIA coup are' detailed in CounterSpy's special report. At the same time that Love was participating in the CIA- directed coup, his articles were receiving front-page coverage in the New York Times and most major U.S. newspapers. Not one of the stories mentioned,tlie CIA's in- volvement in the coup. Indeed, before Mossadegh was overthrown, Love reported that Mossadegh had been toppled and his story was transmitted through the U.S. Em- bassy and was broadcast over Ra- dio Teheran. If Kennett Love had exposed the 1953 CIA operation; or if he had, at least, not fed CIA propaganda about an imminent Soviet takeover of Iran to.the U.S. public, the coup and the subsequent Shah-led "police state" (Es even Love called it) might have been pre- vented. Likewise, the present CIA precipitated tensions between the U.S. government and Iran may also have been averted. CounterSpy is publishing the Kennett Love story at the present time because Congrees is prepar- ing to enact what Representative Robert Drinan has called on offi- cial Secrets Act. If this CIA written law (HR5615 and S2216) were in effect now, it would be a crime punishable by three years in prison to write or talk about Kennett Love and his role as an agent for the CIA. This is the fu- ture for press coverage-of CIA operations if HR5615 and--S2216 are made into law. ? The Kennett Love story shows that the pending Official Secrets ests and a threat to national-se- curity. This is because it will not allow the exposure of present and past CIA operations, such as the 1953 coup in Iran, which, in the-long run, did not enhance U.S. security as exemplified in the present tensions between the U.S. and Iran. CounterSpy is thus issuing this special report in order to alert the American people to organize actions to prevent the passage of HR5615 and 52216. We are also is- suing the report at this time,'be- cause in our opinion, it will be next to impossible to publish CounterSpy under the pending law even though all the information in Counterspy has been obtained from public sources; and CounterSpy's stories have been in the interest of national security and world peace. In conclusion, we urge our read- ers to disseminate this report to activate people into stopping the CIA's rape of the U.S. Constitu- tion. The CIA must not be allowed again to carry out its actions against peoples of other coun- tries without any scrutiny from the U.S. media at. all. Order Counterspy back issues NOW Complete set of back issues $45 vol.4 no-.-3-(on counterinsurgency in Thailand, U.S. bases in Turkey, CIA in Argentina, MOSSAD, Ghana, Sweden, South Korea, Afghanistan) $2 vol.4 no.2 (on CIA in Afghanistan, CIA and Labor in Turkey, CIA domes- tic operations, U.S.-Australian role in East Timor) $2 vol.4 no.l (on U.S. intelligence in Norway, CIA in Indonesia, U.S. in- tervention in Afghanistan, CIA food study) v $2 vol.3 no.4 (on CIA in Iran and West Germany, the Lebanese Right, 1964 coup in Brazil) $2~ Add 50G for postage CounterSpy , P.O. Box 647 Ant is ag st td Fe ion 1 ( Washington DC 20044 prove or ejeasea2DO / /f CIA-RDP88-013148000100350001-6 6? - COun.terSpy U.S.A.