LETTER TO WILLIAM CASEY FROM MORTIMER B. ZUCKERMAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 18, 2009
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 11, 1985
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1.pdf626.75 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87MOO539ROO2904800014-1 1934/1 2400 N Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20037 ? (202) 955-2537 Mortimer B. Zuckerman, Chairman Mr. William Casey Director f Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Dear Mr. Casey: Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed for the June 17 issue of U.S.News & World Report. Your insights into Soviet espionage and the recent case involving the Walkers should prove very interesting for our 11 million readers. Sincerely, rtime.r, B. `;Tuckerman airman and Editor-in-Chief Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87MOO539ROO2904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 ?r1 hi O cd .y- ? S ~ cn SS~~ a) cd ~ (ll .gyp ~~ ,1 s ' / eff t , ~ C7 Y ~ ~ C\ CV 1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 June 7, 1985 2400 N Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20037 ? (202) 955-2275 Lester Tanzer, Managing Editor Mr. William Casey Director Central intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 LG; 1934/2 Dear Mr. Casey: Our interview with you will appear in the current issue of U.S.News & World Report, which will reach our subscribers early next week. We will deliver ten copies of the magazine to your office on Monday, and we sincerely appreciate the time you gave us for the interview and your cooperation in so promptly clearing the manuscript. Sincerely, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 ins 1e ?vc ~~~ N ) IL,J I 1 rv It Rvat,e S._ ,,, past, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 ~gjstry '^, (703) 351-7676 George V. Lauder Director, Public Affairs ~FO sraies os "-~'?E. 6 May 1985 ; :mot-", , ;r= : Dill~pl'.V"4 6) Joe Fromm of U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT has asked if you might be interested in doing another interview with them, similar to the one you did last year (copy attached). Again they will give you final approval of the text. Fromm says the new regime there is interested in meeting with you and that the interview would be followed by an off the record luncheon with chairman and editor-in-chief Mort Zuckerman and editor Shelby Coffey. Their schedule is flexible, but they'd like to do it within the next month. Accept interview with U.S. NEWS E:dFN~F~ Washington, D.C. Georg V. Lauder 14 MAY 1985 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 23/~^Y,1/~ L~ r- 5S Inter view E, VIC tnd Washington's ultimate goal, the CIA chief contends, is heading off a massive refugee crisis on America's southern border. Cl Mr. Casey, with so much attentlon fo- cused right now on Nicaragua and the con- tras, can you give us your assessment of the impact of the anti-Sandinista guerrillas? A They're creating a great deal of dis- array and pressure on the regime. They've damaged the economy. Daniel Ortega Saavedra (leader of the Sandinis- ta junta) said a couple of weeks ago that the contras have cost them about one third of their exports. . The main impact, however, is to di- vert Sandinista leaders from supporting the insurgency in El Salvador and bring pressure on them to negotiate sensibly to a more peaceful situation in that whole area They are perceived to be the threat to the peace by all the surrounding countries because Nicaragua is the base for supporting insurgencies not ooh in El Salvador but in Costa Rica, Guatemala and Honduras as well. Q While the United States may want to pressure the Sandi- nistas to end support for Marxist guerrillas elsewhere, is that really the goal of the contras in Nicaragua? Aren't they bent on overthrowinc the regime? A Those things are always mixed. They would like to unseat the regime. The question is: What is th'e U.S. govern- ment's purpose? After all in World War fl were helping the Communists, the Royalists, the Caullists and everybody. They were all trying to get power. We didn't care about that, we just wanted to get help against the Nazis. It's an analogous situation we have here. Our own national inter- ests need not be strictly tied to any one group's goals. Q What chance do the contras have of overthrowing the Sandinista regime? A I think there's no chance that they will be able to overthrow the government In the resistance, you have, it is said, perhaps 15,000 men with rifles scattered around the open, unpopulated parts of the country, which is where guerrillas can hide. They can't go into the cities, which the government is protecting with tanks and 75,000 men in the Army, the militia and the security forces. So they're not going to overthrow that government It could be-but it's a very long shot and unlikely-that the government would dissolve because the people would get fed up and fall away from the regime. But it's hard to change a government that operates a system of control where everybody in every block is counted and any strang- ers who show have to explain themselves. Q What is your response to published reports that the CIA was involved in the mining of the Nicaraguan ports? A I can't comment on such allegations. Q What about reports that the CIA Is actively running this V/im V/illia,,-l Casey, Director, Cent; al Intelligence Aoencc 2 Y,."h M t 11" M,n 6- J mining operation with a mother ship offshore? A I never comment on such reports, Q Are the Cubans still heavily in- volved in Nicaragua or have they reduced their presence there as some recent re- ports suggest? A While the Cubans have been talking about lowering their presence, they've actually been moving in more people. The Cubans run the security services that manage the block-popu- lation-control system. There are about 7,000 to 9,000 Cu- bans in Nicaragua including 3.000 to 3,500 military advisers intertwined with the Nicaraguan military. They also have 5,000 to 6.000 teachers, construction and health workers who are regularly taken back to Cuba on rotation. The replacements now be- ing sent have had military training and are under 40. As we saw in Grenada, Cuban con- struction workers carry rifles as well as shovels. There have been occasions where these Cuban construction workers joined in the fighting in Nic- aragua when contras tangled with the Nicaraguan military. Cl Is there any evidence that Cuba or the Soviet Union Is'converting Nicaragua into a kind of strategic base along lines you've warned about in the past? A We were concerned about that because they were lengthening airfields in Nicaragua to make them long enough to handle supersonic planes. And we know, Nicara. guan fliers were going to Bulgaria, to the Soviet Union and Cuba to be trained- Now, that has continued. The training has been completed. We believe that MiC-23s are in Cuba earmarked for Nicaragua and that Nicaraguan pilots are practicing in them. We believe the planes haven't been sent over to Nicaragua, because they're concerned about our response. Q How many Nicaraguan pilots have been trained? A We don't have an exact figure, but it's substantial- something like 40 pilots, enough to handle a squadron of planes, which is what we think they have in Cuba. One thing you've got to understand is that both the Soviets and the Cubans go to great lengths to keep their military' support for Nicaragua quiet and ambiguous. The heavy Soviet weapons come largely in Bulgarian and Alge- rian ships. Soviet and Cuban ships bring. n the lighter stuff mixed with commercial cargo. We have intelligence that the Cubans in Nicaragua shave their mustaches and hide their dog tags. They are mixed in with Nicaraguan units, not kept in separate Cuban formations that could be identified.. Q You mentioned that an objective of the contras was to divert the Sandinistas from their support of the Marxist guerrll- ias in Et Salvador. Are they having an, impact on the flow of supplies to the Salvadoran rebels? A Oh, they certainly have had an impact, though it's hard to ouantify. To start off with, the Nicaraguans have to use their weapons and ammunition to fight the contras instead of sending them to El Salvador to fight the govern-. ment. That's got to have an impact The supplies are.stili coming in from Nicaragua, but we think it's in reduced Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 amounts. We know -that the, Nicaraguan government and the Army are having to pay greater attention to dealing with the internal resistance, which means that there's much less attention they, can give to exporting revolution. But I can't be very much more specific than that. Q It Nicaragua is being forced to divert Its attention from El Salvador, why do the Marxist guerrillas In El Salvador seem to have been gaining In recent months? A Well, they might be doing better without that diver- sion. We do know that the Salvadoran guerrillas have been able to increase their numbers by training and. arming some of their support people. At the same time, we have pretty good reporting that they're short of ammunition and they're short of funds and they're not as effective as they would be if Nicaraguan support were unimpaired. Also, the Salvadoran Army has been getting more effec- tive. Before the period leading up to the elections, the Army had the guerrillas pretty well broken up and pushed back into their bases in mountainous areas. Q How do you reconcile your claim that the Salvadoran Army is getting better with the constant criticism that It's still too Incompetent to make headway against the guerrillas? A It has a lot of deficiencies but it is improving steadily through better training, better leadership, more-aggressive tactics and more-sustained operations. It needs more mobil- ity. It is not a perfect world, and there is still plenty of room for improvement. That can be said about any army. The main problem in El Salvador from the military stand- point is this: As a rule of thumb, experts say that an army needs an 8 or 10 to 1 advantage to win a guerrilla war. Look at the Nicaraguan Army and militia 75,000 men under arras---and they are unable to cope with 15,000 contras. Now the ratio of the Salvadoran Army to the guerrillas is something like 4 to 1, and the guerrillas have a safe haven, a supply and a command-and-control base right across the border in Nicaragua. Given that situation, the Salvadoran, Army is not doing badly. The only way you're going to resolve the conflict in El Salvador is if two things happen: You have to deprive the guerrillas of their safe haven and further reduce the flow of 1atn Ports Made-b CIA Dcector-, 'Controversy over inlning People are 4ess:con-}= ._cemed'.about .reports-cf a'riin-ng ..Nicaraguan harbors" han :. ley .are -;about _bangers , f ''f anotf -er _f~rba" -.: in . impact of contras In Nicaragua. While?e =atirig a Qraat -deal of orsarray and;pressure.;on he egime ; _ :theres :no. c?tance that They will be'-able'to -overthrow r povemme-nt " Arms to "Salvadoran iebel& 'Guemlla .operations against-Nicaragua's Sari Wiis a-Tegirrie 'certainly;have ::gad ail rr~pacY-Dri1ow of ,Weapons to Marxist insur -.. ilS_=concern about destii vquade The real issue is ',ti;rhether. oue. primary -purpose is to establish abetter' ~.. . soceety Tn Sa}va~or .. : -to protect the security vrter ':gists f 3tie ~l}iiited States-S-*':, ~,4 `?~ -' ,` ~2rart~lraq war. "Prevailing opnion is Thai in.2 - ' would pose grave dangersfor entire gull regiorL - -zState~porsored terrorism ~lnternabonal communt- ty, hould isolate diplomatically-and Impose sanctions -against countries sponsoring terrorism. supplies and build up the Salvadoran Army by 25 percent to 40 percent to improve the ratio of Army to guerrillas. Q How do you handle the growing pressure In Congress to cut otl military aid to El Salvador if the death squads continue to operate there? Why Is the Salvadoran government unwniing or unable to deal with the death squads? A I think?it's a cultural problem. It's a violent society like most of the societies down there. Everybody talks about the right-wing death squads. During recent months, most of the assassination victins have been supporters of the Ro- berto D'Aubuisson mdvement, the so-called right wing. So there are left-wing death squads. The guerrillas practice intimidation, and the}' slaughter people as they did in Viet- nam. It's a civil war. And they also have this special kind of free-lance, nongovernmental death squad that practices re- venge. That works both ways right across the society. Besides that, the judicial system in El Salvador leaves much to be desired. They have a hard time getting any convictions. But basically what we're talking about is whether our primary purpose is to establish a better society in El Salvador, which isn't likely to happen quickly under present circumstances, or to protect the security interests of the United States and give Salvadoran democracy a chance to develop. Q Are you worried that Central America will become a major Issue In the political campaign and undermine popular support for the administration's strategy there? A I think that people in the long run are less concerned about reports of mining Nicaraguan harbors than they are about the danger of creating P. wave of immigration into this country if Central America or any part of it should fall under Soviet-Cuban domination. If we have another Cuba in Central America, Mexico will have a big problem and we're going to have a massive wave of immigration- The effort to prevent this from happening is not going to excite Americans as much as the threat they would face if things go wrong. Also, I think people are concerned about the military danger. If the Communists solidify their hold on Nicaragua, the other countries down there would have to accommo- date in some way. The Communists would next be looking at Mexico, to find problems that they specialize in exploit. ing. So what you're looking at for your children and your grandchildren is a long-term prospect of a hundred million hostile people immediately south of our border if we fail to give democracy a chance to develop in Central America. Q To turn to the other spot that worries Americana-the Middle East What is the likelihood of an Iranian victory In the war with Iraq? A The Iraqis should be able to stave off this current offensive because they have such a preponderance of air power and artillery and tank power. But the Iranians have the numbers; they have the staying power; they've got the economic resources. The Iraqis are in bad shape economi- cally. They've also got a big Shia population with religious ties to Iran. I think the prevailing opinion is that in the long run the Iranians have some important advantages. Q. What dangere might the United States face if Iran does win? A If Iran prevails and a radical Shiite regime is estab- lished in Baghdad similar to the Khomeini regime in Tehe- ran, there are a lot of people they could turn loose against Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the gulf states, which have sup- ported Iraq. The Iranians are in a vengeful frame of mind. We have seen what they can do with the terrorist attacks on the American Embassy in Kuwait and the Marine barracks in Beirut. They are taking people from those gulf states to camps in Teheran fox terrorist training and sending them Continued Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1 back. So already they hpve a pretty potent subversive poten- tial in those small countries. Q What would the United States do if Iran moved against these oil states in the gulf region? A I can't speculate on that. The U.S. government said that we would keep the Strait of Hor- muz open. As to something hap- pening in one or another of these countries around the gulf, any re- action, I would suppose, would depend upon the circumstances at the time. Q That brings up the problem of state-sponsored terrorism that Sec- retary of State Shultz has been talk- ing about: What can the United States do to counter terrorism sponsored by Iran and other gov- ernments-assassinate their peo- pie, bomb their capitals or what? A Don't put words in my mouth. As Secretary Shultz said, we're dealing with a new phe- nomenon in state-sponsored ter- rorism--a new weapons system that obliterates the distinction between peace and war. Contras: "Perhaps 15,000 men with rifles scattered around the unpopulated parts of the country." The Iranians use their diplomatic facilities as a platform to make revolutionary guards, communications facilities and money available for terrorist planning and action. They've attacked us twice in Beirut-the American Embas- sy and the Marine barracks. They turn up in many coun- tries in Africa, Asia and Europe, and we are likely to see them here. They send their missionaries across the whole Moslem world, from Morocco to Malaysia and Indonesia, preaching Khomeini's brand of radical religious-social gos- pel. It's a force that we're going to have to reckon with in many dimensions. Q But what can you do about It? Do you get-into the business of assassinating terrorist leaders? e more ntensively on the A We don't engage in assassinations. We have to depend screening and surveillance at entry and departure points of on a combin tion of `t i`'. -- -d - . - - rong secur measures -- coopera on to deter and defeat terrorism. Let's look at the problem of state-sponsored terrorism'- and international terrorism in a little more detail. There are more than 50 major terrorist organizations, and hun- dreds of mom and pop shops-little groups that take on operations for hire. We can count scores of terrorist-train- ing camps in Iran, Libya, Syria, South Yemen, Bulgaria, the Soviet Union, Romania, Cuba and other bloc countries. Now, there are several things you can do to cope with this kind of terrorism. You can handle it by defending yourself, defending potential targets. That's pretty tough because you haven't got enough policemen to protect ev- ery target and you don't know where they're going to hit So we are engaged in helping security organizations in a great many countries to improve their training and opera- tional proficiency. These countries have their own intelli- gence capabilities to watch the terrorists. They're apt to be better at it than we are because they've got to live with them all the time and they're closer to them. A qualified antiterrorist network has developed through the liaison relationship between intelligence and security organiza- tions. It is being improved by intensified intelligence ex- changes and by training and other forms of assistance. On top of that, there's a question of deterring terrorism by sending the message that if the terrorists attack there will be retaliation. It's not necessarily a matter of striking back directly at the terrorists. The Israelis, for ex- ample, send the message: "If we're hit from your territory, that's your responsibility and we're going to kick you in the teeth somehow." I think you will see more of that-retaliation against facilities connected with the country sponsoring the ter- rorists or retaliation that just hurts the interests of countries which sponsor terrorism. Some people say that you've got to find out who the terrorists are and make sure you hit the people who hit you. Well, usually that means you're not going to do it at all. If retaliation is going to be a deterrent, the countries sponsoring terrorism have got to know it's going to happen quick-, 1), and with certainty. Now, there's a third way to handle state-sponsored terrorism which, in my view, needs to be developed faster. Q What's that alternative way? A That's a kind of international, diplomatic counterof- fensive against international terrorism. In effect, it would apply a modern version of the 18th-century international law on piracy that charged every nation with responsibility for picking up pirates and putting them away where they could do no more harm. It's a little hard to get acceptance of that in today's world, and I'm not quite sure just how you would implement it. But nations could join together to invoke economic sanc- tions against and isolate diplomatically countries, such as Iran and Libya, that practice terrorism as a matter of state policy. They could collaborat i They could agree to respond more quickly and surely to requests from other countries for extradition and assistance. So there are three ways you can deal with state-spon- sored terrorism short of sending out hit squads. You can defend, you can retaliate and you can impose international barriers and sanctions of a nonviolent nature. Q If we can turn finally to the Soviet Union: What, as you see It, has been the effect of the change In leadership there from Andropov to Chernenko? A Minimal. Chernenko is clearly a transitional leader, but nobody knows whether he's going to be around six months, two years or five years, and it doesn't make much difference. We predicted that China's Mao Tse-tung would die 20 times before they finally buried him. So we are very shy about predicting how long Chernenko will last. My view is that under the Soviet system today everything is worked out in a collegial way. Certainly with this kind of short-term leader, no one man is going to have the power to make a drastic change of direction. And there's no reason to assume that when Chernenko goes, the situation will change. What you've got in the Soviet Union is a generation of septuagenarians who are reluctant to forfeit their perqui- sites by passing power. to a younger generation. They're intent on hanging on to power. 0 3. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP87M00539R002904800014-1