MOSCOW AGAIN PLAYS THE PEACEMAKER IN SOUTH ASIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001100100053-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 8, 2006
Sequence Number: 
53
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 3, 1971
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001100100053-7.pdf320.97 KB
Body: 
f, , A ._._._____J P9_I - - __ nAA~I/An/An /11n r.r1r.nrTnnn7rrlnnwwn DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE 9100053-7 Secret Intelligence Memorandum Moscow Again Plays The Peacemaker in South Asia State Dept. review completed Secret 3May1971 No. 1685/71 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of than United States, within the meaning of Title 18, sections 793 ,end 794, of the US as amended. Its transmission or rc-,elation of its convents to or re- ceipt by an unauithorized person is prohibited by law. on-Our T'- -- I C RCLVIl1:11 14'IM AtTPMAT1C INI'AN111? 111N11 ANTI L11f'LA1..1 I1'ATIIIY_ Approved. For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence 3 May 19 71 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM Moscow Again Plays the Peacemaker in South Asia Introduction Moscow's attitude toward the present trouble in Pakistan is a logical outgrowth of the Soviet position in the Indo-Fakistani crisis of 1965=1966,. The Tashkent Conference in January 1966 marked the end of the USSR's one-sided support for India in the Kashmir dispute and the debut of the USSR in the role of peacemaker on the subcontinent. Premier Kosygin personally met with Indian and Pakistani leaders at Tashkent and succeeded in getting them to agree to withdraw their troops to positions held prior to the outbreak of the fighting in August 1965, to repatriate their prisoners of war, and to work toward improving their cultural and economic ties. The USSR committed its prestige to such a venture because it wanted to see stability restored on its southern flank and to deny the Chinese the chance to exploit the conflict between the two countries. Note: Ts memorandum was prepared by the Office of Current Intelligence and coordinated within CIA. Approved For Release 2007 -RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 SECRET Soviet Stakes in India and Pakistan 1. The same considerations that prompted Moscow to act in 1965-1966 continue to affect Soviet pol- icy toward the subcontinent. Moscow has worked to maintain its "special relationship" with India, to improve its relations with the Pakistanis, and to prevent both the US and the Chinese from expanding their influence. A close relationship with India continues to be the cornerstone of Soviet policy in South Asia. India, one of the USSR's largest aid clients in the underdeveloped world, has re- ceived a total of about $1.5 billion in Soviet eco- nomic and military assistance since 1954. The USSR has an extensive presence in India, and the leaders of the two countries consult frequently on a wide -variety of issues. 2. Moscow's preoccupation with India, however, has not prevented it from courting Pakistan in order to increase its leverage there and, in particular, to check the grc?oth of Chinese influence. Since 1966, the USSR has agreed to provide Pakist.n with some $172 million in economic assistance and in April 1968 signed its first military aid agreement with Pakistan. The provision of Soviet arms did not succeed in significantly limiting Chinese or US influence in Pakistan, however, and it did cause serious strains in the USSR's ;relations with India. Consequently, Moscow suspended these arms deliveries in early 1969. Last June, the Soviets agreed to help in the construction of the steel mill that Pakistan has long been seeking, a decision that will cost the USSR an estimated $200 million in new eco- nomic aid. 3. Moscow has generally tried to maintain an im- partial position on contentious issues in Indo-Paki- stani relations and has encouraged the two sides to seek a step-by-step resolution of their outstanding differences. In April 1966 and again in August 1967, when the Soviets apparently were concerned that Indo- Pakistani relations were deteriorating, Kosygin personally interceded with the leaders of both coun- tries to urge moderation. Approved For Release 200 -RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/0/0,-.DP85T00875R001100100053-7 Moscow Slow to Recognize Crisis 4. Although the Soviets were apparently slow to realize the dangers inherent in the latest Pakistani crisis, they finally did make attempts to defuse the situation. Though their efforts to moderate West Pakistani actions in the East failed they were probably successful in moderating to some degree Indian reaction to Pakistani developments. 5. I Ithe Soviets viewed the results o the ' a is ani elections last December with mixed feelings. They took some satis- faction in the victory of "progressive" forces, but they were disturbed by the good showing of former foreign minister Bhutto's party in West Pakistan. As the s,:lf-proclaimed architect of Pakistan's policy of rapprochement with China, Bhutto ht,.s long been one of the USSR's least favorite personalities on the Pakistani political scene. Moscow seems not to have fully appreciated, however, the depth of frus- tration among the East Pakistanis and their deter- mination to ensure that discrimination against them would not be perpetuated in the new government that was to be established. 6. The first evidence of serious Soviet concern came in mid-February during a conversation in Islamabad between thL Soviet deputy chief of mission and his US counterpart. The Soviet official expressed sur- prise and disappointment at East Pakistani leader Mujibur Rahman's inflexibility regarding autonomy for East Pakistan while he commended President Yahya's "statesmanlike" effort to bring East and West Pakistani civilian leaders to some form of accommodation. He said that the USSR favored the continuing existence of a unified Pakistan and indicated considerable con- cern that the Chinese might be given an opportunity to exploit the unrest in East Pakistan 7. For a long time Moscow has maintained fairly cordial relations with the men most likely to emerge as leaders of an independent East Pakistan. Some So- viets may, therefore, have argued that the USSR would initially be off to a good start if Pakistan were di- vided; but probably the general conclusion was that the longer term prospects for the USSR in East Pakistan bituiKET Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 SECRET were not bright. An independent East Pakistan would face virtually insoluble social and economic prob- lems, and the Soviets probably feared that the Chi- nese might ultimately find fertile ground for ex- panding their influence among the minority extremist groups there. Fighting Prompts Action; Soviets Intercede with Yahya 8. Moscow, however, did not actually intercede un- til fighting appeared imminent. 9. Once the fighting began, the Soviets lost no time in trying to get it stopped. On 3 April, TASS published the text of an appeal from President Podgorny that was strongly critical of Yahya'o resort to arms. In the message, Podgorny called for "the most urgent measures to stop the bloodshed and repressions" against the people of East Pakistan. He asserted that the crisis must be solved politically, without the use of force. 10. Among the chief reasons for the publication of the appeal were Moscow's wish to appear responsive to Indian requests that the USSR speak out an(l a genuine Soviet desire to bring additional pressures on the West Pakistanis to stop the fighting. The obvious sympathy for the plight of the East Pakistanis that was conveyed by the message suggests it was worded with an eye to the East Pakistanis as well as the Indians. Podgorny expressed concern over the "arrests and persecution" of Mujib and other leaders, and gra- tuitously reminded Yahya that these men had received the support of the "overwhelming majority of the popu- lation of East Pakistan." 25X1 -4- Approved For Release 2007/ V -RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 SECRET 11. The West Pakistanis, not surprisingly, were in- censed by Podgorny's intervention. Their response to the message, however, was tempered by their desire to avoid driving Moscow further toward New Delhi in the current dispute and their interest in keeping Soviet aid comi.iig. In his reply, Yahya rebutted the points made by Podgorny, but he did so politely and in a tone that suggested sorrow more than anger. 12. The Soviets have made no further gestures of sup- port for the East Pakistanis. In fact, as it became increasingly clear that the military situation was go- ing in favor of the West Pakistanis, Moscow has sought to relax the strains its public appeal had put on So- viet - West Pakistani relations. This line was further espoused in Soviet propaganda, which denied any intention of interfering in Pakistan's internal affairs. 13. Since the Podgorny appeal, the USSR has confined 25X1 itself to a continuing series of high-level private efforts to defuse the crisis. Soviets Keep Close Tabs on Indian Reaction 14. From the outset Moscow has probably coordinated most of its moves with the Indian Government, ap- parently counseling it against a precipitate reaction to the Pakistani crisis. The Indians confirm that they have been talking regularly to the Soviets about Pakistani develop ents. 25X1 -5- 25X1 Approved For Release 2007/SE RBT-RDP85T00875R001100100053-7 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP85T00875RO01100100053-7 SECRET Prospects 15. The outcome of the current crisis is at present uncartain and depends upon factors over which the USSR has little control. Moscow, nonetheless, can be ex- pecte3 to continue its efforts tc prevent a deteriora- tion to the level of the Indo-Pakistani hostilities during the Kashmir dispute in 1965. in the event of an imminent threat of war between India and Pakistan, the Soviets might once again intervene in dramatic fashion. For the present, however, the Soviets will probably continue to move cautiously, behind the scenes, and will do what they can tc nurture and preserve good relations with all parties to the dispute. At the same time, they will be trying to anticipate and counter any Chinese actions. Approved or Release 100053-7