LAND REMOTE SENSING SATELLITE COMMERCIALIZATION ACT OF 1984

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 11, 2008
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 8, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3.pdf1.31 MB
Body: 
June 3, 1084 aavImbaY COSOrIYTma Sec. S. (a) EsTAarasfMErrr.-Tile Secretary shall establish a Mfasm[aetusing Btdence and Technology Rabaaveare it Advisory Com- mittee to advise the Secretary eoneerrdng the activities to be Conducted under this Act. The Advisory Cosasittee abou have representation from teehsaelsgy-smsitive itr dustrial sectors, from labor, from the marrna- factusing research eomrmrtnhty. and from such other sectors as the Secretary consid- er appropriate. Such members shall be ap- Pointed by the Secretary for a term of 2 Years, and shall receive no corppensation. Any such member shall. In accordance with section 6703 of title S. United States Code, be entitled to reimbursement for travel or transportation expenses incurred in the per- formance of responsibilities as a member of the Advisory Committee. (b) Fuxccrrous.-The Advisory Committee shall- (1) review the policies and selection crite- ria for grants made and cooperative agree- ments entered into under this Act; (2) review the program of the Secretary of Commerce In meeting an the requirements of this Act; (3) assess the effectiveness of the activi- ties funded pursuant to this Act; and (4) submit to the Secretary, at least annu- ally, evaluations and recommendations re- garding activities carried out under this Act. (c) REPORT.-The Advisory Committee shall submit to the Congress an annual report on its activities under this Act. (d) APPtrcARnLTY. TLe Advisory Commit- tee shall be subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (6 U.B.C. App. 1 etseq.). The amendment was agreed to. The bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, read the third time, and passed. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the bill was passed. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. LAND REMOTE SENSING SATEL- LITE COMMERCIALIZATION ACT OF 1984 The Senate proceeded to consider the bill (R.R. 5155) to establish a system to promote-the use of land remote-sensing satellite data, and for other purposes, which had been re- ported from the Committee on Com- merce, Science, and Transportation with an amendment to strike all after the enacting clause and insert: That this Act may be cited as the Lend Remote Sensing Setellile Csnantrowfaa tion Act of 1984': TITLE I-DECLARATION OF FINDINGS AND PURPOSES nwemevs Sze. 101. The Congress finds and declares that- (1) the Federal Government's experimental Landsat system has established the United States as the world leader in land remote sensing satellite technology; (2) the continuous collection of land remote sensing data from satellites is of major benefit in managing the Earth's natu- ral resources; (3) private sector involvement in space can provide sound bases for the future growth of space-based technologies; (4) it is necessary to determine the extent to which it is appropriate and in the nation- Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE S 6853 at interest for Me private sector to assume civil land remote sensing satellites involy- responsibility Aw civil land Nnmote sensing ing rectification of distortions registration satellite arstevt operations and data manage- with respect to Jbatura of the Earth. and ment- calibration of spectral response; the term (5) the existing civil land remote sensing does not include conclusions, manipula- sYstem of the Unwed Stake taewies inpsr- lions, or calculations derived from such sig- tent isthrnetitsv comuritne,Ns; nals or combination. of the signals with (6) civil hand tRmsa/ semi ,.g involve, rele- other data or injbrmatfon; and vant national scurf cosseernr (5) "United States private entity" means (Ti it is in Ott natisnat aeiavet ts prsfao(e any citizen of the United States or any non- the establishment of private land nrwoM governmental entity or consortium of enti- sensing ventures; ties, the majority of whose assets is owned (8) private industry is Jest salted in devil- by citizens of the United States the majority op markets for remote sensing dace; of whose personnel is comprised of citizens (9) it is doubtful that the private sector of the United States, and whose principal alone currently can develop s Wet lend place of business is in the united States. remote sensing system because of the high risk @rW t TITLE II-OPltltd?1011id1yDD,iTI (10) 1 cooperation capital between th usen the FanlFeaal (Ape. MARKETING OF LANA I SYSTEM ernmeat and private indmtbp I. necessary aa-ARA?ra71N to manage effectistist the esisti g Landsat Sac M. (a) The Department of Commerce system ee as to ensure data continuity, to shall be responsible for- honor international and national security (1) the orbit and data collection of Land- responathilities and is broaden the data sat 4, and disposition of Landsat 4 upon the market enough to aprsrt sWseilf dent pri- termination of its useful operation, as deter- sate vent urss; and iddblihd mne an puse by the Secretary; (11) such cooperation should be structured (2) the orbit and data collection a! Land- to utinistiae the -oast 1 s i d * eyrot mu reg - ulation by the Federal Government, while assuring continuous avsAaliite to the Fed- eral Government W. land inmate sensing data PWRJKNW SEc. 2P2. The purposes 4< this Aet are to.- (1) guide the Federal flowenrment in achieving proper involvement of Ae private sector by providing afruesework for gradual commercialization of land rensete sensing allowing an increasing private role as the market for data expands, and maturing tow- tinuous data availability to &e Federal Government; (2/ preserve the leading position of the United States in civil land remote ~091 preserve the national security, and honor the international obligations of the United States; (3) reaffirm the right of all Nations to sense the Earth's surface and acquire land remote sensing data, so long as such data are made available to all potential users on a nondiscriminatory bests; and (4) miniseize the duration and amount of further Federal investment nowasury to assure data continuity tabibr achieving com- mercialization of civil land reneob sensing D"BEFTFOWD SEc. 103. For purposes of this Act. the term- (1) "Landsat systems- me?aus Landsat 4 and Laudsst 5, and misted glowed equip- sat 5, and disposition of Landsat 5 upon the termination of its useful operation, as deter- mined and published by the Secretary; (3) ground equipment and facilities which are used to operate the Landsaf system; and (4) provision of data to foreign ground stations under the terms of sststing Memo- randa of Understanding beta en the United States Government and nations that operate ground stations. (b) The Department of Cotmaaeree may extend any such Memoranda of Understand- ing if such extension provides for their expi- ration upon the termination of the use/sd operation of the Landsat systems. Ic) The provisions of this section dual; not prohibit the Department of Cmminerce from continuing to contract for the operation of use Landsat svsten so long as the United States Government retains- (1) ownership of the system; (2) ownership of the unenhaneed data; and (3) authority to make decisions concern. ing operation of the system. MARREtINO OF UNapvN.4 ID DATA SEc. 202. (a) In accordance with the re- quirements of this title, the Secretary shall, to the extent provided in advance by appro- priation Acts by means of a competitive process contract with a United States pri. vane entity for One marketing of unenhanced data collected by the Landsat system. Any such contract shall provide that- without preference, bias,_ or any arrange- enhanced data products. if the products are ment that favors any purchaser or Gras of always available to all potential users on a purchasers over seethe,- aura that- nondiscriminatory basis; (A) data prtdaois an vwn/e available to (2) the contractor shaft compensate the all potential buyers at standard published United States Government for the right to prices; sell the data by payment of an initial fee, a (B) an purchasers are given the saute op- percentage of data sales receipts, or some portunities for access to date, such ax time- combination of arch lief and receipts; lines* of availability and terms of defiveM (3) the contractor Mall pay to the United and States GoversrNeui eke AN purchase price of ICl special arrs*gesnew s, other than any any unenhanced data that the contractor arrangement for exclusive access to data by elects to utilize for purpoun other than sale, any purchaser, such as volumse discounts, in accordance with paragraph (41 of this gathering of data with certain eharecterts- subsection; tics requested by a purchaser, and mainte. (4) the contractor shall not engage in any nance of secrecy regarding any such or. sale of processed data except in a manner rangements are permissible if the aveilatbil- consistent with applicable antitrust laws; ity and prices of suck services am published and and uniformly available the alt data purchas- (5) the Secretary has determined that such ems; contract is likely to result in cost savings for (3) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the United States Government. Commerce; (b) Prior to entering into such a contract, (4) 'unenhanced data" means digital or the Secretary shall publish the requirements minimally processed signals collected from of subsection (a)(1) through (3) of this sec- Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 S 6854 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE June 8, 1984 tion, and the contract shall be subject to such requirements. (c)(1) Any decision or proposed decision by the Secretary to enter into any such con- tract shall be transmitted to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representa- tives for their review. No such decision or proposed decision shall be implemented unless (A) a period of 30 days of continuous session of Congress has passed after the re- ceipt by each such committee of such trans- mittal or (B) each such committee before the expiration of such period has, by vote of a majority of its members, agreed to transmit and has transmitted to the Secretary written notice to the effect that such committee has no objection to the decision or proposed de- cision. As part of such transmittal, the Sec- retary shall include the information speci- fied in subsection (a)(1) through (5) of this section. (2) For purposes of this section- (A) continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment sine die; and (B) days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 5 days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of such period. AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT SEC. 203. (a) The Secretary shall award any such contract on the basis of- (1) the financial return to the United States Government, based on any initial fee offered for marketing rights and any per- centage of data sales receipts offered to the United States Government; (2) the ability to expand the market for unenhanced land remote sensing data; and (3) such otherfactors as the Secretary con- siders appropriate. (b) If, as a result of the competitive proc- ess required by section 202(a) of this title, the Secretary receives no proposal which the Secretary determines to be acceptable under the provisions of this title, the Secretary shall so certify and fully report such finding to the Congress. As soon as practicable but not later than 30 days after so certifying and reporting, the Secretary shall reopen the competitive process. The period for the sub- sequent competitive process shall not exceed 120 days. If, after such subsequent competi- tive process, the Secretary receives no pro- posal which the Secretary determines to be acceptable under the provisions of this title, the Secretary shall so certify and fully report such finding to the Congress. In the event that no acceptable proposal is received, the Secretary shall continue to market data from the Landsat system (c) Such contract may, in the discretion of the Secretary, be combined with the contract required by title III of this Act, pursuant to section 305(b) of this Act TITLE Ill-DATA CONTINUITY AFTER THE LANDSAT SYSTEM PURPOSE SEC. 301. It is the purpose of this title to- (1) provide for a transition from oper- ation by the Federal Government to private, commercial operation of civil land remote sensing satellite systems; (2) determine, with minimal risk during the proposed transition period, whether wholly private operation of land remote sensing is in the best interests of the United States; (3) provide for the continuity of land remote sensing satellite data after the termi- DATA CONTINUITY SEC. 302. The Secretary shall evaluate pro- posals from United States private entities for a contract for the development and oper- ation of a system capable of generating land remote sensing data, and marketing such unenhanced data for a period of 6 years. Such evaluation and any solicitation of pro- posals shall be conducted by means of a competitive process. Such proposals, at a minimum, shall specify- (1) the quantities and qualities of data ex- pected from the system; (2) the projected date upon which oper- ations could begin; (3) the number of satellites to be construct- ed and their expected lifetimes; (4) any need for Federal funding to devel- op the system; (5) any percentage of sales receipts offered to the Federal Government; (6) plans for expanding the market for land remote sensing data, and (7) the proposed relationship and proce- dures for meeting the national security and international obligations of the United States. NOTIFICATION REGARDING A WARPING OF THE COA77UCT SEC. 303. (a) The Secretary shall evaluate the proposals referred to in section 30:.' of this title and, to the extent provided in ad- vance by appropriation Acts, may contract, in accordance with section 401 of this Act, with a United States private entity for the provision by such entity of the capability of generating land remote sensing data and marketing such unenhanced data for a period of 6 years. As part of such evaluation, the Secretary shall analyze the expected out- come of each proposal, in terms of- (1) the availability of such data upon the expected termination of the Landsat system; (2) the quantities and qualities of data to be generated by the recommended system; (3) the cost to the Federal Government of developing the recommended system; (4) the potential to expand the market for data, (5) any percentage of data sales offered to the Federal Government, in accordance with section 304 of this title; (6) the contractor's ability to advance remote sensing technology and maintain the technological leadership of the United States in remote sensing; (7) the commercial viability of the propos- al, (8) the technical competence and financial condition of the contractor,' (9) the proposed relationship and proce- dures for satisfying the national security and international obligations of the United States; and (10) such other factors, including the mar- keting of unenhanced data from the Landsat system, as the Secretary deems appropriate and relevant (b)(1) Any decision or proposed decision by the Secretary to enter into any such con- tract shall be transmitted to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representa- tives for their review. No such decision or proposed decision shall be implemented unless (A) a period of 30 days of continuous session of Congress has passed after the re- ceipt by each such committee of such trans- mittal or (B) each such Committee before the expiration of such period has, by vote of nation of the operation of the existing a majority of its members, agreed to trans- system, as described in title II of this Act; mit and has transmitted to the Secretary and written notice to the effect that such com- (4) assure development of a land remote mittee has no objection to the decision or sensing system that will result in cost sav- proposed decision. As part of such transmit- ings for the United States Government tal, the Secretary shall include the informa- tion specified in subsection (a) (1) through (6) of this section. (2) For purposes of this section- (A) continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment sine die; and (B) days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 5 days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of such period. (c) If, as a result of the competitive proc- ess required by subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary receives no proposal which the Secretary determines to be acceptable under the provisions of this title, the Secretary shall so certify and fully report such finding to the Congress. As soon as practicable but not later than 30 days after so certifying and reporting, the Secretary shall reopen the competitive process. The period for the sub- sequent competitive process shall not exceed 180 days. If, after such subsequent competi- tive process, the Secretary receives no pro- posal which the Secretary determines to be acceptable under the provisions of this title, the Secretary shall so certify andfully report such finding to the Congress. Not earlier than 90 days after such certification and report, the Secretary may assure data conti- nuity by procurement and operation by the Federal Government of the necessary sys- tems, to the extent provided in advance by appropriation Acts. SIARKE2ING INCENTIVE SEC. 304. In order to promote aggressive marketing of land remote sensing data, any contract entered into pursuant to this title may provide that the percentage of sales paid by the contractor to the Federal Gov- ernment shall decrease according to stipu- lated increases in sales levels. TERMS OF TIfE CONTRACT SEC. 305. (a) Any contract entered into pursuant to this title- (1) shall provide that the contractor will offer to sell and deliver unenhanced land remote sensing data to all potential buyers on a nondiscriminatory basis; (2) shall provide that the contractor will engage in any sale of processed data only in a manner consistent with applicable anti- trust laws; (3) shall not provide a guarantee of pur- chases of data by the Federal Government from the contractor; (4) may provide that the contractor uti- lize, on a space-available basis, civilian Government satellites as platforms for a civil land remote sensing satellite system, it (A) the contractor immediately reimburses the Government for all related costs in- curred with respect to such utilization, in- cluding a reasonable and proportionate share of fixed, spacecraft, data transmis- sion, and launch costs; and (B) such utilization would not interfere with or otherwise in any way compromise the intended civilian Government missions, as determined by the agency responsible for the civilian satellite; and (5) may provide indirect and direct finan- cial support by the United States Govern- ment, including loans and loan guarantees, payments pursuant to section 305 of the Federal Property and Administrative Serv- ices Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 255) for a portion of the capital costs required to provide the follow-on capability, and other financial considerations. (b)(1) Without regard to whether any con- tract entered into under this title is com- bined with a contract under title II of this Act, the Secretary shall promptly determine whether the contract entered into under this title reasonably effectuates the purposes and policies of title II. Such determination shall Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Juw 8,14984', CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -= SENATE be submitted to the President and, the Con- gress together with a full statement of the basis for such determination. (2) Zr the secretary determines that such contract does not reasonably effectuate the purposes and,policies of title 11 of this Act the Secretary shall promptly attempt ..to carry out the provisions ysuch title. woRT Sac 304. Within 2. years after the com- mencement of operations of any system with respect to which a contract has been entered into under this Mtle, the Secretary shall report to the Congress on the progress and feasibility of the transition to total private financing, operation. and ownership of a land remote sensing satellite system, togeth- er with any legislative recommendations to accomplish such transition. UTXORIZATION OFAPPROPRLAT7ON3 SEC 307. There are authorized to be appro- priated for purposes of this title not to exceed $60,000,000 for fiscal year 1985. Such sums shall remain available until expended, but shall not become available until the time period specified in section 303(b)(1)(A) or (B), as appropriate, has expired TERMINATION OF A U78OR1TY Sac 308. The authority granted by this title shall terminate 10 years alter the date of enactment o/ this Act TITLE IV-PRIVATE LAND REMOTE SENSING SYSTEMS GENERAL AVIYIO ITY Sac 401. (a) In consultation with other appropriate Federal agencies, the Secretary shall license qualified United States private entities to operate civil land remote sensing satellite systems for such period as the Secre- tary may specify and in accordance with the Provisions of this title (b) No license shall be granted by the Sec- retary unless the Secretary. determines its writing that the applicant will comply with the requirement of this Act any regulations issued pursuant to this Act, and will meet applicable international obligations and national security concerns of the United States. CONDH7OAW FOR OPERATION Sea 402. (a) No private sector party or consortium may operate any civil land remote sensing system which is wallet to the Jurisdiction or control of the Untieid States without obtaining a license pursuant to section 401 of this title. (b) Any license issued Pursuant to this title shall specify, at a minimum, that the li- censee shall- (1) make available data generated by the system to ail? potential users on a nondis- criminatory basis; (2) upon termination of its operations under the license make disposition of any satellites in space in a manner satisfactory to the President; (3) promptly make available to the Secre- tary all data generated by the system, pursu- ant to title VI of this Act; (4) furnish the Secretary with complete orbit and data collection characteristics of the system, obtain advance approval of any intended deviation from such characteris- tics, and inform the Secretary immediately of any unintended deviation; (5) obtain advance approval from the Sec- retary of any agreement it intends to enter with a foreign nation, entity or consortium involving foreign nations or entities; (6) operate the system in a manner that is consistent with international lava (7) Permit the inspection of its facilities and financial records; (8) surrender the license and terminate op- erations upon a finding by the Secretary that continued operations would be detri- mental to the national interest; and (9) not snow, in any sale of processed data. ceps in amannerconsistent with alp. piianble antitrustlaws OP 77IE *fCAi1 RY SEC 403 The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate Federal ageneims, shed be reiponsibl4 for protection of nailbnal eecurt- ty interests and agherenet to international obiyatione of the Un_ iced. Stsb#r utdch are fdievant to operation e~prtirste land remote sensing satellite systems, including- (1) responsibility for all land remote sens- ing activities of nongovernmental entities of the United States; (2) liability for damage caused by space objects under registration or license by the Federal Government; and (3) registration with appropriate interns- remote sensing resedreh and development tional authorities of all objects launched activities, and is encouraged to conduct ex- into space by nongovernmental entities of perimental remote sensing programs and to the United States develop remote sensing technologies in sup- A UJTIOR/TY OP 7711 SECRETARY port of its mission, and SEa 404. In order to carry out the respon- (2) authorized and encouraged to- sibilities specified in this Mtle, the Secretary (A) conduct such research and develop- may- ment in cooperation with other public and 11) inspect the facilities or financial private research entities including private records of any licensee under this title; and industry, universities, other Federal agen- (2) provide, within the licenses or regula- tions ties, State and local aoversnnent foreign soncompli- sneeJiiall ped, the rjbr equirements requirements creme penalties of for such licensee governments and international orpaniza- or regulations issued under section 405 of acres; and this title, tneluding ts>mfnraMon, modif ea- IB) enter into arrangements (including tics or suspension of a license and civil Joint ventures and cooperative -agreements) penalties not to exceed *14000L- which will foster cooperation out advance Each day of operation in violation of such the state-of-the-art of remote sensing tech- licenses or regulations shall constitute a Sep- nologfes crate violation. (ts) In order to preserve the worldwide REOULATORTAUTJloMTT OF TZa; 8ECJes7SrRY leadership of the United States in remote 81a 405 The Secretary may issue repute- sensing technologies and appe , the tions to carry out the provisioner of this tale. Secretary, the Secretary as the luterlteri or and Such regulations shall be promulgated only the Secretary of after public notice and comment in accord- (1) shall continue nue research earch is o i gcatiohe apex with the provisions of section 553 of of remote sensing date{, maeitortng of the title 4 United States Cbdt Earth and its environment and deveiop- AcsaNCYAC 7VJTas ment,of technologies for such monitoring; and Sze 400. (a) A private sector party may (2) are authorized and encouraged to- apply .for a license to operate a civil land /A) conduct such research and devek-p- space ava sensing ilable basystemsis, 'li which civilian lian a on United a ment in cooperation with.otlrerpublic and space states Government satellite or vehicle as a private research entities, induMM. private indw wniversiMes, other Faderd agen- -plabbr+n'fbr such system. The Secretary, ciesi State and local governmank foreign vureve t .to the authorities of #hfs title neap governments and irnterwatiewtal orgarniaa- .Barns" suchsystem {ft ueeet: ail condition: Mmu; and of thts'tiMe and- l1) the system operator immediately reim- (B) enter into arrangements (including bursa the Government for all related coats Joint ventures and cooperative agreements) incurred with respect to such utilization, in- which will foster cooperatioi% advance the cludiny a reasonable and proportionate applications of remote sensing and enhance Marc of fixed, spacecraft data transmis- monitoring activities and technologies. sion, and launch costs; and Ile) In order to preserve- the worldwide I2) such utilization would not interfere leadership of the United States in remote with or otherwise in any way compromise sensing technologies and applications, other intended civilian Government missions, as Federal agencies are encouraged to conduct determined by ."the agency responsible for research and development Programs in such civilian satellite. remote sensing if such programs are consist- (b) The Secretary may offer assistance to ant with the authorized missions. of such private sector parties in finding appropriate agencies. opportunities for such utilization. USS Or EXPERIMENTAL DATE (le) Tb the extent provided in advance by Sea 502. Data gathered in Federal expert- appropriation Acts, any Federal agency may mental land remote sensing programs may ,enter into agreements for such utilization if be used in related research and development such agreements are consistent with such Prams funded by the Federal Govern- agency's mission and statutory Authority, meat including applications programs but and V such remote sensing system is It- not for commeretal or in competition censedby the Secretary. , With private sector ac~Mvities, aeMt as per- (d) The provisions of this title shall not she .11. milted by section 503 Qf this title. a l at b wow. acti it to carded pp y o y v y tion pursuant to its authority under title IV S1r, 503. Data gathered in Federal expert- ,of the National Aeronautics and Space Act mental land remote sensing programs may, of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2481 st me.). by means .of a competitive process, be sold le) Nothing in this section shall affect the en bloc (consistent with national security authority of the Federal' Communications interests and international obligations of Commission to assign r4dio frequencies pur- the United States) to any United States suant to the Communications Act of 1934 entity which will market the data on a non- (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). discriminatory basis. S16855 TERMINATION Sac. 407. The authority' granted by this title shall terminate 20 years after the date of enactment of this Act if no private sector Party: or consortium has been licensed and continues in operation'under Sus provisions o/ this tali TITLE V-CONTINUED REMOTE SENS- ING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT F1D1/tAL,SSt4R0M AND DEVILOPMBNT Sac 501. (a) In order to preserve the worldwide leadership of the United States in remote sensing technologies and applica- tions, the Administrator of the National Aer- onautics and Space Administration is- Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 S 6856 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE TITLE VI-GENERAL PROVISIONS NONDISCRIMINATORY AVAILABILITY OP DATA SEC. 601. (a) Unenhanced land remote sensing satellite data generated by any system operator under the provisions Qf this Act shall be made available to all users on a nondiscriminatory basis, in accordance with the requirements of this Act. (b) For purposes of this title, the term "system operator" means a contractor under title II or III or a licensee under title IV of this Act. (c) Any system operator shall make public- ly available the prices, policies, procedures and other terms and conditions (but not the names of buyers or their purchasers) upon which the operator will sell such data. ARCHIVING OF DATA SEC 602. (a) It is in the public interest for the United States Government to- (1) maintain an archive of remote sensing satellite data for historical, scientific and technical purposes, including long-term global environmental monitoring; (2) control the content and scope of the ar- chive; and (3) assure the quality and continuity of the archive (b) The Secretary shall provide for long term storage, maintenance and upgrading of a basic, global, land remote sensing data set (hereinafter referred to as the "basic data set") and shall follow reasonable archival practices to assure proper Storage and pres- ervation of the basic data set and timely access for parties requesting data. The basic data set which the Secretary assembles in the Government archive shall remain dis- tinct from any inventory. gf data which a system operator may maintain for sales and for other purposes. (c) In determining the initial content of, or in upgrading, the basic data set the Sec- retary shall- (1) use as a baseline the data currently ar- chived; (2) take into account future technical and scientific developments and needs; (3) consult with and seek the advice of users and producers of remote sensing data and data prodnctg (4) consider the public need for data which may be -duplicative in terms of geo- graphical coverage but which differ in terms of season, spectral bands, resolution, or o ther Seteuant ,factors; (5) include, as the Secretary considers ap- propriate, unenheneed remote sensing data generated either by the Landsat system, pur- suant to title III, or by licensees under title IV of this Act; and (6) include, as the Secretary considers ap- propriate, data collected by foreign ground stations or by foreign remote sensing satel- lite systems (d) All original data for copies Qf such data) shall on request be made promptly available to the Secretary by any system op- erator in a form suitable for processing for data storage, maintenance and access. The Secretary may (subject to the availability of appropriations) pay to such system operator reasonable costs for reproduction and trans- mittal of any such data (t) Any system operator shall have the ex- clusive right to sell all data that t/de opera- tor provides to the United States remote sensing data archive for a period to be deter- mined by the Secretary, but not to exceed 10 years from the date the data are sensed In the case of data generated from the Landsat system prior to the implementation of the contract described in section 202(a) of this Act any contractor selected pursuant to sec- tion 202 shall have the exclusive right to market such data on behalf of the United States Government for the duration of such contract. A system operator may relinquish the operator's exclusive right and consent to distribution from the archive before the period of exclusive right has expired by ter- minating the offer to sell particular data. U) After expiration of such exclusive right to sell, or after relinquishment of such right, the data provided to the United States remote sensing data archive shall be in the public domain and shall be made available to requesting parties by the Secretary at prices reflecting reasonable costs of repro- duction and transmittal. (g) In carrying out the functions of this section, the Secretary shall to the extent practicable and as provided in advance by appropriation Acts, use existing Govern- ment facilities. NONREPRODUCTION SEC 603. Unenhanced land remote sensing data generated by any system operator under the provisions of this Act may be sold on the condition that such data shall not be reproduced and disseminated by the pur- chaser. REIMBURSEMENT FOR ASSISTANCE SEC. 604. The Administrator of the Nation- al Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other Federal agencies may provide assist- ance to operators of remote sensing systems under the provisions of this Act. Substantial assistance shall be reimbursed by the opera- tor, except as otherwise provided by law. ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT SEC. 605. The Secretary may, by means of a competitive process, allow a licensee under section 401 of this Act or any other private party to buy, lease, or otherwise acquire the use of equipment from the Landsat system, when such equipment is no longer needed for the operation of such system or for the sale of data from such system. Officials of other Federal civilian agencies are author- ized and encouraged to cooperate with the Secretary in carrying out the provisions of this section. RADIO FREQUENCY ALLOCATION SEC. 606. (a) Within 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall deter- mine the frequencies for use by United States Landsat and commercial land remote sensing satellite systems. In making such de- termination, the Federal Communications Commission shall seek the comments of the Secretary or the Secretarys designated rep- resentative. (b) it is the intent of Congress that the Federal Communications Commission allo- cate to any licensee under title IV of this Act access to Government radio frequencies and other civil radio frequencies appropriate for land remote sensing within 120 days of the receipt of an application for such access. If final action has not occurred within 120 days of the receipt of such an application, the Federal Communications Commission shall inform the applicant of any pending issues and of actions required to resolve them. (c) The Federal Communications Commis- sion shall without prejudice permit the de- velopment and construction of any United States land remote sensing system (or com- ponent thereof) while any frequency deter- mindtion is being made. (d) Frequency allocations made pursuant to this section by the Federal Communica- tions Commission shall be consistent with international obligations and with the public interest. CONSULTATION SEc. 607. (a) The Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Defense on all matters under this Act affecting national security. June 8, 1984 The Secretary of Defense shall be responsible for identifying and notifying the Secretary of those national security concerns of the United States which are relevant to activi- ties under this Act. (b) The Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of State on all international mat- ters arising under this Act. The Secretary of State shall be responsible for identifying and notifying the Secretary of those interna- tional obligations and commitments of the United States which are relevant to activi- ties under this Act. (c) Appropriate Federal agencies are au- thorized and encouraged to provide remote sensing technology and training to develop- ing nations as components of programs of international aid. (d) If, as a result of conditions imposed on a system operator based on national securi- ty or international obligations or policies, the Secretary (in consultation with the Sec- retary of Defense or the Secretary of State, as appropriate) determines that additional or development costs will be incurred by such system operator, the Secretary may re- quire any agency requesting the imposition of such conditions to reimburse the system operator for such costs, excluding anticipat- ed profits. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATION ACT, 1983 SEC. 608. Subsection (a) of section 201 of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration Authorization Act 1983 (Public Law 97-324; 96 Stat. 1601) is amended to read as follows: "(a) The Secretary of Commerce is author- ized to plan and provide for the manage- ment and operation of civil remote sensing satellite systems, which may include the Landsat 4 and 5 satellites and associated ground system equipment transferred from the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration; to provide for user fees; and to plan for the transfer of the operation of civil remote sensing satellite systems to the pri- vate sector when in the national interest. The amendment was agreed to. Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, I rise today to urge passage of H.R. 5155, the Land Remote Sensing Satellite Commercialization Act. This bill would provide for a phased commercializa- tion of Landsat, our Federal land remote sensing satellite system. The bill is designed to balance commercial interests with national security, for- eign policy, and other concerns of the Federal Government related to land remote sensing. I am very pleased that we have reached a consensus on this important issue. As I stated when I introduced this legislation as S. 2292 in February, legislation must be enacted this year to maintain hope of having a continu- ous U.S. land remote sensing capabil- ity and to thereby avoid an interrup- tion in the flow of data. Since the House of Representatives has already passed a similar bill, I am confident that this legislation will lead to a timely transfer of land remote sensing capabilities to the private sector. The concept of Landsat commercial- ization is a complex one, involving many issues. My colleagues will recall that the administration's original com- mercialization proposal included trans- fer to the private sector of weather satellites as well as Landsat. I Intro- Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 June 8, 1984 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -- SENATE S6857 duced a re elution opposing the trans- passage of this bill. However, I must sponsibilities and activities retained by fer of weather satellites, reflecting my. say. I have often said the Past this legislation are adequately and en- view that weather satellite services are that I remain very skepticai critically important to public safety potential outcome of this issue the thusiaatically Pursued. and welfare, and thus are essential Do not misunderstand, Mr. pr esi- I am very Proud of the Important Government services. The resolution dent. This is good legislation. It sets role that the EROS Data Center in my passed both the Senate and House, realistic guidelines for the Commerc}~- home State of south Dakota plays in and the weather satellite proposal was ization process of our Landsat system this program. Obviously, I want to see eventu its role continued and enhanced. But ally dropped. and contains numerous safeguard s LAW, icatio ,ns are much re auch as commerically loriented than thoseoof nondiscr motor a cost-savings, weather satellites. For this reason, I data continuity, a strong~R&D ofd p-- feel that land remote sensing can, with plications research program, an ade- appropriate guidelines, become a quate training program, and many viable industry without threatening others. And I do believe that we may our national security or foreign policy very well want to ultimately commer- imperatives. This legislation estab- cialize this system. But I remain skep- lishes specific guidelines for private tical that we are ready to do that remote sensing systems. National secu- today. Ten years from now may be a rity interests will be protected. Inter- more realistic target, but I am willing, national obligations and development will if feorth in ~ this bpl follow ~ we Federal research continue, so that our worldwide lead- give It a try because I do believe we are ership in remote sensing will be pre- headed in the direction we should ulti- served. The Government will continue mately go. to archive data for historical, scientif- But I want to make it clear that I ic, and academic purposes, will be following the implementation All of these policies involve tradeoffs of this legislation very carfully; I do between commerical interests and not want to see another repeat of the Government concerns. I am very recent weather satellite fiasco that we grateful for the assistance of my col- worked so hard last year to resolve. leagues In shaping this legislation into We have invested billions of taxpay- its present form. In particular, I thank er dollars in this program. It should and congratulate my Commerce Com- not end up in the hands of a govern- mittee colleagues, Senator Hor r.IN?S mentrsubsid ized monopoly that will o d Senator PrzssLsR and their staffs, cost us more than we spend today. I r working diligently to develop legis. also expect to see some clear R&D re- lation agreeable to all concerned par- search application proposals and train- ties. Ing program proposals before tutning _ -- In conclusion- I wn?ir+ like ?^ di scuss importantly, I want to make sure that we maintain our strong technological worldwide leadership in this area, and use Its abundant applications in the best interests of our Nation's resources and security, and the scientific com- munity as a whole. Mr. President, given the need to ad- dress this Issue in a timely manner, I urge my colleagues to support this im. portant legislation. Mr. HOLLINGS. Mr. Presidents I rise in support of the Land Remote Sensing Commercialization Act, H.R. 5155, and ask that my colleagues sup. Port this measure. Mr. President, I compliment the Senator from Washington, the able chairman of the Science. Technology, and Space Subcommittee, for the ex- cellent job he has done with this legis- lation. H.R. 5155, as reported by the Senate Commerce Committee, is a carefully crafted bill that balances the concerns of users and operators, safe. guards national security and foreign policy concerns, promotes commercial- ization, and sustains important Feder- al research and development activities in land remote sensing. Mr Presid t I en have merce to effect a transition of Landsat maintain a strong _zwurLaugi that we remote sew for rite on of land from Government to private hands. continue to explore nR&D ew program ys to utilize and a matter of fact I introduced time. first The Secretary of Commerce Is expect- the invaluable scientific data from land remote sensing legislation in the ed to announce in the near future a Landsat. As we continue to move proposal to 98th Session of Congress, $, 1855, a carry out the commercial- closer toward a global information so- bill that was cosponsored by my distin- ization process. I am optimistic that ciety, we should make certain that we guished colleagues Senators FORD and the Secrtary's l-r will be consist- make the best use of the tools we have RIEGLE. I am pleased, therefore, to see ent with the requ is of this leg- available. As one expert said in the Senate acting upon H.R. 5155 in a islation, and will provide cot savings recent state Landsat hearing "wa e timely manner because enabling legis- to the Government p Opposed to have our hands on the most powerful lation Is required before the Depart- keeping Landsat In Government source of (global) information that went of Commerce can award a land hands. has been known to humankind." We remote sensing commercialization con- I expect the Secretary's proposal to must make m f to a- .-m-Tv or this wealth of Information to Its full- funds carry out the proposal. I hope eat potential so we can reap its tmvalu- that, if clear cost savings can be able rewards today and in generations shown,, the funds will be to come. quickly provided io that the transition Although I am not eorwinced that can flow oegidata "n n and a 'harmful gap In the. this technology--which is still really in be avoided. Its infancy-is ready for commercial- Finally, I would like to clarify that ization, it is absolutely essential that nothing in this bill Is Intended to au- we move forward with its development thorize the enactment of new budget as soon as possible. Its potential value authority for fiscal year 1984. to the scientific, scholastic, and inter-Mr. rise today to Join my diMr. stinguished col- continuation of a by itself merits strong U.& land le GORToN-and agues from Washington--Senator remote sensing program, It is essential from South Senator HoraaNGS--in support oft this worldwide leadership in s this maintain its technolo- legislation. I also want to thank them gy. and their staffs for all of their hard Thanks to the Senator from Wash- work and cooperation in reaching an ington and othersw this committee will effective, workable compromise that Is be maintaining a strong oversight role agreeable to all. in this process in the months and After the cooperation and leadership years, to come. I expect to use that to displayed by the Senator from Wash- make sure our Intent is carried out Ington, I have agreed to support the fully and that the Government re- bers who are not aware of the status of the Department of Commerce re- quest for proposals for transfer of the U.S. land remote sensing program to the private sector, let me give a brief status report. The Department received seven bids pursuant to the request for proposals prior to the March 19, 1984, submis- sion deadline. At present, three of those bids are still being assessed by the Department of Commerce, and the committee expects to be notified soon as to what course of action the De- partment intends to pursue in award- ing a contract. Mr. President, in assessing whether the existing Federal land remote sens- ing system should be commercialized, the committee was required to review and assess a variety of issues involving data continuity, foreign competition, nondiscriminatory availability of data, Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 S 6858 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE June 8, 1984 national security, international policy, I will address the latter concern addressing the net cost effect of com- appropriate regulation of private first. Mr. President, there is some con- mercialization, a copy of which I ask remote sensing activities, and determi. tern among the user community as to unanimous consent to include in the nation of the long-term Federal role in the effect of the commercialization of RECORD at this point. remote sensing research and develop- Landsat on data prices. Needless to The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- ment and data archiving. say, I am not in a position to assure out objection, it is so ordered. The final bill reported by the Senate the user community that commercial (See exhibit 1.) Commerce Committee addresses each data prices will not be higher than Mr. HOLLINGS. Mr. President, of these concerns in a responsible current Federal data prices. I am able, based on the information supplied by manner and creates a rational proce- however, to assure the user communi- the Department of Commerce, it can dure and framework for phased trans- ty that the committee went out of its be seen that the average annual costs fer of the Federal land remote sensing way to protect the interests of the for continuation of the existing Land- system to the private sector. user community. The Senate bill's em- sat system would be in the range of In particular, I would like to indicate phasis upon the. importance of the $183 million per year. Considering the that the bill requires any operator of a marketing of remote sensing data and fact that the Department has devel- land remote sensing system, subject to data continuity is meant to reflect the oped the most advanced remote sens- the jurisdiction and control of the committee's position that broader ing system in the world, these are rea- United States, to provide for the non- markets and reliable service-not sonable costs. However, a good case discriminatory availability of data. higher data prices-are the keys to the can be made that for significantly less Mr. President, the principle of non- successful commercialization of land money, a good percentage of the exist- discriminatory availability of data is a remote sensing. In addition, the com- ing capability can be provided. A good fundamental component of U.S. for- mittee realizes that the advent of for- case also can be made that the private eign policy and is a key element of eign competition should help restrain sector alone has the ability to expand H.R. 5155. As noted in the committee price increases, as should the availabil- the land remote sensing data market report on page 28: ity of remote sensing experimental to the point where it is commercially The Committee is aware that Landsat data generated by Federal Govern- feasible. At present, the current Fed- data have been sold to non-U.S. government ment research and development activi- eral system is unable to generate a rev- users and data have been made available to ties. Finally, the nondiscriminatory enue base adequate to offset operating all purchasers on a nondiscriminatory basis. availability of data provisions included costs, let alone spacecraft and launch- Indeed, the data policy of the Landsat pro- in H.R. 5155 insure equal access to ing costs. gram can be considered to be a cornerstone data at standard, published prices to Mr. President, as noted in the Con- for skies" peaceful policy purposes. and By of folthe- all users. gressional Budget Office's cost esti- use of of the U.S. space "open lowing this policy, the United States has Mr. President, I realize that change mate, until the committee is advised as been able to blunt criticism of other activi- can be frightening, and potential cost to the exact nature of the proposed ties, such as operation of classified surveil- increases can be more frightening. contract, it is difficult to estimate the lance satellites. The policy has also demon- However, based on both the GAO and amount of the rsubsidy and strated to the entire world U.S. adherence OTA reports, it is clear that the amount there will required t a subsidand to the principle of the free flow of informa- demand for remote sensing data is whether Government. savings Ho the tion. very elastic in terms of price. A com- cost t to based the Federal commitment of owe The Committee so strongly supports this mercial operator, therefore, would ever, on the doctrine of nondiscriminatory access to data have to think twice about a significant Deputy Secretary of Commerce in the that it has given this concept a statutory aforementioned letter "not to proceed oasis. The Committee feels that this princi- data price increase. with commercialization unless it is a pie is fundamental to any remote sensing Finally, I should indicate that good deal for the taxpayers" and activity and that it is a key component of during the Source Evaluation Board's congressional notification and require- the foreign policy interests. review of bids, the final three bidders co included in the Senate-reported During the Committee's Landsat hearing, indicated that there would be no ments version iof H.R. 5155, ncluded the it is highly the issue was raised that adherence to the major data price increases over the principle of nondiscriminatory access to projected NOAA price increases for likely any contract that did not result data was not in the best interest of a com- Landsat data. I would ask at this time in net cost savings would be found ac- mercial entity since ope operator from it woul preclude that two tables reflecting NOAA's pro- ceptable to the or this Sena tom specific scenes for the proprietary use of a jected Landsat data prices be included merce, Mr. the Congress, conclusion, hiSe let . sole purchaser. The Committee is sensitive in the RECORD to give Members an idea . M President, I sunppcot legislation me this s of let loon to this issue and realizes that "land remote of the possible price effect on users of indicate . he commercialization sensing for hire" could have a potential the proposed legislation. and and the sensing. It is my opinion that marketplace and that site-specific scenes Mr. President, next I would like to remote could have significant value. The Commit- address the issue of the cost of com- the time is right for increased private tee feels, however, that the benefits from mercialization to the Federal Govern- sector participation in this area just as such a commercial enterprise pale in com- meet. the timing was right for private sector parison with the benefits to the United During the course of the debate on participation in satellite communica- ciple es of f n maintaining on discriminatory atinatoory acc c acesss s to the daindata. - this issue, there was concern as to tions years ago. With this legislation, of to iplry we are providing a climate for innova- promote Committee realizes that in its efforts to whether or not the commercialization Imagination and promote commercial land remote sensing ac- of the existing Federal land remote w entrepeneurial that hat encourages ourages so imagination and tivities, it has established certain barriers, sensing system would result in net cost the en spirit in particular concerning U.S. foreign policy savings to the Federal Government. istic of this Nation. I support this and national security concerns. The Com- Clearly, during the early years, a Fed- measure and ask for the support of my mittee feels, however, that these are reason- oral subsidy will be required by the fellow Members. able costs to be incurred by an operator and, although they might reduce the profitabil- commercial operator. The exact ity of land remote sensing, they should not amount, however, will not be known EXHIBIT 1-SUMMARY OF PRODUCT PRICES 1979- impede commercialization of land remote until the final contractual agreement PRESENT FOR LANDSAT MULTISPECTRAL DATA sensing activities. is made public. Still, in its efforts to EDC Ece ED there are two other insure a Federal cost savings, the com- E0C isEDC 190 1983-84 19C , President . r M bill it s issues that I also would like to surface: mittee has included language in First, the net cost of the commer- to emphasize the importance of the cialization of Landsat to the Federal cost of the commercial system to the Government; and Federal Government and the impor- Second, the effect of commercializa- tance of a competitive awards process. tied upon the Landsat data user tom- The committee also requested a letter munity. from the Department of Commerce Standard image products: to in taw pprint .. rint ...... ................... $2 $20 $30 58 $35 .... 40 in claw print .............................. 20 35 95 4 5 105 50 20 in color print ........................????? 12 35 45 1 10 40 in color print .............................. 50 70 175 195 Colo composite generation charge....... 50 75 195 220 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 June 8,1884 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE ExlRefr 1,-sUMMAR~ of moouET S 6859 PIUCE51979. SUMMARY OF PRODUCT PRICES 1979 FNESENT FOR through use of less expensive systems built PRESENT FOR EANDSAT MULTISPEC ItAL DATA--Continued UNDSAT MULTISPECTRA DATA-40wed by pursuing alternative spacecraft and Digital product: 9?track,,1600 BPI ma crier cro- 71799.81 1982 1983-3-01 19EDC 85 ply ad 1979 1982 1903 1985 EOM Inc NOM NOAH Rice Price Price Priot 9-trade, 1600 BPI CCT, RBV (Singleesubscene) .......... ..._............ 200 300 650 730 9-track 1600 BPI CCT RN Note.-Prices Bated are for mr4w r ham r* Eros Data (set 4 ppodue >tdwewes) .................................... 100 680 1,300 1,460 ardd A sa Sion Fags SB. The image masts Maid mrWat ft b* caw aftarter 11-track, ho don* tpe (pies Wndaat "matt dale repeats for de ycen 1979.1903. That is. trhcear 60 per sane...._ ..............___...._....... NA NA ' l,oe0 r 1.120 ma90%jority of at of aaag omeen data rapwsts aro,., ... Is Ns si`e imaMepodcts Iabd. The nv Near ~ --- SUMMARY OF PRODUCT PRICES 1979-PRESENT FOR LANDSAT MULTI-SPECTRAL DATA WV= Ima pefte! : 1979 EDC fTa 1982 EDC Price 1903 NOM price 1985 NOAH Prim an psadjce (KW 10 WA ).... _......... 0 mm 10 in Rim fdm nega8ce (BgN)_._-._. PSJIIW (B&W) t8 10 $8 10 $22 $30 35 _..._.._._ 10 in on n (8$W7............ __ i 10 10 12 30 40 10 In papa vasr. (_M9 ............... 8 10 30 35 20 in ppa pai8at (881N}..._ 12 20 58 65 40'n pspar paefsr WIN) ??- ._._ 20 35 95 105 10 jn f8m MOM Cc*) ---- 15 25 74 80 10 in pow 00d ft (Cola) ................ 12 15 45 50 20 in pow poise (a*) ................ 25 35 90 110 40 in Wper pooi0`e (odor) ................ 50 70 175 195 Gwohm of can cemposib..__._..... Digital prodatm 50 75 195 220 9-t uk 1600 BR CCB, M$9 9ane- 200 300 Tex DEPUTY SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, Washington, D.tw, April 5, 1994. Hon. ERNEST HoLLINGS, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. DEAR SENATOR RoLLINCs: This letter is in response to your concerns regarding the cost of commercializing the Land Remote Sensing Satellite System. Enclosed is a compilation of the projected costs through 1997 if the Government were to proceed with the Landsat program as cur- rently configured. The figures are the "upper limits' based on the assFaaption of four additional satellites procured in two pairs. They do not Include any receipts from Landsat data sales or capital investment from the contractor which would, of course, reduce the cost to the Government. We be- lieve substantial savings can be realized sensor options. With regard to the proposals currently under review by the Source Evaluation Board, I am aware of the desirability from your standpoint of having more detailed in- formation concerning the range of costs to the government of the proposals, Nleverthe- less. I am gravely concerned that premature release of this information could Jeopardize the procurement process. Any advantage provided to a bidder through Inadvertent disclosure of proprietary information con- tained in these proposals could ebill the ne- gotiations yet to come and place the govern- ment at a disadvantage in its effort to struc- ture the most favorable deal for the taxpay- er. As the Secretary has stated, we will not proceed with commercialization unless it is a good deal for the taxpayers, I want to assure you in the strongest possible terms that we will not make an award under the RPP unless the projected cost to the gov- ernment is substantiatiy less than the fig- ures outlined on the enclosed sheet. I appreciate the cooperation and assist- ance Your staff has provided and look for- ward to quick Congressional consideration and passage of the time-critical Landsat leg- islation. Sincerely, tANDSAT COSTS (tr mOionn at ddral Operatin....... _.......... _ ................. Spacecraft and lam mm. ------....._.. ..........._................................._......_............._......_..................................................._..... D^ ........... ? and Dm......... _ ................... _................................ .................................................................................... .......... ........ t6 ......._.....__...._... ..._........_..._ ............................................................_..........._................................................... and D"..._....____..__...._...__.._.._..........._. _...._._..... 29 101 l7t 157 106 58 49 54 ............___ .......__....__... . ........... _..........._......... _....... total S/C and INT4 ..................................................................................__.................................................................... 55 101 171 157 106 Based on landsat D? and D1? estimates and inflated at 5 percent The bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, read the third time, and passed, as amended. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the bill was passed. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. GRATUITY TO MATTIE WASHINGTON The resolution (S. Res, 397) to pay a gratuity. to Mattie Washington, was considered, and agreed to as follows: S. RES. 397 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate hereby is authorized and directed to pay, from the contingent fund of the Senate, to Mattie Washington, mother of Robert A. Hunter, an employee of the Senate at the time of his death, a sum equal to six months' compensation at the rate he was receiving by law at the time of his death, said sum to be considered Inclusive of funeral expenses and all other allowances, Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the resolution was agreed to. 1984 1915 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1983 1994 1905 1996 1997 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 - .................................... ........ _..._._.~..._ U 140 214 196 146 98 127 225 262 244 118 115 104 110 .. ..................................................................... D' .... .._............. _. D? .. Dm .... 1rv pa year. Average ar" Cosh hair FY 15 thrturr FY 94: Qamone, $40,000,000; Spacecraft and Launching, $143.000,000; Total, $183,000,000 per year. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. PRIVATE RELIEF The resolution (S. Res. 398) to pay a gratuity to Peter Washington; James A. Washington; Harvey E. Washing- ton; Don Washington; Travis A. Wash- ington; Diane Cook; Jacqueline Greene; and Tracey R. Washington was considered, and agreed to as fol- lows: S. RES. 398 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate hereby Is authorized and directed to Pay, from the contingent fund of the Senate, to Peter Washington, James A. Washington, Harvey E. Washington, Don Washington, Travis A. Washington, sons of Joyce E, Washington, and Diane Coon, Jac- queline Greene, Tracey R. Washington, daughters of Joyce E, Washington, an em- ployee of the Architect of the Capitol as- signed to duty in the Senate Office Build- ings at the time of her death, a sum equal to six months' compensation at the rate she wag receiving by death, said sum to be considered inclusive of funeral expenses and all other allowances. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the resolution was agreed to. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. NATIONAL BIRDS OF PREY CONSERVATION WEEK The joint resolution (S-J. Res. 230) to designate the week of October 7, 1984, through October 13, 1984 as, "Na- tional Birds of Prey Conservation Week," was considered, ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, read the third time, and passed. The preamble was agreed to. The joint resolution and preamble are as follows: S.J. RES. 230 Whereas hawks, owls, and other birds of prey are vital ecological components of the wildlife communities In which they live, and are important environmental indicators of ecosystem quality; Whereas forty of the fifty-three species of birds of prey that occur regularly In the United States have been listed by one or Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3 S 6860 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SENATE June 8, 1984 more State conservation agencies as endan- gered, extirpated, threatened, or of concern: Whereas public attitudes regarding birds of prey are changing to one of appreciation and understanding; and Whereas over a million Americans are birdwatchers who regularly observe hawks and other birds of prey every autumn at mi- gration outlooks located on major raptor flyways scattered from California to Maine, and from Minnesota to Florida and Texas: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Rep- resentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 7, 1984, through October 13, 1984, is designated as "National Birds of Prey Conservation Week", and the President of the United States is authorized and request- ed to issue a proclamation calling upon indi- viduals to observe such a week by consider- ing the importance of birds of prey in wild- life communities. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution was agreed to. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. FORTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LIBERATION OF ROME The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 240) relating to the 40th anniversary of the liberation of Rome, was considered, or- dered to be engrossed for a third read- ing, read the third time, and passed. The preamble was agreed to. The joint resolution and preamble are as follows: S.J. RES. 240 through July 1, 1985, as the "Year of the Ocean," was considered, ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, read the third time, and passed. The preamble was agreed to. The joint resolution and preamble are as follows: S.J. REs. 257 Whereas the oceans are the major source of the waters on planet Earth providing an essential link in the chain of human exist- ence; Whereas the ocean environment provides us with a wealth of products and services but is increasingly subject to stress caused by population growth, economic develop- ment, placement of energy-related facilities, extraction of mineral resources and fossil fuels, transportation and navigation, waste disposal, and harvesting of living marine re- sources; Whereas America is the steward of the re- sources of Caw ocean and coastal regions that border our Nation and this stewardship entails a responsibility to match our in- creased uses of marine resources with an in- creased vigilance of the well-being of the marine environment; Whereas it is important to educate Ameri- cans as the users of ocean products and the beneficiaries of our ocean heritage, to the role the world ocean plays in our lives; Whereas a "Year of the Ocean" will be used to expand public awareness and knowl- edge of the importance of the ocean and its resources; and Whereas it is fitting and proper that "Ocean Day" be the first day of celebration during the "Year of the Ocean": Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Rep- resentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That July 1, 1984, to July 1, 1985, be designated "Year of the Ocean", and the President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such cele- bration with appropriate activities. al will and contrary to their desire for inde- pendence and sovereignty into the U.S.S.R.; and Whereas the U.S.S.R. since 1940 has sys- tematically removed native Baltic peoples from their homelands by deporting them to Siberia and caused great masses ofFR,ussians to relocate in the Republics, thus threaten- ing the Baltic cultures with extinction; and Whereas the U.S.S.R. has imposed upon the captive people of the Baltic Republics an oppressive political system which has de- stroyed every vestige of democracy, civil lib- erties, and religious freedom; aod Whereas the people of Lithuania, Latvia. and Estonia find themselves today subjugat- ed by the U.S.S.R., locked into a union they deplore. denied basic human rights, and per- secuted for daring to protest; and Whereas the United States stands as a champion of liberty, dedicated to the princi- ples of national self-determinat i et, human rights, and religious freedom, and oppossed to oppression and imperialism', and Whereas the United States, as a member of the United Nations, has repeatedly voted with a majority of that international body to uphold the right of other countries of the world, including those in Africa and Asia, to determine their fates and be free of foreign domination; and Whereas the U.S.S.R. has steadfastly re- fused to return to the people of the Baltic States the right to exist as independent re- publics separate and apart from the U.S.S.R. or permit a return of personal. po- litical. and religious freedoms: Now, there- fore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Rep- resentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress of the United States recognizes the continu- ing desire and the right of the people of Lithuania. Latvia, and Estonia for freedom and independence from the domination of the U.S.S.R. and deplores the refusal of the U.S.S.R.. to recognize the sovereignty of the Baltic Republics and to yield to their right- ful demands for independence from foreign domination and oppression and that the fourteenth day of June 1984, the anniversa- ry of the mass deportation of Baltic peoples from their homelands in 1941, be designated "Baltic Freedom Day" as a symbol of the solidarity of the American people with the Whereas, on June 4, 1944, in the city of Rome, Italy, Allied 'armies comprising mili- tary units of sixteen sovereign nations, to- gether with Italian resistance forces, drove out the Axis occupier and liberated the Eternal City; Whereas the combined United States-Ca- nadian First Special Service Force and at- tached armor and artillery units were in the forefront of attacking forces seizing eight bridges over the Tiber River in Rome, thus assuring immediate advance to the north by Allied units; Whereas, on the fortieth anniversary of this successful assault, United States and Canadian veterans of the First Special Serv- ice Force will commemorate that liberation of Rome by unveiling a memorial plaque at Saint Paul's Gate in that city, under the sponsorship of the Premier of Italy and the mayor of Rome: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Rep- resentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives ask the American people to take cognizance of this commemoration in Rome on June 2 through June 3. 1984. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution was agreed to. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. YEAR OF THE OCEAN The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 257) to designate the period of July 1, 1984, Mr. BAKER. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution was agreed to. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. BALTIC FREEDOM DAY The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 296) to designate June 14, 1984, as "Baltic Freedom Day," was considered, or- dered to be engrossed for a third read- ing, read the third time, and passed. The preamble was agreed to. The joint resolution and preamble are as follows: S.J. REs. 296 Whereas the people of the Baltic Repub- lics of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have cherished the principles of religious and po- litical freedom and independence; and Whereas the Baltic Republics have exist- ed as independent, sovereign nations belong- ing to and fully recognized by the League of Nations; and Whereas the people of the Baltic Repub- lics have individual and separate cultures, national traditions, and languages distinc- tively foreign to those of Russia; and Whereas the Union of Soviet Socialist Re- publics (U.S.S.R.) in 1940 did illegally seize and occupy the Baltic Republics and by force incorporate them against their nation- aspirations of the enslaved Baltic people and that the President of the United States be authorized and requested to issue a proc- lamation for the observance of Baltic Free- dom Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. Mr. BAKER. Mr. President. I move to reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution was agreed to. Mr. BYRD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. NATIONAL ICE CREAM MONTH AND NATIONAL ICE CREAM DAY The joint resolution (S.J..Res. 298) to proclaim the month of July 1984 as "National Ice Cream Month" and July 15, 1984, as "National Ice Cream Day," was considered, ordered to be en- grossed for a third reading, read the third time, and passed. The preamble was agreed to. The joint resolution and preamble are as follows: Approved For Release 2008/09/11: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200290008-3