OUTLOOK FOR THE 1972 SOVIET GRAIN HARVEST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
19
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 28, 2006
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 1, 1972
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9.pdf761.5 KB
Body: 
Apprad/ 4 e 20QK/0'4/19: CIA-Rd =Ya8 F(001700040007-9 Confidential DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum Outlook for the 1972 Soviet Grain Harvest Odemiai C on ER im 72-124 DOCUMENT SERVICES BRANCH 19 2 7 August FILE COPS Copy No. 10 8 CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 DO?NUT iJESTROY9: 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence August 1972 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM OUTLOOK FOR THE 1972 SOVIET GRAIN HARVEST Introduction 1. This memorandum summarizes the development of the 1972 Soviet grain crop and offers a preliminary estimate of its size. The implications of the harvest for the livestock program and Soviet imports of grain are then explored. 2. Because of a combination of winterkill and drought, the preliminary estimate of 1972 Soviet grain prospects is for a decline in. the crop to about 135 million metric tons of usable grain, 13 million tons less than the 1971 harvest. To stave off the consequences of this shortfall, the USSR has already bought more than 20 million tons of grain from the West for delivery in fiscal year (FY) 1973, up 12 million tons over imports of the previous year. 3. Following the loss of one-third of its winter grain crop to a January cold /ave, the USSR mounted a successful drive to replant spring grains on the areas of winterkill and to extend the total area sown to grains. Hopes of at least maintaining the harvest at the 1971 level of 148 minion tons, however, were destroyed by insufficient soil moisture in some of the major grain regions at the beginning and during the early part of the growing season. High temperatures and untimely and heavy rains during the harvest of early maturing grains contributed to a sharp decline in production in the Ukraine; North Caucasus, and the Volga Basin. Note: This memorandum was prepared by the Office of Economic Research. Approved For Release 2006/0MrML5R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 200 (?1f4 .. fiV_ MP,L875R001700040007-9 4. Even with the importation of 20 million tons of grain the Soviet Union will be hard pressed to meet domestic needs and, at the same time, to continue supplying its client states at the average level of recent years. The surge in the use of grain as livestock feed in the campaign to alleviate domestic meat shortages is expected to continue. Finally, because of drawdown of wheat stocks for use as feed, carryover stocks of wheat suitable for consumption as food are believed to be at a minimum. Background S. The USSR harvested 150 million tons of usable grain in 1970 and 14f; -11Non tons in 1971.(1) Although these were the two best crops in Soviet history, they were not enough to support the livestock program which has been so insistently advanced by Party Chairman Brezhnev and other Soviet leaders. To fill the gap between domestic production and total requirements for food, livestock feed, and exports to client states, the Soviet Union has been purchasing large quantities of grain over the past fiscal year. The USSR had apparently decided to seek additional supplies of grain from the West on a long-term basis before a combination of severe cold and sparse snow cover threatened the 1972 winter grain crop. By February of this year the Soviet Union had arranged to buy 3.5 million tons of grain from Canada for delivery in FY 1973. The commitment in May to purchase $20G million of grain - about 3.5 million tons - from the United States in.FY 1973 as part of the recently concluded 3-year grain sale seemed to reflect a decision to ensure an adequate supply of livestock feed until the USSR could boost its own grain output decisively. 6. In July and early August, however, after Soviet officials were in a better position to appraise the 1972 grain crop, the USSR negotiated further purchases of unprecedented quantities of grain from US companies. These new contracts. taken together with additional orders for Canadian and French grain, place total purchases for FY 1973 at more than 20 million tons (compared with 8 million tons in FY 1972) and will require hard currency outlays - cash and credits - of more than $1.2 billion (compared with $500 million in FY 1972). The Soviet decision to import grain in this volume, reflects a serious shortfall in bread grain production in 1972 and a continuation of the strong upward trend in the use of grain as livestock feed, coupled with t minimum level of carryover stocks of grain from previous harvests. 1. For a definition of usable grain, see Table 2. (~ N j~EN^1~IA Approved For Release 2006109;9'TlA-RDP85T0 75 R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 CONFIDENTIAL The Area Sown to Grains 7. In the fall of 1971, about 35 million hectares of winter grains were sown, some 4.5 million hectares less than the average in the preceding five years. These fall-sown grains - mostly winter wheat and rye - usually supply more than 30% of all production. As the winter progressed, evidence accumulated that the winter grains had suffered extensive winterkill. The USSR's mid-year plan fulfillment report pinpoints the loss at nearly one-third of the area planted in the fall, or 8 million hectares more than last year's loss (see Figure 1). A good deal of the remaining winter grain area, moreover, was substandard in terms of expected yields. To compensate for the damage incurred by the winter grains, the USSR. seeded 11.3 million hectarez more in spring grains than in 1971 (see Table 1) which, when combined with losses of fall-sown crops, provided a net gain of 3.3 million hectares in total grain acreage over 1971. Even with this expansion in total acreage, however, the Soviet leadership knew that to prevent a drop in grain production in 1972, yields in the spring grain areas would have to be better than in 1970 or 1971, two of the best years on record. Given average yields for spring and winter grains, it requires an increase of 1.5 hectares sown to spring grains to overcome the loss in production from I hectare of winter grains. 8. In order to compensate in part for these differences in yields between winter and spring grains, Soviet planners changed the composition of spring sowings. Instead of attempting to increase the spring wheat area to offset the losses of winter bread grains (wheat and rye), the USSR planted more feed grains (barley, oats, and corn) which have higher yields than spring wheat. The Soviet strategy in overcoming the losses of last winter compared with the reactions to the comparable winterkill in 1969 indicates how agricultural priorities have changed. In 1969 the spring wheat was increased by about 4 million hectares; this year the increase was less than a million hectares. The Soviet Union probably chose to emphasize the higher yielding - but lower value - feed grains this year because the demands of the livestock program for ever-increasing supplies of grain could not be deferred for the sake of preventing a fall in the production of bread grains. Crop-Development Through Early July(2) 9. In the European USSR, unusually warm weather accelerated the spring sowing schedule by about two weeks, while in the important spring grain areas of West Siberia and Kazakhstan (the "New Lands") seeding was delayed somewhat but not past the usual planting period. The growing 2. The progress of the grain crop is described in greater detail in the Appendix. Approved For Release 2006/ 1Vj__-M 'jQkV,5R001700040007-9 3 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Table 1 USSR: Comparison of Potential Grain Harvest Areas a/ Million Hectares Winter Grains Spring Grains All Grains Of Which: Total Total RVe Total Wheat Corn Barley Oats _ 1971 119.0 31.6 20.7 9.5 87.4 43.9 3.3 20.5 9.7 1972 122.3 23.6 14.7 8.1 98.7 44.8- 5.1 25.1 12.2 Net change 3.3 -8.0 -6.0 -1.4 11.3 0.9 1.8 4.6 2.5 a. Because the estimated area is given as of 1 July, it is net of winterkill in the winter grain areas. The mid-year reports usually show a slightly larger sown area than do the final statistical repo:-ts because about 1% to 2% of the standing crop at mid-year is not harvested in late summer and early fall. Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 History of Winterk@Il in the Soviet Union Million hoctaros 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 "Sown in the preceding fall for harvest in the given year. "Also includes a fe.v million hectares of fall sown grains used as green Area of Winter Grain Lost to Winterkill % ?6 1955 8 1963 3.956 21 1964 .1957 8 1965 1958 6 1966 1959 8 1967 1961 8 1989 1962 8 1970 25 16 17 17 18 35 .20 Averaae 1955-60 12 Average 1961-65 15 Average 1966-70 22 1971 13 1972 Figure 1 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 CONFIDENTIAL season began badly from another standpoint, however. Much of the European USSR had below-normal supplies of soil moisture. In Kazakhstan and Siberia, soil moisture reserves were about the same as in the good crop years of 1970 and 1971. 10. Weather conditions have foreclosed the prospects for average or above-average grain yields in the major grain regions in the Ukraine, the North Caucasus, and along the Volga. Rainfall has been below normal in many regions and less than the average of 1970-71 in almost all of the USSR's grain districts (see Figure 2). The shortfall was greatest in the winter grain areas of the Ukraine and in the spring grain belt extending from the west bank of the "olga through the western part of Kazakhstan. In the eastern and southern regions of the Ukraine, the Lower and Middle Volga, and the Northeast, Caucasus, soil moisture levels at the end of June were below or close to the lowest levels reached during the past decade. Meanwhile, highcr-than-normal temperatures were speeding the development of the grain crop, particularly in the Ukraine and North Caucasus. In some of these areas, extreme temperatures combined with a lack of rain prevented the normal development of the grain kernels. 11. When harvesting began in early July, the USSR had to deal with some special problems which threatened to reduce the crop. The warm weather advanced the maturation of some of the spring grains - particularly barley - to the extent that it ripened at the same time !As the winter grains in many regions. The difficulties presented by the expansion of the usual harvest area were compounded by the effects of a rash of heavy rains which flattened and tangled the grain, making it hard to cut and increasing the likelihood of larger than usual harvest losses. Preliminary Estimate of the 1972 Grain Harvest 12. The 1972 grain crop can be projected on the basis of the sown area and the analysis of the development of the crop since March. The projection is stated in terms of usable grain: the differences between the official Soviet measure of gross production and usable grain are shown in Table 2. The estimate, of course, is preliminary since the final outcome of the spring grain harvest will depend partly on the weather in August and September. 13. Soviet winter grains production is tentatively estimated at 28 million tons, or 24 million tons less than the 1971 crop and 13 million tons less than the 1966-70 average (see Table 3). On the basis of the rainfall and temperature so far, yields of spri!ig grains should be down appreciably in the Volga and Urals regions and off somewhat from last year's mark Approved For Release 2006/t4(3ffflyfffi(geL75R001700040007-9 5 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 CONFIDENTIAL Table 2 Grain Production in the USSR a/ Million Metric Tons Official Claims of Estimate of / Gross Production Net Production b AVERAGE, 1956-60 121 105 1961 131 110 1962 140 109 1963 108 92 1964 152 120 1965 121 100 AVERAGE, 1961-65 130 ' 106 1966 171 140 1967 148 122 1968 170 135 1969 162 128 1970 187 150 AVERAGE, 1966-70 168 135 1971 181 148 1972 (plan) 190 (forecast) 132-137 a. Inclu ing pulses. b. Estimate of usable grain. Tlet usable grain is estimated as the officially claimed gross output minus excess moisture, unripe and damaged kernels, weed seeds and other extraneous materials, post-harvest losses incurred in loading and unloading grain, between the grain harvesting combine and storage facilities, and suspected biases in the official reporting of grain production. pproved For Release 200GQMF b875R001700040007-9 Approved For Release 2006/04/19 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001700040007-9 Figure 2 Precipitation in Major Grain Growing Regions in May-June 1972 as Percent of Average May-June Precipitation in 1970-71* Odessa r)J\i NORTH . Krasnodar >95% -- Economic Region Boundary Q