INDONESIA: TIGHTENING THE SCREWS - SOEHARTO'S GROWING AUTHORITARIANISM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 27, 2009
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1984
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1.pdf486.83 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Directorate of Intelligence Indonesia: Tightening the Screws Soeharto's Growing Authoritarianism Secret Secret EA 84-10143 July 1984 Copy 3 0 7 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Intelligence Authoritarianism Indonesia: Tightening the Screws- Soeharto's Growing This paper was prepared by Office of East Asian Analysis. Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Southeast Asia Division, OEA, Secret EA 84-10143 July 1984 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 secret Indonesia: Tightening the Screws- Soeharto's Growing Authoritarianism Key Judgments President Soeharto has begun his fourth five-year term in office with an Information available eye on his place in history: as of 5 June 1984 ? He has begun the process of regeneration within the military and the was used in this report. government by promoting younger people-all Soeharto loyalists-to replace his comrades from the revolutionary generation of 1945 in leadership positions. ? He also has accelerated institutional changes to restructure the military and to convert the government party (Golkar) into a more effective organization so that he will bequeath to his successor an effective political system. The 1981-83 recession, however, has weakened the government's economic underpinnings and contributed to a shift in Soeharto's tactics for maintain- ing political stability ip Indonesia. Soeharto now faces the danger that some of the more repressive measures taken in the past year may become institutionalized at the same time economic austerity undercuts the government's ability to attack the underlying causes of Indonesia's political and social strains. The result could be a rise in domestic discontent and a backlash against the government that would produce further repression. Secret EA 84-10143 July 1984 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 secret Indonesia: Tightening the Screws- Soeharto's Growing Authoritarianism F_ Tightening the Screws Soeharto's ruling style traditionally has incorporated a mix of coercion and co-option that has varied as his political strength changed and events dictated (see inset). His gradual assumption of power following the October 1965 abortive Communist coup, for example, reflected his cautious approach and a realistic assess- ment of the political strengths and loyalties of various groups such as the Sukarnoists, the Communists, other political parties, civilian politicians, and factions within the military. He skillfully manipulated his adversaries, including former President Sukarno, as he consolidated his hold on power without arousing organized opposition or antagonizing the masses. F_ The severity of the 1981-83 recession has intensified government concern over internal stability and helped spur Soeharto to shift from his traditional preference for balancing coercion with less repressive measures. The government has resorted to increasingly authori- tarian measures to deal with social and political problems in the past year and a half-in contrast to its pragmatic measures to restore the long-term health of the economy. In part, this reflects the government's reduced ability to alleviate social problems because of its financial austerity. We also believe it reflects a decreasing tolerance for political dissent by a regime that has held office for nearly 20 years and has never hesitated to use repressive measures against potential threats to domestic order. In early 1983, the government, in response to a rising wave of violent crime committed largely by organized urban gangs, undertook a campaign of arbitrarily shooting criminal suspects. Security officials, who referred to the killings as "mysterious shootings," were concerned that growing public apprehension over crime and distrust of local police forces threatened a breakdown in public order. Although the government has scaled down the killings in recent months, officials indicate Jakarta will not hesitate to resume such drastic measures to keep crime in check. Earlier this year, a draft version of a controversial bill on internal exile was leaked to the public. It is intended to replace a 1962 presidential decree issued by former President Sukarno. Once it becomes law, it will legitimize the government's authority to detain dissidents, often on flimsy grounds or suspicions. The Soeharto government has previously used internal exile as a means of punishing dissidents. Thousands of Communists and their sympathizers, for example, were exiled for years on Buru Island, typically with- out any legal recourse. Soeharto released the last prisoners only after strong human rights pressures from the United States a few years ago. Although the Soeharto government remains sensitive to human rights criticisms, it continues to detain Timorese suspected of opposing the Indonesian takeover of the former Portuguese colony of East Timor on Atauro Island and would not hesitate to take similar action against any group challenging the government's au- Jakarta's tougher line during the past year is reflected particularly in: ? The unprecedented "mysterious shootings" cam- paign by special military units that have killed over 4,000 known or suspected criminals without judicial trials during the first year of operation. ? The submission to parliament of a bill proposing new legislation on internal exile-a move aimed at legitimizing the government's harsh treatment of political dissidents. thority. In addition, the Soeharto government in the past year has reemphasized its concern with internal security through: ? The appointment in the spring of 1983 of loyalist hardliners to key cabinet posts to deal with internal security, students, and the labor force. Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1 Soeharto's Use of the Carrot Soeharto has often emphasized co-option to maintain his rule. To win and hold the loyalty of key asso- ciates and subordinates, he has tolerated a high level of personal corruption not only within his inner circle but also throughout the military and bureaucracy. In addition, Soeharto has permitted many of the sym- bolic trappings of democracy such as a vocal press, political parties, elections, and a parliament to act as safety valves for the political frustrations of many Indonesians-although within strict, but unwritten guidelines. Soeharto views the economy as a critical determinant of his political leverage. The rapid economic growth of the 1970s, underpinned by sharp increases in oil export earnings, enabled the government to play a benevolent role. Although critics complain that the government's development strategy is too capital in- tensive and has benefited mainly the elite, one of the regime's most striking accomplishments has been the doubling of rice output from 1968 to 1981. Agricul- tural growth has received a strong impetus from government investment in irrigation facilities, high- yield rice varieties, and the application of fertilizer and other modern techniques. Although Jakarta's motives are primarily to protect the military, civil servants, and the more influential urban consumers from rice shortages or sharp price hikes, the benefits of the government's rice pricing and production poli- cies are evident in adequate rice supplies and the absence of rural unrest. Soeharto used the financial windfalls from oil ex- ports in the 1970s to help maintain political control by increasing spending on popular programs such as food and fuel subsidies and on education, health, and housing. In addition, Jakarta has provided jobs in state enterprises and the bureaucracy for faithful supporters of the government party (Golkar). State- owned firms and government agencies direct business to favored suppliers and subcontractors. With central government control extending down to the village level through the military command structure, bu- reaucratic channels, and the government party orga- nization, spending on construction projects and other programs continues to be funneled to firms controlled by Soeharto loyalists. In addition, foreign investors must contract only with approved subcontractors and suppliers, an arrangement that gives government offi- cials powerful leverage in winning support for the Soeharto regime. And the Stick Soeharto, nevertheless, has maintained the underly- ing reality of a military regime that brooks no ed to use the full panoply of powers available to him to consolidate and maintain his rule. For example, although the government permits a fairly lively press to operate, Ministry of Information officials screen all publications to ensure they do not expose prohib- ited topics such as the business interests of Mrs. Soeharto, incidents of civil unrest, or other potential- ly damaging information. Whenever any of the media fails to observe the unwritten guidelines, the govern- ment responds swiftly. In the first four months of 1984, for example, the government shut down three publications. Soeharto also demonstrates a readiness to use mili- tary force whenever necessary to maintain order. Troops have been deployed in Indonesia's cities on numerous occasions when security officials feared explosions of violence, such as anti-Chinese riots or outbursts following election campaign rallies. Over the years, Soeharto has also used his power to transfer or reassign uncooperative officers or to reor- ganize the military to reward his loyalists and to remove potential challengers from positions of power. 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1 ,ecret ? An increase in antisubversive rhetoric by govern- ment spokesmen, including warnings of a resur- gence of activity by the Communist Party. ? Repeated anti-Muslim measures, including at- tempts to impose the state ideology, Pancasila,' on all organizations These measures bolster the regime's long-established policies of tightly controlling potential opposition ele- ments and critics, including the media. The Cabinet-All Soeharto's Men The most notable characteristics of the new Cabinet were the elimination of potential rivals to Soeharto and the concentration of power among a smaller circle of trusted advisers, particularly State Secretary Sud- harmono and Armed Forces Commander Murdani. Major figures outside Soeharto's inner circle were excluded from top posts in government. Previous cabinets included such well-known independent fig- ures as the Sultan of Jogjakarta, Adam Malik, and General Jusuf, a devout Muslim untainted by corrup- tion. Indeed, Jusuf was considered by many as a potential successor to Soeharto after his appointment as Defense Minister in 1978. Some generational change in the new Cabinet was evident in Soeharto's transfer of longtime comrades such as Amir Machmud and the since deceased Ali Murtopo to less demanding jobs and their replace- ment by younger advisers. The Cabinet also includes more Javanese from Soeharto's native province and a stronger military representation in key portfolios than the previous cabinet. The appointment of the former head of internal security, Admiral Sudomo, as Minister of Manpower showed the regime's intent to maintain a tight lid on the activity of organized labor, which had become increasingly restive over growing unemployment and a wage squeeze since 1981. Although Sudomo has made it clear he will not tolerate strikes, he has often helped maintain labor peace by siding with labor against employers. He has taken a hard line against ' Pancasila is a broadly based formulation expressing five principles of belief in one god, humanitarianism, national unity, democracy, and social justice. The first principle, belief in one god, is intended to accommodate Muslims, Christians, Javanese mystics, and any other adherents of belief in a supreme being, while maintaining the reality of a secular state. many private employers, typically Chinese business- men, and forced them to absorb at least part of the cost of supporting idle laborers during the current recession by prohibiting them from laying off workers without his approval. The Minister of Education, retired Gen. Nugroho Notosusanto, was credited with stifling student dissent when he was rector of the University of Indonesia and is continuing to cooperate closely with the military to maintain order on campus. Targeting the Security Threats Government officials also repeatedly warn of the 25X1 danger of a resurgence in Communist Party (PKI) activity as a result of the clandestine return of former PKI members who had fled Indonesia in the after- math of the 1965 coup attempt. Over the past year and a half, security forces have arrested a handful of former PKI members who reentered Indonesia illegal- ly from China and other Communist countries. Al- though security officials do not consider the number of illegal returnees an imminent threat, they are concerned over the specter of foreign support for the PKI and the danger that PKI promises may prove attractive to Indonesian youth, particularly if the economic situation deteriorates. Jakarta's nervousness about the PKI underscores its preoccupation with internal security; the remnants of the PKI-which was nearly eliminated following the attempted coup in 1965-pose no threat to the government. Government officials reserve their strongest state- ments for the threat posed by Islamic fundamental- ism. Soeharto and his associates monitor all signs of Islamic opposition to avert a recurrence of the Muslim rebellions against the central government such as occurred during the war against the Dutch and the early years of the republic. They remain concerned that a resurgence of Muslim militancy threatens the unity of Indonesia and regularly monitor sermons in major mosques for signs of dissidence. On several occasions during the past few years, the government's fears have been intensified by the circulation of radical Islamic literature among students and other groups. Although Muslims have demonstrated against Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85T00310R000200030001-1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 government moves they considered anti-Islamic, they remain leaderless and divided. Most demonstrations quickly dissipate once the immediate cause is correct- ed or eliminated. Officials also are concerned over the danger of sub- version presented by students returning from the Middle East where they might have been infected by radical Islamic tenets associated either with Iran's Khomeini or Libya's Qadhafi. Security officials moni- tor returning students for signs of radical influence. Besides relying on its internal security apparatus to counter the Islamic threat, the government has pushed hard to impose its nonsectarian, and essential- ly secular, state ideology, Pancasila, on all groups in society. Soeharto's Perspective: A Still Firmer Hand Soeharto's position in Indonesia is as strong now as it will ever be. He is the unchallenged national leader with the full backing of the armed forces, the loyalty of the bureaucracy, and widespread respect among the populace. Opposition groups are disorganized and leaderless. No organization exists that can readily challenge the government nor is there any individual with the political stature to challenge Soeharto suc- cessfully. The Muslim schools might become a stage for a potential challenger, but we have too little information on them to determine whether they pro- vide a suitable environment for the emergence of a charismatic leader who could attract enough followers outside the orthodox Muslim community. During the 1982-83 election campaign, Soeharto made a number of references to preparations for the transfer of power to a new generation of leaders and indeed he has begun the process. His contemporaries in the military-the generation of 1945-have begun to cede command to younger officers, although most observers expect Soeharto to remain in office after his current term expires in 1988-when he will be 67 years old-as long as his health remains good.F_ Although Soeharto has brought some younger faces into the Cabinet, his inner circle is narrowing and outsiders have less access to him. His subordinates have found it difficult to report unpleasant news. Although Soeharto still exhibits realism in his assessments of current political and social develop- ments, he faces a danger of growing isolation simply by virtue of his position. Reliance on a decreasing circle of loyalist advisers and the institutionalization of heavyhanded techniques- such as the shooting campaign, the internal exile law, and the Pancasila campaign-suggest the regime is growing less tolerant of alternative views, criticism, or threats to social order. Soeharto periodically lashes out against unspecified critics of his New Order economic policies. Recent statements, plus renewed threats by officials to close newspapers and magazines critical of government policies, offer further evidence of Soeharto's intolerance of dissent. Dangers Ahead Having restored the nation from the political and economic chaos of the late Sukarno years, Soeharto seeks a legacy of political stability based on self- sustaining economic growth. The regime's tendency toward more authoritarian solutions during the cur- rent period of economic austerity and social strain, however, poses a danger of institutionalizing repres- sion. The "mysterious shootings" campaign against criminal suspects provides a precedent for using simi- lar tactics against other groups in the future. Jakarta's reliance on coercion to contain social pres- sures risks alienating significant segments of society and producing serious outbursts. For example, al- though efforts to impose Pancasila on all groups in society do not offend most of the population, the government's heavyhanded tactics have created ill will among many of the 20 to 30 percent who are orthodox Muslim believers. Ill-conceived government moves, such as the ban last year on wearing tradition- al Islamic headdress by high school girls, have the potential for producing major disturbances. A near riot ensued at the Al Azhar Mosque in Jakarta when security forces moved in to break up a meeting at which Muslim activist Tony Ardie criticized the ban. Similar incidents could escalate into widespread com- munal violence although Ardie's later arrest and trial 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Secret did not lead to major demonstrations. The 1980 anti- Chinese riots, for example, were sparked by a traffic accident. If Soeharto remains in office beyond 1988, there is an increasing risk that his current term could be the last five-year term in which his government can confident- ly undertake bold new initiatives or respond construc- tively to new problems. Beyond 1988, there is a danger that Soeharto and his close advisers will concentrate primarily on retaining power, resisting change, and relying on force rather than imagination to solve some of the intractable problems Indonesia will face. We cannot predict who will succeed Soeharto or when, but we can project some of the major domestic problems he or his successor will face in the coming decade, such as the need to deal with the nearly 2 million who will enter the labor force annually. Increasing rural landlessness, migration to the cities, rising expectations, and growing dissatisfaction with poor living standards will tax the government's limit- ed financial and managerial resources. As employ- ment in the informal sector of the urban economy approaches its saturation point, even street vending or pedicab driving will disappear as cushions for absorb- ing jobless workers and landless rural migrants to the cities. At the same time, Indonesia's oil exports will not generate financial windfalls in the 1980s as they did in the 1970s, and the country's primary commodity exports will not provide a comparable boost in foreign exchange earnings. As for the development of new manufacturing export industries, Jakarta faces both stiff competition from more advanced Third World producers and protectionism in developed country markets. With dim prospects for a dramatic improve- ment in the country's financial position in the next several years, the government will be hard pressed to avoid resorting to increased coercion to maintain stability. On the political front, Jakarta probably will face increasing demands for a political voice by groups that have been effectively disenfranchised by the government such as the intelligentsia, students, and human rights advocates. With the danger of repres- sion becoming institutionalized or cyclical as the government responds to political and social strains, pressure for political freedom is likely to cause grow- ing problems. At present, we have no evidence of foreign involvement in Indonesia's domestic politics, but Jakarta's tighter finances and growing authoritar- ianism increase the government's vulnerability to internal political opposition with or without foreign support. Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1 Secret Secret Approved For Release 2009/04/27: CIA-RDP85TOO31 OR000200030001 -1