TAXIWAY OVERPASS TESTED TO SEE IF IT CAN HANDLE JUMBO JETS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86-00244R000300170001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 6, 1999
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86-00244R000300170001-5.pdf305.79 KB
Body: 
beca y_~.e FAA would extend aid only for with the Corps of Engineers' ?researc CPYRG 15 in., but since has agreed to thickr center at Vicksburg, Miss., will includ pavements. He A 9p h tPb a gg fft/ nn ? t a P~ -00244R 3 d1 1-a5 G cal soil conditions and temperatures ing or deve opment an va i a id have dramatic effects on load bearing a rational method of pavement design roducers of building products tried for ton hi W k i , ng as n ability. both rigid and flexible, in consonant two days last wee - h t i i h m w a t But PONYA's Yang insists that weight with aircraft development." .C., to get caught up w ! is only one factor to consider. "Bas- It will cover analysis of dynami act they will feel from the systems ap- ically, pavement theory is wrong," he loading, plus studies of continuous) proach to building, the building team e- t h c f ru ons e t says with near missionary zeal. "We reinforced and prestressed concret concept and the advent o didn't design for moving aircraft, but pavements, stabilized and membran tion manager. t at Producers' Council's 50th an- Fi rs for a static load like a parking lot. Vi- sealed subgrades, the effects of frost an bration that develops on the runway is permafrost and load transfer devices fo niversary meeting, then at the annual Executives Confer- t d P ildi uc s ro ng the big thing." In this respect, he says rigid pavement joints. Bu to develop criteri ence run by McGraw-Hill Information h- The second phase hi f l , g rom earn airport designers can way practice, though most engineers for rehabilitation, will include field o Systems Co., the speakers who roused criticize the fact that many airport servations to determine the effects most interest described the changes cur- ft n d as i h w.. . g ave been ... s r pavements Researchers will instrument pavemen Robert F. Hastings, president of the hi h d f ways. g e up bee resolve and subgrades and evaluate nond American Institute of Architects, pre- ' s new program may The FAA all that. It's first phase, coordinated structive testing techniques. dicted that the gathering of building .,,.1.a he renamed a CRYRGHT CPYRGHT Taxiway overpass tested to see if it can handle jumbo jets ngineers are testing a ve-year-o taxiway bridge at Chicago's O'Hare In- ternational Airport to see whether it can handle jumbo jets. The four-span structure over eight lanes of the air- port's main access route was designed for gross weights of 600,000 lb with an impact factor of 30%. The Boeing 747 weighs in at up to 750,000 lb and heav- ier craft are expected. Theoretical studies by Westenhoff & Novick, Inc., Chicago, indicated that the 225-ft bridge can take heavier load- ing, but engineers wanted a more defi- nite answer. Loading tests conducted by WissJanney-Elstner & Associates, Northbrook, Ill., concluded recently and recommendations are expected later this month. The. bridge is a continuous girder structure with a 13-in. concrete deck cast compositely with 22 stringers. Center spans are 73.5 ft long and each end span is 39 ft. Two longitudinal joints divide the 125-ft-wide structure with the center section being 44 ft wide. When design started eight years ago, attempts to get forecasts of future air- craft weights from manufacturers were unsuccessful, according to the city's bu- reau of engineering. The largest planes then operating were about 300,000 lb and the bureau decided on 'a design load twice that, assuming dual tandem landing gears that concentrate loading on a few stringers. A 747 has four land- mna aears in a tranezoidal configuration Test plane heavier than bridge design load. mented the bridge with more than 100 strain gages plus meters to measure ac- celeration and velocity for static and dynamic testing. They monitored nor- mal operations during the day, then closed the taxiway at night for con- trolled testing. First they ran a cart on a 747 gear loaded with 190,000 lb of iron, then a DC-8 aircraft and finally a 747. The aircraft were taxied at various speeds, braked to a stop and accelerated at four locations. Because the jumbo's outboard engines overhang the bridge, the consultants also measured jet wakes and noise levels on the roadway below. Among determinations to be made are the distribution of loads and the 747's actual impact loading, stresses that would be imposed by heavier 747s and other jumbo jets with different con- figurations, plus the expected life of the structure under repetition of various loadings. The consultants will also de- termine whether the 30% impact factor, typically applied on highway bridges, is unnecessarily conservative. . Taxiway overpasses at Kennedy In- ternational have been strengthened .for 3 t uansvers J--_ that spreads rrp" 1 9 n9rir1t-.JeapenltJ991 1t5r>:ltwA s -00T/~b.$40Q'~0OfFiTiO first CM This sum building systems conference in a few years in recognition of changes he sees in the construction process. Hastings urged materials producers to get on the vers rather than vendors." "Instead of looking to you fur prod- ucts, we will look to you for solutions to design problems," said Hastings. "If this process develops as I expect it to, we will call you into the early meeting of the design team, and you will be of- fered a professional fee for your coun- sel;" Hastings warned that with changes in manufacturing there will be market- ing and selling changes for materials or systems producers. With increased pres- sures of quality, cost and time on con- struction, design teams will need more producers who can meet performance specifications and guarantee in-place performance of systems or subsystems. Designers will no longer be able to spec- ify products in detail, he said. "You will be the logical professional to design, build, test, fabricate, install and guar- antee the system or subsystem you offer the building team," he told the build- ing products executives. Manager's role. Gerald McKee,-presi- dent of McKee-Berger-Mansueto, Inc., New York City, joined Hastings in de- scribing the role of construction man- ager (CM) as it has burst upon the con- struction scene of late. Hastings' Detroit A-E firm, Smith, Hinchmann & Grylls Associates, Inc., has been tele- scoping construction schedules as CM .on buildings for the State University of New York. McKee's firm is in. partner- ship with Walter Kidde Constructors, and S t tr'" Approve orate ministration for its Beltsville, Mc-, building (ENR 9/9 p. 9). "CM is an owners' invention," McKee said. The owners have seized on simultaneous design and con- tructin under er coordination of a CM as wa to cut time and dollars out of heir jobs. As to who will be the CM, cKee said the good general contrac- or (GC) has a head start, but the CM nd the GC are two fundamentally dif- Brent roles. McKee said the GC's usual anagement functions are "only a point of departure toward the CM role" an agent of the owner with authority ver design, costs and scheduling as CPYRGHT wOqACgo_ZDP86 The CM has to "mana e costs, n t just predict them," said McKee. Saul Horowitz, Jr., president f HRH Construction. Corp., New Yo City, and a vice presidential nominee f the Associated General Contracto (AGC), told the Producers' Council a - dience that the ranks of design-co struct organizations will grow as a r suit of the CM concept. Horowitz reminded the produce that he predicted the growing use construction managers at a Producer, ' Council meeting in 1968. He told the the concept really got its start wit manufacturing industries. The govern Mwo, ho said, is f"48 01 ing industr Y. Pollution bill says EPA will pay its overdue bills CPYRGHT Pollution control officials in states that routinely prefinanced the federal share of treatment plant construction costs got good news last week. They will get their money back if the water pollution bill now before the Sen- ate passes as expected (ENR 10/28 p. 13). The bill authorizes the reim- bursement of the $2.4 billion the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) es- timates it owes states and communities that went ahead with construction de- spite lack of promised federal funds. According to EPA, the federal pro- gram under the 1966 Clean Water Res- toration Act actually covered only 6% of construction costs nationwide instead of the promised maximum of 55%. Under the new bill, $2 billion is spe- cifically earmarked for reimbursing communities for plants built between July 1, 1966, and the date the new bill becomes law. Another $400 million is included to cover reimbursement for plants built between 1956 and 1966. As an added attraction, all reimburse- ments for plants built after 1966 will be at 50% of construction costs even if the individual community was eligible for only a 30% grant because its state did not participate. The Senate Public Works Commit- tee, in its report on the bill, called the old sliding grant system inequitable for many communities, especially large ones. The report says that the reim- .bursement was aimed at "righting any past discrimination against those . . municipalities that PTb 'ft6F full federal contribution. For the 1956 to 1966 period, the reimbursements will be a maximum of 30% because that was the maximum under the law covering those years. More money may be authorized if the $400 million is inadequate. The bill calls for the EPA adminis- trator to divide the available funds by giving "to each project approved for reimbursement an amount which bears the same ratio to the reimbursement approved for such project as the total of such sums appropriated bears to the to- tal reimbursement authorized for all projects eligible for reimbursement as estimated by the administrator." Horowitz discussed AGC's action on M at its mid-year meeting (ENR 9/30 14). That action in effect put off at east until next March any definitive GC policy statement. Horowitz said general contracts will e mobilizing to provide CM services. CPYRGHT Worry over reimbursement started in New York state, where a large chunk of a $3-billion pollution control bond is- sue has gone to prefinancing promised federal money. State officials have expressed concern in recent weeks because a letter from EPA extending the provisions of the ex- pired 1966 law failed to mention exten- sion of reimbursement. Since reim- bursement has never been actually written into law, some state officials felt that New York might be left holding the bag. EPA officials in Washington last week said that the omission is meaningless. CPYRGHT Building failure may bring $1-million suit CPYRGHT The Dade County, Fla., Port Authority has voted to sue a general contractor, an A-E firm, a consultant, a steel fabri- cator and a steel erector for over $1 mil- lion to cover repair of three garages built or under way at Miami Inter- national Airport. Last January cracks developed in the main supporting columns of two seven- story reinforced concrete garages that have post-tensioned slabs and beams (ENR 4/29 p. 14). The original contract for three garages totaled $10.3 million. Cost is now estimated at $113 million. If a suit is filed, the defendents will be general contractor Gust K. Newberg Construction Co., Chicago; architect- tures, including removal of concrete ~GfiD9l2itI/Q486o-1Q9u34 1QnlQo -5ith %fv Fla.,; Howard, Needles, Tammen & stronger members, is costing $609,000. Bergendoff, New York City, consultant to the owner, the Dade County Port Authority; Inland-Ryerson Construc- tion Products Co., Chicago, suppliers of tendons and equipment for stressing and grouting during the post-tension- ing operations; and the erector, Gate- way Erectors, division of Imoco-Gate- way Corp., Chicago. The third structure, now under con- struction, was not under way when the cracks were found. Redesign of the third garage, including additional rein- forcing steel, forming and post-tension- ing, resulted in an increase in cost of $476,000. Repair of the first two struc-