LANGUAGE HIGHLIGHTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
15
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 7, 2001
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 1, 1971
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6.pdf1004.81 KB
Body: 
ed For Rele e20 ? ~It/ iiI'I;I -D I, ,.~ ~i mr, oa C C) N F I DC N T I A L Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 LANGUAGE HIGHLIGHTS FIRST ISSUE AUGUST 1971 PUBLISHED PERIODICALLY BY THE LANGUAGE SCHOOL OFFICE OF TRAINING 25X1A 25X1A INQUIRIES, COMMENTS, AND CONTRIBUTIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE EDITOR, EXTENSION 3271, ROOM 406, BUILDING. Approved For Release 200410810%: #iArRDP86-00244R000200300015-6 CONTENTS LANGUAGE INCENTIVE PROGRAM 1 ALL LANGUAGES ARE EQUALLY DIFFICULT 3 TAPES .TAPES . TAPES 4 SELF STUDY MATERIALS 7 FOR SPOTTERS ONLY 8 ARE WE LOSING OUR LANGUAGE CAPABILITY? BAHLT? BAHLT? WHAT MEANS BAHLT ? KNOW YOUR IDIOMS 10 FOREIGN LANGUAGES AT STATE 11 C 0 N F I Li E N T I A L Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 %w ~Nw On 12 March 1971 a new Agency-wide program was initi- ated to spur the development of proficiencies in languages which the Agency has in short supply -- or for which a future shortage is anticipated. This is not the first time, of course, that. the Agency has offered. monetary awards for language proficiency. In 1957-63 over $765,000 was paid out to personnel who could demonstrate through a proficiency test that they had achieved or maintained reading or speak- ing skills in a modern language. Perhaps the most benefi- cial effect of that program was that we found out for the first time how many people there were in the Agency who had at least some foreign language proficiency. We also learned that even though we have a good supply of speakers of most languages, the employee with a language skill is not always in the job that requires it. The pur- pose of the new program, then, is not only to encourage more people to study languages, but to get peon7.e to learn specific languages to meet specific requirements in specific components. The new program differs principally from the old in that: 1. The new regulation does not provide cash awards for the maintenance of s ills that an employee already has, but only for the achievement of new skills. 2. The new program is not on a voluntary basisi to be eligible for an award an individual must be designated by his component to anhieve specific skills at the level of proficiency determined by the compo- nent (which also provides the funds for the award). Also different from the old program is the fact that cash awards will not be paid for new skills in all lan- guages. Each Directorate establishes its own list of incentive languages, approved by the Deputy Director con- cerned, according to needs reported by operating officials.. The lists are subject to constant review and revision, so the best source of information about the current list of awardable languages in your Directorate is your Senior Training Officer. Because languages differ, incentive languages have been grouped into three categories, according to the degree of difficulty each poses for the English-speaking student. The languages in Group III are considered the most difficult for English-speakers to learn, and awards for achievement of skills in them are the highest. Awards are made in either the Specialized Program (e.g., Reading onLa, or Speaking only) or the Comprehensive Program, requiring competence in reading, speaking, and understand- ing. Awards in the Specialized Program are half those in the Comprehensive. Following is the rash awards schedule in the Comprehensive Program: AWARDS SCHEDULE COMPREHENSIVE (Reading, Speaking and Understanding) Of particular interest is the fact that awards are cumulative. That is, if an employee is designated to achieve, as a career goal, skill level 4 in a Group II language like Persian or Lao, his awards will total $2400 whenever he finally achieves the 4-level in a proficiency test administered at the Language School. There is no time limit for designees in the program and the designee receives an award each time an awardable level is reached and verified by testing. The designee may study any way he can.,-- in self-study here or abroad, with a tutor, in a non-government`school, or in formal training at the Language School. Note, however:;:-that if you study your designated language abroad, yop mu~~;:Wpr your award until you return for an official prohijG_;;C::t Headquarters. 25X1A Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 Approved F Release r2GOd/fl8/0%: #tAPRDP86-08?44R000200300015-6 LANGUAGES ARE EQUALLY DIFFKULT There is practical, as well as theoretical proof of the above state- ment. The theoretical argument goes: the more complex a language is, the more useful it is to those who speak it. The more distinctions a language makes, the more you can say in that language. But there is a limit -- the capacity of the human mind. Each person develops his language to the limit of his mental capacity; the language of a genius is more complex, grammatically as well as in its vocabulary, than the language of a moron. But this difference is merely quantitative, whereas there is a qualitative difference between lan- guage and animal communication on the level, for example, of dogs or crows. The practical proof runs as follows: if language A were actually less difficult than language B, child- rer, would learn to speak it sooner than children learning language B. This does not happen. Children learn- ing to speak any language acquire grammatical mastery of it at about the same age. Depending on the definition of "grammatical mastery," this varies from five to seven years, but it is the same for any language. When we talk about "difficult languages," we are talking about the difficulty English speakers have in learning them. This is, of course, based on how different the language is from English. The more similar a language is to English, the easier it is for English speakers to learn, and vice versa. ,5X1A Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 "That's not necessarily true. You can lay a very useful foundation in part- time study. Then when you get to where the language is spoken you can really start learning to speak it. After all, how much German could you really speak after two years in college?" "There the picture is not nearly so bleak. A person who has had some language experience might pick up quite a bit of one of the easier languages by self- study." The above conversation illustrates a good many common, but falla- cious ideas about language training, particularly the use of tapes. Since World War II, great strides have been made in teaching languages by the intensive method, and the use of tapes has been an important part of the improvement. The wholly wrong impression has spread that language tapes are the sole reason for the improvement -- that they are some sort of miracle medium. Actually, the most important element in a language course is the teacher. A good, professional language teacher can take almost any set of materials and do a good job. By far the most important element in the success of the language instruction at GS/OTR is the profes- sional competence and devotion to duty of the instructors. The number and quality of the tapes available is definitely secondary. Success in :self-study demands high motivation and adequate apti- tude, but it also requires a good set of materials designed for self- study. Unfortunately, such materials are currently available in a discouragingly small number of languages. Self-study is also more likely to be successful if the student already knows one or more foreign languages. Another area where self-study is likely to succeed is in reinforcing or improving proficiency in a language the student already knows something about. For all these reasons, the Language School makes self-study materials available on a loan basis for all Agency personnel Approved ~TTrquayc ?: L..ol maintains a' loam proutam of texts and tapes for sell-stud-, avai;abtc to all Agency personnel M:ator :.:zl r s available in 11 ian:;ua ,es, fion, Ar-i is to Viet- rtw-cse. 'these materials .are mostly at. the bc.pa.nning level. The pro- ced?re nc,raoliv tot the student to bet. w lIa- tas- end the first three tapes. The te:+t is loaned for the duration at the self-study, and the tapes tot a weak, with a week's exs_cn;i.on , n rc,.luest. AThr-n the stu- dent reLuru4 tho ricst i:hrco tapes, hc, raceives the noxt three, and so on. This proc_eA continues until he has =:omplOLvA hie course of self- study, when he -e?uans the text and the last three tapes. The student or his cor.:p:unca:t trust provide a tape recorder to t,sr vi 6o thr tapes. The li crar ian will h he happy to furnish infornat.io,: c..-, the self- study ar(;yreyr,, C"s1l .Tune on exten- sion 177 at, the -,no ia, e School Library, Rea)n 214, the LS ?;L is truqueutly asked to make aupi:'cate copies of tapes. Requestore sh%al,i understand that it costs pr icti c.-,il:; the 5,iriw amount to duplicate tapes at the LS lab as it does to purchase theta ?'a the open market. The h,=,avy demands on duplicat- ing equipment. 11.a;v lee. a to considerable delays on most order;. As a result, it is usae Ly cheaper and quicker to sat- isfy dee?ands 1 o,r .o;,muet cl.n i Lv. avail- able tapes on the op-j, market. There are, moreover, certain legal restraints on the copying at copyrighted tapes. in the co o.. of tapes produced at LS/OTR, or other tapes not commercially available, arrtngemant _-an he made. to satitsty ru_~aconanla re.,i;;:sts based on linguistically :sound requirements and operational ,stns i. .. Approved For Release 2 4liiliii-!!!iliiilili!!iili!!!? FOR SPOTTERS !!!liii!!!!a1liiliiiiii!!!!i ONLY The Language School is always interested in spotting good teachers of foreign languages. There is not always an immediate vacancy, but it is a good bet there will be one soon. hue to resignations, retirements, maternity leave, and other causes, we are constantly experiencing a turnover in teaching personnel. in addition, demands on the School for language instruction are steadily growing, causing us to be constantly on the watch for new teaching talent. What are we looking for? We want well-informed or educated native speakers, preferably young and with teach- ing experience. Once in a while, a non-native who has lived in the country of the language concerned for a long period will also qualify. This, of course, is the optimum, but often, for languages in which the supply of qualified personnel is scarce, we have to settle for less. For all teaching personnel, however, a reasonably good command of English is required. Absolutely essential to the hiring of any teacher is the granting by security of at least a Type H clearance (with access to an Agency building). Chances are best for American citizens, and next best for Resident Aliens. In- dividuals with some other types of visas, other than for permanent residency, are also eligible. Those with diplo- matic, tourist, or student visas, however, are definitely ineligible. while there has been a long history of emigration from European and Latin American countries to the United States, the pattern of emigration from the Middle East and South- east Asia has been quite different. The supply of potential teachers crom these areas is relatively small. Often, our best lead is the spouse of an Agency employee, American official, or serviceman. To get leads to potential teachers; of "rare" languages, we resort. to such sources as the Immigration and Naturali- zation Service, friends of current teachers, and other grape- vine methods. The results of even these methods are some- times frustratingly meager. We need help in our spotting task, and ask all Agency personnel aware of potential teachers to contact the Language School on extension 3065 and give us such leads as they may have, keeping in mind that the po- tential instructor must be professionally competent or on a level such that with a little training he could be brought to professional competence. C 0 ih 1 0 F;, N T L A L Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000200300015-6 wv ARE WE LOSING OUR r- During Calendar Year 1x70 thrr,uyh retirements and resigna- tions the Agency lost 1011 speaking and reading proficiencies at the 4 (High) and 5 (Native) levolr;. Durinq the same period 49 new employees brought a 4- or -fecal language competence to the Agency. However, during this same period, a total of 55 employees already on board br-ight their tested proficiency to a 4 or 5 level through further n+-nctice abroad and/or further Inside the Agency rlr,, leer-:ems studied a foreign language in FY 71. This breakdown. was ~s follows; 244 full-time,atudents at the Language School 267 part-time students at the language School 105 students in the BAHI,T rprngrsm A total of 64 Agency pers,jnnel et,ictied at other govern- ment schools or at commercial srhnoLe in CY 70 for reasons of cover, advanced training, nr hecause the Language School does not offer the lnngi.age concernnfl, In CY 70 a total. of 570 employees were studying a wide range of languages at overseas posts. The BAHLT (Before and After Hours Language Training) Pro- gram is completing another successful season. Proposals for implementing the '1971/72 BAHLT Program have been approved by the Language Development Committee. First and second-year basic instruction will continue to he offered in French, German, Russian, and Spanish. The Language School expects to experi- ment during the coming academic year with programmatic instruc- tion in Spanish; this, if successful, will make it possible to accommodate more students than can regular classes. Another proposed change in the B?JJLT Program o a'the plan to hold some classes at the Language School, i.nst.ead of only at Headquarters. Under the new ground rules, classes will he conducted strictly during off-duty hours, three or four days per week for 40 weeks. Bulletins will be issued, announcing the program and solicit- ing applications from str,tt employ-,_s who desire to become instructors. *No C 'Q 9 ; . Mh!J' P:" t', , I A L y4pppV1?Por Release; 2001/08 ;09 : CIA-RdP86-00244Ff?Q F=' m iDffM m u r A iCtiajpx pi ob L in 14i n z{ N l tw vo a aula y of 1etngut}5e ie ,;idiom. 'An idiom .. .cn etpu_sft c.11 Chat arms xtore thjh,the"13terat us of yis6Parts mfr, mty n' 4 tl-4 ''oc7x al,l niclh w th a . A31vk17`1laYay au4 h is uu t.ta u ar i a f3ovrwaiksax. Op4e "Ou tn4w toe tn~a'niY9' A Fl:aoxo _11k r? 3 t3 orivatr.on i.a f~irl al are of 1'a s sty ea i y i du Ma dint ~ yt n o$t Eg li*17 speaker rtiJ1k 9y j tt!at go off, half c e a a its deY"' -vafl t5T1 E a ?, itlGiot l 1u 4 plc, v a in r knf w tha s n _ap Ohs pan. i alro c 0Si.loc eaw. Jri t 2 rs r- that "marl 4$ e hatter erivesmfram thm tif:aut Qf ie (#