AFGHANISTAN'S EXPANDED OPIUM TRADE: BYPRODUCT OF WAR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
20
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 13, 2011
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 1, 1985
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1.pdf1.81 MB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Directorate of Intelligence Trade: Byproduct of War Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Secret cre GI 85-10247 September 1985 Copy 5 1; Q 9 4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Directorate of Secret Intelligence Trade: Byproduct of War Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Strategic Narcotics/Eurasia-Africa Branch, the Strategic Narcotics/Eurasia- Agency. Africa Branch, OGI, and by the Analytic Support Group. It was coordinated with the Department of State and the Drug Enforcement Division, OGI, Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Terrorism/Narcotics Analysis Secret G! 85-10247 September 1985 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Trade: Byproduct of War Key Judgments Afghanistan's narcotics industry has expanded since the Soviet invasion, Information available and we anticipate continued growth. Economic disruptions caused by the as of 15 August 1985 Soviet invasion and the wartime environment have substantially increased. was used in this report. the attractiveness of opium poppy cultivation, heroin refining, and narcot- ics smuggling. Poppy cultivation is expanding and probably will stimulate further narcotics trafficking and processing activities. Many Afghans have long grown and smuggled narcotics, and individuals loosely associated with insurgent groups probably participate in the trade. Available evidence, however, does not indicate large-scale, organized exploitation by the insurgents. We judge that the Afghan Government is unlikely to crack down on poppy farmers, laboratory operators, and narcotics traffickers. Indeed, UN officials believe that much of their financial and technical aid is being used to fight the insurgents rather than to attack the narcotics trade. Moreover, Afghan authorities at all levels are willing to aid traffickers for a price. Even if the Afghan Government were to institute control programs, the narcotics trade would be difficult to suppress because most of the activity takes place in insurgent-controlled areas beyond Kabul's authority. More- over, the Soviet-backed Karmal regime is preoccupied with combating the insurgency, and as long as the narcotics trade neither finances the insurgents' efforts nor seriously affects the Soviet military campaign, government authorities have little incentive to curtail an activity that helps to keep the economy afloat. Increased Soviet concern over drug abuse by troops, however, could encourage interdiction efforts, at least in the cities where authorities are able to exercise control. Afghanistan's role as a heroin supplier to international markets probably will expand as long as the instability and strife continue. In the absence of any concerted effort at narcotics control within Afghanistan, the ability of neighboring authorities to intensify their interdiction efforts offers the only alternative for limiting Afghan narcotics exports. We do not expect Iran to move decisively against narcotics traffickers; but Pakistan may step up enforcement, at least in some cities, to stem its rising drug abuse. iii Secret GI 85-10247 September 1985 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Key Judgments The War: Incentives for the Opium Industry 1 Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Trade: The Evidence 2 Smuggling 8 The Role of the Refugees and Insurgents 11 Refugees 11 Insurgents 13 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Trade: Byproduct of War I Introduction The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979 disrupted incipient government narcotics control pro- grams and gave rise to insurgent warfare in opium- producing areas. 25X1 25X1 25X1 hashish use and at least the start of heroin addiction. 25X1 Drug use among the Soviet troops is a growing problem. idespread the Soviets frequently suggests that the disruptions of tradi- tional social and economic patterns in the country have not hampered and may have even stimulated new growth in the narcotics industry. The War: Incentives for the Opium Industry The predominantly agrarian Afghan economy has been seriously hurt by the Soviet hostilities: irrigation networks are being neglected, distribution and mar- keting systems disrupted, and a significant part of the labor force has taken flight or been displaced. The small industrial sector also has been plagued by labor and raw material shortages, frequent power black- outs, and fuel rationing, severely disrupting trade and commerce. Such unsettlement does not always have similar negative effects on illegal economic activi- ties-black-marketeering or smuggling, for exam- ple-and, indeed, the evidence suggests that the civil war environment in Afghanistan has spawned a flour- ishing opium trade. sell boots, clothing, and ammunition to shopkeepers 2L X1 ` 1 assaults and robberies of bus passengers by Soviet soldiers were commonplace before the drivers started carrying adequate supplies of drugs to Isolated incidents suggest the Soviets believe that drug abuse has impaired the performance of their troops in Afghanistan, but there is no evidence that drug abuse alone has lessened the overall military readiness of the forces. The problem probably is not as severe as the infectious diseases and alcoholism among both the troops and the officers. Drug usage, however, could become more of a problem for the Soviets as troops on rotation out of Afghanistan bring the narcotics into the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Some East European countries have attrib- uted an increase in hashish use to Soviet troops Opium poppies are an ideal cash crop for subsistence farmers when wartime conditions disrupt commerce in traditional crops. They are a hearty, multi-purpose crop that yield a variety of products besides opium gum. The seeds can be eaten whole or processed into poppyseed cake or edible oil, the seed pods can be used for medicines or liquor, the straw for fuel, and the resulting ash for soap. Since opium does not spoil, it can be stored or stockpiled indefinitely. Profits from selling opium are as much as two to three times more than the next most profitable crop, yet cultivation costs are low. reassigned therefrom Afghanistan. Wartime disruptions, in our view, also make heroin refining an attractive enterprise. Heroin is more prof- itable than opium-1 kilogram of heroin is worth substantially more than the 10 kilograms of opium used to produce it. It is less bulky to transport and more easily concealed than opium, and the processing 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret laboratories are small, simple to start up, difficult to locate, and easily moved. War also produces a poten- tial new source of demand for refined opiates-the Smugglers and merchants have similar incentives to move into the opium trade. War disrupts regular trade patterns and encourages smuggling. Smugglers regularly operate outside normal distribution and transportation networks, and the disruptions enhance their ability to travel surreptitiously and to bribe officials. Although the war increases demand for smugglers' services, it also adds to, their risks, which encourages them to turn to high-profit, illicit contra- band. Merchants, finding their established markets adversely affected, also seek alternative commodities, such as opium and heroin, to trade. Afghanistan's Expanded Opium Trade: The Evidence Part of the case 'for Afghanistan's expanded opium trade depends on circumstantial, uncorroborated, or secondhand information. The frequency of the report- ing and the nature and number of allegations, howev- er, strongly suggest that the opium trade continues unabate as well as Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and State Department reporting, indicates that Afghan farmers are cultivating opium poppies throughout the country, that heroin is now being refined in Afghan laborato- ries, and that Afghan smugglers are taking advantage of the insurgency to increase their involvement in the drug trade. Cultivation. A wide variety of evidence indicates poppy cultivation in Afghanistan is becoming more widespread (figure 1). Reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan, predicts that the 1985 opium crop in Af- ghanistan may be 25 percent greater than that for 1984, which by our estimate was 140 to 180 metric tons.' DEA reporting claims that individual farmers are devoting a higher percentage of their acreage to poppies in traditional growing regions, and sowing poppies. poppies are even cultivated in nontraditional growing areas, and nonfarmers, such as civilian militiamen, are cultivating poppies. Analysis of satellite imagery substantiates reports of increased acreage to poppies in traditional growing areas. Preliminary analysis of imagery over Nangar- har Province, the major producing region, reveals that in some areas of the province approximately 50 to 70 percent of the cultivated fields are planted to poppy, compared to 30 to 40 percent last year (figure 2). Nangarhar traditionally accounts for about two-thirds of all poppyfields in the country, and, if opium production in Nangarhar has more than doubled, Afghanistan's total production for 1985 may be as high as 300 metric tons. A count of poppyfields in other provinces indicates similar increases in the number of fields of poppy. We are unable to confirm with imagery the expansion of poppies to nontradi- tional areas. Nevertheless, we believe that the expan- sion in traditional areas alone is sufficient to boost production this year by at least 70 percent. 25X15X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Figure 2 Crop Growth in Eastern Afghanistan, Late March 1985 This Landsat scene centers on Nangarhar Province in eastern Afghanistan where nearly two-thirds of the poppy crop is cultivated. Snowmelt feeds the irrigation networks here, and this image, taken shortly before poppy flowering, reveals ample snowfall in the mountains. Contrary to reports of a drought during this year's growing season, the deep red color- ing in the valleys indicates high crop vigor and the prospects for good yields. Opium is a major cash crop here, and accord- ing to imagery analysis, about 50 to 70 percent of the cultivat- ed fields were planted to poppy in some areas this year. Jalalabad, seen in the middle of the image, is a major market Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Figure 3 Areas of Poppy Cultivation and Major Military Activity We suspect that poppy cultivation in Afghanistan is unaffected by the war, largely because of the nature of the fighting. Most of Afghanistan's poppy is culti- vated in small, scattered fields in remote mountain valleys away from Soviet and government military operations, which have been directed mostly against specific, accessible targets along main roads or near important towns (figure 3).Z Many operations are focused attempts to relieve besieged garrisons or halt Intense poppy cultivation Scattered or suspected poppy cultivation Major military activity Province boundary Road insurgent infiltration along the Afghan-Pakistani bor- der or the Afghan-Iranian frontier. The use of air- power also has limited combat on the ground that could have disrupted poppy planting or opium har- vesting (figure 4). Government operations in the past year suggest less interest than before in acquiring control over remote rural areas and more willingness to countenance insurgent control there, or at least a low level of activity. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Figure 4 The Poppy Season in Afghanistan Sowing Eastern, southern, and western provinces a a Confirmed for Kabul, Nangarhar, Konarha, Laghman, Lowgar, Kapisa, Helmand and Oruzgan Provinces. Probably similar in Herat. b Probable, but not yet confirmed with imagery. c Spring sowing and summer harvesting is likely characteristic of much of the poppy crop, but possibly some is grown as a winter crop. dConfirmed supports these conclusions about the likely impact of military operations on poppy cultivation. Imagery reveals no signs of wide- spread crop burning or destruction of irrigation sys- tems; bomb damage and craters are seen most often in villages and along roadways. We estimate that the destruction of crops and farms caused by military operations affects only a small portion of cultivated land, less than 1 percent of total farm crop areas observed on satellite imagery.' We judge that the rugged landscape and numerous irrigation ditches restrict access to fields in remote areas to foot soldiers 25X1 or heliborne troops, who are more concerned with the battle at hand than with destroying poppyfields. The manner in which insurgents conduct their opera- tions limits the effects of the war on agriculture. At times it appears the insurgents deliberately divert their operations from farming areas and from their sometime supporters. Operating in small mobile bands, they have engaged Soviet and government forces in brief, confined battles. Generally, insurgents attack regime garrisons, Soviet installations, radar 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret The War in the Poppy-Growing Provinces Analysis of several military operations in poppy- growing regions during the fall of 1984 and early spring of 1985 illustrates why the hostilities probably have little negative effect on poppy planting or har- vesting: Valley. Although the heavy airstrikes before the insurgents' withdrawal could have delayed the opium harvest, we believe that farmers had ade- quate time to harvest their opium because the airstrikes ended in early April. ? Kabul increased its military operations in mid- October 1984 in Nangarhar Province and continued at that level of activity through the end of the year. Major battles during this time of the year could have limited sowing and damaged seedlings, but most of the activity was aimed at relieving garri- sons and interdicting insurgent supply caravans and occurred near major roadways crossing the Afghan- Pakistani border rather than in the countryside. Lowgar Province was the site of similar military efforts late in 1984, but the operations were primarily along important sup- ply routes and did not affect farming areas away from the roads. ? From the end of 1984 through early 1985 there was heavy fighting in Herat Province. Although we know little about the poppy crop in Herat, we doubt that it was affected if the Soviets used the same tactics as used in Lowgar and Nangarhar Provinces. ? Qandahar Province was the scene of heavy fighting in January 1985, but the activity was limited to insurgent attacks against the airport, Soviet and government posts, a Soviet military convoy, and daily skirmishes in the bazaar. The Soviets re- sponded by bombing nearby villages, but we doubt major damage was intflicted on the more remotely located poppyfields. ? In late March 1985 insurgents attacked an Afghan base northeast of Lashkar Gah in the Helmand ? Konarha Province was the scene offighting in February 1985. Most military operations in Kon- arha, however, occurred along the province's main roads in the valleys of the Darya ye Konar and its major tributaries, the Landay Sind and the Darya- ye Pich. Although some airborne forces were used in the mountains little destruction of the terraced poppyfields. ? Paktia and Paktika Provinces have been the scene of constant battles as Soviet and Afghan troops have attempted to relieve insurgent pressure on regime outposts. The government conducted a blockade and sweep operation in Paktia in late October 1984, but we doubt that the poppy crop was damaged because many regime units here, hard pressed to hold their posts against guerrilla as- saults, have little time to conduct massive field operations that could destroy crops. These prov- inces, however, have experienced considerable popu- lation loss that may have reduced poppy cultivation. ? Kapisa and Laghman Provinces, often the location of Soviet offensives, are mountainous with only scattered poppy cultivation on smaller-than-average fields in terraced agricultural areas. Farmers prob- ably had difficulty planting or harvesting their fields because of the fighting, but we consider it unlikely that destroyed poppyfields in these areas will affect total Afghan production. 25X1 1 25X1 25X1 = Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret outposts, border posts, military supply convoys, air- ports, and highways. Many insurgents are also part- time farmers, which tends to reduce hostilities during planting and harvesting seasons. We judge that the increase in the number of heroin refineries reflects the traffickers' belief that Afghanis- tan's lawless, war-torn environment is ideal for refin- ing heroin with impunity. 25X1 25X1 1 25X1 Processing. Evidence indicates that trafficking orga- nizations in Afghanistan have had the capability to process opium into morphine and heroin since the We doubt that Afghan laboratories manufacture large amounts of pure heroin or compare in number with those in Pakistan.' pect that some laboratories also may be shifting from Pakistan to Afghanistan because of the increase in Afghan opium production and decrease in Pakistani cultivation. soldiers at checkpoints and border crossings. drivers in Afghanistan routinely carry heroin to bribe 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 ' Most heroin laboratories in Southwest Asia process raw opium into crude heroin base (Number 2 Heroin) or smoking heroin (Number 3 Heroin), but reporting suggests that more laboratories are refining pure heroin (Number 4 Heroin), particularly in Paki- stan. Pure heroin is also referred to as injectable heroin or heroin hydrochloride. ' Ribat is a village somewhere in the Afghan-Iranian-Pakistani triborder area. 25X1 25X15X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 frequently traded in the bazaars of Jalalabad, Qanda- har, and Herat, as well as other cities and towns (Kabul, Mazar-e Sharif, Towr Kham, Farah, and Zaranj), The distance of some of these locations from Pakistani laboratories suggests nearby refining in Afghanistan. DEA reporting also indicates that Pakistani authori- ties have seized heroin en route from Afghanistan. items in the Afghan bazaars for heroin. Heroin powder is readily available in Afghan cities and major roadways. the laboratories are 25X1 in remote mountain areas where government control We believe that military operations have little effect on heroin refining activities in Afghanistan. Few laboratories are located in areas that are potential military targets, such as the important villages or is limited. Like Pakistani operations, most Afghan heroin laboratories are so-called garage or kitchen operations-easily established, crudely constructed, and using existing buildings in outlying villages and 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret farm compounds. It is unlikely that the laboratories would be distinguishable from normal agricultural buildings, and, if destroyed, they easily could be borders with Pakistan and Iran. Before the insurgen- cy, tribal caravans traveled west across northern Afghanistan carrying opium to the consumers in Iran and the processing laboratories in eastern Turkey. Traditionally, opium was brought from almost all the growing regions to Herat, a commercial center in the western part of the country. There, arrangements were made to smuggle the opium across the border into Iran. Caravans carried some of the opium south to Qandahar Province and from there west across Helmand and Nimruz Provinces into Iran or south into Pakistan and west across Baluchistan-these routes facilitated diversion of the cargo to the Persian 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 reestablished (figure 5). Smuggling. Smuggling has long been a way of life for many Afghans, and Afghan drug smugglers have taken advantage of the insurgency-related disruption to increase their activi- ties. drug smuggling throughout Afghanistan and of bazaars well supplied with narcotics. Drug smuggling into Pakistan and Iran is also common, according to numerous DEA reports. Afghan smugglers have a large number of well- established routes, most of which cross unguarded Gulf area. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret The Opium and Heroin Trade In Afghanistan, opium is purchased initially by a local dealer, who may himself be a grower, or by a dealer from a nearby town. Using a human carrier, an animal caravan, or a motor vehicle, the dealer takes the opium from the growing area to a major center or bazaar, where it is either stockpiled by an opium broker or sold directly to smugglers. The broker usually maintains a stock of about 4 tons of opium. He will sell to refiners or may rune opium himself. When his opium stocks run low, he orders more from the dealers in the growing areas. Brokers and refiners in the Afghan bazaars supply the smugglers. Usually, the smugglers transport their cargo in vehicles or on pack animals to villages near the border. These villages serve as staging areas where the opiates are transferred to pack animal caravans to begin the journey across the border trails into Pakistan. Once inside Pakistan, the opiates are transferred to anoth- er pack animal caravan, or to small trucks, for delivery to the brokers and refiners in the North- West Frontier Province (NWFP) bazaars. The NWFP brokers and refiners are the major regional wholesal- ers who move the opium and heroin by car or truck to major traffickers in Karachi or Lahore, who, in turn, generally supply the international trafficking net- works that supply the United States and Europe. also operates between Quetta and Qandahar. According to US Embassy reporting, Afghan drug smugglers take advantage of the traditional money bazaar between Peshawar and Kabul-a hundi net- work of partnerships based on family and tribal relationships-to finance the flourishing narcotics trade. The hundi-called Hawala in Afghanistan-is an instrument of credit and exchange in Southwest Asia that predates and bypasses banking institutions. The small chit of paper authorizing delivery of a specific amount of money to the bearer has been replaced by the telephone. Transactions between the receiver in Kabul and distributor of hundifunds in Peshawar are now authorized by phone. The hundi dealers simply convert rupees to afghanis at whatever exchange rate the market establishes; a transaction takes only three days to complete. A separate system We believe that the Soviet invasion has altered the use of traditional smuggling routes and added a new dimension to narcotics trafficking in Afghanistan.' To avoid contact with roadblocks and other increased security measures, smugglers began moving their drugs to the nearest border. Smugglers from the less important, northern-producing provinces, such as Balkh, Konduz, and Baghlan, continued their treks southwest to Herat; but new routes were needed from the major growing areas on the eastern border to Pakistan. The need to develop routes leading east was reinforced further by a crackdown on heroin laborato- ries in Turkey. As a result, Jalalabad (Nangarhar Province) became the major marketing center in Afghanistan for transshipment to Pakistan. Some changes in routes were made to adjust for the disloca- tions of the insurgency. For example, smugglers from the Helmand Valley still travel to Qandahar, but now are more likely to head east to Pakistan than west to Iran. Five years after the Soviet invasion, Afghan smug- glers have adapted to the fighting and security mea- sures, and we believe they may be in an even stronger position than before the hostilities began (figure 6). They have managed to maintain access to their old smuggling routes and connections, while developing new ones with Pakistani organizations. Smuggling east to villages near the Khyber Pass and into Paki- stan occurs on a much larger scale, and Pakistani trafficking organizations in the North-West Frontier Province have expanded their operations to handle more narcotics. Afghan smugglers are also crossing the Afghan-Soviet border near Iran. According to DEA analysis, the location of several seizures in Iran at or near the Soviet border suggests that this route is being used. We doubt that drug smuggling through the Soviet Union is a regular occurrence, however, because Soviet security measures along the Afghan border are quite thorough and movement across this border is tightly controlled. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Figure 6 Narcotics Smuggling Routes ?- , Sov~; nin China Relatively new route The Role of the Government Preoccupied with combating the insurgency, the Soviet-backed Karmal regime is devoting little atten- tion or resources to the narcotics problem. Most cultivation occurs in areas beyond its control and is so widespread-in two-thirds of the provinces, that eradication would be impos- sible. The government has not made poppy cultivation illegal. This lack of government action may be a simple acknowledgment that to do so would be futile but also may be an attempt to appease rebellious farmers, particularly those in areas of significant opium production adjacent to Pakistan and Iran. Old route frequently used 5 Old route infrequently used Road + 0 100 200 Kilometers 0 100 200 Miles Publicly, the regime maintains that land reform has almost eliminated poppy cultivation and that any narcotics found in Afghanistan originate in Pakistan. Afghan counternarcotics efforts focus on interdiction by the Anti-Smuggling Division of the Ministry of Interior's Criminal Investigations Department. Staffed with about 40 poorly equipped men, it is not an effective antinarcotics force. The division has men assigned to eight provinces in Afghanistan but is Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret active only in the major cities, such as Kabul and Herat, according to a State Department source. Af- ghan officials try to highlight their successes and effectiveness and claim that a coordinated drug law enforcement effort has been implemented that in- cludes the armed forces. Kabul reported a significant increase in drug seizures in the first half of 1984, compared with the first half of 1983. The 1984 seizures netted less than 5 metric tons of opium and only about 91 kilograms of heroin. Even if these claims are accurate, such seizures are only a tiny portion of estimated production, and we judge they have not appreciably affected the drug trade. The US Embassy reports that most narcotics seizures proba- bly result from efforts to intercept illegal arms ship- ments to insurgents rather than from actual drug apprehended. Of those taken into custody, most are either allowed to escape after abandoning the drugs or freed after bribing the officials. KHAD, the Soviet-backed Afghan intelligence network, may be directly involved in heroin trafficking in Afghanistan. KHAD officers, at the direction of the Kabul government, work with Pash- tun tribesmen in moving heroin to border areas. Allegedly, KHAD routinely identifies the apprehend- ed smugglers as mujahideen.e 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 enforcement operations. Kabul has given no sign that it intends to increase the emphasis given antidrug efforts. To the contrary, the government misuses the limit- ed drug enforcement resources available. According to UN representatives, the Karmal regime has sum- marily rejected past offers to train qualified Afghan narcotics officials in drug enforcement. UN officials believe their financial and technical aid is being used to fight the insurgents. These same officials report that vehi- cles supplied to drug investigative units are being used by the military for routine security patrols. Even if the government had a comprehensive antinar- cotics program, we believe that it would be quickly subverted by the traffickers. Afghan authorities at a eves are corrupt and willingly. abet traffickers for a price. We suspect, how- ever, that most of the corruption entails bribing Afghan border guards and customs officials or offer- ing heroin to Soviet soldiers at roadblocks and check- points outside the cities. drug smugglers routinely bribe customs officials in advance, but even those who do not are seldom 25X1 journalist, recently in Afghanistan, heard persistent stories of heroin being transported to the Pakistani 25X1 border under Soviet military protection. He is work- ing on the story and is convinced of official Afghan Government collusion in the narcotics trade. We believe the authorities may use the troop movements to facilitate the narcotics trade and suspect that the export of heroin from Afghanistan may serve regime objectives to increase drug addiction problems in Pakistan and Iran, earn hard currency, and smear the 25X1 The Role of the Refugees and Insurgents Afghan and Soviet press statements allege that the 25X1 Afghan refugees and insurgents are largely responsi- ble for the illegal narcotics trafficking. Refugee and 25X1 insurgent leaders have denied publicly any collusion 25X1 with narcotics traffickers. There is no conclusive evidence to support either side's contention, but individuals or small groups of refugees and insurgents are profiting from the narcotics trade. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Refugees. Both opium cultivation and narcotics smug- gling are traditional activities in Afghanistan, and we 25X1 Mujahideen is a term used to refer to the Afghan insurgents or resistence fighters. Literally, the word translates "fighters in the holy war." In the Pashtu language, "mu" means fighter, "jihad" 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Figure 7 Afghan Ethnic Groups Involved in Opium Trade Baluch LU Tajik Pashtun Ii Turkmen Boundary representation is not neceaaarrly authoritative. assume that refugees continue to pursue these activi- ties (figure 7). On the basis of reporting from US and UN officials in Pakistan, we estimate that at least three-fourths of the Afghan refugees are Pashtun farmers, some of whom are poppy farmers who regu- larly cross back into Afghanistan to assist with the crop.' For centuries, Pashtun tribesmen have routinely traveled to what is now Pakistan to trade narcotics and other goods, look for work, visit relatives, and Groups not associated with opium trade 0 100 200 Kilometers 0 100 200Miles move their herds to winter grazing areas. Establish- ment of national borders has not stopped this move- ment. According to DEA intelligence sources, some Pashtun families reside only part-time in the refugee camps; the older family members remain in Afghani- stan to look after the farms and the younger men return periodically to tend and harvest their crops. Although we have no direct evidence, we suspect many refugees may migrate between their farms and refugee camps. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret In most cases, from the producers in the growing regions to the brokers in the bazaars across the border, transactions are based on longstanding rela- tionships. Consequently, most regions are free zones for opium and heroin smuggling among the Pashtun, Baluchi, Turkmen, and Tajik ethnic groups who inhabit the various opium-growing regions and whose ties span the nearby international borders. The Pash- tun tribes dominate the narcotics smuggling trade, inhabiting the southern and eastern slopes of the Hindu Kush in Afghanistan and Pakistan and con- trolling the fabled Khyber Pass and the strategic Khojak Pass through which most of Afghanistan's opium and heroin move. The Baluchistan Desert- spanning Qandahar, Helmand, and Nimruz Prov- inces, as well as parts of Pakistan and Iran-is the usual area of operation for Baluchi caravans. Turk- men caravans move across northern Afghanistan- through Samangan, Balkh, Jowzjan, Faryab, Badghis, and Herat Provinces-and the Tajiks are dominant in northeastern Afghanistan, particularly Badakhshan Province. Turkmens and Tajiks also inhabit the regions across the Soviet border. Insurgents. Despite some circumstantial evidence that individual insurgents or insurgent bands are involved in smuggling narcotics, we have no information of organized narcotics smuggling involving the mujahi- deen. We judge that such involvement is unlikely under present circumstances because the disadvan- tages outweigh the potential benefits and will contin- ue to do so as long as other sources of income are available. Any publicity regarding insurgent partici- pation in narcotics smuggling, moreover, would tar- nish the mujahideen's image and could cost them support from external sources. It could also cost them some popular support from the Afghan community itself; Islamic religious leaders teach strongly against the use of opium, and many Afghan Muslims are very conservative. Organized narcotics smuggling also would divert insurgents' attention and energies from planning and staging military operations and under- mine their ability to achieve political and ideological Several individual Pashtun tribes are particularly well known for their smuggling activities. The Afridi and Shinwari tribes have switched from brandishing rifles on horseback to running profitable trucking concerns and smuggling narcotics across the Afghan- Pakistani border. Some tribesmen farm poppyfields, and others are reported to operate heroin laborato- ries. They inhabit the region south of the Darya ye Kabul on both sides of the border and dominate licit and illicit traffic on the Grand Trunk Highway between Kabul and Peshawar through the Khyber Pass. Some of the Ghilzai and Durrani confedera- tions are nomads, migrating between winter quarters in the valleys and summer pasture grounds in the mountains. They also tend to be itinerant merchants and moneylenders, whose caravans regularly move opium across Afghanistan. Many of the Durrani and Ghilzai confederations also have large landholdings and farm acres of poppies. The Ghilzai live in the region south of Kabul as far as Chaman, and the Durrani inhabit a broad arc of territory from the 25X1 lower Darya ye Arghandab and Darya ye Helmand Valleys eastward toward the Iranian border. 25X1 The major insurgent organizations have repeatedly denied any involvement and have officially instructed their supporters not to engage in narcotics smuggling, The insurgency draws heavily from groups that historically have been in- volved in opium growing and smuggling, however, and these groups maintain considerable autonomy as part of the insurgent movement. In addition, numerous other Afghans sometimes follow the mujahideen, and many of these individuals may well grow or smuggle opium for their personal benefit. Outlook We doubt that the Afghan Government will take any action to curtail narcotics production and smuggling given present circumstances. Kabul's preoccupation will lie with putting down the insurgency, and not goals. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret with stopping a thriving trade that brings hard cur- rency and Western goods into Afghanistan. The attitudes of the Kabul regime and its Soviet advisers toward drug enforcement could change if they per- ceive that drug abuse threatens the performance of Soviet troops in.Afghanistan or that drug sales fi- nance the insurgent movement. The government would have difficulty curbing the narcotics trade even if it decided to implement a serious control program. Authorities would be able to crack down on narcotics trafficking in and around Kabul and the various military outposts, but this intervention would not significantly reduce the flow of narcotics out of Afghanistan unless accompanied by crop eradication. Manual elimination of opium culti- vation would first require greater government control of the countryside, which would entail a costly mili- tary buildup and a commitment of additional re- sources to narcotics enforcement. Aerial spraying, the cheapest and most effective control method, would require planes to fly at such low altitudes that they would be easy targets. Either method could easily be thwarted by moving the fields into more remote and difficult-to-locate areas, a countermeasure used with a great deal of success in other opium-producing countries. In the absence of any concerted effort at narcotics control within Afghanistan, the ability of neighboring authorities to intensify their interdiction efforts offers the only alternative for limiting the amount of opium and heroin from Southwest Asia that reaches interna- tional markets. Iran-preoccupied by the war with Iraq and sharing a rugged, nearly 900-kilometer-long border with Afghanistan-is not likely to be able to check the flow of drugs moving west. Effective inter- diction of opium and heroin moving through Pakistan could cut Afghanistan's other principal means of access to the international narcotics traffic. Control of Pakistan's growing drug abuse problem offers Paki- stani authorities some incentive to step up interdic- tion. Although we doubt that Islamabad will move against narcotics traffickers in the North-West Fron- tier Province, increased enforcement efforts in Kara- chi and Lahore could'at least limit some of the narcotics currently reaching European and US markets. 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1 Secret Secret O Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/13: CIA-RDP86T00586R000400460006-1