THE GREEK ECONOMY UNDER THE JUNTA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
17
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 30, 2006
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 1, 1972
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7.pdf806.83 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001400040027-7 ~ Confidential DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence 1Vlemorandurn `I"he Greek Economy Under the Junta Confidential ER IM 72-144 October 1972 Copy No . r'! 6 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 25X1 gpproved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19^ CIA^RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence October 1972 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM THE GREEK ECONOMY UNDER THE JUN'T'A Introduction 1. In April 1967 the Greek government was toppled by military officers seeking to remove leftist influences and establish political stability. The junta has been criticized for suppressing the democratic process and mismanaging the economy. With respect to the economy, however, the junta has used its power monopoly to pursue sensible policies. At the time of the coup, the economy was experiencing a slowdown.. following several years of rapid expansion. The junta put one of its leap ling members in charge of economic affairs and rapidly initiated measures to accelerate growth. Under Colonel Papadopoulos, who took over as Prime Minister in December 1967 following an abortive counter-coup, the regime has given ~onsiderarle attention to orderly, broadly based economic de~~elopment. This memorandum assesses Greek economic policy and performance under the military government, together with the outlook for the next several years. Summary and Conclusions 2. Greece's economic grow~h during 1967-71 was the most rapid in Western Europe. Contributing to this growth were the country's return to a mc,:e stable political situation following the tumult of 1965-66 and the new military regime's espousal of conservative economic policies, notwithstanding its talk of creating a new Greece. Although investors initially were apprehensive, private capital outlays soon recovered, adding impetus to economic growth. Output gains have averaged 7.5% yearly, only slightly lower than in the 1961-66 boom period. Per capita income rose almost as rapidly because low rates of natural increase and substantial emigration field population gains to about 0.5% annually. Note: This memorandum was prepared bl~ the Office of Economic Research and coordinated within the Directorate of Intelligence. Approved For Release 200~~1>~f~~'~~0875R001700040027-7 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONFIDENTIAL 3. Unde*lying this rapid growth has been the progress made in huiiding up the industrial base and improving the composition of agricultural output. Private investment was augmented by large increases in public investment. While various fiscal measures were used to stimulate growth, the government held inflation to about 2;"o annually -considerably less than elsewhere in Western Europe. Emigration of workers - ~ mostly to West Germany -combined with a moderate expansion of industrial employment, kept unemployment low. 4. Because of the need for capital goods imports and foreign investment, the balance of payments is the major potential constraint on economic growth. Since 1966, however, this situation has been more a worry than a problem. Foreign reserves reached a record $525 million in December 1971 despite a wic~.ening trade defi;;it. Although merchandise exports expanded appreciably, they could not keep pace with the 70% increase in imports. The accumulation of reserv~.~ was made possible by large gains in tourist earnings, shipping receipts, and remittances from Greeks working abroad, together with rising capital inflrws. Despite condemnation by many observers abroad, the regime gradually won the confidence of foreign investors. 5. The outlook for continued rapid economic grow?h over the next few years is good. With public and private investment apt to expand rapidly, Greece should be able to sustain at least a 7% annual. growth rate. Although the trade deficit will likely continue to worsen, the prospects for ~Towth of seavice receipts are good, and Greece should. be able to attract cut 'icient medium-term and long-term capital to prevent erosion of its foreign exchange reserves. Background: The Pre-Coup Boom 6. In the early 1960s, Greece made major economic strides despite initially low investment and increasing political turmoil. With its gross national product (GNP) increasing ar. average of 7.7% annually in 1961-66, Greece was second only to Spain among West European countries. Although private investmr;nt declined moderately in 1961-63 in reaction to excess capacity and declining US economic aid, growth generally held up well. Moreover, 1964 saw the start of an investment boom characterized by growing private outlays i'or housing, tourist facilities, manufacturing plants, and ships, as well as heavy public spending oi~ infrastructure, especially transportation and power prej~cts. As a result, the share of gross fixed Approved For Release(~?$ilD~ll1~~,~,5T00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONFIDENTIAL investment rose from 19% of GNP ir- 1955-GO to 22% in 1961-66. Public programs, financed with little inflationary effect, provided much of the growth impetus, but private outlays continued to make up nearly three-fourths of total investment. ?. The balance of payments remained precarious during 1961-66 but did not require special controls. Imports jumped from $723 million to $1,153 mi;li:,n, and -although good gains were made in sales of minerals and simple manufactures such as te:Ktiles, metal products, cement, and chemicals -merchandise exports equaled only 35% of imports n 1966, compared with an already low 40% in 1960. The growth in workers' remittances during the six-year period, from $90 million to $238 million, greatly helped in closing the gap. Tourism also was a bright spot: net earnings more than tripled, reaching $103 million in 1966. Even these revenues and a large gain in shipping receipts did not forestall increased current account deficits, however. Growing capital inflows, mainly long-term private capital and suppliers' credits, thus were important factory enabling Greece to avoid payments difficulties. 8. Although economic growth rates remained high, they slipped in 1965-66 because of political tensions and gover:~ment efforts to ease demand pressures. During this period, four governments fell, and strikes and riots occurred almost daily. A..ttempting to divert some investment funds from housing into more productive sectors, the government in 1966 imposed a tax on real estate transactions. It also tightened monetary policy to combat rising prices. These events combined to reduce annual investment growth to about 15%, down from about 25% at the boom's 1964 peak. The Junta's Economic Policies 9. The junta's economic policies have been essentially conservative, resembling those followed by Brazil's military regime. It thin contrasts with the nationalism, populism, and revolutionary reforms that some military coups elsewhere have brought forth. T'he government has guided and supported the country's economic advance but has nc ~ resorted to nationalization or direct involvement in production and distribution. It clearly sees the private sector as playing the main role. Moreover, the regime has strongly encouraged foreign private investment, writing into the 1968 constitution guarantees against nationalization and against blocking capital remittances. ~:reece's new leaders seem to have a genuine interest in improving the people's material welfare. So far, at least, they have pursued this goal no: through income redistribution but by fostEring economic growth. Approved For Release 2006/~~ICIt'1~~~75R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONFIDENTIAL 10. The military's commitment to economic development was indicated most explicitly in the 1968-72 five-year plan, which included real per capita income increases averaging 7.5% annually. Investment was to increase 10% annually, with the public share rising from 29% in 1962-66 to 33% in 1968-72.. In public investment, the junta has stressed expansion of educational, health, transport, a;~d communications facilities throughout the countr~~. In addition, it has worked out schemes for building up manufacturing, tourism, and certain lines of agriculture -particularly those advantageous to the balance of payments. The government obviously also hopes that long-term economic progress will be furthered .by various financirl incentive programs, by its plans to provide more technical education, and by r~:orms designed to make the civil service more expert and responsive to direction. Initial Tasks 11. The junta's immediate economic priority upon taking power was to reverse the slowdown that had begun in 1965. This action could not be accomplished without restoring business confidence, which had been shaken by the earlier confused political situation and then by uncertainties about the officers' aims. The Revolutionary Council, as the coup leaders walled themselves, quickly tried to reassure domestic and foreign investors that private enterprise was secure and that no drastic reforms were contemplated. To help strengthen demand, the regime stepped up public spending, especially investment outlays. After stagnating in 1967, investment budget expenditures jumped by 29% in 1968. Private investment increased even more rapidly, as the spacial tax on real estate transactions was repealed and new incentives fir manufacturing investment were offered. Private demand also was buoyed by a 22% rise in the minimum wage. These stimuli made possible a 7% GNP growth in 1968, somewhat better than in 1967 but below earlier levels. A more impressive outcome was prevented by drought and other problems that reduced agricultural output. Return of High Growth Rates 12. The overall economic growth record for the junta's first five years is creditable. With average output gains of '7.5% (see Figure 1), Greece almost matched its earlier accomplishment and outdid all other West European countries. Population growth continued to be slow -only 0.5% annually. Henc,~ ~, per capita outnut rose almost as fast as total output - ab~ut 40% ove, the five-year period. Although private outlays dipped in 1970 because of a credit crunch on housing investment and normal fluctuation in shipping investment, fixed investment showed considerable strength, advancing to an average of 26.5% of GNP during 196%-71 (see Figure 2). Moreover, a greater share of investment comprised new Approved For Release'2~(t6'/~4Yt9'~~~1~Q~85T00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONrIDIJNTIAL Greece: Econc-mic Growth Under the Junta 1968=100 180 Greece: Trends in Gross Fixed Investment 1966=100 Private Investment 80 1966 67 68 69 70 Pubic Investment as a Percent of Total Investment 26.0 31.0 26.0 25.5 Total Investment as a Percent of GNP 71 Est. 25.0 22.5 26.5 29.5 27.0 26.5 51168 1077 r~~ `~ ~ 140 Public Investment 20 ' ~ Total Investment '~ r Approved For Release 2QO~~r1 ~~~CIA=RCTP$5'~00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 C~JNFIDEI~TTIAI, manufacturing capacity -much of it export-oriented -? while a smaller share was for luxury housing. 13. Led by new industries established in the early 1960s and expanded later in tite decade, marufa:,turing output grew about 10% annua.'~y during 1967-71. The *nost notable gains were in metals (up 108% since 1966), rubber and plastics (91%), and chemicals (68%). In contrast, output of food and beverages rose only about 30%, and tobacco manufactures declined. Mining expanded at about the same rate as manufacturing, paced by a ripe in ouigut of nickeliferous iron o*e from about 90,000 rietric tons in 1966 to 883,000 tons in 1970, reflecting expansion of the Larimna operation. 14. In agriculture, modest growth was accompanied by desirable chances in the composition of output and by wide-ranging institutional reforms. Farm output rose an average of 2.5% to 3% annually Ids Killion Current Drachmas Deficit as a Percent of Total Expenditures 13.9% 13.6% 13.6q? 14.0% 14.8q? Figure 3 0 w 67 68 Bg 70 71 1966 policy of encouraging industrial development and structural reform in agriculture; the regime selectively employed monetary policy to provide a substantial, although not excessive, rise in credit to private industrial and agricultural enterprises. At ?he same time, it restricted the growth of credit for trade and housing construction. After rising about 1 % annually in 1967-68, prices climbEd by 2.5% in 1969 ar-d 3?I? in 1970 and 1971. Although the inflation was low by West European standards, the government reacted by setting up a committee to review price increases, raising commercial bank reserve requirements, and directing the banking system to curb expansion of some types of credit. Foreign Trade Trcrds 19. Crucial to the econom,~'s continued rapid progress was the fact that several means of `~llrancir>fg- ir~tports were available and all developed fairly favorably. As a result of Greece's growing net receipts from services and large inflows of foreign capital, the rapid rise of imports -and the Approved For Release 2006~~:~1~85'1z00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONFIDENTIAL consequent swelling of tha trade deficit to $1.3 billion by 1971 -did not create balance-of=payments drain. The Indus*rial buildup and rising incomes had a marked impact on imports, causing them to grow an average of 11% yearly. In the forefront of this growth were capital goods imports, up 21% annually to $584 million. 20. The campaign to broaden the asso,?tment of exports yielded good results; overall export growth averaged 9% yearly in 1967-71. Greece did especially well in nearly quadrupling deliveries of manufactured goods, which rose from about one-eighth of total exports in 1966 to ogre-third in 1971, as shown in the following tabulation: 1966 1970 1971 Percent Change 1971 over 1966 Manufactured goods (including handicrafts) 54 224 209 28', Minerals 27 46 47 74 Food and beverages 133 175 137 41 Tobacco 120 102 95 -21 Other b9 66 87 25 Sales of metals (mainly aluminum, nickel, and steel) and metal products averaged $101 million in 1970-71, almost half of all manufactured goods exports. Also growing especially rapidly, albeit from a small base, were exports of chemicals and pharmaceutical products, footwear and other leather goods, and handicrafts such as pottery and ornamental earthenware. Moreover, mineral exports rose considerably even though an increasing share of the bauxite and nickeliferous iron ore mined was processed domestically and exported as metal. Deliveries of dead-burnt magnesite boomed and accounted for nearly half of mineral exports by 1971. In the aggregate, sales of food and beverages also showed moderate gains. Large increases in sales of citrus fruit, vegetable and fruit preserves, and wine were partly offset by declines in exports of raisins and stagnation in exports of curanta, olives, and olive oil. The most seriu~.~s decline among agricultural exports, however, occurred with respect to oriental tobacco, still the largest single commodity among Greece's exports. This decline is due largely to a shift in world demand from oriental tobacco to ether varieties. Approved For Release 2006/~~.~~~75R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 CONFIDENTIAL :? 1. With the progressive liberalization of tariff and other restrictions under Athens' associate membership agreement, the European Community (EC) has become an increasingly important customer. The EEC's share of Greek exports increased from 36% in 1966 ~o about 46% in 1970. It has risen to around three-quarters for some textile and chemical products, which have enter~~ duty free since 1968. The EC countries also account for very sizable shares of many Grc.?k agricultural exports such as raisins (allowed duty-free entry) and olive oil ~:nd wine (which receive tariff preferences). The share of exports going to the United States, still one of Greece's leading trade partners, has stagnated since 196E - :vainly because tobacco sales have plummeted while sales of most manufactured goods have increased only moderately. Importanc., of Service Receipts and Capital Inflows 72. Far. more important than exports iri supporting import growth during 1967-71 was the overall gain in receipts from services. As shown in Figure 4, workers abroad, tourism, and shipping have provided a large and increasing share of foreign exchange earnings. 114any Greeks continued to find jobs in labor-short West European nations, particularly West Germany. In 1970, for example, there wen:; approximately 250,000 Greek workers in West Germany alone. By 1971, workers' remittances reacP~ed $457 million, compared with $238 million five years earlier. Remittances grew r,~uch faster than the number of workers abroad, as the latter profited from West European wage inflation and .changing exchange rates. To capitalize on growing affluence in the United States and Western Europe, Athens fostered construction of tourist facilities and held down charges for lodging by exempting the business from certain taxes. These efforts - and Greece's historic and scenic interests -combined to attract 2.5 million foreign visitors in 1971, and net tourist receipts soared to $232 million, or more than twice the 1966 level. 23. One of the junta's goals was to repatriate Greek-owned vessels and thereby increase shipping receipts. Although Greek nationals owned numerous vessels, less than half were registered in Greece in 1966.. The government has persuac.ed many shipowners to register vessels in Greece and transfer their home offires to Athens or Piraeus by offering tax concessions and liberal loans for purchasing ships, improving facilities for worldwide communications, expanding maritime banking and insurance services, and opening additional seamen's training schools. Since 1966, the number of ships operating under the Greek flag has increased by about three-fourths -largely because of transfe*s from other countries -and net transportation receipts have risen from $150 million to $284 million. Approved For Release 2~A/~~~~~iA0875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 20~~/1~~~I~i-~~RY8~Tj00875R001700040027-7 Greece: Net Foreign Exchange Receipts from Services Mglion US $ 1000 900 -100 1966 67 68 69 70 24. Greece has continued to need sizable capital inflows to help cover its import bill, but these requirements have neither grown as fast as imports nor depended significantly on official aid. Receipts of private capital - mostly long-term or medium-term -rose from $173 million to $306 million during the period and largely covered the current account deficits (see the table). Although considerable reliance was placed on su;lvliers' credits (including some with short maturities), the junta neither initiated this practice nor carried it to extremes, as some of its critics have charged. Other long-term private capital inflows fell sharply in 1966 because several large foreign investment projects had been completed and few new ones were being initiated. Private capital inflow continued to stagnate for a time after the military takeover, but in the past two years it has surpassed the Net Receipts ~^ Workers' Remittances eceipts from Transportation (Mainly Shipping) ~'~lieceipts from Tourism Other Approved For Release 20'6b`/0~41~19`~?~~~00875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 200~A~~~~?$~~ap875R001700040027-7 Greece: Summary I4alance of Payments a. Including public power corporation. 1965 peak. In cemtrast to the large, capital-intensive projects undertaken in the first half of the 1960s (for example, the Esso-Pappas oil refinery and petrochemical complex and the Pechiney aluminum plant), foreign investors recently have shown the greatest interest in relatively small projects, often with an export or tourist orientation. Benefits for Consumers 25. Whatever they may think about the political situation, most Greek consumers can scarcely ccmplain about the economy's progress. Workers' real wages increased between 4% and 7% each year in 1967-71. The diet has imp*oved, as evidenced by sizable '.ncreases in both production and imports of meat since 1966. Retail sales volume was up 65%, and the number of passenger cars more than doubled during the five years. 12 Approved For Release 20QQ6/04/19 :CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040.027-7 C:ONFIDENTT A T Approved For Release 2006 0 /19:CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040027-7 - NFIDENTIAL Prospects for the Next Several Yea*s 2fi. Prospects for further rapid economic growth during the next several years are good. The recently announced development plan for 1973-87 sets a target ~f annual GNP gains averaging about 7%. If current economic policies and high levels of fixed investment are maintained and if - as seems like:y - abalance-of-payments crunch is avoided, Greece should be able to approximate the 7% goal for the next several years, at least. Greece probably will conti:rue to have a military-backed government for some years, even though one conli~ion that the junta set for a return to parliamentary rule - a per capita income level of $1,100 -has now been attained. There is little reason to suppose that the Papadopoulos regime, or any successor acceptable to the military, will change basically the economic policies that obviously have been working well. 27. To avoid abalance-of-payments crunch, Greece almost certainly will have to achieve large i:~creases in industrial exports and tourist earnings, together with sizable gains in other current account receipts and capital inflows. Only in this way will it be able to finance import expansion, which Athens tentativelyestimates at about 12% annually fora 7% growth of GNP. Prospects for boosting exports of manufactures -particularly textiles, metals, chemicals, simple electrical appliances, footwear, and handicrafts - are fairly bright. These products are of demonstrated competitiveness and have been sold in rapidly growing amounts, particularly in the EC, in recent years. In addition, ~,frica and the IVliddle East have been developing as a market for these products. Capacity to make them has been increasing steadily and can be expected to expand further. Thus, the possibility is good that exports of ma:~ufactured and Handicraft goods will grow by 30% to 40% annually for seve~?al ycars. Althougr: r;etais are subject periodically to weak demand or excessive supply in the world market, Greece is counting heavily on its metallurgical industry to boost export earnings and should nave at least some success. Increases in metal processing and manufacturing capacity should begin providing additional output beginning in 1973. 28. Growth prospects for agricultural exports -which still make up half of total exports -are only fair, and even moderate gains depend on further changes in the composition of output. Although the demand for oriental tobacco is poor, demand for fruits and vegetables is strong - especially in EC countries. Greece is subsidizing production of these commodities and }ras had considerable success marketing them in recent years. Cotton has also become an important agricultural export (second largest in 1971), and Greece is experimenting with long-staple Egyptian cotton, which is in great demand worldwide. Approved For Release 2~9I~FIB?~~p0875R001700040027-7 Approved For Release 2~f(N~~~~~Q-,F~,Q,~$~.T00875R001700040027-7 29. 'i he outlook for earnings from services seems favorable. In particular, tourisi receipts are expected to increase rapidly over tlt~ next several years. Greece i-as the location and attractions to cash in on the travel boom associated with growing affluence. Moreover, its pri~P1 ~*;; expected to remain low compared with those of most other South European countries. Although the West European demand for foreign labor probably will decline toward the end of the 1970s, some increase is expected ever the next few years. Tlris demand, combined with an available s:tpply of Greek labor and rising wage rates abroad, should tend to boost workers' remittances. Earnings from shipping activities are likely to be more volatile and. will probably grow less rapidly than workers' remittances or tourist receipts. 30. If exports and other current account receipts grow by 10% or so during the nex: few years (about the same rate as in 1967-71), Greece will still need to attract some $300 million to $500 million in medium-term and long-term capital to Y.eep its external payments :lpt~roximately in balance. With about $1.5 billion of foreigr, obligations -mostly short-term or medium-term maturity loans obt^ined on commercial terms -falling due within the next five years, the presently modest (13%) ratio of debt service to exports and service earnings will rise. Greece, however, is meeting with considerable success in obtaining new, longer term financing. Following a lengthy hiatus after the coup, the military government recently has been able to obtain sizable long-term loans -some on concessionary terms - from the international Bank for Reconstruction and Development, an international bank consortium, and a Japanese bank consortium. In addition, seven-year ~::: longer suppliers' credits are now a~~ailable to Greek purchasers as opposed to the three-year to five-year credits offered prior to 1 ?71. 31. If Greek foreign exchange earnings do not develop as favorably as expected, the growth of output probably will slacken. Athens' foreign reserves are sufficient to compensate partly for some widening of the payments gap. Moreover, import restrictions, if necessary, could be focused on the large flow of consumer goods, obviating restrictions on capital goods and industrial inputs. Even with such measures, however, the government probably could not head off a slowdo~.vn in growth, because balance-of-payments strains would dampen private investors' confidence. Approved For Release~sly+41~1~9't~~oT00875R001:700040027-7