LETTER TO THE HONORABLE THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE THE HONORABLE THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
78
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 7, 2002
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 29, 1955
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6.pdf6.41 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86b00269F G614001800$1-6 -- NEIL I4tac,,ML, Editorial nirictor, commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Gouernrnent. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 COMMISSION ON ORGANIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVy NT INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES w rnlt rlC1C'. re um n Vn Rr4rR tI HOLD FOR REQ. SE! 8 Governmene 'ttt,ecTreport to 'B,, trnns,nit e tnch of the r d5 :S t.. 1 drganizsttion of the 1 recuti rj and no part, extract, or - e p.-p d._ in n Lg :411;51 be hfid Y _ -&g~~ snY uerson, or Pu > tans e v uoau~tivo Rye Room 7-E-12 dNd_q SECS l _. _ Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL June 29, 1955 Dear-Sirs-.- In accordance with Public Law 108 Eighty-third Congress, approved July 10, 1953, the Commission on Organization of the Executive-Bran.ch of the Government submits herewith its Report on Intelligence.Activities. The- Commission ha-s' --had-- the-services of* an able Task Force presided over by General Mark W.'Clark, President, The Citadel. Respectfully, s/ Herbert Hoover Chairman The Honorable The President of the Senate The. Honorable The Speaker of the House of Representatives Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269RP01400180001-6 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................... i PREFACE ........................... ..................:.. -PART I - COBLISSION REPORT ............................ 1 PART II -- TASK FORCE REPORT**.* ......................... Approved For Release 2002/10130`: CIA-RDP86B0026:9R00140018080 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The. investigation--into"'the" Intelligence" Activities of the Government was performed by a Task Force under the Chairmanship of General. Mark W. Clark, President,' The Citadel, and-comprising the members listed below: CHAIRMAN = CLARK, Mark Wayne. General; U. S. Army (retired). United States Military Academy. Now President, The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolina. In World. War II. commanded Allied ground forces in Italy and effected first large-scale surrender of a'German field command in Europe. June 1945, Commander-in-Chief of U. S. Occupation Forces in Austria and U. S. High Commissioner for Austria. Deputy to U. S. Secretary of State in London and Moscow with Council of Foreign Ministers negotiating Austrian treaty. May 1952, Commander-in-Chief, Far East Command, serving simultaneously as Commander-in-Chief, United- Nations Command, Commanding General,. U. S. Army Forces, Far East, and Governor of Ryukyu . Islands.. JulY 1953, signed Korean armistice agreement for United Nations. MEMBERS CONOLLY, Richard Lansing. Admiral, U. S. Navy (retired). Brooklyn, New York. Served at sea throughout World War I and awarded Navy.Cross. In World War II commanded Destroyer Division Six; served*in Office of Chief of Naval Operations and on staff,. Commander-in=Chief, U. S Fleet. Postwar duties included Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, U. S. Naval Advisor to European Advisory Commission, President of Naval War College, Now President, Long Island University.. HOLLINGS, Ernest Frederick. Lawyer. -Charleston, South Carolina. World War II, served-in African and European Theaters with U. S. Army.' Former member" South Carolina State Legislature. The Citadel and University of South Carolina. During Now Lieutenant Governor, State of. South.. Carolina. Approved For' Releas62002/0130_ CIA-RDP86B002 9800:1;400118. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 KEARNS, Henry. -Manufacturer, inventor and executive. Orange Oaks Ranch, La-Verne, California. University of Utah. Past President, U. S. Junior Chamber of Commerce; Vice President, Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and Director, Tournament of Roses Association. Chosen as "California's Most Useful Citizen," 1944. Fellow, American Institute of Management. RICKENBACKER, Edward Vernon. Aviator.. New York, New York. Inter- national Correspondence School. In World War-,1 commanded 94th Aero-Pursuit Squadron, personally credited with 26 air victories. World War II activities included special missions for Secretary of War to nine foreign countries and. areas. U. S. and foreign government awards include Congressional Medal of Honor. Formerly executive with American Airways, Aviation Corporation, and North American Aviation. Since 1933, with Eastern Air Lines, Inc. as general manager and president; now Chairman of the Board. RUSSELL, Donald Stuart. Lawyer. Spartanburg, South Carolina. University of South Carolina and University of Michigan. Practiced law in'Spartanburg. Formerly member-Price Adjustment Board, War Department; Assistant to Director of Economic Stabilization; Assistant to Director of War Mobilization; Deputy Director, Office of War Mobilization Reconversion; Assistant Secretary of State. Now President, University of South Carolina. STAFF DIRECTOR CHRISTIANSEN, James George. Major General, U. S. Army (retired). University of California, United States Military Academy. Former- Chzefof Staff, Army Ground Forces; Commanding General; 2nd Armored Division, Ft. Hood, Texas; Commanding General, 6th Armored Division, Ft. Leonard Wood; Missouri; Chief Engineer, Far East Command; Chief of Military Assistance Advisory Group, Rome, Italy. The Commission wishes to express its appreciation of the services and devotion of the members of the Task Force and to record its appre- ciation for the information and assistance provided by the officials of the various Federal agencies. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001`-i Approved For Release 2002/10/30 CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 PREFACE The Task Force on Intelligence Activities,. under the Chairmanship of General Mark W. -Clark, found- it- nerassary for some of" its members to visit foreign countries to study these activities abroad as well as classified,-character -to w hic"h they were given full -access. The Task Their.-inveatigationa inevitably-involved matters of extreme at home. Force has, therefore, prepared two reports _m an unclassified one bearing on the administration and the coordination of "the intelligence to the national security. This report was sent directly to the ,President and was not considered by the Commission because of its bearing the highest security classification was substantially related Army, Navy, Air Force, and State Department. The other report, services of the Central. Intelligence Agency and the services of the Therefore this Report of the Commission deals only with the extremely sensitive content. unclassified Task Force Report. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R00140018000-1 , Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 PART I COIAMISSION REPORT The Task-Force, in order to give assurance to the Nation that all segments of the Intelligence Activities are efficiently carried out and that the expenditures are properly administered, recommends that a permanent "Watch-Dog" Committee be created. They recommend that such a Committee be created from members of the Senate and House,,together with eminent citizens serving part time as needed,. to be'appointed by the President. , a .. The Commission believes, however, that while. mixed Congreriaional and, Citizens Committees for temporary service: are useful and helpful to undertake specific problems and to investigate and make recommenda- tions, such Committees, if permanent, present difficulties. thergX-dre make the following recommendation. give such information to the public as the President may foreign intelligence activities. This committee should also and report to him periodically on the work of Government a. That, the-President- appoint a .committee of experienced private citizens, who-shall-have the responsibility to examine Recommendation direct. The committee should function on a. part time and per diem basis. Approved For. Release 2002/10/30: CIA-ROP86B00269R0p;1400180001 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 b. That the Congress consider creating a Joint Congressional Committee on Foreign Intelligence, similar to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. In such case, the two committees, one Presi- dential and the other Congressional, could collaborate on matters of special importance to the national security. review, and we therefore include it in full as Part II of this report. Other measures requiring legislation or of-an administrative character are recommended'by the Task Force and we suggest these for the consideration of the- Congress 'and the Departments concerned. .The unclassified report of the Task Force requires no detailed Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001 . Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 PART II Task Force Report on INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES in the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Prepared for the COMMISSION ON ORGANIZATION ` OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT MAY 1955 Approved For Release 2002/1.0/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Post-War Organization 19 Functions Divided ..........0...0..........a.....0 20 CONTENTS Page Task Force Personnel ...................................... i Acknowledgments ....................... i Letter of Submission ...................................... iv Preface ................................................... vi Introduction .............................................0 viii Scope of the Studies ..................................... Department-of the Navy ......e.........e,....... 9 Department of the Air Force ................... - 12 Department of State ....... . ... ........ .......... ." -13 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ............ 16 Department of the Army .... ..... a .. . ....... .... The National Security Cotncil 1 The Central Intelligence Agency 3 Il - THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY - DEPARU4ENTAL LEVEL...... 5 Department of Defense 5 Office of Special Operations (OSO) 5 Joint Chiefs of Staff ......................... -., 5 Organization of the Task Force XV "Intelligence" - A Definition ............................. xv:iii I - THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY NATIONAL LEVEL .. 1 III - FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ......................ee....e... 18 Evolution of.Our Plans ........................... 18 1V -INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL AND SECURITY 22 Character of the Present Working Force 22 G-2 Personnel and Security 23 ONI Personnel .................................... 24 Air Force Intelligence Personnel ................. 25 Industrial Security .............................. 26 Individual Security Cases 27 V "WATCH-DOG" COMMISSION .............................. 29 Agency Gets Wide Exemptions ....................... 30 Would Study-Complaints ........................... 32 Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269R00.1400180001.6` Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Page VI - FUNCTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ............................ 34 Map Procurement ................................. 34 Intelligence Libraries 34 VII - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................... 36 Administrative Flaws Noted ...................... 37 Data on Soviet Bloc Inadequate 38 Recommendations with Respect to Personnel ....... 39 Recommendation No. 1 39 Recommendation No. 2 40 Recommendation No. 3 41 Recommendation No. 4 ....................o......D 43 Recommendation No. 5 ..................... 44 :Recommendation No, 6 45 Recommendation No. 7 ..... ................o...... 46 Recommendation No. 8 ...........................0 47 Recommendation No. 9 C ......... . .. C .. ...... . .Y. . . C - 48 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 COMMISSION ON ORGANIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE - BRANCH OF THE GOVEMWENT Mark W. Clark, Chairman Richard L. Conolly Ernest F. Hollings Henry Kearns Edward V. Rickenbacker Donald S. Russell TASK FORCE STAFF J. G. Christiansen, Director Dorothy- Ho- Davis, Staff Assistant CONSULTANTS Charles C. Blakeney Lee E. Cooper Richard-A, Ericson Robsr t.. J o Foley.... Michael M., Karlene Heiman _ 0-, Lane ..... . .John .L. McGruder Eugene L. Miller Oliver Lloyd Onion Richard P. Ovenshine Henry.E. Richter Terence J. Tully 'SECRETARIAL STAFF Gertrude I. Dixon Marie K. Smith ACKNOWLEDGMENTS that it was accorded free access to the "raw" intelligence material staffs throughout the departments and agencies surveyed, and believes The Intelligence Task--For ce wishes to-acknowledge the complete cooperation it received from all the officials' and members of their Approved For Release 2002/10/30 :.CIA-RDP86'B00269R001400t8.00G1-1 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The enthusiasm and interest which the personnel engaged., in intelligence activities displayed in their work was gratifying to the members of this task force and its staff. Their full coopera- tion enabled us to complete our assignments within the allotted The chairman and the staff-director are most appreciative of the support-:re ndered' brthe--executive staff of .the President and other governmen't??officials who. appeared and were interviewed and gave us.tbaiir-tdmer' and-'the- benef?t'o.t''their knowledge; and of the help-of' t3se_:~cutive staff` of- the'Commission-, particularly John B. Hollister,.V.'Hallam Tuck;' Francis Po Brassor,; and': ClaraDemuling. Without Miss-Demul:ing`s?able,assistancey.the Job of obtaining security clearances for the-task''forc'e and, staff would not have been accomplish- ed in time to permit completion-of-our survey. The chairlnan..also is deeply- obligated--to and most appreciative of the valued support and contributions . of. his colleagues on the task ?; force, the members of the staff, and the able consultants. The task force further wishes to express its deep gratitude for the valuable aid of those public-spirited' individuals who gave freely of their time, and who.by their objective'approach to.the problem and their government experience materially enlightened our members. We are especially grateful for the- advice and thebenefit of the wide experience-of Major General William J0 Donovan, former Chief of the Office, of Strategic-Services; J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the Federal Bureau of,.Investigation; William H. Jackson, former Deputy Director Approved For Release '2002/10/30-: CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 of the Central Intelligence Agency; General W. Bedell Smith, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Major General Charles. A. Willoughby, former Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2, Far East Command; and others. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180.001- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 COMMISSION ON ORGANIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT Washington, D. C. The Honorable Herbert Hoover Chairman, Commission on Organization of the We have -the `honorr-to- present , to you the reports of the. Task the 'task forcer"-analyzes? the- national- intelligence effort and makes Force on Intelligence Activities- of our Government . In-these reports, recommendations with a-Tview to correcting-the weaknesses, Improving the quality, --and -increasing the .efficiency :of-this vital operation. The aggressiveness of-the Soviet bloc, their methods ..f infil- tration, subversive activities, and propaganda employed in the cold war now in progress, as well as the airricuity o3" -penetration of their security barriers,- point up thefact that our'intelligence effort must be the-best-in our,histoz70-ThisJqadded-tc of nuclear weapons, together with their advanced delivery systems, has made adequate and timely intelligence imperative to our national Executive Branch-of the Government, Washington 25, D. C. security. The task force is fully aware of the grave responsibility implicit in its assigned mission. Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B602t9R00140G 18080'1 May 1955 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Mark W. Clark, Chairman Richard L. Conolly Ernest F. Hollings Henry Kearns Donald S. Russell Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269ROO1440018000.1- classified TOP SECRET, with certain separate appendices which require Commission. Two reports are submitted: one, unclassified; the other, depart in some degree from the form of the report prescribed by the Security requirements have made it necessary that the task force appreciation for the wholehearted and enthusiastic cooperation given additional clearance. In submitting these reports, we wish to express our personal us by the departments and agencies surveyed. Respectfully submitted, Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 For self-preservation,, the defenders of a free world need complete. prompt, and continuing information on the plans and potentialities of those who would enslave it. Nations-and people who value liberty and a sovereign national existence in a free world now look to the United States for leadership and inspiration in their struggle to safeguar these inherent rights o In the historic family of nations, this country ranks as a com parative newcomer. In the early days of the Republic -- not so long ago as the world measures time -- our people felt comfortably distant from the hotbeds of foreign intrigue and conflict. Transportation and communication facilities in the days of clipper ships and the pony express were so limited and so slow that they fostered a serene assurance of isolation and geographical protection against possible aggressors. Technological developments-and political realignments in modern times inspire no such sentiment as that which once led a famous Denver editor to evaluate news on the premise that "a dogfight in Champa Street" was worth more space in his paper than war in some minor country abroad. Our early philosophy.o.f'peace-still prevails, but within our generation and for our own protection, organized.-intelligence has been forced upon us by the rapidly shrinking world of electronics,, nuclear weapons and planes-which travel at supersonic speed. Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269ROO14001800Q1= Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 timely intelligence so that we might fulfill our responsibilities in. methods for their delivery, intensified the need for adequate and advent of,atomic bombs,*together-with the development of advanced The United States emerged from World War II as the politics, leader in free-world--affairs-and the outstanding military power. The our protection against the propaganda, infiltration, and aggressions Effective intelligence has become increasingly necessary for international affairs and insure our own survival. much to be done by our intelligence community to bring its achieve:., we must not labor underr any complacent delusions. There is still By trial and error, study, and skill, we have made progress-'but, of the Communist leaders. The task force is cognizant of the-grave responsibility assign- ments up to an acceptable level, stint on some phase of the' intelligence operation and thereby run ed to it. It recognizes the fact that it mould be false economy to but also must do our utmost to prevent war. Adequate and timely viewpoint that in time of peace we must not only be prepared for war, The recommendations of the task force are presented from the handled and gets adequate results. the substantial expenditures our country makes in-this field are! worth while and that the whole intelligence output is efficiently On the-other-hand, it is--desirable and proper, for us to insist that the-risk-of another costly and''tragic surprise like Pearl Harbor. ,intelligence is the most effective and economical means of attainin vii Approved For Release' 2002/10/30.,: CIA-RDP86B00269R001400:180001-6 . Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The machinery for-accomplishing -our~ intelligence, objectives, whole, includes the Central Intelligence Agency, the National hereafter called the-intelligence community when referred to as a Energy Commission.--Some of these agencies approach or exceed the State, of- the- Army, -the Navy,, and-the Air Force, and of the Atomic of Investigation `and-the- intelligence sections of the Department. of Security Council,. the National Security Agency, the' Federal_.Bureau operations- of the CIA- In- functions and In expenditures-, - However, since CIA is charged with the- overallresponsibility for coordinat_ ing Our investigations showed that the sensitive and vital work of the output of"all intelligence forces, the task force gave special attention to the work of-that agency. were poor security risks. All such cases, except those obviously without-merit ' were investigated by proper authority, or 3nvestiga- some..individuals'-alleging--a few members of the intelligence community organized subversive-or-Communist-le clique. Charges were made by intelligence family was being effectively contaminated by any and dedicated to the service of the nation, We discovered no valid ground for the. suspicion that the CIA or any other element of the the intelligence community is being led by a group which is sincere On the basis of its comprehensive studies, the task force feels tions are in the process of being made. "that- the Americas people can -and should-give.-their full confidence and support to the intelligence program, and contribute in every Approved For Release 2002/1.0/30: CIA-RDP86B00.269RO01400180D1S1 Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 however, that in his enthusiasm he has taken upon himself too many tive, selfless, enthusiastic, and imaginative. We are convinced We found the Director of Central Intelligence to be industrious, objeca possible way to the vital work in which'these agencies are enga_,d, burdensome duties and responsibilities on the operational side. of CIA's activities. The task force feels that certain administrative. flaws have developed in the CIA, which must be corrected to give proper emphasis and direction to its basic responsibilities of intelligence information from our primary target - Russia and her The major aim would be greater concentration on. the collect emphasis, aggressive leadership, boldness, and persistence are intelligence data from behind -the Iron Curtain, Proper directional The task force is deeply concerned over the lack of adequate: satellites, and Communist China, effort must not- be permitted' to overshadow other vital phases of the The glamor and excitement- of- -some angles'of our intelligence essential to achieve the desired results. work or- to cause neglect 'of primary- functions. A majority of the task force is convinced that an internal reorganization of the CIA is necessary to give assurance that each of these' functions gets adequate attention without diversionary interests. factory machinery for surveillance of the stewardship of the Central -Intelligence Agency, It is making recommendations which it.- believes The task force further is concerned over the absence of satis? will provide the proper type of "watch-'dog" commission as a means of Approved.-For Release 2002/10/.30: CIA-RDP86B00269R001.4001.80 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 ,Approved For`R le"e,'2002/1'0/30: CIA-RDP86B0p269.R0O1.4001800.011-6"' statutes relating to the Agency. It would include representatives reestablishing that relationship between the CIA and the Congress so essential to and characteristic of our democratic form of government, but which was abrogated by the enactment of Public Law 110 and other of both Houses of Congress and of the Chief Executive. Its duties would embrace a review of the operations and effectiveness not only One of the aims- in the creation ofa compact-commission of this. of the CIA, but also of. all other intelligence agencies. worthy accomplishments of our intelligence forces, and toFenlist type would be to keep the public assured of the essential and trust-% public support--andparticipation in the intelligence effort. the intelligence program. There is-a corollary demand for clarifica- Action' of this sort is needed to promote a general .-awareness and appreciation among the people of the significance and objectives of as a result of the misapplication of secrecy. However, it must be recognized that intelligence operations require a large element of tion of misunderstandings which have arisen in the public mind, largely attractive program of. career incentives for its officials, and of over a long period in the intelligence field.. It should develop a more foreign field, and among retired military personnel who have specialized pool of retired citizens with wide previous business experience.in The intelligence community should draw more widely on the 'available secrecy as an essential to success. Recommendations to.'achieve.these-desirable results are being benefits for its overseas employees. offered by the task-'force. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 SCOPE OF TIE STUDIES Early Instructions Initially, - this task force 'was-' instructed by the Commission on Organization of'the,Executive Branch of the Government (hereafter referred to as the-Hoover Commission or the Commission) to study and make recommendations-as to--the structure and administration of the Central. Intelligence Agency. Later, those .instructions were changea.by,tne commission o embrace studies of'all intelligence operations. of 'the Federal Govern- ment and recommendations for changes necessary to promote economy, efficiency, and improved service in this field. The task force gave thorough consideration to the decision of the Commission to broaden the scope of the studies. It found at activities expend'-public'funds .directly or indirectly in behalf of in one form or another; In addition, ten or more. minor agencies or'. least twelve major 'departments and agencies engaged in intelligence -task- force wass'c'onfronted with the Herculean job of studying and reporting on more, than a score of major and minor departments and agencies.-- It quickly' became' evident' that any attempt to spread its Thus, tinder-the broad'definition of"its terms of reference, the the intelligence effort of the Government. investigations over such a large area would mean that only sketchy' results could .be achieved within the allotted time. Approved For Release 2002/10130 : CIA-RDP86:B00269R0014001~9000't- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 services, activities, and functions of the agencies surveyed it con- ing,that the task force would determine which of the intelligence Task Force Procedure Revised The most pressing need under present conditions is for officials in important positions in Government, particularly those responsible for foreign policy, to have readily available full and factual foreign intelligence. (The word "foreign" as used here denotes the target of information as distinct from the geographical source). Accordingly, the task force suggested to the Commission that the best results could be obtained if the dimensions of the inquiry were limited to certain key departments and agencies. This proposal was approved by the Commission with the understand- requiring consolidation in the public interest; those non-essential sidered essential; those not necessary, or of similar nature and and competitive with private enterprise; and-those representLng 1. The intelligence functions of the National Security Council.. 2. The value and effectiveness of the information supplied by duplication or overlapping of work between agencies. Under this..: revised program, the task force would cover, among other matters: 3. The effectiveness of the coordination of intelligence acti the operating agencies. vities. 4. The, organization, procedures, methods, and performance of agencies as to economy, adequacy, effect on efficiency, and utilization. 5. An examination of the operation and physical plant of the. the Government agencies in the field of intelligence. xii Approved For Release'2002/10/30 CIA-RDP86B00269R00140018000' - Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 9. Effectiveness of the coverage by the various agencies of their. Commission. In order to obtain a clearer picture of intelligence operations, Teams Make Firsthand Studies Abroad two teams were sent abroad for on-the-spot investigations. Each team was composed of a member or members of the task force and members of Approv d`For FZ base 2002/10/30.: CIA-RDP86B00'2C9RO014001800,0;1 report which has been placed in the hands of the Chairman of the jeopardize our national defense and security. These findings have been incorporated in a separate, highly-classified, comprehensive have been omitted from this report on the ground that their disclosure publicly might give aid andcomfort to our potential enemies or might 6. The various programs of the agencies in such fields as training, research and development, stockpiling, reference material, and security. and dissemination of-intelligence information within the Government, 8. All programs and procedures for the collection,-development,. 7. Personnel policies and manpower utilization. including-collection apparatus and dissemination media. specific areas of assignment-, and extent of teamwork between these:, agencies. Two- Reports Prep red ..._ by a sincere desire to present as complete an account of its findings In tho preparation , of this report, the task force was motivated as considered Judgment indicated would best serve the public interest. Certain other facts and recommendations prepared by the task force Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 the staff. One group visited the European sector and the other tent visited. The visits-and-discussions provided the task force with representatives and-- senioTr military commanders in the countries These staff groups held- conferences with the senior United States to the Far East. firsthand information which could have been obtained in no other this report., and in the more comprehensive report to the Chairman The conclusions reached and the recommendations contained in fashion. of the Commission., reflect the benefit of those personal tours o inspection. xiv Approved For-;.Rele4se-2002/10/3.0 CIA-RDP86B00269R001400 :80001 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 ORGANIZATION OF THE TASK FORCE Security Impact on the Selection of-Personnel The Task Force on Intelligence Activities was the last investiga- Before a-member of-the task force or staff could'have access to any material, a-security background-.investigation was conducted and prior association -with...departments and agencies embraced in the survey. for background security and possible prejudicial interest- arising from The task force personnel and staff had to be screened carefully and. its methods of operation. intelligence field influenced to some extent the structure of the staff' of available personnel in this country with prior experience in the of the staff assumed their duties on October 1, 1954. The limited.pool:. tive group authorized by the- Hoover- Commission. The director and deputy to "Top Secret" information. In each case where the inquiry involved the individual declared by proper authority to be eligible for access. access to atomic energy data, a time consuming special clearance was own critteria, practices, and standnrds for clearance "The task ,force It.was found that each-department and agency had developed its. the department or agency involved in each specific inquiry. adopted a policy in conformity with the policies and requirement3 of In the interest of security and economy, the task force also. decided to keep its staff as compact as possible, Sensitive generally was studied on the premises of the agencies. Approved For Release 2002/10130 CIA-RDP86B00269R001-400180001 6~ Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 their influence and guidance in the staff activities and at the same Thus, all task force members were in a position to interject ing the work of designated staff teams. force members were assigned across-the-board responsibilities parallel- staff members to study specific agencies, and to delegate to other teams specific across-the-board survey functions. Individual task Staff Organization After careful consideration by the task force of various possible methods of organizing the staff and its work, it was decided that the most practical course would be to assign teams composed of one or two time obtain valuable firsthand knowledge of the overall. problem. department and agency, from the clerks up to and including the heads pared briefings were furnished to the staff for ready reference. Discussions were had with many echelons of personnel in each usually were employed. In some instances, however, copies of pre- ings were characterized by informality. Oral questions and answers The task force and staff had the benefit of detailed briefings by top officials and employees of each agency studied. These brief- Procedures for Gathering Data. particularly in the case of the study of activities oversease certain areas found it necessary to employ the "sampling" method, of the executive departments. Ap'provedFor.Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269R00.1.4001 000~I-C Approved For Release 2002/10/30 CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The task force also received expert advice from many individuals no longer in Government employs but who previously occupied positions of prime responsibility in the development of our present intelligence operations and organization. Some of these witnesses appeared before the task force at no expense to the Government and at considerable personal sacrifice. Their help and suggestions were of,-inestimable Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6' "INTELLIGENCE" - A DEFINITION The fate of the nation well may rest on accurate and complete intelligence data which may serve as a trustworthy guide for top- level governmental decisions on policy and action in a troubled world, where so many forces and ideologies work at cross purposes. The Congress had clearly recognized the importance of the role of intelligence in our national security. It has authorized expenditures by appropriate departments and agencies to carry on this work comprehensively. Immediately after World War II, at the suggestion-of the Chief Executive of our Government, the Congress approved the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency to coordinate the intelligence activities of the various government departments and agencies in tation or delimitations to get at their precise application. were lengthy and involved use of words requiring additional interpre- surveyed had its own "pet" definition. Many of these definitions special field of study, it was found that each department or agency In the search for an acceptable definition as applied to our as applied to its own areas of work and investigation. understanding and agreement on the meaning of the word "intelligence," confronted at the outset with the problem of arriving. at a common In order to evaluate the extent and effectiveness of intelli- gence as carried out under present conditions and under the present organization, the Task Force on Intelligence Activities found itself this- field, in the interest of national security. .Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269R001_4001.:80001- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The task force sought a definition as simple and clear as possible and arrived at the following: "Intelligence deals with all the things which should be known in advance of initiating a course of action." Useful for our purpose also, as a supplemental and extended defini- tion, is that given in the Dictionary of United States Military Terms "INTELLIGENCE- The product resulting from the collection,. evaluation, analysis-P.-integration and interpretation of all available information which- concerns one or more aspects of foreign nations. or of areas of'operations, and which is immediately or potentially significant to planning." CIA-RDP8:6 B00269 R001'40 180,000 i Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 I THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY -- NATIONAL LEVEL THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL military policies relating to the national security so as to enable The function of the National Security Council is to advise the President with respect to the integration of domestic, foreign, and the military services and the other departments and agencies of the Government to cooperate more effective],y in matters involving national Security. The Council is composed of the President, the Vice President,-the ,Secretaries of State and Defense., the Director of the Foreign Operations military' departments when appointed by the President, to serve at his secretaries and under secretaries of other executive departments and 'Administration, the Director of the Office of Defense mobilization, the .;;"pleasure. The Council, in addition to performing'such other functions as the. ;President may direct, for the purpose of?coordinating more effectively the policies and functions of the departments and agencies of. the Gover- meat relating to national security, subject to the direction of the 1. Assess and appraise the objectives, commitments, and risks President, shall: power, in the interest',. of national security., for the purpose of making of the United States in relation to our actual and potential military recommendations to the President to meet these problems.. 2. Consider policies on matters of common interest to the departments 'and agencies, of ' e, I Government concerned with the national Approved, For Release,'200211U130 CIA-RDP86B00269ROO14'Q015Q091 - Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 within the field of national intelligence. security, and make recommendations to the President on these matters. In order to accomplish its mission, the National Security Council has at its disposal several groups which function in varying degrees . Duties of Special Assistant to the President at any NSC meeting, but sits (just beneath the Council itself) at the meetings. This Special Assistant to the President. does not preside and with the Presidentfs approval prepares the agenda for the NSC He personally briefs the President on national security affairs, ..important Planning Board of the NSC. name, the Executive Officer of the NSC and is chairman of the highly has constant and direct access to the President and enjoys his com- plete confidence. This Special Assistant to the President is, in fact if not in of'the designation by him of a Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs who, as a member of the White House Staffe-.~ The Council islinked closely to the President,.not only because the Chief.-Executive is chairman and a member of it, but also because: apex of the NSC administrative machinery.. The National Security Council has issued several intelligence directives. They express the policy by which the intelligence effort is guided and coordinated; establish, within the intelligence community, committees for the fulfillment of specific intelligence functions; an pinpoint the responsibility for specific duties in designated fields- of ; intelligencef Approved For f Lease 2002/10/30` CIA RDP86:B00269R0014001`80001- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Director of Central Intelligence and correlation of intelligence by the national security through a process of coordination of effort by the calls for integration of all departmental intelligence relating to The national intelligence polity., as expressed in these directives, Central Intelligence Agency. Other groups have been established as appendages to.the Council,. through some ,of which intelligence, advice., and recommendations have been received: by the Council for its use in advising and making recom- . THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY no system inexistence"to assure that the information, properly evaluated, the attack actually was available to the Government; but that there was impressed upon Congress the fact that information necessary to anticipate That investigation of events leading up to the 'dayof infaay" receive adequate and prompt warning of the impending Japanese attack. or lack of intelligence played in the failure of our military forces to Pearl Harbor and to the post-war investigation into the part intelligence The CIA. well may attribute its existence to the surprise attack on mendations to the National Security Council on such matterso security. The Director of Central Intelligence gives advice and recom- evaluating, and distributing intelligence data affecting the national Act of 1917, is charged with the responsibility of coordinating, The Central Intelligence Agency, created by the National Security. would be brought to the attention of the President and his chief advisers so that appropriate decisions could be made and timely instructions transmitted to the interested military commanders. Approved For Release; 2002/10/30 .,CIA-RDP86B0 269R0 140018000 4-6 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 among members of the Congress that responsibility for the coordination organization was being considered, there was a widespread feeling Therefore, in 197, when legislation for a national intelligence in the debacle. unjustly, on the military commanders present and immediately involved It also demonstrated that in the pre-war Government organization no single official was responsible for whatever failure of intelligence was involved; and the blame for the military surprise fell, justly or departmental intelligence, and for its dissemination, must be centered of the production of national intelligence, as distinguished from to fill this need. The Director of Central Intelligence, in the perforLaance of this responsibility, receives pertinent information from charged with the' coordination of the intelligence effort, was authorized Creation of the Central Intelligence Agency, with its director at one point. all branches of the Government engaging in collection of intelligence, administration of the Agency and grants the Director wide autonomous The Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1919 provides for the including the Atomic Energy Commission. authority. Approved For. _Release 2002/10/30 CIA-RDPa,6B002691 0G1'40A1.8QOOi Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 II THE IN' .LIG&TCE COMMUNITY -- DEPARTMENTAL LEVEL Office of Special Operations (OSO) of the armed services. Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Intelligence Unit: As an adjunct of the Joint Chiefs of Staff., there is a Joint Intelligence Committee composed of the intelligence chiefs of the Approved, For helease 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86BO0269R001400-i8OOOt Authority,. Responsibility, and Functions The responsibility of the Secretary of Defense for intelligence activities in the military services is not specifically defined in legislation or executive order, but-is implicit in the following provision of the National Security Act of 1947: "The Secretary of Defense shall be the principal :assistant to the President in all matters relating to the Department of Defense.- Under direction of the President.,- and subject to the provisions of this Act., he shall have direction., authority, and control over the Department of Defense.' DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Special Operations) was designated to fulfill -a requiremelt for staff participation and representation in matters affecting defense and national intelligence efforts. His authority and responsibilities are set forth in various directives and memoranda of the Secretary of Defense. The organization is small and is neither intended nor prepared to exercise administrative control over day-to-day intelligence activities Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The committee members are: the Deputy Director for Intelligence of the Joint Staff, who acts as com- mittee chairman-. the G-2 of the Army; the Director of Naval Intelligence The Deputy Director for Intelligence of the Joint Staff heads the and the Director of Intelligence, Air Force. duties assigned to him by the Joint Chiefs of Staff through the Joint Intelligence Croups performing the intelligence functions and Director of..the Joint: Staff within the Department of Defense, the Joint Intelligence Croup supports Inasmuch as the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff the Secretary of Defense in intelligence matters. Department of the Arty Responsibilities of the. Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2., Intelligence f 5 e ' The AC/S, G-2, under supervision of the Deputy Chiefs of Staff -_ 6 Apprdve.d.-For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RD.P86.BQ0269RO0140:01!80001=7 and of the Comptroller of the Army., within his scope of responsibility - foreign nations, and the strategic vulnerability of the United States potential, topography, military forces and military activities of dissemination of intelligence information pertaining to the war plans, coordinates and supervises the collection, evaluation and The AC/S, G-2, also gives staff guidance and coordination to the Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) and to the Army Intelligence Center and. its possessions. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 basis in conformity with rigid requirements aid standards established Attache System Army efforts in the intelligence collection field are carried out largely through its Attache.Systen which maintains stations in many foreign countries. Officers are assigned in the Attache System on a highly selective for. candidates for this type of duty.. After. selection, officers are assigned to language and intelli- gence schools to prepare them for their assignments. G-2ts training interest lies principally in the areas of policy guidance and planning. The training division establishes the policies under which intelligence and language schools operate, and monitors G-2 Training Interest their program. 'Elements of the division also monitor training programs in the intelligence field, which are conducted by the various field commands and agencies, to insure conformance with G-21s guidance. Counter-Intelligence Corps and security functions, he does not exercise a true command control -while the Corps commander. is responsible for certain administrative also, in effect, a deputy of AC/S, G-2, for CIC matters. However, This Corps operates under the command of a major general, who is over the personnel of the Corps. Based on the principle that security Approved For Release 200;2/10/3 , 7 CIA RDP86;B00 B9R00140Q1., to field units and operate directly under command of the unit to which they, are, assigned. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The mission of the CIC is, to ferret out any treason, sedition, subversive activity or disaffection, and to detect and prevent enemy espionage or sabotage within the Army Establishment and its area of jurisdiction. In the pursuit of their primary functions, members of the Armyas Counter-Intelligence Corps acquire some intelligence data, and these are fed into- the intelligence system.. Relationship'to Other Agencies G-2 operates generally in a healthy atmosphere of cooperation and understanding in its relationship with other segments of the intelli- gence community. Committee, subcomm.ttee, and working groups provide for ready interchange of material, practices, methods., and other pertinent intelligence information.. Much of the effectiveness of this system is achieved through person-.l contacts. Material of an urgent nature can be disseminated throughout the intelligence community through these contacts without being delayed to await scheduled committee meetings. There is positive evidence of an aggressive willingness and desire among those engaged at the working level to promote the overall intelligence effort. Language. training for the Attache System and for the Foreign Area Specialist Training (FAST) is conducted at the Army Language School Language Training Program in Monterey, California. Use also is made of the Naval Language School in Washington,'D.. C., and civilian"colleges. The Army conducts language courses for CIC personnel at Fort Holabird, Maryland. Approved For Release. 2002/10/30 `.'CIA-RDP8.6B00269 R0014001&oool 6, Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Department of the Navy. 2. Providing the Naval Establishment with the intelligence the purpose oft to Informing the Naval Establishment of the war-making capabilities and intentions of foreign nations. Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI)' The Office of Naval Intelligence is part of the organization of the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. The Director of Naval Intelligence is designated as an Assistant Chief of Naval Operations, and reports directly to the Vice Chief of Naval Operations. He also has a direct responsibility to the Secretary-of the Navy. Under the authority and direction of the. Chief of Naval Operations, the Director of Naval Intelligence is required to administer, operate, and maintain an intelligence service fulfilling the intelligence and counter-intelligence requirements of the Department of the Navy for needed for plans-and operations. and international intelligence. 5. Promoting the maximum intelligence readiness of the 4. Providing the Naval contributions to joint, national.,. Warning.Naval authority of threats to security of the Naval Establishment. - operating forces and other components of the Naval Establishment. 6 .;Coordinating the intelligence effort of the Naval Establishment. App'rQ d:For "Release`2002/10/30.: CIA-RDP86B0026.9R001,4001800Qti Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 7. Developing and promulgating, subject to approval of the Secretary of the Navy, policies for the protection of classified protection of classified matter. Organization in the Field matters relating to Naval intelligence and security policies for the 8. Advising the Chief of Naval Operations concerning all matter, including such policies applicable to industrial security. intelligence mission of the Navy: In the field, three organizations assist in carrying out the 1. Naval District Intelligence Officers, who are under ONI's management control and operate in the continental United States and in certain outlying areas. 2. Intelligence organizations within the forces afloat., .which, although directly under their respective commanders, are still ,under ONI's technical supervision, 3. The Naval Attache System, which also is under juris- The primary., functions of the District Intelligence Officers are the conduct of counterintelligence and the implementation of security policies. The District Intelligence Officer serves on the staff of which his district is located. 'The Naval District Intelligence additional duty on the staff. of the commander of the sea frontier in his Naval District Commandant, and in certain designated districts has Offices are the major.source of domestic counterintelligence of special concern to the Navy. In the forces afloat, each area mander, and all flag officers exercising command have a staff intelligence Approv) 14 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 them collection missions within their capabilities to executes for the collection, processing, and dissemination of intelligence for the command. ONI supports their intelligence requirements and assigns section. This is headed by an intelligence officer who is responsible the-chief of the diplomatic mission to which they are assigned. they also have a responsibility to the ambassador or.minister who is Naval attaches and their staffs are officially a part of ONI, but Naval Attache System problems arising from these visits and the attendant shore leaves. Naval elements would like to have a naval attache to take care of many Each of the ambassadors to countries having ports of call for our primary Naval interest to ONI. Normally, attaches are stationed only in those countries which are of- Administration Administrative work in the Office of Naval Intelligence is handled to maintain efficiency and economy throughout?TONI. power and management surveys are conducted continuously by this division by the Assistant Director of Naval Intelligence, Administration. Man- line officers, not specialists. The Military Personnel Act of 1947 made Most of the military personnel assigned to intelligence duties are provision-.for intelligence specialists in the Regular Navy. However., since-by law none of these "Special Duty Only"; officers may succeed to . command, and since command is the usual stepping stone to flag rank, the. "Special Duty Only" *,class of service is unpopular among line. officers. .Approved For Release 2002/10/30 :]ICIA-RDP86B00269ROOT40018.0001.-1 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Department of the Air Force Organization for Intelligence Work The civilian staff of the Secretary of the Air Force includes a Special Assistant for' Intelligence who is responsible for review and evaluation of all matters pertaining.to plans, policies, and programs relative to the Air Force intelligence program. He is also charged with supervision and ultimate review of the personnel security program, both military and civilian. The Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations, is responsible for the Air Force intelligence activities, communications activities, and atomic ,energy matters. The Department2s Inspector General is responsible to the Chief of Staff, USAF. Among his other duties, he conducts investigations of :activities, sabotage and espionage; and performs related counter- matters involving major crimes, violations of public trust, subversive Comptroller, affects adversely the efficiency of staff operation. Elevation The Director of Intelligence, Headquarters, USAF, is directly responsible to the Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations. This organiza- tional relationship places him in a position subordinate to a Deputy Chief of Staff. The interposing of an echelon between the major intelligence element-of the Air Force and the Department's Chief of Staff and certain other functional Deputy Chiefs of Staff, such as the ,intelligence functions for the Department. of the Director of Intelligence to the level of Deputy Chief of Staff. would greatly enhance the prestige of intelligence in the Air Force. Approved For:Release 2002/10/30: ,CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001:- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 This is a desirable and appropriate step in view of the tremendous importance of intelligence in the overall mds lion of the Air Force. Air Force Intelligence Training Recognizing the need for continuing intelligence training, the Air Force has established such a program for officers and airmen, embracing courses ranging from those of an introdu,;tory nature to those appropriate for staff officers in higher headquarters. In addition to the service schools, college facilities are used for language training and special studies. Training courses also are available for Air Force reserve personnel. The Air Force training program generally is adequate for current requirements, even in technical areas where the personnel turnover is heavy. Periodic studies should be made, however, to assure the adequacy of training facilities in relation to worldwide staff requirements. The staffing of foreign posts with inadequately trained personnel may be not only uneconomical, but might result also in the loss of opportunities to collect intelligence. diplomatic means. By virtue of the authority the Secretary exercises foreign policy and to implement and supervise its execution by DEPARTMENT OF STATE Responsibility for Foreign Policy A primary function of the Secretary of State is to act as principal adviser to the President in the determination of American over all the activities of derives'principal:support for the accomplishment of this task from the 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B00269RQO1400180001 x-64 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 reports essential to determination and.execution of foreign policy. program for foreign intelligence for the Department and for producing of an Assistant Secretary, develops and implements a coordinated-- The Special Assistant-Intelligence, with rank equivalent to that. Under Secretaries, the Administrator of the Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs, the Special Assistant-Intelligence, and the Director of the Policy Planning Staff. action in the field. attitude has prevailed, often to the detrinent of vigorous and timely come to the attention of the task force where too conservative an fight to preserve our national welfare and existence. Instances have that, while political ends must be served and unjustifiable risks avoided, the collection of intelligence is a vital element in the -interests It must be realized that diplomacy is not an end in itself; of cold war. . While all contribute to the end in view, conflicts between them must be resolved, usually on a high level, and always in the national operations incident to the collection of intelligence and the conduct Effect of Diplomacy on the Overall Collection of Intelligence The task force has recognized the incompatibility in method between the practice of diplomacy and the more direct and active foreign policy was produced by the inadequate research staffs of Prior to World War II, intelligence for the support of American Creation of the Intelligence Area departmental policy offices Approved For Release.,2Q02/10/30: CIA-RDP86BO0269R001400180001- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 and maintains liaison with the other members of the-intelligence Secretary and senior policy officers of the Department of State, Council. The Intelligence Area provides staff assistance to-the The Secretary of State is a member of the National Security situation. the quality of intelligence demanded by the tense international Creation of the Intelligence Area of that Department, by"Executive Order 9621 of September 20, 19115, recognized the need for improving community in the discharge of the Department's responsibility in total intelligence program of the Government. quarters for this special type of work. -The'cost of adequate The Intelligence Area maintains its offices and records in a converted apartment building, which does not constitute satisfactory Better Quarters Needed and miscellaneous services for this branch of the intelligence vacating of leased spaces, and reduce costs of security, maintenance, approved under the provisions of Public Law 519, would improve working conditions and efficiency, produce savings through the Existing plans for an addition to the New State Building, if security measures consequently is high* effort. Approved For, Release 2002/10/30'.: CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 FERAL BUREAU OF, INVESTIGATION (FBI) Ih view of the limited activities of the FBI in the positive and agency became known as the Federal Bureau. of investigation.- Bureau of Investigation were established in. 1924, and in July 1935, this 1908. The policies now followed in the administration of the Federal Attorney General'of the United States,, by Executive order of July 26, A Bureau of Investigation was created, under jurisdiction of the foreign intelligence fields, a detailed study of this agency was not. studied with,'deep interest by the task force, in order to fill out the organization of its kinds We are confident that in the FBI we have a We found the ,Director of the FBI, through his forcefulness, initia tive, and managerial ability, to have developed his agency into a model FBI Responsioil'.Ties in uounterinzeslagence Among other assigned responsibilities, the FBI has jurisdiction. over investigations relating to espionage, sabotage, treason, and other mat- ters pertaining to the internal security of the United States, This Jurisdiction places the FBI directly in the field of counteri.ntelli,gence. privileged to be employed in the departments. and agencies of the Govern-- procedure covering stall persons seeking the privilege of employment or Executive order 10450 (May 27, 1953), which established the security rent,41 provides that: "All investigations conducted, by any other agencie coercion of an employee to act contrary to the interests of the national ';`security' shall be'referred promptly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation or -a full' field investigation,!' Approved or Release:2002/10/30 ClAc DP86B00269R08:1:4G01.80001- ywhich develop adverse information involving loyalty or, information.showing for the coordination of the investigation of all domestic espionage, Relationship to Other Departments and Agencies Interdepartmental Intelligence Conference (TIC) rich is responsible Inspector General, Headquarters, U. S. Air Force - is a member of the -. meet of the Navy; and the Director of Special In-.astigations, the G-2, Department of the Army; the Director of Naval Intelligence,'Depart- The Director of the FBI - along with the Assistant Chief of Staff, matters affecting Snternal security.. counterespionage, sabotage, subversion, and other related intelligence- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The 'TIC Charter does not disturb the responsibilities of the u:ember agncies, but makes mandatory such action by those agencies as is necessary .Government. of effort, through appropriate exchange and coordination of information and action among the various pertinent agencies and departments of the .to insure complete investigative coverage of this field without duplication Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 From the'beginning, the United States has tried consistently to III FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE Evolution of Our Plans Traditionally, Americans are a peace-loving people. But, a philosophy of peace is no guarantee of peace. In a tortured world where greed,. intrigue, and lust for power exist, protection of liberty and assurance of survival lie in alertness and strength. Alertness in- wolves adequate intelligence data on which to base adequate preparedness. ,,maintain relationships with other countries openly and to refrain from a'ta.cipation in secret treaties. This principle likewise established collection of information concerning poll tical and military policies the earl;- pattern for the conduct of our intelligence activities. The and plans of foreign governments was accomplished openly and with the full knowledge of the foreign powers. 'rne wore was peslviia wu~ the offices of our diplomatic representatives abroad and accredited and to draw from it logical conclusions upon which to base national machinery at home to, pull this information together into a cohesive mass A substantial volume of material was collected, but there was no military attaches. policy and future plans e in-Chief of the Armed Forces, established an Office of the Coordinator On July 11, 1941, the Chief Executive, in his capacity as Commander-~ otherwise,, which may bear upon national defense strategy; to interpret of information to ".collect and analyze information data, military'or ..and correlate such strategic information; to make it available to the to carry rout, when requested by the President, such supplementary; Approved For I elease:2002/10130 CIA-RDP86B00269R0b 1 40,0190601 such' other officials as the President may determine, actiAftav%Fig? gi&8m2&W1 s~ & ( ~QA;4d0f~@0~0~'ka~n not available to the Government." This office came into being only five months before Pearl Harbor, Through a process of evolution, there finally emerged the Office of Strategic Services as an operating agency of the Joint Chiefs of Staff., This organization remained intact until the end of World War II.' Post-War Organization In the-fall of 191i14, ' the Chief Executive wrote to the Director of trategi:c, Services requesting recommendations as to the organization of a: post-war'intelligence organization. The director submitted a plan for the creation of a central intelligence service. The plan placed the proposed central intelligence service in the Executive Office of the President and called for the appointment by the President of a Director f Intelligence who would discharge and perform his functions and duties under the direction and supervision of the President. It also provided for the establishment of an Intelligence?Advisory Board consisting of the Secretaries of State, War, and Navy, and such others as the President deemed necessary. The duties of the board would be to advise and assist the Director of Intelligence. The plan placed in the hands of the Director the work,of coordinating, pd _ collecting,'evaluating, and disseminating intelligence for national pur- .poses. It also recognized that various departments of the Government' :.should have their own intelligence bureaus for the collection and process-. ing of such information and material as might be needed in the performance ? of their daily functions and duties. Each of these bureaus would be under the sole control of its department head and would not be encroached upon. or impaired by the . f unctions granted. to any other governmental in- Approved For Release: X002/'10/30 : CIA DP86B00269R00 x400 180001-6= Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The plan further contemplated that in time of war or unlimited emergency, all programs of such an agency in areas of actual or pro- jected military operations would be coordinated with military plans and be subject to the approval of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; or in case of the consolidation of the armed services, under the supreme commander. Functions Divided agencies of the State, War, and Navy Departments as related to the It charged the'Central Intelligence Group with the task of correla- ting, evaluating, and disseminating intelligence relating to the national security; with coordinating such activities of the intelligence Under the pressure of prompt dissolution of wartime agencies, the Chief Executive, on September 20,-1915, divided the functions, personnel, and physical resources of the Office of Strategic Services between the State Department and the War Departments The research and presentation element was transferred to the State Department, to be absorbed or liquidated so that the elem'ant would cease to exist on December 31, 19135. On January 22, 19136, the Chief Executive created. the National In- telligence Authority consisting of the 'Secretaries of 'State, War, and'' Navy, and the President's personal representative,' to plan, develop, and coordinate Federal foreign intelligence activities so as to assure the' most effective accomplishment of the intelligence mission for national security., This Presidential directive also created a Central Intelligence Group (CIG) under the direction of a Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), designated by the President to assist the National Intelligence Authority (NIA) and to be responsible to it. The directive specified that the head of CIG would sit as a member of the NIA. Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 By the National Security Act of 19i .7, as amended (Pablic Law 253, 80th Congo, July 26, 1947), the Congress established .a. National Security Council (NSC) which took the place of the old National Intelli- gence Authority; and created under the National Security Council a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) with a Director of Central Inte11i-- gence (DCI) as its head. The National intelligence Authority ceased Under the provisions of this Act, the National Security Council established an Intelligence Advisory Commdttee (IAC) made up of the various intelligence chiefs, to advise the Director of Central Intelli- gence in his efforts to coordinate the intelligence activities of the For kelease 2002/10/30: CIA--P86B00269RO01400180001-6; Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 IV INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL AND SECURITY Character of the Present Worka.ngForce elements were readily infiltrating into these sensitive jobs.- Our in The methods used for selection of personnel were reassuring in the light of suspicions which have been voiced that subversive and communistic vestigatiazs indicated that the intelligence leadership in all branches designed to prevent any such infiltration. One flaw in the present system, however, seems to be the absence of a genera plan for a periodic review of the security status of every person after employment in intelligence activities,, to guard against the possibility that some employee who was completely dependable and honorable when starting work might have changed character, fallen from grace, or succumbed to alien blandishments or some personal weakness such as strong drink or sexual perversion. The task force makes recom- Schedule 'A'"of the'-Civil Service program by some intelligence units. The continuing need for skilled civilians in certain categories of intelligence work suggests further use of the appointment method under AFOIN, CIA, and State) and are generally adequate. The major obstacle in Policies and procedures to-give assurance of security of personnel follow a standard pattern in all of the. agencies concerned (FBI,. ONI, G-2, this area is. the load. thrown upon investigative agencies in providing :personnel clearances, Backlogs exist in all agencies, and the time re uired for complete clearance-checks ' and full background investigation -Approved Fot Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86B0O269R0014001'8.000 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 runs as high as fifteen months. Such long delays hamper certain phases of the intelligence program to ihich these prospective employees are to be assigned., and some potential'intelligence personnel are lost to the intelligence community. They grow tired and restive at the long wait and accept other offers of employment. G-2 Personnel and Security All military assignments to G-2 are made by The Adjutant General (TAG in a manner similar to other assignments. T .thin G-2, however, there are certain key billets in which G-2 has a special interest. In such cases, selection of qualified personnel to meet specific requirements is'made from nominations by TAG. With only a few minor exceptions, the quality of personnel in Gm2 was found to be of an exceptionally high order, Contact with officers in this field indicated that they were alert to their obligations and duties, Personnel records of those -o may have had experience in intelli- gence are clearly marked so that such men are not lost to the system and may be made available readily for future assignments in this wrk. Most, senior officers wish to retain attachment to their basic branches of service, but feel. that an intelligence assignment is beneficial to their career, Regulations and necessary implementing procedures for compliance with Executive Order No. 10501, titled ".Safeguarding Official Information in the Interests of the Defense of the United States" are in effect and are well observed. Personnel attached to G-2 are security conscious to a high 11y alert and ever conscious of their responsibility. 23 etease 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001'400180001`-6 Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 ONI Personnel Security policy in the Navy is vested in the Secretary of t:--e Navy. Preparation of security policies has been delegated, through the Chief of Naval Operations, to the Director of Naval Intelligences Administrative work in the Office of Naval Intelligence is in the hands of the Assistant `'surveys are continuously conducted by this division to maintain both Director of Naval Intelligence, Administration. Manpower and management efficiency and economy throughout ONI. In addition to ONI, three other offices have responsibilities in Navy; aid the office of Naval Material, in matters of industrial s :~curi: maters concerning security among civil service personnel within the of military personnel, security; the Office of Industrial Relations, :certain phases of security. They are the Bureau of Personnel,. in,matters Each was surveyed and appeared to be functioning adequately. in the Military Personnel Act of 1917 to include intelligence specialists duties are not specialists; they are line officers. Provision was made The'major portion of military personnel assigned to intelligence in the Regular Navy. However, since by law none of these "Special Duty 24 Only" officers may succeed to command, and since command is the usual stepping stone to flag rank, the "Special Duty Only", class of service is unpopular. The present tour of the Naval attache is two. years, to language schools. Many attaches are just getting proficient in'the Because of personnel limitations, it has not been possible to send all Naval attaches .language of the area to which they have been assigned at the end of the tour. Approved For Release 2002/10/30: CIA-RDP86.BQ0269R001400180001-6 r Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 The other two services use the three-year tour, and so does the ONI. It would seem logical to bring the Naval attache Is tour in line by making it three years also. Air Force Intelligence Personnel Air Force security operations are centered in the office of the Deputy Inspector General for Security. The Deputy Inspector General has two dire ctorateso that of the Office of Special Investigations, and of the Air Provost Marshal, t.th the functions of security divided The Office of Special Investigations is responsible for conducting between these. directorates. all personnel background investigations. within. the jurisdiction of the Air Force and for forwarding final reports on completed investigations to interested commanders for appropride action. Close liaison is maintained with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Givil Service Cozmmtission, and other investigative and law-enforcement agencies. Regu4 lations have been published for the purpose of establishing uniform. policies and procedures for the personnel security investigation and clearance of Air Force rrd_li.tary and civilian personnel requiring access There is some reluctance now on the part. of career service personnel to classified information. in the Air Force to take assignments or to specialize in intelligence work because of the limited opportunities to reach the grade of general officer Approved. For Release 2002/10/30'.: CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001- Approved For Release 2002/10/30 : CIA-RDP86B00269R001400180001-6 in this field. If the Director of Intelligence had greater latitude in the selection of personnel, an improvement in this general attitr.de might be achieved. The service would be more attractive if some of the highly trained officers he would select could anticipate eventual elevation to the grade of general officer. Because of Civil Service restrictions, the Air Force also has exper- ienced difficulty in cbtaining civilian persomi-1 suitable for special intelligence. duties. Certain specialists, such as analysts, need great technical sld.2l and long experience, are generally in short supply an reluctant-to be placed under Civil Service. Civil Service exemptions.' for a limited number of such experts would help the Air Force to overcome this deficiency more readily. Industrial Security The intelligence units of the armed services realize fully that. vital secrets placed in the hands of private industry must be amply pro- tected without sacrificing efficiency or hampering productions "The Aimed Forces. Industrial Security Regulation" (AFISR), dated January 15, 1953, and issued by the Department of Defense, is the. current directive governing security in this area. Instructions to contractors regarding the handling of classified material are set forth in a Department of De- fense publication bearing the title "tIndustrial Security Manual for Safeguarding Classified Information" (ISTISCI). AFISR effectively coordinates the industrial security activities of all military agencies engaged. in procurement operations. Prior to its _ issuance, agencies operated individually under their on departmental directives and supervision. AFFISR fixes responsibility for plant'super-- .vision, designates procedures for clearance of both-facilities and individuals, and eliminates. duplication of effort and uncertainty over Approved For Release 20012/1090 : fdA-RDP86BOO269ROO14001 SO( areas or security responsibiity. Approved For Release 2002/10130: CIA-FRP>~g369 0011#~e6 to ac- After a plant has receive agency cept classified material from any agency. The agency which is having the work performed in that plant and which gave the clearance for that work, is responsible for the contractor's obedience to the security be a security risk, although removed from work of a classified nature, program arises from the fact that an individual who has been declared to instructions. A serious weakness in the industrial personnel security o. material and information of great value to a potential enemy of ' this of movement.wLthin the. plant, such an employee still would have access- contact with employees engaged in sensitive production and enjoys freedom might still be retained in the salve plant. Because he has daily personal country. . The military departments are aware of the situation and have recom- such a proposal and feels.that this loophole in our security barriers mended legislation to correct this deficiency. The task force commends should be closed promptly. Individual Security Cases In the conduct of this survey, the task force assiduously endeavored of operation of the members of the intelligence community, and to deter- . Ccnmd.ssion to study and investigate the present organization and methods accomplishment of the specific duties assigned to it by the Hoover to keep its effort focused and to expend its time and resources in the mine what changes, if any, would he necessary or desirables Although detailed study of the policies, functions, and procedures as outlined to us by the Commission, did not primarily entia3.l... uie An- of the d paxtmeuts and agencies collecting and handling intelligence data, vestigationof the security angle of every individual. engaged in:, affects these intelligence functions, ' and, we faced squarely the issue of intelligence, we recognized: the fact that the character of personnel indi#MRIeg&;s 4e ~QQ & .