LETTER TO PAUL S. SARBANES FROM HARRY E. FITZWATER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 28, 2008
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 30, 1984
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4.pdf78.09 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/08/28: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4 T,eistry Central Intelligence Agency The Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 10 MAY 1984 Dear Senator Sarbanes: I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your letter of 11 April 1984 regarding an inquiry from one of your constituents. The latter raised several questions concerning the plans of this Agency to assume responsibility for its security protective program. There is the suggestion that this takeover might possibly be in violation of the National Security Act of 1947. It is implied by the letter writer that his eight years of experience as a Federal Protective Officer will have been wasted. This is to advise that the level of protective support provided by the Federal Protective Service has suffered over the past few years because there has been a significant problem in recruiting high caliber personnel for assignment to the Central Intelligence Agency. As a result of the acute vacancy rate, this Agency explored other ways to provide adequate security protection in a cost-efficient manner. With the approval of the General Services Administration and the Office of Management and Budget, the Agency recently negotiated a transfer of responsibility and limited authority for handling the protection of certain CIA facilities. The Agency is currently in the process of hiring Security Protective officers who will gradually replace GSA Federal Protective officers over the next three years. This matter has been carefully reviewed and it is the opinion here that there has been no violation of the National Security Act of 1947. It is important to note that Agency Security Protective Officers will have no powers of arrest or any protective responsibilities outside of the boundaries of specific Agency facilities. Approved For Release 2008/08/28: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4 Approved For Release 2008/08/28: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4 With regard to the expressed concern of this Federal Protective Officer that there will be the loss of eight years of security experience, it should also be understood that there will be no adverse impact upon this person's-career as a Federal Protective Officer with the General Services Administration. The loyalty and dedication of Federal Protective Officers who have served the Agency well for many years is certainly appreciated. Some of these officers will likely apply for jobs with the Agency's new Security Protective Force and those that do will get serious consideration. it is hoped that this response fully addresses the issues surfaced by your constituent. Sincerely, Harry E. Fitzwater Deputy Director for Administration OS/DD/P&M STAT Revised/D/S:laj Distribution: Orig - Adse 2 - DDA - D/OLL 2 - D/S 1 - OS Reg 1 - OS/PPG 1 - DD/P&M (4/30/84) (5/2/84) Approved For Release 2008/08/28: CIA-RDP86B00338R000200190017-4