MACNEIL-LEHRER NEWSHOUR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01070R000200910007-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 27, 2008
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 19, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01070R000200910007-1.pdf389.86 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-01070R000200910007-1 riauvLlL-Lr.i1LC~K NKWJtiUUK 19 October 1983 bACNEIL: In a moment we're going to hear both sides of the covert aid debate in the Congress. First, we hear both sides. in the struggle in Nicaragua from a key member of the Sandinista leadership and a leader. of the contras, or rebels., Last week, on assignment for us, Charles Krause talked in hanagua with Humberto Ortega, Nicaraguan defense minister and commander in chief, about-_. the miltiary situation. HUXBERTO ORTEGA (Voice of Interpreter): What we see in the coming weeks is a worsening of military factors and the real possibility of war with Honduras, to the extent that Honduras is becoming more fully and directly involved in the aggression against Nicaragua. It's no longer the counter-revolutionaries receiving help from Honduras but rather the counter-r?evolu'tionaries'as part of U.S. strategy to use Honduras to distract our. forces and create conditions allowing Bonduras to make overwhelming attacks against our revolution, against our army. RRAUSE: Then you're expecting war with Honduras? DRTEGA: Against 'Nicaragua. KRAUSE: And the United States? ORTEGA: O# course and with the support of the United States. There are American. soldiers in Honduras with full logistical and adviser support, assurance of all kinds, of material for.agression. Now, whether the United States is going to get directly involved in our war, that I can't predict. I'm not a fortune-telling wizard who can say exactly what will happen. But I can affirm that with the yankees and troops that are in Bonduras, if there is a conflict between .Honduras and Nicaragua, arising from the activities of the Somozista counter-revolutionaries, then the possibility of the U.S. getting involved in that conflict is much greater. the real icenario I see for the coming weeks is serious. It's deteriorating because efforts toward peace, efforts at understanding are not preceding a pace with the sabotage, the build-up of the Honduran forces and the counter-revoluionaries in Honduras and in Costa Rica. KRAUSE: What's more likely, negotiations or war? ORTEGA: If the United States has a number of points to make that they believe Nicaragua is supplying arms to El Salvador, that Nicaragua has Cuban advisers or from elsewhere, etc., if there are a number of things that they don't like about Nicaragua, there are also aspects of U.S. policy that we don't like. And we think that there-cam and.should be analysis, talks, discussions but in a framework of mutual respect, decent framework, a civilzied framework, a framework without conditions, without abusing the strength of one over the other, without threats, without holding. a gun to our head. ?tACNEIL: Later., back in Washington, Charle Krause talked with Adolfo Calero, commander in chief of one of the -largest contra groups, the FDN, or Democratic Forces of Nicaragua. Krause asked for his reading of the situation in Central America. CALERO: Well, I would say the situation is real hot and, ah, it will continue to beat up. And, ah, we will not cease in our efforts to establish democracy in Nicaragua, by whatever means it.takes. At the beginning, right after the Somoza overthrow, we, political parties, private enterprise, practically all Nicaraguans gave the Sandinistas the opportunity to establish a Democratic government. In January.of this year we told the Sandinistas that we were ready, ah, to put down our arms if they would fulfill the' commitments that they made to the Organization of American States for democracy, pluralism, elections, respect of human rights. And since none of those commitments. have been fulfilled, ah, we have been obliged to take up arms against this sea of troubles that Nicaraguans are going through. Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-01070R000200910007-1 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 KRAUSE: Why should the Nicaraguan people, or for that matter, the American people believe that your group, which has Somozista officers in, why should anyone believe that you are democratic? CALERD: Well, to begin with,,. there' is. not proof to the contrary. And I, in putting it positively, I think that the people who need FDN through their lifetime have proved to be people who want democracy, who have worked f or democracy. KRADS.: Has the Reagan administration gitien You assurances that they will :support you ,to that end? CALERD: We believe that there is a firm' commitment on the part of this government and that the principal people in this government, like President Reagan and, ah, Ambassador Kirkpatrick and Secretary Shultz, they have continually made the statesmen, giving us, ah, let's say, hope. KRAUSE. To what extent are 'CIA advisers helping you? 'GALER0: Well, CIA has no people,. nor FBI people, for that matter, go-around...showing their identification. I could say that I have met no one who has shown,;me.a CIA,ah, ah, identificati'on card. KRAUSE: Well, then, what is all of the money from the United States going for? CALERO: If the United States is giving us .any money, -which -is 'something I couldn't prove in a courtroom. And if other. people and other., from other countries are also giving us money, I mean, ah, that, .ah.., whatever we get" goes for the armament we have, for the ammunition we have and, ah, and for the needs that an army would have. LEHRER Now to the debate, in this country between two congressmen who will speak on opposites sides tomorrow when the contra.aid issue goes to the house floor. They are Peter\Kostmaver, Democrat of Pennsylvania, and Mark\Siliander. Republican of Nicbigan. Both are members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Congressman Kostmayer, you want the ai?d cut off, is that correct? KOSThAYER: That's right. LEHFtER: Why? KOSTriAYER: Well, I think there are a number of reasons. The first is that .it's clearly illegal, against the law. In December of 1982, Congress passed the Boland amendment, which was quite clear in prohibiting any expenditure of American funasto assist in the destabilization or overthrowing of another government. Second3y, I think it Tuns strongly contrary...... LEHRZR: Wait a minute. Let's, let's take that one, let's take that one first. Congressman, Siljander, how do you argue the, what, what's your answer to the legality argument? SILJANDER: Well, we have other commitments, the UN Charter, the OAS agreement, the Rio Pact, the ?ionroe Doctrine, by which we stand by, commitments we've made to our fellow Americans, plus the issue really is we're not out to overthrow the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. That is a misnomer, a misunderstanding of the issue. LHRER: All right. KOSThAYER: Well, I visited the contra camps and say 15, 16, 17-year-old kids heavily armed with machine guns. They are there to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, not -to influence or to moderate policy. The Boland amendment speaks not to these general principles and policies but specifically to Nicaragua. And it says that the CIA should not be-expending, as it is now, millions of dollars to assist in the destabilization or overthrowing a government. No.... LEHRER: What do you see the purpose of. the contras to be, Congressman Siljander? SILJANDER: Well, there are two clear purposes. Number one,:certainly we're supporting the contras who are demanding, ah; fulfillment of commitments made by the Sandinistas. before the Organization of American States, free election, freedom of &on . Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion and labor unions, none of which, none -of which have..been, ah, follwed through by the Sandinista government. Secondly, we are there to stop the export of arms and revolution, which'is clearly happening by the Sandinista, especially, specifically into El Salvador. And the next target, as we heard by Ortega himself, likely will. be Honduras. LEHRER: What's wrong with that, Congressman? KOSTMAYER: Well, let me say two things. First of all, the bill, which-we'll consider tomorrow which -cuts off covert funding for the contras provides $50 million for -armsinterdiction. So, we're not suggesting the United States.... LEHRER: You means arms interdiction, arms going from Nicaragua to 1:1 Salvador? ROSTh YER: Nicaragua to. El Salvador, absolutely. We recognize that that's occurring to some extent.. No one's quite sure how much. We'.re not talking about some kind of unilateral irresponsible withdrawal of -American -involvement in Central America. We authorized the expenditure of $50 million in 1984,t-o assist friendly nations in stopping the flow of weapons from Nicaragua to El Salvador. Secondly, the administration's concern -with free labor unions,-elections, democratic political principles -doesn't apply in Chile_ It doesn't apply in Argentina or in 'South Africa. The Reagan administration's. concern with these issues is, is really quite new. LEHRER: Is that true, Congressman? SILJANDER: It iss,-it's nothing new. What we're attempting to do is force commitments, freedom, freedom of basic human rights and self-determination. I an more than willing to cut off all covert aid. Now my, my fellow colleague is willing to contribute overt aid, which implies premise of potential involvement of overt war. We're talking about assisting freedom fighters, in my opinion fighting for 'their owr freedom. I wanted to cut it off, if the Sandinistas are willing to call for internationally supervised elections, before s.o all sides may campaign freely, during so there's not interference and after so whomever wins will take power. And if they win, the left wins, we should then as a government agree to pull out all assistance, arms, any 'type. LEhRER: Let 'em have it, just let 'em have it? SILJANDER: Let 'em have it. If the people really want the harxists backed by 7000 Cuban troops, 1000 Soviet bloc advisers and 800 to 1000 (inaudible) Libyans that are using the Nicaragua as their base for exporting revolution. If they want that, let them have it. LEHRER: To the vote tomorrow, specifically, Congressman Kostmayer, you heard what the contra leader told Charles Krause. Be says that he feels he has a commitment from the United States government, from President Reagan, Secretary Shultz, Ambassador Kirkpatrick for, for the U.S. support. If you all do vote to cut this support off, what.have you done, what have you done to those folks? KOSThkYER: I think Congress made its commitment very clear in December, 1982, when it adoped the Boland amendment. An contras; ah, should, should be aware of that. The question is very simply:_.. LEHRER: You don't see this as undercutting the president? KOSTMAYER: I think it undercuts a bad policy, the policy which is to overthrow governments with whom we have some very legitimate disagreements. And. I'm certainly not an admirer of the Sandinistas. The question is fundamental. Should the United States be in the business of overthrowing governments whose policies we do not agree with? LEHRER-: What do you think would be the impact of a negative vote tomorrow in the Bouse? SILJANDER:' Well, the impact of a negative vote certainly will send ripples that we have not made a firm commmitment and sticking to our UN charter commitments .or Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 Rio Pact commitments, our'OAS commitments, the Organization of American States.- And let me repeat, the, the contention made that we're there to overthrow the Nicaraguan government is erroneous. It has been stated time and time again by them by the secretary 'of state and the president of the United States our policy it not.to overthrow the government. KOSTMAYER: I think the impact..... SILJANDER; But the two points than I made earlier.... KOSTMAYER: The impact will be very clear. The impact will be simply that we don't accept a military. solution; we believe in a political solution. That's what the impact of this will be. LEHRER: Let me, let me ask you both this question. Both the, both gentlemen we just h d f .*- ear ; rom the ground bthid d th ono sesownere say things are getting hot, there's gonna be war. Which, how would the vote up or down impact on that situation, C ongressman Siljander? SILJANDER:Wllb =e, numer-one, the interdiction of .arms has proven'to be successful. -We've caught Libyan vessels. ._We've found fishing villas assistant ambassador in the Sandinista regime... KOSTMAYER: And we're not opposed to th ' i e nterdiction of arias SILJANDER WlL .:e, are you gonna answer my question or I.... KOSTMAYER: We provide 50, 50 million. SILJANDER: ...Or may I answer my own question? KOSTMAYER: Sure. SILJANDER: Thank you. I talked to an assistant ambassador formerly to Honduras who had involvement with the Cubans and Soviets, and he says clearly that the involvement of the contras, as they .accelerate their involvement, the attention goes to stabilizing the bastion of revolution, Nicaragua. The Cubans make decisions. They firmly are committed to forgetting El Salvador, for stop (sic) *the arms shipment and let's worry about keeping Nicaragua stable, stable. So it will have a very negative impact. LEHRER: Do you, Congressman Kostmayer, agree with Ortega's scenario that the more the U.S. supports the contras the more likely there's gonna be a war with Honduras? KOSTMAYER: Well, I wonder, I think we have to ask ourselves what happens when the contras cross from Honduras where they're based into Nicaragua for these raids in which they are engaging and the Nicaraguan army pursues them into Honduras. I think the possibility of a wider war is, is a very realistic possibility. I think we're running that risk. LEHRER: If, if that should happen, Congress Siljander, should the United States get involved? SILJANDER: United States should not get involved. The president said there will not be troops involved in combat, combat in Central America. And... LEARER: No matter what*happens? FOSTMAYER: But there are 20,000 American troops in Central America now on the Caribbean and Pacific coasts of Nicaragua, and another 8 to 10,000 troops based in... We're.only asking for trouble. It's awfully easy to send those American soldiers in. It's mighty tough to get them out. SILJANDER: Here, here's what we've asked for. Every year or two we've had routine military maneuvers in Honduras. 'This- is nothing new. The difference.is, certainly the timing is appropriate, and a show of force, within 48 hours of our show of force and the acceleration of contras' efforts in Nicaragua, all of a sudden the Sandinistas for the first time in months come out with a six-point peace plan. Proof is positive. We are out for .a non-militaristic solution, and the only way to do that, and is clearly to force- the Sandinistas into sitting down -at the negotiating table, talking about elect 'ions., talking about freedom of self-determination. KOSTMAYER: (simultaneously with Lehrer) I think the... QW7VVVZD Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 11 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1 LEHRER: The toughest question... KOSTMAYER: I think the opposite has happened there. They've turned more and more to the Soviet Union and to Cuba, I think, as a result of all this. LEHRER: Toughest cuestion of all, Congressmen. Bow's the vote going to go tomorrow? KOSTMAYER: It,'s going to be very close. We had a meeting with the leadership this afternoon and it's going to be terribly close. I can't predict it, although.I think we-have a chance of winning it by a very narrow margin. SIL.ANDER: I think that it's likely the Congress will pass theBoland-Zablocki language. It's unfortunate... LEHRER: Meaning cutting off the -aid? SILIANDER: Yes,-I think they will. It will not go through the Senate, so I encourage those freedom fighters in Nicaragua that while the Congress may not keep up with their commitments -at l a t , e s on the mouse side, I hope the Senate will maintain commitments that we've made to the freedom fighters to force' orce therr th eir opponents into the-negotiating table. Not to war, but to the negotiating table. -LEHRER: Gentlemen, thank you both very much./ Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP88-0107OR000200910007-1