ARE THE SOVIETS SHIFTING RESOURCES FROM MILITARY TO CIVILIAN PRODUCTION?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86M00886R001000020023-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 20, 2009
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 9, 1984
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86M00886R001000020023-7.pdf159.25 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 - Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 The Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20505 9 April 1984 National Intelligence Council MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence FROM: Herbert E. Meyer Vice Chairman, National Intelligence Council SUBJECT: Are the Soviets Shifting Resources from Military to Civilian Production? 1. In this draft paper, DIA analyst makes extensive use of intelligence reporting to argue that since--T9-80- the Soviets have been shifting resources from the military ivilian sector as part of a carefully planned, long-term program. tie argument runs like this: -- By late 1980 the Soviets had begun to appreciate the extent of their economic problem. Several successive poor harvests, combined with plummeting productivity, had worked to lower living standards and raise the level of civil unrest.) -- Precisely at this low point for Soviet agriculture and for that country's consumers, the U.S. embargoed trade following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Subsequent to the convergence of these events the Politburo, concerned over its agricultural vulnerability and over enormous hard currency outflows for food, implemented an Agroindustrial Food Program designed to achieve agricultural self- sufficiency by 1990. The second U.S. trade embargo of December 1982 over the "Polish Crisis" served,to reinforce the Food Program decision. -- The Food Program, which depends heavily on a major retooling of agricultural and food processing machine-building facilities, is designed to draw support from industry's best sector, the military- industrial sector. Since late 1980, this sector, including its R&D facilities, has been repeatedly directed--in key speeches and other forums--to provide such support and also to do more for non-food consumer goods output. Intelligence has provided numerous instances25x1 Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 TOP SECRET showing that the military-industrial sector has responded to the directives and resolutions calling forfor support even at some cost in materials and investment funds. - Directly related to the Politburo's consumer oriented policies was the decision to accord high, perhaps highest, priority in railroad cars and service to the movement of agricultural commodities even at the direct expense of the industrial sector. The inability to insulate military suppliers and producers from the resultant bottlenecks was one consequence of this decision. However, continued implementation of the decision to give agricultural shippers rail priority in spite of civil and military industrial disruptions serves as one measure of the deep Politburo concern over the issue of ndards, unrest, labor productivity and political stability. -- The full impact of these policies on actual levels of Soviet military production is yet to be determined. However, these developments have occurred during the period in which estimates of Soviet weapons procurement have shown little if any growth and at a time of uncertainty over future procurement levels. Thus, it is essential to look as closely as possible at the evidence indicating that economic policies surrounding domestic programs are responsible for these trends. Indeed, economic policy decisions may have more bearing on the military procurement and total military expenditure trends than the reasons considered to date; concurrent procurement cycles, technology delays and industrial bottlenecks. These factors may be only the symptoms of significant changes that are occurring in Soviet resource-allocation policies. 2. It is against this backgrounds ~ that we should view Brezhnev's October 1982 speech to the top 500 military commanders. In that speech, which proved to be Brezhnev's last and which was attended by all key Politburo members, Brezhnev acknowledged the tense world situation and the renewed U.S. emphasis on defense. He then stated that a country's policy "is only effective when it relies on the real economic and military strengths of a state." You will recall that Western analysts were quite baffled by this speech. If =_ is correct, its meaning and importance become clear: an important sOtt from military to civilian production was well under way, and the leadership was telling the generals that the policy was a lona-ta m one to which they must accommodate themselves and their institutions. 3. ~appened on to all this as a result of an earlier piece he wrote--and which DIA has not yet published either--that summarizes the extraordinary measures taken in Moscow to distribute imported grain. These measures included periodic, total shut-downs of the rail system to all Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 TOP SECRET industrial users--a tactic that crippl well as civilian production.- (It is in this report tha V_~the,600-k back-up of rail cars on the Soviet side of the Iranian border.) 4. I thesis is valid, the intelligence community has missed something of the utmost importance. Since relies so extensively on , t~ ommunity should be charged intelligence reporting, analysts throughou with either explaining why they reject the______ conclusions, or accepting these conclusions and dealing with their implications Herbert E. ever Attachment: Draft paper by Distribution: Copy 1 - DCI 2 - DDCI (I)- Executive Registry 4 - DDI 5 - DDI Registry (w/o att) 6 - VC/NIC Chrono TOP SECRET 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7 Next 66 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Approved For Release 2009/02/25: CIA-RDP86M00886RO01000020023-7