ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF ISRAELI MILITARY EXPENDITURES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
23
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 20, 2011
Sequence Number: 
33
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 1, 1970
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2.pdf1000.69 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 0119JWP-I,T~m 90-33 Sellet ''j)', 25X1 DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum Economic Consequences Of Israeli Military Expenditures WOUBUL ER IM 70-33 March 1970 Copy No. 33 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States, within the meaning of Title 18, sections 793 and 794, of the US Code, as amended. Its transmission or revelation of its contents to or re- ceipt by an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. GROUP t C,Qluded Iron. outnn.oI C t downprndinry and _._d.dnuifcolion _ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence March 1970 Economic Consequences Of Israeli Military Expenditures Introduction Since the June 1967 war, Israel has greatly increased its foreign exchange expenditures for military purposes while sustaining very rapid growth of the.economy and of civilian im?,orts. The war also induced a large increase in foreign remittances. In 1967 these more than covered the added foreign exchange spending, and foreign ex- change reserves rose greatly. In 1968 and 1969, however, remittances declined, and Israel had to draw down its foreign exchange reserves to about $400 million. Israel is now projecting a continued high level of military imports during 1970-74. This memorandum examines the economic impact of high foreign military expenditures during recent years and considers Israel's capability to finance its projected military expenditures. Note: This memorandum was produced solely by CIA. It was prepared by the Office of Economic Research and was coordinated with the Office of Strategic Research and the Office of Current Intelligence. SECRET ? 1 -1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET The Pattern of Growth, 1950-65 1. Israel has a highly developed and dynamic economy. The economy is industrialized. diversi- fied, technically advanced, and institutionally sophisticated. It continues to rely heavily on foreign resources to finance investment, however, which, together with immigration, helped to generate an 11% average annual growth of real gross national product (GNP) between 1950 and 1965. 2. Israel has grown rapidly despite a severe paucity of natural resources, in large measure through the efficient use of immigrant labor, many of whom were already skilled. Net immigration, which amounted to 165,000 in 1951 and then averaged 33,900 annually during 1952-65, accounted for 45% of the increase in total population of about 4.8% annually and probably for about one-half of the 5% annual increase in employment. 3. Efficient utilization of immig:?ant labor has required substantial capital investment. Capital stock in real terms increased about 13% a year during 1951-65, and the share of net invest- ment in GNP varied from 18% to 29%. The average annual net inflow of foreign resources (as measured by the deficits on transactions in goods and services) was equivalent to about 77% of net invest- ment during 1951-65, and this ratio, although fluctuating from year to year, has not changed significantly since the early 1950s. About 70% of the net capital inflow consisted of private gifts, primarily from world Jewry and official government compensation payments from Germany.* Other sources of foreign funds have included official foreign aid from the United States, sales of Israeli Development Bonds, and a small volume of direct private investment in Israel. The 1966-67 Recession 4. Israel's economy suffered a major reverse in 1966 when real GNP growth plummeted to 1%. * As these inflows are not repaid, they are desig- nated in balance-of-payments statistics as "uni- lateral transfers. " - 3 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 ^ SECRET Per capita GNP actually declined by 2%, aid private investment, with the exception of some export in- dustries, fell sharply. Although recovery began in the second half of 1967, GNP rose by only 2% for the entire year. This recession can be attrib- uted largely to deflationary government actions and to a sharp decline in construction caused pri- marily by an unexpected fall in immigration.* Government measures were designed to ease balance- of-payments pressure through a combination of reducing economic growth slightly to '7%-8% annually -- from 10%-11% -- and of accelerating export growth. The impact of the deflationary policy on the economy was far greater than anticipated, and the trade deficit declined markedly. Because of a drop in gifts and other remittances and capital inflows, however, the balance of payments did not improve (see Table 1). 5. Faced with large-scale unemployment, dis- content over economic conditions in general, and the proximity of national elections, the government reversed its policy in the first half of 1967 and attempted to reflate the economy. But, although money became more plentiful and interest rates were lowered, consumer spending remained sluggish, and cautious businessmen were not investing. Unemployment leveled off by June 1967 but remained high at about 80,000, or 9% of the labor force. The Post War Period 6. Except for a period of three to four weeks of extensive mobilization, when unemployment was reduced sharply, exports dwindled, and imports declined, the Arab-Israeli war had little direct impact on the Israeli economy. With the return of most of the reserves to civilian life, the economy returned to normal. A tax increase and a domestic bond issue, designed in part to finance a prolonged war, proved unnecessary, and the increase in taxes was rescinded shortly after the war. * Net immigration, which averaged about 44,000 annuaZZy during 1961-65, declined to about 23,000 in 1965 and then dropped and about 5,000 in 1967. to about 7,000 in 1966 SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Israeli Balance of Payments a/ 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 b/ Current account -446 -467 -448 -573 -520 -445 -532 -706 -889 Imports of goods and services -844 -938 -1,025 -1,192 -1,231 -1,277 -1,440 -1 842 -2 140 Exports of goods and services 398 472 577 619 711 832 908 , 1,136 , 1,251 C/1 Long-term and medium-term Ul 540 499 615 557 476 824 676 672 & M C17 ~ Unilateral transfers 346 331 346 335 327 292 521 425 455 0-] Repayable capital 187 209 153 280 230 184 303 251 217 Short-term capital and reserves -87 -73 -51 -42 -37 -31 -293 30 217 Gold and foreign exchange reserves c/ Non-monetary short-term -88 -21 -96 35 -201 98 304 d/ capital movements Errors and omissions 10 -3 -3 40 33 4 -48 27 40 19 -39 -27 -77 -15 -25 43 -87 a. Because of rounding, components may not add to the totals shown. b. Based on nine month data. c. Reflects changes in net holdings of gold and foreign exchange within Israeli banking system. A minus sign denotes an increase. d. Assumes that non-monetary short-term capital movements and errors and omissions net out to zero. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET 7. The June 1967 war acted as a catalyst, however, in ending the two-year-old economic recession. The war induced a very large increase in foreign gifts, from $292 million in 1966 to $521 million in 1967. In addition, the net inflow of repayable capital increased from $184 million in 1966 to $303 million in 1967, primarily because of increased overseas sales of Israeli Development Bonds. These receipts from gifts and loans greatly improved the balance of payments and enabled the government to pursue vigorously expansionary poli- cies. Two supplementary budgets totaling $274 mil- lion* were adopted. The extra funds were earmarked for defense purchases, industry, tourism, and re- training workers. The reflation program was effec- tive; during the second half of 1967, compared with a year earlier, unemployment declined by 18% and GNP increased by nearly 11%. During 1968, however, imports increased about 41%, and the current account** deficit reached $532 million -- about 20% greater than in 1966. 8. Israel used the British devaluation of 18 November 1967 as an opportunity to devalue its own currency. The new Israeli exchange rate, which maintained the pre-November ratio between the British and Israeli pound, potentially made Israeli exports more attractive in most other countries. The government also expected that this action would make foreign as well as domestic investment in export industries more appealing. The main impact of the devaluation was deliberately limited to the export side; the government offset most of the effect on import prices by reducing tariffs and has since pursued a liberal import policy to help absorb the growth in aggregate demand as well as to support the growth of pro- duction. 9. The strong upward trend in economic activity continued into 1968. The decisive victory over the Arabs, the unexpected inflow of foreign capital, and a substantial increase in government expenditures all combined to restore * At the pre-November 1967 exchange rate of $1 to three Israeli pounds. ** The current account in the Israeli balance of payments excludes unilateral transfers because of their almost unique role in Israeli finance. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET Israeli investor confidence. As a result, gross capital formation in real terms increased nearly 44% in 1968, to near the 1965 (pre-recession) level. There were also substantial increases in private and public consumption. Because the recession had caused substantial unemployment of labor and plant capacity, the economy was able to respond to rising demand with extremely rapid growth of production. In real terms, GNP in 1968 increased by more than 13% and per capita GNP by nearly 10%. At the same time, employment rose almost 10% while the average unemployment rate fell from 9% of the civilian labor force in 1967 to about 6% in 1968. Despite a 14% increase in the money supply (26% if quasi money is included), the consumer price index rose only 2% because of large increases in produc- tion and imports. 10. The pace of economic expansion remained high through 1969 as GNP grew by 12% and investment by 26%, even though the government shifted to mildly restrictive monetary policies. Most of the remaining slack in the economy was taken up as unemployment fell to 4% of the labor force. Nevertheless, the price level increased by less than 4%, primarily because union-government wage stability agreements continued to be enforced.* 11. Exceptionally rapid economic growth since mid-1967 has increased imports substantially and pushed up the trade deficit. The 1967 devaluation apparently helped boost Israeli exports of goods and services, which increased by 25% in 1968 and an estimated 10% in 1969, but imports of goods and services (including military purchases -- see paragraphs 12 and 13) increased even more rapidly, by 28% in 1968 and by an estimated 16% in 1969. Civilian imports alone grew by more than one-half between 1967 and 1969 and the current account deficit, excluding military purchases, reached a new high. i4 Wage rates generally are controlled by agree- ments between the government and the Histadrut (the omnipresent labor union). The agreement in effect during 1967-69 provided that labor will not push for higher wages provided the government does not raise taxes. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET 12. Accompanying the rise in civilian imports was a massive increase in military imports during 1967-69. The Israeli balance-of-payments category "Government not elsewhere stated (n.e.c.)"* con- sists of direct government imports -- primarily military goods and services -- which increased from $159 million in 1966 to $324 million in 1967, $366 million in 1968, and an estimated $410 million for 1969 (see Table 2). During 1967-69, Israel spent more than $1.1 billion (an average of $370 mil- lion annually) for direct government imports compared with only $798 million ($133 million annually) during 1961-66. As a result of the combined growth of civilian and military imports, the total current account deficit increased from $445 million in 1966 to $532 million in 1967, $706 million in 1968, and an estimated $889 million in 1969. 13. Inflows of capital and unilateral transfers fell in 1968 and 1969 from their 1967 high as the impact of the war on private contributors wore off and were not sufficient to finance these deficits. Israel was forced to draw down net foreign exchange reserves by $98 million in 1968 (see Table 3) and by an estimated $304 million in 1969. In effect, the buildup of foreign exchange reserves between 1964 and 1967, which resulted from deflationary measures and war-induced capital inflows, was consumed during 1968 and 1969. By December 1969, reserves had fallen to less than $400 million, or the equivalent of only about two months' imports of goods and services. Problems for the Future 14. Israel's economic prospects for the 1970s are clouded ',y major military expenditures the government now expects to make during the early 1970s.** If these sums are actually spent, a * This category almost certainly includes all goods and services purchased on military account -- not only finished military equipment, but also components for military equipment and imported materials used in military industries. ** Analysis of Israeli military expenditures and evaluation of Israeli military requireme7;ts are beyond the scope of this memorandum. - 8 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET Israeli Balance-of-Payments Category "Government Not Elsewhere Stated" Annual Million US $ Million Annual Year US $ Period Total Average 1961 93 1954-69 2,280 14 1962 124 1954-60 372 5 1963 146 1961-66 798} 1,170 133 90 1964 129 1967-69 1,110 370 1965 147 1970-74 a/ 2,910 582 1966 159 1967 324 1968 366 1969 410 1970 c/ A 525 B 555 1971 d/ 575 1972 590 1973 d/ 615 1974 d/ 575 a. Based on the B estimate for 1970. b. Preliminary estimate. c. Israeli projection. A is the original estimate; while B is the most recent estimate. d. Israeli projection. - 9 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Israeli Foreign Exchange Reserves 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 Bank of Israel 279 419 515 545 643 621 715 663 382 Commercial Bank 85 71 69 76 84 101 120 162 N.A. Treasury deposits abroad 12 16 31 22 22 8 133 91 N.A. Gross reserves 376 506 615 643 749 730 968 916 N.A. Less deposits of foreign residents and foreign banks in Israel 80 100 121 128 138 154 191 237 N.A. Net reserves 296 406 494 515 611 576 777 679 375 Change from previous year 110 88 21 96 -35 201 -98 -304 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET sharp reduction in the growth of civilian imports or substantial foreign assistance will be needed to avoid a balance-of-payments crisis. For the next five years, 1970-74, direct government imports -- that is, mainly military imports -- are planned to average $582 million annually (see Table 4) compared with $370 million a year during 1967-69 and only $133 million a year during 1961-66. According to Israeli projections, the annual current account deficit would run about $1 billion a year through 1974. Such deficits would exceed anticipated capital and unilateral. inflows by amounts ranging from $105 million in 1970 to a high of $250 million in 1973 and totaling more than $900 million over the period 1970-74. Judging from current trends and the recently announced 1970-71 Israeli budget, which indicates continued expansionary economic policies and also revises earlier military spending plans upward, the balance-of-payments deficits in 1970 could considerably exceed $125 millic... 15. The Israeli projections probably understate the potential balance-of-payments problems if the projected military expenditures are in fact incurred. Their current account estimates appear reasonable, but those for capital and unilateral inflows appear optimistic. 16. The Israeli forecast for imports of goods and services appears to be based on an annual GNP growth rate of about 8%. Historical relationships between Israeli non-military imports and GNP growth indicate that an 8% annual expansion in GNP would require non-military imports of goods and services to grow more than 9% a year for a 1970-74 total of $11.3 billion.* The Israelis project virtually the same import total ($11.5 billion); however, the pattern of growth is somewhat different, the rate of import growth being higher in the early part than in the latter part of the period. 17. An 8% growth rate seems feasible, given adequate foreign exchange receipts. The average Gt'P growth rate since the early 1950s has been * Non-military imports refers to all imports of goods and services other than "Government n.e.s." See the Appendix for a description of the regres- sion analysis used. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Israeli Balance-of-Payments Projections 1970 2" 1971 1972 Current account -975 -1,105 -1,025 -1,050 Imports of goods and services -2,475 -2,455 -2,675 -2,875 Non-military imports -1,950 -1,900 -2,100 -2,285 Government n.e.s. -525 -555 -575 -590 Exports of goods and services 1,500 1,350 1,650 1,825 Long-term and medium-term capital Net unilateral transfers 520 595 525 515 Net repayable capital 330 405 3:,0 360 Overall deficit 1973 1974 -1,075 -1,025 -3,100 -3,275 -2,485 -2,700 -615 -575 2,025 2,250 825 800 510 490 315 310 -250 -225 197C-74 Y 1970-74 cI -5,150 14,400 -14,380 -11,520 -11,470 -2,880 -2,910 9,250 4,225 2,560 1,665 9,100 2,635 1,740 -925 a. The A estimate for 1970 was part of the five-year balance-of-payments projections nade by the Israeli in the fall of 1969 while the B estimate reflects those projections incorporated in the recently proposed budget for 1970-71. b. Using the A . i timate for 1970. c. Using the B estimate for 1970. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET about 10%. It is unlikely, however, that either the labor force or the stock of productive capital will increase as fast in the next five years as in the 1950s and the early 1960s. Immigration -- a major source of new labor -- has slowed, and, with military expenditures up sharply, investment probably will be a smaller share of GNP. In 1969 the share of investment in GNP was 25%; the 1955-65 average was nearly 31%. While the Israeli economy grew by 13% in 1968 and 12% in 1969, a substantial part of this growth was derived from utilization of unemployed resources. Israeli officials claim that 8% is an optimum growth rate under present conditions, representing a compromise between the goals of high employment, a rising standard of living, limited deficits in the balance of payments, and a low rate of inflation. A somewhat higher growth rate possibly could be attained, but probably at the cost of a significant amount of inflation and a larger balance-of-payments deficit. 18. Israel's growing potential trade gap is not likely to be reduced much by unexpectedly large increases in exports. The Israeli expectation that exports will grow about 11% a year seems realistic. Although exports of citrus fruit and diamonds, about half of total exports, probably will increase relatively slowly, rapidly rising exports of a host of small manufactured items probably will bring the average up. Growth in the value of citrus fruit exports (15% of total commodity exports) probably will not exceed 8% a year despite larger gains in volume because of anticipated price r declines in the European market.* Diamond exports (one-third of total commodity exports) may grow by as much as 10% a year, well below the 17% obtained during most of the 1960s. The reason for the ex- pected decline is that Israel, which in the past was able to increase substantially its share of the world market for medium-sized diamonds, has now Israel has concluded an ag?eement on preferen- tial tariffs with the European Common Market, beginning in 1971, that will reduce tariffs on imp,,.rts from Israel, which totaled $86 mi Z Zi:'n in 1968, including $28 million of industrial products. Europeans tariffs on Israeli citrus products will be reduced by 40%. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 eclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET captured most of this market and that penetration of markets for larger gems probably will be diffi- cult because the polishing of larger gems requires substantially different equipment and techniques than those available in Israel. 19. The projected 11% annual growth of exports clearly assumes profitable conditions for Israeli exporters. This means continuation of the wide variety of export promotion schemes already in being and would require devaluation if domestic inflation becomes excessive. Once domestic profit- ability is assured, however, the volume of export is little affected by price changes. Export prices of polished diamonds, about one-third of the value of commodity exports, are fixed in dollars by an international cartel. Moreover, the demand for other major Israeli exports, citrus fruits and textiles, probably is not highly responsive to price changes. Israel has concentrated on specialty textiles and clothing, the export of which depends more on highly skilled handiwork and fine design than on price. Israel also has a substantial but small export market in custom manufactures where a willingness to fill small orders to specification is critical. The expansion of such markets probably depends upon changes in demand for specialty items rather than on price. Even if exports expanded more rapidly than is currently anticipated, however, such expansion would provide only partial balance- of-payments relief because a dollar of exports on the average requires half a dollar of imported inputs. 20. Israeli estimates of receipts from unilateral transfers during 1970-74 seem less realistic than those of imports and exports. These receipts are projected at a level near the $521 million attained in 1967. But the 1967 level reflects the strong response of world Jewry to the war emergency and was well above both the annual average of $337 mil- lion during 1961-65 and the $425 million to $455 mil- lion obtained in 1968 and in 1969. To increase these transfers during 1970-74, the Israelis apparently are relying on world Jewry's ability and willingness to contribute more. In view of the evident Israeli military superiority in the Middle East, tight money conditions in the United States and Western Europe, SECRET )eclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET and the slowdown in US economic activity, however, it seems questionable that the projected contribu- tions will be forthcoming. 21. Israeli estimates of repayable capital inflows also seem optimistic. While such inflows rose substantially in 1967, to $303 million, they declined sharply in 1968 and 1969. The fall stemmed largely from a decline in the sales of Israeli government bonds, which earn far below market interest rates, and, like outright gifts, depend largely on the psychological impact of the Arab threat toward Israel. On the other hand, net direct foreign investment in Israel, which reflects almost entirely economic motivations, fell from $71 million in 1966 to $11 million in 1967 and to $8 million in 1968. Such investment is unlikely to increase substantially until the current political and military unrest in the Middle East is reduced. Conversely, however, relative peace almost certainly would reduce bond sales substan- tially. 22. Thus if Israel maintains a high rate of economic growth and fulfills its planned military imports, its balance-of-payments gap probably will be greater than projected. For 1970, moreover, Israel has raised its military import plan from $525 million to $555 million and raised the projec- tion of the current account deficit by an even greater amount (from $975 million to $1.1 billion) because of expected shortfalls in exports. To finance this increased deficit the Israelis hope to further increase their receipts from gifts and bond sales and slightly draw down their reserves (see Table 4). Policy Options 23. Israel would like to fill the incipient balance-of-payments gap by means of official credits from the United States. If it is unable to do this it has the following options: - 15 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET (a) Reduce military imports from planned levels; (b) Let foreign exchange reserves run down and tap available sources of short-term banking and commercial credit; (c) Hold down civilian imports by slowing the growth of the economy and by other means (austerity). Which of these options might be used, for how long, and in what combination, depends on many things, including development of the military situation, the extent of US military sales, Soviet military support to the Arabs, and the growth of Israel's own military industries. 24. If military imports could be cut substan- tially the balance-of-payments problem would disappear. For example, if annual government n.e.s. expenditures were limited to the high 1967 level of $324 million, with other balance-of-payments projections being unchanged, then Israel would have a cumulative balance-of-payments surplus of $335 million during 1970-74 instead of a deficit of $925 million. Too little is known about the com- position of planned military imports to permit a firm judgment as to how easily they could be cut. 25. It is clear that Israel cannot rely on a drawdown of reserves and on short-term banking credits to finance large deficits over several years -- the reserves are too small and the credits too expensive. This approach could be used, how- ever, to cover deficits that were expected to be temporary, even for a year or perhaps two. There is no doubt that Israel could obtain substantial bank credit and its reserves are still in excess of $350 million while prospective balance-of-payments deficits are of the order of $200 million a year. In any event, these funds provide ample flexibility in establishing viable long-term economic and mili- tary strategies. 26. Israel has a variety of policy tools that could be used to hold down non-military imports, - 16 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SE(: RIB,' l but could not prevent a reduction in the rate of economic growth because of the economy's heavy dependence on imported raw materials and capital goods. Nearly every commodity and service produced in Israel is dependent upon imports to some degree. In 1968, imports of goods and services amounted to about 45% of GNP. 27. The loss in aggregate economic growth involved if non-military imports were held down could be minimized through use of quotas and tariffs. Imports of finished consumer goods in 1968 exceeded $110 million, or nearly equivalent to the 1970 balance-of-payments deficit projected by the Israelis. Nearly all of these commodities could be eliminated by quotas or prohibit.i.vely high tariffs without directly affecting the economy's productive capacity. Use of these policy tools, however, will be avoided if at all possible because Israel recognizes that they lead to an inefficient allocation of resources and would thus hinder the export orientation that Israel must achieve to become self-sustaining in the long run. During the past decade, Israel has been actively liberalizing its foreign trade. Nearly all quantitative restric- tions have been eliminated and tariffs have been reduced substantially. 28. If the wage-stability agreements should break down, devaluation will become necessary. As indicated earlier,* it would have little effect on the volume of exports. Moreover, because Israeli labor and plant capacity are nearly fully employed, domestic production would not be able to respond readily to the increased demand for domestic goods that woulu result from the higher prices of competing imported goods. Thus, to dampen inflation and strengthen the beneficial. effects of devaluation on the balance of payments, devaluation would have to be accompanied by deflationary fiscal and monetary policies designed to reduce total domestic demand. 29. The potential decline in economic growth that might be associated with curtailment of civilian imports in 1970-74 was calculated on the basis of historical relationships between imports and GNP. On this basis, each 1% cut in the GNP growth rate would save some $60 million to $70 million a year 4 See paragraph 19. - 17 - SEC`,RE'I Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET on the average in civilian imports during 1970-74, or a total of $300 million to $350 million over the period. The cumulative payments deficit would be reduced from some $1.8 billion for an 8% growth in GNP to perhaps $1 billion with a 6% rate, assuming exports are unaffected. To eliminate foreign exchange deficits entirely, the growth of Israeli GNP would have to be lowered to less than 4% a year (see Table 5 for projected current account deficit). Calculated Israeli Balance-of-Payments Projections for Various GNP Growth Rates 2/ Current Account Deficit GNP Growth a. For derivation, see the Appendix. Rates 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1970-74 Million US $ 8% 924 1,016 1,082 1,166 1,200 5,388 6% 890 943 963 995 964 4,755 4% 854 865 837 813 710 4,079 2% 817 788 713 636 480 3,434 - 18 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET Conclusions 30. Israel probably cannot finance both its planned military imports for 1970-74 and the growth of civilian imports required to support rapid growth of GNP without foreign assistance. 31. Israel could close the potential balance- of-payments gap either by not increasing military imports frcm recent levels or by restricting civilian imports to levels that would support a 4% growth of GNP instead of the planned 8%, or by some combination of these. 32. Foreign exchange reserves and access to commercial credit give Israel considerable flexi- bility in establishing viable economic and military strategies and are sufficient to finance expected deficits for a year or perhaps two if necessary. 33. In the current year, Israel is planning to continue expansionary economic policies and has revised its military import plan upward. These policies will probably continue at least until Israel knows the US response to its economic and military aid request. - 19 - SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2 SECRET Non-Military Imports and GNP To forecast non-military imports of goods and services at various levels of GNP during 1970-14, these imports were divided into two parts: (1) imports c.i.f. (merchandise plus insurance and freight) and (2) all remaining services. A least squares fit of the relationship between imports c.i.f. and GNP was obtained for the years 1954-65 and 1968.* This relationship is described by the equation M(t) _ -45 + 0.2335GNP(t) (where M(t) represents imports c.i.f. in any of the years under consideration and GNP(t) represents GNP in the same years**]. These results mean that for each $1 increase in GNP, civilian imports are estimated to increase by $0.23. The correlation between imports and GNP was high, with an R2 of 0.979.*** The correlation between GNP and other service payments, which include such items as profits repatriated by foreign investors, factor payments abroad, nonmerchandise insurance, and Israeli tourist expenditures abroad, was found to be rela- tively weak. Other services were projected to grow at a constant annual rate. Utilizing a double log transformation and applying a linear regression, with respect to time, this function was estimated to be log OS(t) =21.62 + 0.069(t) for the 1954-68 period, with an R of 0.975. According to this function, OS increases each year by about 17%. The 1966-6? period Was excluded by use of a dummy variable because a severe recession occurred in Israel during these two years and the relation- ship between import8 c.i.f. :znd GNP appeared to be distorted. '''' The constant factors in all equations are expressed in million US dollars. *" R2 is the square of the correlction coefficient and represents the proportion of the total variance of the dependent variable that is accounted for by the variance of the independent variable. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030033-2