(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
23
Document Creation Date: 
January 12, 2017
Document Release Date: 
March 11, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 8, 1986
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2.pdf621.7 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Q Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE 8 August 1986 USSR: Expanding Its Financial Horizons Summary The Soviet Union could lose as much as $6 billion in hard currency earnings this year as a result of lower oil prices. Moscow's currently strong credit rating allows it the flexibility of covering most of these losses by borrowing at favorable rates in the traditional Eurocurrency market. The Soviet leadership is unlikely to let its debt gram too large, however, out of fear of diminishing bankers' confidence and to avoid increasing its dependence on Western banks. Higher gold sales--a traditional cushion for the USSR in times of hard currency shortages--are likely, but Nips cow also will Trove cautiously in this market in an attempt to keep prices high. In its efforts to mitigate the effects of the hard currency shortfall, s esrre o lrmrt the overall cost of its borrowing and, to sane extent, obscure the magnitude of its growing debt. Although Gorbachev's appointees may be more willing than their predecessors to take advantage of a wider range of Western borrowing facilities, financial conservatism, endemic risk- aversion, and the need for centralized contro 'll probably limit Moscow's borrowing through these channels. This typescript menorah um was re ared b Office of Soviet Analysis was coordinated with the Office o o a ssues. es ions an cwrnrents are welcarre and should be directed to Chief, Econanic Performance Division, py of 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 ese latter initiatives, in all likelihood, stem from the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86TO1O17ROOO5O517OOO1-2 USSR: Expanding its Financial Horizons Moscow's Financial Bind The fall in world oil prices has prompted a flurry of Soviet .activity in both financial and commodity markets as Moscow seeks ways to counter the financial losses inflicted by its principal hard currency earner. Domestic oil production problems in early 1985 and falling prices by yearend resulted in lost revenues of about $3 billion last year. Such losses could possibly double this year in the wake of still lower oil prices. The Soviets' problem has been compounded by a depreciating dollar which has eroded the purchasing power of those oil dollars still flowing Moscow's responses to date have been largely predictable, with the Soviets employing a combination of debt buildup and increased gold sales to limit the size of immediate import cuts. Although hard currency export revenues dropped 15 percent last year--due largely to a 20 percent reduction in oil earnings --the import decline was held to just 5 percent. This was accomplished by increasing gold sales nearly $800 million to $1.8 billion, and boosting net indebtedness from $10.4 billion to $14.4 billion. The USSR also managed a steep buildup of assets in Western banks during the fourth quarter, preventing net debt from climbing to record levels. Both borrowing and gold sales continued at a brisk pace during the first quarter of 1986, which 25X1 25X1 II Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86TO1O17ROOO5O517OOO1-2 1 I Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 helped to keep imports from dropping sharply in the wake of Indeed, the Soviets' approach to date parallels their response to their financial pinch in 1981 when a weakening oil market also constrained export earnings (see Figure 1). In addition to a debt increase and higher gold sales, Moscow also redirected some oil from Eastern Europe to hard currency markets beginning in 1982. The dilemma confronting Moscow this time, however, is that a severe hard currency crunch could persist until at least the end of the decade should oil prices fail to recover significantly. Under such circumstances, the Soviet leadership is unlikely to continue foreign borrowings at the rate exhibited in the past 18 months, not only to avoid jeopardizing a solid credit rating, but also out of fear of becoming too dependent on Western banks and their governments. Borrowings will continue and the net debt is likely to grow, but import cuts continuing losses in oil revenues. Although the development and execution of a more prudent import strategy is probably preoccupying the Soviet planners, Moscow also seems to be altering--at least at the margin--its approach to international finance.. While not abandoning its financial conservatism by any means, the Soviets at least appear willing to push out the boundaries of their "financial possibilities frontier." Some of Moscow's actions predate the current crunch, but they have taken on added importance as funds dwindle. Such moves are probably not intended to garner will bear a much larger burden over the next few years. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 ____r. 81 82 83 ~_--Net Debt ? 84 85 86 30 40, Billion Current Dollars 10 -~ 4~ Billion Current Dollars I :,Exports Imports 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 20 ~ Billion 18~ Current Dollars Figure 1 Recent Soviet Financial Strategy When hard currency export revenues suffer, as in 1981 and 1985, imports are constrained... gold sales rise... ,? Gold 'T'-`-"T-"'--'T 81 82 83 84 85 86 ...and net debt climbs. 10 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 __. 1 .I Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 require. the funds needed to stave off sizable import cuts. The Soviets already are moving to decrease imports to redress the financial imbalance, with Foreign Trade Minister Aristov stating that imports from the West could be cut between one-fourth and one- third this year. Nonetheless more sophisticated approaches could help Moscow adjust more quickly to changing international conditions and more cheaply obtain the foreign exchange it will Moscow, nonetheless, probably remains leary of pushing a good thing too far. bankers' concerns about Soviet creditworthiness are growing as low oil prices continue, .with apprehensions somewhat heightened following the Chernobyl' accident. While Moscow will not have any difficulty finding willing lenders, it does face the possibility of higher interest costs. Rather than risk "losing face" by being tagged with a lower financial stature than it deems worthy, Moscow appears to be trying out options beyond traditional, long- term syndications. By "segmenting" financial markets, the USSR syndications have been oversubscribed this year. Exploiting Old Friends... Moscow's financial position remains relatively strong despite the setbacks suffered in the oil market. The Soviets have taken advantage of their excellent credit rating and attractive interest rates to arrange more than $1 billion in long-term syndications this year. In fact, the USSR remains such an attractive borrower vis-a-vis most other debtors that three 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 R ~ ~ is insuring adequate money flows while effectively bypassing exposure limits set by the West's major financial institutions, and, to some extent, obscuring its debt position. One major example of such activity is Moscow's reemergence in the forfaiting markets.2 After making extensive use oP this technique in the second half of the 1970s to finance purchases of machinery and equipment and, to a lesser extent, in the early 1980s to help buy grain, the USSR cut back on such loans in favor of other financing. o The Western press reports that the Soviets also used forfaiting financing this spring to fund a $40 million plastics plant to be built by an Italian firm. Although forfaiting loans are generally medium term (in the neighborhood of 3 to 5 years), this paper carried a long, 1~/2 year term with a fixed interest rate subsidized by the 2 The forfaiting market is essentially a market for "indirect" supplier credits. In this market the seller of the note is usually an exporter who is seeking to pass on al.l the risks and responsibilites for the collection of a debt in exchange for immediate cash payment. The buyer has recourse only to the originator of the note--a Soviet-awned bank in this example--and may - resell at any time, dischar~in~ his obligation. A ready market exists because 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Italian export bank. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Moscow also appears to be boosting its use of third parties to obtain funds. In particular, the Soviets appear to be looking more toward the banks they own in the SNest for opportunities to increase access to low-cost funds. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 It is unclear how far iVloscow will push these banks. On the one hand, the Soviets have been interested--at least since their last financial crunch in 1981--in extracting as much surplus cash from these banks as possible.3 While the Soviet Union's current The Soviets may also be tapping the International Investment Bank (IIB) for funds. The IIB, headquartered in iVloscow, generally funds long-term CEMA projects. Box text). needs for hard currency are great, it will probably require these banks to move cautiously before engaging in any activities that could backfire with losses far outweighing potential gains (see 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 II Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 i Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Playing the Interbanks least according to official records--a Soviet bank. Vneshtorgbank and Soviet-owned banks in the West are active users of the interbank market. This market--as its name implies --involves bank-to-bank transactions in which banks with excess cash can earn a small ret-.urn or banks with a cash shortage can borrow to meet cotmiitmenfs. Rates worldwide vary, usually slightly below the best commercial rates. There has long been a "gentlemen's agreement" among bankers that deposits, for the most part, will be offsetting so that n es advantage of this relatively cheap source of funds. The sometimes lax reporting by banks of the flow of funds through interbank channels as well as a gradual erosion over the years of the "gentlemen's agreement" has prompted some Western observers to claim that Moscow is abusing this market. In particular, it is argued that Moscow obtains low-cost interbank funds and then uses the money to underwrite imports and/or cover the cost of foreign activities. At a minimum, laundering money through intermediaries, it is alleged, would artificially inflate the size of Soviet assets and thus reduce Western estimates of its net debt. The process involves one of the Soviet-owned banks in the West--which is not legally a Soviet bank--borrowing cheaply via the interbank market and then depositing the money in the bank of another country, usually one that does not report its liabilities and assets to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS)--a repository and regular reporter of international money flows. This money is then transferred to VTB, which in turn redeposits it in a Western bank in the BIS reporting area. The end result is that the only transaction that is reported in Western statistics and includes the Soviet Union is the last one, and this is reported as a Soviet deposit in the West. The earlier money flows are either not reported or do not involve--at 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 i Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Although we have no evidence of Soviet misuse of the interbank markets, the loophole exists and might be tempting to Moscow during these austere times. We doubt, however, that Moscow will play this game. The money is not free, and, even if the rates are low, costs probably rise as the process becomes more intricate. Moreover, there is a large element of risk in borrowing heavily in what is basically a short term market and using the money for long term purposes. Given that the Soviets can borrow long term at only one quarter percentage point above the interbank rate in London, there is probably little to be. gained by paying only slightly lower rates for money that may not be rolled over. Table Interbank Deposits by Soviet-Owned Banks Percentage of deposits made to: VTB BIS Banks Non-BIS Banks Deposits made by: MNB-London 67 30 3 E-W United Bank 64 32 4 Eurobank 47 49 4 MNB-Singapore 89 1 10 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 25X1 25X1 Another third-party operation focuses on Moscow's use of its clearing account arrangements.4 _..and Exploring New O tions Although the Soviets are still adhering to their long- standing financial conservatism and relying largely on familiar instruments, they do appear more willing to expand their financial horizons. Such a course is by no means a precursor of a significantly larger role for the Soviets in world financial markets. Indeed, Moscow's past activity in global financial markets has almost exclusively been linked to facilitating trade flows, and thus the dollar magnitude of Soviet transactions is likely to contract along with oil earnings. But the scope of Soviet financial activity may well expand as Moscow increases the 4 A clearing account is method b which tradin accounting basis in order to avoid hard curreneg partners exchange goods on an the status of the tradin arran anent, usually ynpa s~oftscurrencylsuch aspthef "transferable ruble." 25X1 25X1 ? Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 i Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 benefits of a smaller pool of funds. use of new international financial instruments to maximize the 25X1 25X1 ii Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 The Soviets have been active players in foreign exchange markets for years but are showing signs of increased sophistication in the wake of erratic foreign exchange movements, particularly the need to offset the effect of dollar . depreciation. After being persuaded to accept its first ECU- denominated loan in October 1984, the USSR requested ECU financing on several more loans during 1985.5 Lastly, Moscow appears to have recognized that more sophisticated financial dealings entail increasing the number of actors to handle its transactions as well as expanding its role 5 The l]CxT--an acronym for European Currency Unit--is an accounting currency based upon a weighted average of exchange rates for all European currencies, lessening the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 -- i Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 trade trends and alliances. Meanwhile, Moscow is pushing to obtain observer status in GATT, the multinational group that promotes tariff and trade cooperation, which would increase Soviet exposure to Western New Ventures into Gold, Diamonds and Precious Metals Moscow's financial adventurism also appears to be reflected in its dealings on commodities markets. In particular, gold sales have accelerated this year. At the end of the first in world economic affairs in general. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 II Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 quarter the Soviets had already sold over 100 tons through conventional means, Moscow has traditionally conducted its sales and purchases on the major gold exchanges. Although the heavy volume of Soviet trading has at times helped conceal the level of net sales, the market is now more aware of Soviet transactions so that almost any perceived change in the level of their sales could affect prices relatively quickly. Thus Moscow seems to be seeking less visible ways to market its gold. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 I Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Africa to control the sales of unpolished diamonds, 1~loscow is also continuing to market diamonds agressively. The Soviets already have an arrangement with DeBeers of South television. Such an alliance may have been instrumental in driving up diamond prices by 7.5 percent after they had fallen early in the year. To help with sales, the Soviets also appear ,to have stepped un marketing activities, including an advertising campaign on US and are expected to rise again this year i~7oscow also could earn extra dollars in the palladium market even though there is no indication yet of increased sales. Palladium sales account for the bulk of Soviet earnings in the platinum metals, and Soviet exports have risen in recent years Increasing sales from the 1.7 million ounces sold in 1985 to 2 million ounces this year would bring in over $30 million at current prices. Early in 1986, the USSR changed its payment terms for palladium from 90-day credit to cash and abandoned the previous practice of fixed-price offerings, a Information on Soviet activity in the platinum market is contradictory. Recent press reporting indicates that the Soviets change price. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 J ii Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 . Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 have not yet increased platinum sales, even though demand is strong. In addition, the steadily declining sales over the past decade may mean that the USSR's supply of platinum is insufficient to increase exports. Moscow could increase platinum sales by 25 percent over the 1985 level. Such sales would amount to an additional 50,000 ounces and boost earnings by more than $20 million at current prices. Outlook At present, the only prospect for earning large sums of new hard currency is increased gold sales--a traditional cushion for the Soviets in times of currency shortages. Some market analysts believe a one-time yearly total sale of around 450 tons is possible without large price effects--if handled judiciously. This level of sales would push earnings from $1 billion to $2.5 billion above the 1985 level. Moscow's other financial activities might generate payoffs totalling perhaps $500 million given current market demand. While these earnings seem inconsequential in the face of a possible $6-billion shortfall in revenues from oil exports, they nonetheless help limit the severity of import cuts. iVIoscow probably believes that superpower status requires it to become more active in international economic forums, with the need to become more financially sophisticated heightened by the 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 ~~ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Soviets perceive their hard currency situation. Moscow's actions in this arena will entail some new forms of cooperation with the West. The extent of the relations will be tempered by reduced trade flows and an unwillingness to let dependence on the West get too far out of hand. In fact, its deteriorating hard currency position may even inhibit vioscow from pursuing some riskier activities. But change already is underway, and the scope of new ventures and the resulting pace at which they proceed may be a good indicator of how seriously the utilization of Western financial markets. sharp drop in the price of oil and the depreciating dollar. While we believe that Moscow will continue with its current efforts, and even expand them where low risk opportunities are present, we expect this expansion to be deliberate and well thought out. Gorbachev's appointees may be willing to take on new ideas, but conservatism, risk-avoidance, and centrally controlled decisionmaking which characterize past and present Soviet financial activities is clearly antithetical to the full 25X1 25X1 ii Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 -- . i -- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Typescript Distribution List 1 - DCI (7E47) 2 - IYJCI (7E47) 3 - SA/llCI (7E47) 4 - ID/DCI (7E47) 5 - Executive Registry (7E47) 6 - DDI (7E47) 7 - Senior Review Panel (7B42) 8 - 12 - OGPAS/11VD/CB (7G15) 13 - NIO/USSR (7E47) 14 - NIO/DC>;,i~i ( ?E47 ) 15 - NIO/SP (7E47) 16 - C/L>DO/SE ( 7E22 ) 17 - IDO/SE (7E22) 18 - C (7E22) 19 - (7E22) 20 - 814 KEY) 21 - 58) 22 - ID/BONA (4E58) 23 - C/SOVA/NIG (4E51) 24 - C/BONA/NIG/DPD (4E65) 25 - C/SOVA/NIG/EPD (5E66) 26 - C/BONA/NIG/EPD/IA 27 - C/SOVA/NIG/EPD/RM 28 - C/BONA/NIG/EPD/FT 29 - C/SOVA/NIG/EPD/EP 30 - C/SOVA/R.IG (5E25) 31 - C/SOVA/R,IG/EAD (5E25 32 - C/SOVA/R.IG/TfNAD ( 4E12 ) 33 - C/BONA/SIG (4E13) 34 - C/BONA/SIG/SFD (4E13) 35 - C/BONA/SIG/BPD (4E13) 36 - C/SOVA/DEIG (SE46) 37 - C/SOVA/DEIG/DEA (SE68) 38 - C/BONA/DEIG/DID (4E31) 39 - PDB STAFF (7F30) 40 - C/NIC/AG (7E47) 41 - C/ES/CIB (4E66) 42 - C/FBIS/AG (1016 KEY) 43 - C/ACIS (7D35) 44 - AC/CRES (3E63) 45 - C/IPC (2F21) 46 - D/ALA (3F45) 47 - D/NESA (2611) 48 - D/E[]RA ( 6602 ) 49 - C/PES/N1PS ( 6F44 ) 50 - D/OGPAS (7F17) 51 - D/O~, (2E60) External Distribution: 52 - D/OEA (4F18) 53 - D/OGI (3G00 54 - AD/OIA 55 - D/O64~i. 5F46 ) 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 . Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Robert H. Baraz Director, Office of Analysis for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe Bureau of Intelligence and Research Department of State, lam. 4758 Dr. Stephen D. Bryen Deputy Under Secretary for Trade Security Policy Department of Defense Pentagon, Ian. 40767 Col. Tyrus W. Cobb Director, East-West Section, European and Soviet Affairs DOB, Ian. 373 John Danylyk Chief, Camunist Economic Relations Division Bureau of Intelligence and Research Department of State, Ian. 8662 Stephen I. Danzansky Senior Director and Special Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs National Security Affairs DOB, lam, 373 David Epstein Office of the Secretary of Defense Net Assessments Pentagon, lam. 3A930 Elliot Hurwitz Special Assistant for the Office of the Undersecretary for Economic Affairs Department of State, lam. 7260 Susanne Lotarski Director, Office of Eastern Europe and Soviet Affairs Department of Commerce, lam. 3410 James Bean Office of Soviet Union Affairs Department of State, lam. 4223 Ambassador Jack F. Matlock, Jr. Special Assistant to the President Sr. Director, European and Soviet Affairs DCiB, lam. 368 II Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2 Tom Simons Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Canadian Affairs Department of State, }an. 6219 Lucian Pugliaresi Director, International Economic Affairs National Security Affairs Franklin J. Vargo Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Economic Policy Departrnent of Commerce, lan. 3850 W. Allen Wallis Undersecretary for Econanic Affairs Departrnent of State, Rn. 7256 II Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP86T01017R000505170001-2